Unexpected sequences and structures of mtDNA required for efficient transcription from the first heavy-strand promoter

  1. Akira Uchida
  2. Divakaran Murugesapillai
  3. Markus Kastner
  4. Yao Wang
  5. Maria F Lodeiro
  6. Shaan Prabhakar
  7. Guinevere V Oliver
  8. Jamie J Arnold
  9. L James Maher
  10. Mark C Williams  Is a corresponding author
  11. Craig E Cameron  Is a corresponding author
  1. The Pennsylvaina State University, United States
  2. Northeastern University, United States
  3. The Pennsylvania State University, United States
  4. Mayo Clinic College of Medicine, United States

Abstract

Human mtDNA contains three promoters, suggesting a need for differential expression of the mitochondrial genome. Studies of mitochondrial transcription have used a reductionist approach, perhaps masking differential regulation. Here we evaluate transcription from light–strand (LSP) and heavy–strand (HSP1) promoters using templates that mimic their natural context. These studies reveal sequences upstream, hypervariable in the human population (HVR3), and downstream of the HSP1 transcription start site required for maximal yield. The carboxy–terminal tail of TFAM is essential for activation of HSP1 but not LSP. Images of the template obtained by atomic force microscopy show that TFAM creates loops in a discrete region, the formation of which correlates with activation of HSP1; looping is lost in tail–deleted TFAM. Identification of HVR3 as a transcriptional regulatory element may contribute to between–individual variability in mitochondrial gene expression. The unique requirement of HSP1 for the TFAM tail may enable its regulation by post–translational modifications.

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Akira Uchida

    Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, The Pennsylvaina State University, University Park, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  2. Divakaran Murugesapillai

    Department of Physics, Northeastern University, Boston, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  3. Markus Kastner

    Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  4. Yao Wang

    Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  5. Maria F Lodeiro

    Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  6. Shaan Prabhakar

    Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  7. Guinevere V Oliver

    Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  8. Jamie J Arnold

    Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  9. L James Maher

    Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine, Rochester, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  10. Mark C Williams

    Department of Physics, Northeastern University, Boston, United States
    For correspondence
    ma.williams@northeastern.edu
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-3219-376X
  11. Craig E Cameron

    Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, United States
    For correspondence
    cec9@psu.edu
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-7564-5642

Funding

National Institute of General Medical Sciences (GM075965)

  • L James Maher

National Science Foundation (MCB-1243883)

  • Mark C Williams

Eberly Family Chair Endowment

  • Craig E Cameron

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Reviewing Editor

  1. Antoine M van Oijen, University of Wollongong, Australia

Version history

  1. Received: March 29, 2017
  2. Accepted: July 25, 2017
  3. Accepted Manuscript published: July 26, 2017 (version 1)
  4. Version of Record published: August 10, 2017 (version 2)
  5. Version of Record updated: August 15, 2017 (version 3)

Copyright

© 2017, Uchida et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 2,416
    views
  • 340
    downloads
  • 33
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Akira Uchida
  2. Divakaran Murugesapillai
  3. Markus Kastner
  4. Yao Wang
  5. Maria F Lodeiro
  6. Shaan Prabhakar
  7. Guinevere V Oliver
  8. Jamie J Arnold
  9. L James Maher
  10. Mark C Williams
  11. Craig E Cameron
(2017)
Unexpected sequences and structures of mtDNA required for efficient transcription from the first heavy-strand promoter
eLife 6:e27283.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.27283

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.27283

Further reading

    1. Biochemistry and Chemical Biology
    2. Plant Biology
    Henning Mühlenbeck, Yuko Tsutsui ... Cyril Zipfel
    Research Article

    Transmembrane signaling by plant receptor kinases (RKs) has long been thought to involve reciprocal trans-phosphorylation of their intracellular kinase domains. The fact that many of these are pseudokinase domains, however, suggests that additional mechanisms must govern RK signaling activation. Non-catalytic signaling mechanisms of protein kinase domains have been described in metazoans, but information is scarce for plants. Recently, a non-catalytic function was reported for the leucine-rich repeat (LRR)-RK subfamily XIIa member EFR (elongation factor Tu receptor) and phosphorylation-dependent conformational changes were proposed to regulate signaling of RKs with non-RD kinase domains. Here, using EFR as a model, we describe a non-catalytic activation mechanism for LRR-RKs with non-RD kinase domains. EFR is an active kinase, but a kinase-dead variant retains the ability to enhance catalytic activity of its co-receptor kinase BAK1/SERK3 (brassinosteroid insensitive 1-associated kinase 1/somatic embryogenesis receptor kinase 3). Applying hydrogen-deuterium exchange mass spectrometry (HDX-MS) analysis and designing homology-based intragenic suppressor mutations, we provide evidence that the EFR kinase domain must adopt its active conformation in order to activate BAK1 allosterically, likely by supporting αC-helix positioning in BAK1. Our results suggest a conformational toggle model for signaling, in which BAK1 first phosphorylates EFR in the activation loop to stabilize its active conformation, allowing EFR in turn to allosterically activate BAK1.

    1. Biochemistry and Chemical Biology
    2. Cell Biology
    Ya-Juan Wang, Xiao-Jing Di ... Ting-Wei Mu
    Research Article Updated

    Protein homeostasis (proteostasis) deficiency is an important contributing factor to neurological and metabolic diseases. However, how the proteostasis network orchestrates the folding and assembly of multi-subunit membrane proteins is poorly understood. Previous proteomics studies identified Hsp47 (Gene: SERPINH1), a heat shock protein in the endoplasmic reticulum lumen, as the most enriched interacting chaperone for gamma-aminobutyric acid type A (GABAA) receptors. Here, we show that Hsp47 enhances the functional surface expression of GABAA receptors in rat neurons and human HEK293T cells. Furthermore, molecular mechanism study demonstrates that Hsp47 acts after BiP (Gene: HSPA5) and preferentially binds the folded conformation of GABAA receptors without inducing the unfolded protein response in HEK293T cells. Therefore, Hsp47 promotes the subunit-subunit interaction, the receptor assembly process, and the anterograde trafficking of GABAA receptors. Overexpressing Hsp47 is sufficient to correct the surface expression and function of epilepsy-associated GABAA receptor variants in HEK293T cells. Hsp47 also promotes the surface trafficking of other Cys-loop receptors, including nicotinic acetylcholine receptors and serotonin type 3 receptors in HEK293T cells. Therefore, in addition to its known function as a collagen chaperone, this work establishes that Hsp47 plays a critical and general role in the maturation of multi-subunit Cys-loop neuroreceptors.