1. Developmental Biology
Download icon

Notch/Her12 signalling modulates motile/immotile cilia ratio downstream of Foxj1a in zebrafish left-right organizer

  1. Barbara Tavares
  2. Raquel Jacinto
  3. Pedro Sampaio
  4. Sara Pestana
  5. Andreia Pinto
  6. Andreia Vaz
  7. Mónica Roxo-Rosa
  8. Rui Gardner
  9. Telma Lopes
  10. Britta Schilling
  11. Ian Henry
  12. Leonor Saúde
  13. Susana Santos Lopes  Is a corresponding author
  1. CEDOC, Chronic Diseases Research Centre, NOVA Medical School, Universidade Nova de Lisboa, Portugal
  2. Instituto de Medicina Molecular, Centro Académico de Medicina de Lisboa, Portugal
  3. Instituto Gulbenkian de Ciencia, Portugal
  4. Max Planck Institute of Molecular Cell Biology and Genetics, Germany
  5. Instituto de Medicina Molecular, Portugal
Research Article
  • Cited 7
  • Views 1,582
  • Annotations
Cite this article as: eLife 2017;6:e25165 doi: 10.7554/eLife.25165

Abstract

Foxj1a is necessary and sufficient to specify motile cilia. Using transcriptional studies and slow-scan two-photon live imaging capable of identifying the number of motile and immotile cilia, we now established that the final number of motile cilia depends on Notch signalling (NS). We found that despite all left-right organizer (LRO) cells express foxj1a and the ciliary axonemes of these cells have dynein arms some cilia remain immotile. We identified that this decision is taken early in development in the Kupffer’s Vesicle (KV) precursors the readout being her12 transcription. We demonstrate that overexpression of either her12 or Notch intracellular domain (NICD) increases the number of immotile cilia at the expense of motile cilia, and leads to an accumulation of immotile cilia at the anterior half of the KV. This disrupts the normal fluid flow intensity and pattern, with consequent impact on dand5 expression pattern and left-right (L-R) axis establishment.

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Barbara Tavares

    Faculdade de Ciências Médicas, CEDOC, Chronic Diseases Research Centre, NOVA Medical School, Universidade Nova de Lisboa, Lisbon, Portugal
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  2. Raquel Jacinto

    Faculdade de Ciências Médicas, CEDOC, Chronic Diseases Research Centre, NOVA Medical School, Universidade Nova de Lisboa, Lisbon, Portugal
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-4029-0204
  3. Pedro Sampaio

    Faculdade de Ciências Médicas, CEDOC, Chronic Diseases Research Centre, NOVA Medical School, Universidade Nova de Lisboa, Lisbon, Portugal
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  4. Sara Pestana

    Faculdade de Ciências Médicas, CEDOC, Chronic Diseases Research Centre, NOVA Medical School, Universidade Nova de Lisboa, Lisbon, Portugal
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  5. Andreia Pinto

    Laboratório de Histologia e Patologia Comparada, Instituto de Medicina Molecular, Centro Académico de Medicina de Lisboa, Lisbon, Portugal
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  6. Andreia Vaz

    Faculdade de Ciências Médicas, CEDOC, Chronic Diseases Research Centre, NOVA Medical School, Universidade Nova de Lisboa, Lisbon, Portugal
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  7. Mónica Roxo-Rosa

    Faculdade de Ciências Médicas, CEDOC, Chronic Diseases Research Centre, NOVA Medical School, Universidade Nova de Lisboa, Lisbon, Portugal
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  8. Rui Gardner

    Instituto Gulbenkian de Ciencia, Oeiras, Portugal
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  9. Telma Lopes

    Instituto Gulbenkian de Ciencia, Oeiras, Portugal
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  10. Britta Schilling

    Max Planck Institute of Molecular Cell Biology and Genetics, Dresden, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  11. Ian Henry

    Max Planck Institute of Molecular Cell Biology and Genetics, Dresden, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  12. Leonor Saúde

    Faculdade de Medicina de Lisboa, Instituto de Medicina Molecular, Lisbon, Portugal
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  13. Susana Santos Lopes

    Faculdade de Ciências Médicas, CEDOC, Chronic Diseases Research Centre, NOVA Medical School, Universidade Nova de Lisboa, Lisbon, Portugal
    For correspondence
    susana.lopes@fcm.unl.pt
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-6733-6356

Funding

Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia (PTDC/BEX-BID/1411/2014)

  • Susana Santos Lopes

Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia (FCT-ANR/BEX-BID/0153/2012)

  • Sara Pestana

Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia (PTDC/SAU-OBD/103981/2008)

  • Andreia Vaz

Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia (PD/BD/52420/2013)

  • Raquel Jacinto

Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia (SFRH/BPD/77258/2011)

  • Barbara Tavares

Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia (SFRH/BD/111611/2015)

  • Pedro Sampaio

Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia (IF/00951/2012)

  • Susana Santos Lopes

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the on the decision to submit the work for publication.

Reviewing Editor

  1. Jeremy F Reiter, University of California, San Francisco, United States

Publication history

  1. Received: January 16, 2017
  2. Accepted: September 3, 2017
  3. Accepted Manuscript published: September 6, 2017 (version 1)
  4. Version of Record published: September 21, 2017 (version 2)

Copyright

© 2017, Tavares et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 1,582
    Page views
  • 342
    Downloads
  • 7
    Citations

Article citation count generated by polling the highest count across the following sources: Crossref, Scopus, PubMed Central.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Download citations (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Further reading

    1. Cell Biology
    2. Developmental Biology
    Delia Ricolo, Sofia J Araujo
    Research Article

    Subcellular lumen formation by single-cells involves complex cytoskeletal remodelling. We have previously shown that centrosomes are key players in the initiation of subcellular lumen formation in Drosophila melanogaster, but not much is known on the what leads to the growth of these subcellular luminal branches or makes them progress through a particular trajectory within the cytoplasm. Here, we have identified that the spectraplakin Short-stop (Shot) promotes the crosstalk between MTs and actin, which leads to the extension and guidance of the subcellular lumen within the Terminal Cell (TC) cytoplasm. Shot is enriched in cells undergoing the initial steps of subcellular branching as a direct response to FGF signalling. An excess of Shot induces ectopic acentrosomal luminal branching points in the embryonic and larval tracheal TC leading to cells with extra subcellular lumina. These data provide the first evidence for a role for spectraplakins in single-cell lumen formation and branching.

    1. Developmental Biology
    Shashank Gandhi et al.
    Research Article Updated

    During gastrulation, neural crest cells are specified at the neural plate border, as characterized by Pax7 expression. Using single-cell RNA sequencing coupled with high-resolution in situ hybridization to identify novel transcriptional regulators, we show that chromatin remodeler Hmga1 is highly expressed prior to specification and maintained in migrating chick neural crest cells. Temporally controlled CRISPR-Cas9-mediated knockouts uncovered two distinct functions of Hmga1 in neural crest development. At the neural plate border, Hmga1 regulates Pax7-dependent neural crest lineage specification. At premigratory stages, a second role manifests where Hmga1 loss reduces cranial crest emigration from the dorsal neural tube independent of Pax7. Interestingly, this is rescued by stabilized ß-catenin, thus implicating Hmga1 as a canonical Wnt activator. Together, our results show that Hmga1 functions in a bimodal manner during neural crest development to regulate specification at the neural plate border, and subsequent emigration from the neural tube via canonical Wnt signaling.