Unexpected sequences and structures of mtDNA required for efficient transcription from the first heavy-strand promoter

  1. Akira Uchida
  2. Divakaran Murugesapillai
  3. Markus Kastner
  4. Yao Wang
  5. Maria F Lodeiro
  6. Shaan Prabhakar
  7. Guinevere V Oliver
  8. Jamie J Arnold
  9. L James Maher
  10. Mark C Williams  Is a corresponding author
  11. Craig E Cameron  Is a corresponding author
  1. The Pennsylvaina State University, United States
  2. Northeastern University, United States
  3. The Pennsylvania State University, United States
  4. Mayo Clinic College of Medicine, United States

Abstract

Human mtDNA contains three promoters, suggesting a need for differential expression of the mitochondrial genome. Studies of mitochondrial transcription have used a reductionist approach, perhaps masking differential regulation. Here we evaluate transcription from light–strand (LSP) and heavy–strand (HSP1) promoters using templates that mimic their natural context. These studies reveal sequences upstream, hypervariable in the human population (HVR3), and downstream of the HSP1 transcription start site required for maximal yield. The carboxy–terminal tail of TFAM is essential for activation of HSP1 but not LSP. Images of the template obtained by atomic force microscopy show that TFAM creates loops in a discrete region, the formation of which correlates with activation of HSP1; looping is lost in tail–deleted TFAM. Identification of HVR3 as a transcriptional regulatory element may contribute to between–individual variability in mitochondrial gene expression. The unique requirement of HSP1 for the TFAM tail may enable its regulation by post–translational modifications.

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Akira Uchida

    Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, The Pennsylvaina State University, University Park, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  2. Divakaran Murugesapillai

    Department of Physics, Northeastern University, Boston, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  3. Markus Kastner

    Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  4. Yao Wang

    Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  5. Maria F Lodeiro

    Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  6. Shaan Prabhakar

    Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  7. Guinevere V Oliver

    Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  8. Jamie J Arnold

    Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  9. L James Maher

    Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine, Rochester, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  10. Mark C Williams

    Department of Physics, Northeastern University, Boston, United States
    For correspondence
    ma.williams@northeastern.edu
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-3219-376X
  11. Craig E Cameron

    Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, United States
    For correspondence
    cec9@psu.edu
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-7564-5642

Funding

National Institute of General Medical Sciences (GM075965)

  • L James Maher

National Science Foundation (MCB-1243883)

  • Mark C Williams

Eberly Family Chair Endowment

  • Craig E Cameron

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Copyright

© 2017, Uchida et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 2,529
    views
  • 346
    downloads
  • 33
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Akira Uchida
  2. Divakaran Murugesapillai
  3. Markus Kastner
  4. Yao Wang
  5. Maria F Lodeiro
  6. Shaan Prabhakar
  7. Guinevere V Oliver
  8. Jamie J Arnold
  9. L James Maher
  10. Mark C Williams
  11. Craig E Cameron
(2017)
Unexpected sequences and structures of mtDNA required for efficient transcription from the first heavy-strand promoter
eLife 6:e27283.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.27283

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.27283

Further reading

    1. Biochemistry and Chemical Biology
    2. Microbiology and Infectious Disease
    Mai Nguyen, Elda Bauda ... Cecile Morlot
    Research Article

    Teichoic acids (TA) are linear phospho-saccharidic polymers and important constituents of the cell envelope of Gram-positive bacteria, either bound to the peptidoglycan as wall teichoic acids (WTA) or to the membrane as lipoteichoic acids (LTA). The composition of TA varies greatly but the presence of both WTA and LTA is highly conserved, hinting at an underlying fundamental function that is distinct from their specific roles in diverse organisms. We report the observation of a periplasmic space in Streptococcus pneumoniae by cryo-electron microscopy of vitreous sections. The thickness and appearance of this region change upon deletion of genes involved in the attachment of TA, supporting their role in the maintenance of a periplasmic space in Gram-positive bacteria as a possible universal function. Consequences of these mutations were further examined by super-resolved microscopy, following metabolic labeling and fluorophore coupling by click chemistry. This novel labeling method also enabled in-gel analysis of cell fractions. With this approach, we were able to titrate the actual amount of TA per cell and to determine the ratio of WTA to LTA. In addition, we followed the change of TA length during growth phases, and discovered that a mutant devoid of LTA accumulates the membrane-bound polymerized TA precursor.

    1. Biochemistry and Chemical Biology
    2. Computational and Systems Biology
    Shinichi Kawaguchi, Xin Xu ... Toshie Kai
    Research Article

    Protein–protein interactions are fundamental to understanding the molecular functions and regulation of proteins. Despite the availability of extensive databases, many interactions remain uncharacterized due to the labor-intensive nature of experimental validation. In this study, we utilized the AlphaFold2 program to predict interactions among proteins localized in the nuage, a germline-specific non-membrane organelle essential for piRNA biogenesis in Drosophila. We screened 20 nuage proteins for 1:1 interactions and predicted dimer structures. Among these, five represented novel interaction candidates. Three pairs, including Spn-E_Squ, were verified by co-immunoprecipitation. Disruption of the salt bridges at the Spn-E_Squ interface confirmed their functional importance, underscoring the predictive model’s accuracy. We extended our analysis to include interactions between three representative nuage components—Vas, Squ, and Tej—and approximately 430 oogenesis-related proteins. Co-immunoprecipitation verified interactions for three pairs: Mei-W68_Squ, CSN3_Squ, and Pka-C1_Tej. Furthermore, we screened the majority of Drosophila proteins (~12,000) for potential interaction with the Piwi protein, a central player in the piRNA pathway, identifying 164 pairs as potential binding partners. This in silico approach not only efficiently identifies potential interaction partners but also significantly bridges the gap by facilitating the integration of bioinformatics and experimental biology.