Abstract

N-ethyl-N-nitrosourea (ENU) mutagenesis is a powerful tool to efficiently generate large scale of mutants and discover genes with novel functions at the whole-genome level in C. elegans, flies, zebrafish and mice, but has never been tried in large model animals. In the current study, we reported a successful systematic three-generation ENU mutagenesis screening in pigs with the establishment of Chinese Swine Mutagenesis Consortium. A total of 6,770 G1 and 6,800 G3 pigs were screened, 36 dominant and 91 recessive novel pig families with various phenotypes were established. The causative mutations in 10 mutant families were further mapped. As examples, the mutation of SOX10 (R109W) in pig causes inner ear malfunctions and mimics human Mondini dysplasia, and up-regulated expression of FBXO32 is associated with congenital splay legs. This study demonstrates the feasibility of artificial random mutagenesis in pigs and opens an avenue for generating a reservoir of mutants for agriculture production and biomedicine research.

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Tang Hai

    State Key Laboratory of Stem Cell and Reproductive Biology, Institute of Zoology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  2. Chunwei Cao

    State Key Laboratory of Stem Cell and Reproductive Biology, Institute of Zoology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  3. Haitao Shang

    Department of Laboratory Animal Science, College of Basic Medicine, Third Military Medical University, Chongqing, China
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  4. Weiwei Guo

    Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Institute of Otolaryngology, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  5. Yanshuang Mu

    College of Life Science, Northeast Agricultural University of China, Harbin, China
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  6. Shulin Yang

    Institute of Animal Sciences, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing, China
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  7. Ying Zhang

    State Key Laboratory of Stem Cell and Reproductive Biology, Institute of Zoology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  8. Qiantao Zheng

    State Key Laboratory of Stem Cell and Reproductive Biology, Institute of Zoology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  9. Tao Zhang

    State Key Laboratory of Stem Cell and Reproductive Biology, Institute of Zoology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  10. Xianlong Wang

    State Key Laboratory of Stem Cell and Reproductive Biology, Institute of Zoology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  11. Yu Liu

    Department of Laboratory Animal Science, College of Basic Medicine, Third Military Medical University, Chongqin, China
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  12. Qingran Kong

    College of Life Science, Northeast Agricultural University of China, Harbin, China
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  13. Kui Li

    Institute of Animal Sciences, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing, China
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  14. Dayu Wang

    State Key Laboratory of Stem Cell and Reproductive Biology, Institute of Zoology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  15. Meng Qi

    State Key Laboratory of Stem Cell and Reproductive Biology, Institute of Zoology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  16. Qianlong Hong

    State Key Laboratory of Stem Cell and Reproductive Biology, Institute of Zoology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  17. Rui Zhang

    State Key Laboratory of Stem Cell and Reproductive Biology, Institute of Zoology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  18. Xiupeng Wang

    State Key Laboratory of Stem Cell and Reproductive Biology, Institute of Zoology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  19. Qitao Jia

    State Key Laboratory of Stem Cell and Reproductive Biology, Institute of Zoology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  20. Xiao Wang

    State Key Laboratory of Stem Cell and Reproductive Biology, Institute of Zoology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  21. Guosong Qin

    State Key Laboratory of Stem Cell and Reproductive Biology, Institute of Zoology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  22. Yongshun Li

    State Key Laboratory of Stem Cell and Reproductive Biology, Institute of Zoology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  23. Ailing Luo

    State Key Laboratory of Stem Cell and Reproductive Biology, Institute of Zoology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  24. Weiwu Jin

    State Key Laboratory of Stem Cell and Reproductive Biology, Institute of Zoology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  25. Jing Yao

    State Key Laboratory of Stem Cell and Reproductive Biology, Institute of Zoology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  26. Jiaojiao Huang

    State Key Laboratory of Stem Cell and Reproductive Biology, Institute of Zoology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  27. Hongyong Zhang

    State Key Laboratory of Stem Cell and Reproductive Biology, Institute of Zoology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  28. Menghua Li

    State Key Laboratory of Stem Cell and Reproductive Biology, Institute of Zoology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  29. Xiangmo Xie

    State Key Laboratory of Stem Cell and Reproductive Biology, Institute of Zoology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  30. Xuejuan Zheng

    State Key Laboratory of Stem Cell and Reproductive Biology, Institute of Zoology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijng, China
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  31. Kenan Guo

    Department of Laboratory Animal Science, College of Basic Medicine, Third Military Medical University, Chongqin, China
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  32. Qinhua Wang

    Department of Laboratory Animal Science, College of Basic Medicine, Third Military Medical University, Beijing, China
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  33. Shibin Zhang

    Department of Laboratory Animal Science, College of Basic Medicine, Third Military Medical University, Chongqing, China
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  34. Liang Li

    Department of Laboratory Animal Science, College of Basic Medicine, Third Military Medical University, Chongqing, China
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  35. Fei Xie

    Department of Laboratory Animal Science, College of Basic Medicine, Third Military Medical University, Chongqing, China
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  36. Yu Zhang

    College of Life Science, Northeast Agricultural University of China, Harbin, China
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  37. Xiaogang Weng

    College of Life Science, Northeast Agricultural University of China, Harbin, China
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  38. Zhi Yin

    College of Life Science, Northeast Agricultural University of China, Harbin, China
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  39. Kui Hu

    Northeast Agricultural University of China, College of Life Science, Harbin, China
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  40. Yimei Cong

    College of Life Science, Northeast Agricultural University of China, Harbin, China
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  41. Peng Zheng

    College of Life Science, Northeast Agricultural University of China, Harbin, China
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  42. Hailong Zou

    College of Life Science, Northeast Agricultural University of China, Harbin, China
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  43. Leilei Xin

    Institute of Animal Sciences, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing, China
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  44. Jihan Xia

    Institute of Animal Sciences, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing, China
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  45. Jinxue Ruan

    Institute of Animal Sciences, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing, China
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  46. Hegang Li

    Institute of Animal Sciences, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing, China
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  47. Weiming Zhao

    Institute of Animal Sciences, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing, China
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  48. Jing Yuan

    Institute of Animal Sciences, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing, China
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  49. Zizhan Liu

    Institute of Animal Sciences, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing, China
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  50. Weiwang Gu

    Pearl Laboratory Animal Sci. & Tech. Co. Ltd, Guangzhou, China
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  51. Ming Li

    Pearl Laboratory Animal Sci. & Tech. Co. Ltd, Guangzhou, China
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  52. Yong Wang

    Department of Laboratory Animal Science, College of Basic Medicine, Third Military Medical University, Chongqing, China
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  53. Hongmei Wang

    State Key Laboratory of Stem Cell and Reproductive Biology, Institute of Zoology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijng, China
    For correspondence
    wanghm@ioz.ac.cn
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  54. Shiming Yang

    Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Institute of Otolaryngology, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China
    For correspondence
    yangsm301@263.net
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  55. Zhonghua Liu

    College of Life Science, Northeast Agricultural University of China, Harbin, China
    For correspondence
    liu086@126.com
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  56. Hong Wei

    Department of Laboratory Animal Science, College of Basic Medicine, Third Military Medical University, Chongqing, China
    For correspondence
    weihong63528@163.com
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  57. Jianguo Zhao

    State Key Laboratory of Stem Cell and Reproductive Biology, Institute of Zoology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China
    For correspondence
    zhaojg@ioz.ac.cn
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-6587-4823
  58. Qi Zhou

    State Key Laboratory of Stem Cell and Reproductive Biology, Institute of Zoology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China
    For correspondence
    qzhou@ioz.ac.cn
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  59. Anming Meng

    School of Life Sciences, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China
    For correspondence
    mengam@mail.tsinghua.edu.cn
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.

Funding

Ministry of Science and Technology of the People's Republic of China (National Basic Research Program of China)

  • Jianguo Zhao

National Natural Science Foundation of China (National High Technology Research and Development Program of China)

  • Jianguo Zhao

Chinese Academy of Sciences (Strategic Priority Research Program of CAS)

  • Jianguo Zhao

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Ethics

Animal experimentation: This study was performed in strict accordance with the recommendations in the Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals of the National Institutes of Health. All experiments involving animals were performed according to the protocols approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee of the Institute of Zoology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, China. All surgery was performed under sodium pentobarbital anesthesia, and every effort was made to minimize suffering.

Copyright

© 2017, Hai et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 4,268
    views
  • 732
    downloads
  • 30
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Tang Hai
  2. Chunwei Cao
  3. Haitao Shang
  4. Weiwei Guo
  5. Yanshuang Mu
  6. Shulin Yang
  7. Ying Zhang
  8. Qiantao Zheng
  9. Tao Zhang
  10. Xianlong Wang
  11. Yu Liu
  12. Qingran Kong
  13. Kui Li
  14. Dayu Wang
  15. Meng Qi
  16. Qianlong Hong
  17. Rui Zhang
  18. Xiupeng Wang
  19. Qitao Jia
  20. Xiao Wang
  21. Guosong Qin
  22. Yongshun Li
  23. Ailing Luo
  24. Weiwu Jin
  25. Jing Yao
  26. Jiaojiao Huang
  27. Hongyong Zhang
  28. Menghua Li
  29. Xiangmo Xie
  30. Xuejuan Zheng
  31. Kenan Guo
  32. Qinhua Wang
  33. Shibin Zhang
  34. Liang Li
  35. Fei Xie
  36. Yu Zhang
  37. Xiaogang Weng
  38. Zhi Yin
  39. Kui Hu
  40. Yimei Cong
  41. Peng Zheng
  42. Hailong Zou
  43. Leilei Xin
  44. Jihan Xia
  45. Jinxue Ruan
  46. Hegang Li
  47. Weiming Zhao
  48. Jing Yuan
  49. Zizhan Liu
  50. Weiwang Gu
  51. Ming Li
  52. Yong Wang
  53. Hongmei Wang
  54. Shiming Yang
  55. Zhonghua Liu
  56. Hong Wei
  57. Jianguo Zhao
  58. Qi Zhou
  59. Anming Meng
(2017)
A pilot study of large-scale production of mutant pigs by ENU mutagenesis
eLife 6:e26248.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.26248

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.26248

Further reading

    1. Developmental Biology
    Pénélope Tignard, Karen Pottin ... Marie Anne Breau
    Research Article

    Despite recent progress, the complex roles played by the extracellular matrix in development and disease are still far from being fully understood. Here, we took advantage of the zebrafish sly mutation which affects Laminin γ1, a major component of basement membranes, to explore its role in the development of the olfactory system. Following a detailed characterisation of Laminin distribution in the developing olfactory circuit, we analysed basement membrane integrity, olfactory placode and brain morphogenesis, and olfactory axon development in sly mutants, using a combination of immunochemistry, electron microscopy and quantitative live imaging of cell movements and axon behaviours. Our results point to an original and dual contribution of Laminin γ1-dependent basement membranes in organising the border between the olfactory placode and the adjacent brain: they maintain placode shape and position in the face of major brain morphogenetic movements, they establish a robust physical barrier between the two tissues while at the same time allowing the local entry of the sensory axons into the brain and their navigation towards the olfactory bulb. This work thus identifies key roles of Laminin γ1-dependent basement membranes in neuronal tissue morphogenesis and axon development in vivo.

    1. Developmental Biology
    Natsuko Emura, Florence DM Wavreil ... Mamiko Yajima
    Research Article

    The evolutionary introduction of asymmetric cell division (ACD) into the developmental program facilitates the formation of a new cell type, contributing to developmental diversity and, eventually, species diversification. The micromere of the sea urchin embryo may serve as one of those examples: an ACD at the 16-cell stage forms micromeres unique to echinoids among echinoderms. We previously reported that a polarity factor, activator of G-protein signaling (AGS), plays a crucial role in micromere formation. However, AGS and its associated ACD factors are present in all echinoderms and across most metazoans. This raises the question of what evolutionary modifications of AGS protein or its surrounding molecular environment contributed to the evolutionary acquisition of micromeres only in echinoids. In this study, we learned that the GoLoco motifs at the AGS C-terminus play critical roles in regulating micromere formation in sea urchin embryos. Further, other echinoderms’ AGS or chimeric AGS that contain the C-terminus of AGS orthologs from various organisms showed varied localization and function in micromere formation. In contrast, the sea star or the pencil urchin orthologs of other ACD factors were consistently localized at the vegetal cortex in the sea urchin embryo, suggesting that AGS may be a unique variable factor that facilitates ACD diversity among echinoderms. Consistently, sea urchin AGS appears to facilitate micromere-like cell formation and accelerate the enrichment timing of the germline factor Vasa during early embryogenesis of the pencil urchin, an ancestral type of sea urchin. Based on these observations, we propose that the molecular evolution of a single polarity factor facilitates ACD diversity while preserving the core ACD machinery among echinoderms and beyond during evolution.