Defective synaptic transmission causes disease signs in a mouse model of Juvenile Neuronal Ceroid Lipofuscinosis

  1. Benedikt Grünewald
  2. Maren D Lange
  3. Christian Werner
  4. Aet O'Leary
  5. Andreas Weishaupt
  6. Sandy Popp
  7. David A Pearce
  8. Heinz Wiendl
  9. Andreas Reif
  10. Hans C Pape
  11. Klaus V Toyka
  12. Claudia Sommer
  13. Christian Geis  Is a corresponding author
  1. Jena University Hospital, Germany
  2. University of Münster, Germany
  3. University Hospital Frankfurt, Germany
  4. University Hospital Würzburg, Germany
  5. Sanford Research, United States

Abstract

Juvenile neuronal ceroid lipofuscinosis (JNCL or Batten disease) caused by mutations in the CLN3 gene is the most prevalent inherited neurodegenerative disease in childhood resulting in widespread central nervous system dysfunction and premature death. The consequences of CLN3 mutation on the progression of the disease, on neuronal transmission, and on central nervous network dysfunction are poorly understood. We used Cln3 knockout (Cln3Δex7/8) mice and found increased anxiety-related behavior and impaired aversive learning as well as markedly affected motor function including disordered coordination. Patch-clamp and loose-patch recordings revealed severely affected inhibitory and excitatory synaptic transmission in amygdala, hippocampus, and in cerebellar networks. Changes in presynaptic release properties may result from dysfunction of CLN3 protein. Furthermore, loss of calbindin, neuropeptide Y, parvalbumin, and GAD65-positive interneurons in central networks collectively support the hypothesis that degeneration of GABAergic interneurons may be the cause of supraspinal GABAergic disinhibition.

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Benedikt Grünewald

    Hans-Berger Department of Neurology, Jena University Hospital, Jena, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  2. Maren D Lange

    Institute of Physiology I, University of Münster, Münster, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  3. Christian Werner

    Hans-Berger Department of Neurology, Jena University Hospital, Jena, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  4. Aet O'Leary

    Department of Psychiatry, Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, University Hospital Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-6783-4729
  5. Andreas Weishaupt

    Department of Neurology, University Hospital Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  6. Sandy Popp

    Department of Psychiatry, Psychosomatics and Psychotherapy, University Hospital Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  7. David A Pearce

    Sanford Children´s Health Research Center, Sanford Research, Sioux Falls, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  8. Heinz Wiendl

    Department of Neurology, University of Münster, Münster, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  9. Andreas Reif

    Department of Psychiatry, Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, University Hospital Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  10. Hans C Pape

    Institute of Physiology I, University of Münster, Münster, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  11. Klaus V Toyka

    Department of Neurology, University Hospital Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  12. Claudia Sommer

    Department of Neurology, University Hospital Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  13. Christian Geis

    Hans-Berger Department of Neurology, Jena University Hospital, Jena, Germany
    For correspondence
    christian.geis@med.uni-jena.de
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-9859-581X

Funding

Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (SFB 581 [TP A7])

  • Klaus V Toyka
  • Claudia Sommer

Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (SFB/TR 166 [B2])

  • Christian Geis

Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (SFB/TR 58)

  • Maren D Lange
  • Hans C Pape

German Federal Ministry of Education and Research (Center for Sepsis Control and Care)

  • Christian Geis

IZKF University Hospital Jena

  • Benedikt Grünewald
  • Christian Geis

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Ethics

Animal experimentation: All animal experiments were approved by the respective Bavarian and Thuringian state authorities (No. 55.5-2531.01-12/10; 78/05 and 02-44/12). All efforts were made to minimize animal suffering and to reduce the number of animals used. The study was performed in accordance with the ARRIVE guidelines for reporting animal research (Kilkenny et al., 2010).

Reviewing Editor

  1. Christian Rosenmund, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Germany

Publication history

  1. Received: May 19, 2017
  2. Accepted: November 13, 2017
  3. Accepted Manuscript published: November 14, 2017 (version 1)
  4. Version of Record published: November 21, 2017 (version 2)

Copyright

© 2017, Grünewald et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 1,712
    Page views
  • 275
    Downloads
  • 21
    Citations

Article citation count generated by polling the highest count across the following sources: Scopus, Crossref, PubMed Central.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Benedikt Grünewald
  2. Maren D Lange
  3. Christian Werner
  4. Aet O'Leary
  5. Andreas Weishaupt
  6. Sandy Popp
  7. David A Pearce
  8. Heinz Wiendl
  9. Andreas Reif
  10. Hans C Pape
  11. Klaus V Toyka
  12. Claudia Sommer
  13. Christian Geis
(2017)
Defective synaptic transmission causes disease signs in a mouse model of Juvenile Neuronal Ceroid Lipofuscinosis
eLife 6:e28685.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.28685

Further reading

    1. Neuroscience
    Payel Chatterjee et al.
    Research Article

    During flight maneuvers, insects exhibit compensatory head movements which are essential for stabilizing the visual field on their retina, reducing motion blur, and supporting visual self-motion estimation. In Diptera, such head movements are mediated via visual feedback from their compound eyes that detect retinal slip, as well as rapid mechanosensory feedback from their halteres - the modified hindwings that sense the angular rates of body rotations. Because non-Dipteran insects lack halteres, it is not known if mechanosensory feedback about body rotations plays any role in their head stabilization response. Diverse non-Dipteran insects are known to rely on visual and antennal mechanosensory feedback for flight control. In hawkmoths, for instance, reduction of antennal mechanosensory feedback severely compromises their ability to control flight. Similarly, when the head movements of freely-flying moths are restricted, their flight ability is also severely impaired. The role of compensatory head movements as well as multimodal feedback in insect flight raises an interesting question: in insects that lack halteres, what sensory cues are required for head stabilization? Here, we show that in the nocturnal hawkmoth Daphnis nerii, compensatory head movements are mediated by combined visual and antennal mechanosensory feedback. We subjected tethered moths to open-loop body roll rotations under different lighting conditions, and measured their ability to maintain head angle in the presence or absence of antennal mechanosensory feedback. Our study suggests that head stabilization in moths is mediated primarily by visual feedback during roll movements at lower frequencies, whereas antennal mechanosensory feedback is required when roll occurs at higher frequency. These findings are consistent with the hypothesis that control of head angle results from a multimodal feedback loop that integrates both visual and antennal mechanosensory feedback, albeit at different latencies. At adequate light levels, visual feedback is sufficient for head stabilization primarily at low frequencies of body roll. However, under dark conditions, antennal mechanosensory feedback is essential for the control of head movements at high of body roll.

    1. Developmental Biology
    2. Neuroscience
    Ashtyn T Wiltbank et al.
    Research Article

    Efficient neurotransmission is essential for organism survival and is enhanced by myelination. However, the genes that regulate myelin and myelinating glial cell development have not been fully characterized. Data from our lab and others demonstrates that cd59, which encodes for a small GPI-anchored glycoprotein, is highly expressed in developing zebrafish, rodent, and human oligodendrocytes (OLs) and Schwann cells (SCs), and that patients with CD59 dysfunction develop neurological dysfunction during early childhood. Yet, the function of Cd59 in the developing nervous system is currently undefined. In this study, we demonstrate that cd59 is expressed in a subset of developing SCs. Using cd59 mutant zebrafish, we show that developing SCs proliferate excessively and nerves may have reduced myelin volume, altered myelin ultrastructure, and perturbed node of Ranvier assembly. Finally, we demonstrate that complement activity is elevated in cd59 mutants and that inhibiting inflammation restores SC proliferation, myelin volume, and nodes of Ranvier to wildtype levels. Together, this work identifies Cd59 and developmental inflammation as key players in myelinating glial cell development, highlighting the collaboration between glia and the innate immune system to ensure normal neural development.