Activation of the dopaminergic pathway from VTA to the medial olfactory tubercle generates odor-preference and reward

  1. Zhijian Zhang
  2. Qing Liu
  3. Pengjie Wen
  4. Jiaozhen Zhang
  5. Xiaoping Rao
  6. Ziming Zhou
  7. Hongruo Zhang
  8. Xiaobin He
  9. Juan Li
  10. Zheng Zhou
  11. Xiaoran Xu
  12. Xueyi Zhang
  13. Rui Luo
  14. Guanghui Lv
  15. Haohong Li
  16. Pei Cao
  17. Liping Wang
  18. Fuqiang Xu  Is a corresponding author
  1. Wuhan Institute of Physics and Mathematics, China
  2. Wuhan University, China
  3. Shenzhen Institutes of Advanced Technology, China
  4. Wuhan National Laboratory for Optoelectronics, China

Abstract

Odor-preferences are usually influenced by life experiences. However, the neural circuit mechanisms remain unclear. The medial olfactory tubercle (mOT) is involved in both reward and olfaction, while the ventral tegmental area (VTA) dopaminergic (DAergic) neurons are considered to be engaged in reward and motivation. Here, we found that the VTA (DAergic)-mOT pathway could be activated by different types of naturalistic rewards as well as odors in DAT-cre mice. Optogenetic activation of the VTA-mOT DAergic fibers was able to elicit preferences for space, location and neutral odor, while pharmacological blockade of the dopamine receptors in the mOT fully prevented the odor-preference formation. Furthermore, inactivation of the mOT-projecting VTA DAergic neurons eliminated the previously formed odor-preference and strongly affected the Go-no go learning efficiency. In summary, our results revealed that the VTA (DAergic)-mOT pathway mediates a variety of naturalistic reward processes and different types of preferences including odor-preference in mice.

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Zhijian Zhang

    Center for Brain Science, Wuhan Institute of Physics and Mathematics, Wuhan, China
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  2. Qing Liu

    Center for Brain Science, Wuhan Institute of Physics and Mathematics, Wuhan, China
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  3. Pengjie Wen

    Center for Brain Science, Wuhan Institute of Physics and Mathematics, Wuhan, China
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  4. Jiaozhen Zhang

    Center for Brain Science, Wuhan Institute of Physics and Mathematics, Wuhan, China
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  5. Xiaoping Rao

    Center for Brain Science, Wuhan Institute of Physics and Mathematics, Wuhan, China
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  6. Ziming Zhou

    College of Life Sciences, Wuhan University, Wuhan, China
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  7. Hongruo Zhang

    College of Life Sciences, Wuhan University, Wuhan, China
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  8. Xiaobin He

    Center for Brain Science, Wuhan Institute of Physics and Mathematics, Wuhan, China
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  9. Juan Li

    Center for Brain Science, Wuhan Institute of Physics and Mathematics, Wuhan, China
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  10. Zheng Zhou

    CAS Center for Excellence in Brain Science, Shenzhen Institutes of Advanced Technology, Shenzhen, China
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  11. Xiaoran Xu

    College of Life Sciences, Wuhan University, Wuhan, China
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  12. Xueyi Zhang

    College of Life Sciences, Wuhan University, Wuhan, China
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  13. Rui Luo

    College of Life Sciences, Wuhan University, Wuhan, China
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  14. Guanghui Lv

    Wuhan National Laboratory for Optoelectronics, Wuhan, China
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  15. Haohong Li

    Wuhan National Laboratory for Optoelectronics, Wuhan, China
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  16. Pei Cao

    Center for Brain Science, Wuhan Institute of Physics and Mathematics, Wuhan, China
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  17. Liping Wang

    CAS Center for Excellence in Brain Science, Shenzhen Institutes of Advanced Technology, Shenzhen, China
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  18. Fuqiang Xu

    Center for Brain Science, Wuhan Institute of Physics and Mathematics, Wuhan, China
    For correspondence
    fuqiang.xu@wipm.ac.cn
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-4382-9797

Funding

Ministry of Science and Technology of the People's Republic of China (2015CB755600)

  • Fuqiang Xu

Chinese Academy of Sciences (XDB02050005)

  • Fuqiang Xu

National Natural Science Foundation of China (81661148053)

  • Fuqiang Xu

National Natural Science Foundation of China (91632303)

  • Fuqiang Xu

National Natural Science Foundation of China (31400945)

  • Qing Liu

National Natural Science Foundation of China (31400946)

  • Xiaoping Rao

National Natural Science Foundation of China (31400977)

  • Xiaobin He

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Ethics

Animal experimentation: All surgical and experimental procedures were conducted in accordance with the guidelines of the Animal Care and Use Committee at the Wuhan Institute of Physics and Mathematics, the Chinese Academy of Sciences (reference number: WIPM-(2014)39). All Animals were housed with their littermates in a dedicated housing room with a 12/12 h light/dark cycle. Food and water were available free unless specifically noted. During the surgery, every effort was made to minimize suffering.

Copyright

© 2017, Zhang et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 5,193
    views
  • 898
    downloads
  • 72
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Zhijian Zhang
  2. Qing Liu
  3. Pengjie Wen
  4. Jiaozhen Zhang
  5. Xiaoping Rao
  6. Ziming Zhou
  7. Hongruo Zhang
  8. Xiaobin He
  9. Juan Li
  10. Zheng Zhou
  11. Xiaoran Xu
  12. Xueyi Zhang
  13. Rui Luo
  14. Guanghui Lv
  15. Haohong Li
  16. Pei Cao
  17. Liping Wang
  18. Fuqiang Xu
(2017)
Activation of the dopaminergic pathway from VTA to the medial olfactory tubercle generates odor-preference and reward
eLife 6:e25423.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.25423

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.25423

Further reading

    1. Neuroscience
    Vincent Huson, Wade G Regehr
    Research Article

    Unipolar brush cells (UBCs) are excitatory interneurons in the cerebellar cortex that receive mossy fiber (MF) inputs and excite granule cells. The UBC population responds to brief burst activation of MFs with a continuum of temporal transformations, but it is not known how UBCs transform the diverse range of MF input patterns that occur in vivo. Here, we use cell-attached recordings from UBCs in acute cerebellar slices to examine responses to MF firing patterns that are based on in vivo recordings. We find that MFs evoke a continuum of responses in the UBC population, mediated by three different types of glutamate receptors that each convey a specialized component. AMPARs transmit timing information for single stimuli at up to 5 spikes/s, and for very brief bursts. A combination of mGluR2/3s (inhibitory) and mGluR1s (excitatory) mediates a continuum of delayed, and broadened responses to longer bursts, and to sustained high frequency activation. Variability in the mGluR2/3 component controls the time course of the onset of firing, and variability in the mGluR1 component controls the duration of prolonged firing. We conclude that the combination of glutamate receptor types allows each UBC to simultaneously convey different aspects of MF firing. These findings establish that UBCs are highly flexible circuit elements that provide diverse temporal transformations that are well suited to contribute to specialized processing in different regions of the cerebellar cortex.

    1. Neuroscience
    Eleni Hackwell, Sharon R Ladyman ... David R Grattan
    Research Article

    The specific role that prolactin plays in lactational infertility, as distinct from other suckling or metabolic cues, remains unresolved. Here, deletion of the prolactin receptor (Prlr) from forebrain neurons or arcuate kisspeptin neurons resulted in failure to maintain normal lactation-induced suppression of estrous cycles. Kisspeptin immunoreactivity and pulsatile LH secretion were increased in these mice, even in the presence of ongoing suckling stimulation and lactation. GCaMP fibre photometry of arcuate kisspeptin neurons revealed that the normal episodic activity of these neurons is rapidly suppressed in pregnancy and this was maintained throughout early lactation. Deletion of Prlr from arcuate kisspeptin neurons resulted in early reactivation of episodic activity of kisspeptin neurons prior to a premature return of reproductive cycles in early lactation. These observations show dynamic variation in arcuate kisspeptin neuronal activity associated with the hormonal changes of pregnancy and lactation, and provide direct evidence that prolactin action on arcuate kisspeptin neurons is necessary for suppressing fertility during lactation in mice.