Unexpected sequences and structures of mtDNA required for efficient transcription from the first heavy-strand promoter

  1. Akira Uchida
  2. Divakaran Murugesapillai
  3. Markus Kastner
  4. Yao Wang
  5. Maria F Lodeiro
  6. Shaan Prabhakar
  7. Guinevere V Oliver
  8. Jamie J Arnold
  9. L James Maher
  10. Mark C Williams  Is a corresponding author
  11. Craig E Cameron  Is a corresponding author
  1. The Pennsylvaina State University, United States
  2. Northeastern University, United States
  3. The Pennsylvania State University, United States
  4. Mayo Clinic College of Medicine, United States

Abstract

Human mtDNA contains three promoters, suggesting a need for differential expression of the mitochondrial genome. Studies of mitochondrial transcription have used a reductionist approach, perhaps masking differential regulation. Here we evaluate transcription from light–strand (LSP) and heavy–strand (HSP1) promoters using templates that mimic their natural context. These studies reveal sequences upstream, hypervariable in the human population (HVR3), and downstream of the HSP1 transcription start site required for maximal yield. The carboxy–terminal tail of TFAM is essential for activation of HSP1 but not LSP. Images of the template obtained by atomic force microscopy show that TFAM creates loops in a discrete region, the formation of which correlates with activation of HSP1; looping is lost in tail–deleted TFAM. Identification of HVR3 as a transcriptional regulatory element may contribute to between–individual variability in mitochondrial gene expression. The unique requirement of HSP1 for the TFAM tail may enable its regulation by post–translational modifications.

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Akira Uchida

    Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, The Pennsylvaina State University, University Park, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  2. Divakaran Murugesapillai

    Department of Physics, Northeastern University, Boston, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  3. Markus Kastner

    Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  4. Yao Wang

    Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  5. Maria F Lodeiro

    Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  6. Shaan Prabhakar

    Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  7. Guinevere V Oliver

    Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  8. Jamie J Arnold

    Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  9. L James Maher

    Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine, Rochester, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  10. Mark C Williams

    Department of Physics, Northeastern University, Boston, United States
    For correspondence
    ma.williams@northeastern.edu
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-3219-376X
  11. Craig E Cameron

    Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, United States
    For correspondence
    cec9@psu.edu
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-7564-5642

Funding

National Institute of General Medical Sciences (GM075965)

  • L James Maher

National Science Foundation (MCB-1243883)

  • Mark C Williams

Eberly Family Chair Endowment

  • Craig E Cameron

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Copyright

© 2017, Uchida et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 2,469
    views
  • 341
    downloads
  • 33
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Akira Uchida
  2. Divakaran Murugesapillai
  3. Markus Kastner
  4. Yao Wang
  5. Maria F Lodeiro
  6. Shaan Prabhakar
  7. Guinevere V Oliver
  8. Jamie J Arnold
  9. L James Maher
  10. Mark C Williams
  11. Craig E Cameron
(2017)
Unexpected sequences and structures of mtDNA required for efficient transcription from the first heavy-strand promoter
eLife 6:e27283.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.27283

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.27283

Further reading

    1. Biochemistry and Chemical Biology
    2. Structural Biology and Molecular Biophysics
    Angel D'Oliviera, Xuhang Dai ... Jeffrey S Mugridge
    Research Article

    The SARS-CoV-2 main protease (Mpro or Nsp5) is critical for production of viral proteins during infection and, like many viral proteases, also targets host proteins to subvert their cellular functions. Here, we show that the human tRNA methyltransferase TRMT1 is recognized and cleaved by SARS-CoV-2 Mpro. TRMT1 installs the N2,N2-dimethylguanosine (m2,2G) modification on mammalian tRNAs, which promotes cellular protein synthesis and redox homeostasis. We find that Mpro can cleave endogenous TRMT1 in human cell lysate, resulting in removal of the TRMT1 zinc finger domain. Evolutionary analysis shows the TRMT1 cleavage site is highly conserved in mammals, except in Muroidea, where TRMT1 is likely resistant to cleavage. TRMT1 proteolysis results in reduced tRNA binding and elimination of tRNA methyltransferase activity. We also determined the structure of an Mpro-TRMT1 peptide complex that shows how TRMT1 engages the Mpro active site in an uncommon substrate binding conformation. Finally, enzymology and molecular dynamics simulations indicate that kinetic discrimination occurs during a later step of Mpro-mediated proteolysis following substrate binding. Together, these data provide new insights into substrate recognition by SARS-CoV-2 Mpro that could help guide future antiviral therapeutic development and show how proteolysis of TRMT1 during SARS-CoV-2 infection impairs both TRMT1 tRNA binding and tRNA modification activity to disrupt host translation and potentially impact COVID-19 pathogenesis or phenotypes.

    1. Biochemistry and Chemical Biology
    2. Microbiology and Infectious Disease
    Qian Wang, Jinxin Liu ... Qian Liu
    Research Article

    Paramyxovirus membrane fusion requires an attachment protein for receptor binding and a fusion protein for membrane fusion triggering. Nipah virus (NiV) attachment protein (G) binds to ephrinB2 or -B3 receptors, and fusion protein (F) mediates membrane fusion. NiV-F is a class I fusion protein and is activated by endosomal cleavage. The crystal structure of a soluble GCN4-decorated NiV-F shows a hexamer-of-trimer assembly. Here, we used single-molecule localization microscopy to quantify the NiV-F distribution and organization on cell and virus-like particle membranes at a nanometer precision. We found that NiV-F on biological membranes forms distinctive clusters that are independent of endosomal cleavage or expression levels. The sequestration of NiV-F into dense clusters favors membrane fusion triggering. The nano-distribution and organization of NiV-F are susceptible to mutations at the hexamer-of-trimer interface, and the putative oligomerization motif on the transmembrane domain. We also show that NiV-F nanoclusters are maintained by NiV-F–AP-2 interactions and the clathrin coat assembly. We propose that the organization of NiV-F into nanoclusters facilitates membrane fusion triggering by a mixed population of NiV-F molecules with varied degrees of cleavage and opportunities for interacting with the NiV-G/receptor complex. These observations provide insights into the in situ organization and activation mechanisms of the NiV fusion machinery.