1. Neuroscience
Download icon

Subcellular analysis of pigeon hair cells implicates vesicular trafficking in cuticulosome formation and maintenance

  1. Simon Nimpf
  2. Erich Pascal Malkemper
  3. Mattias Lauwers
  4. Lyubov Ushakova
  5. Gregory Nordmann
  6. Andrea Wenninger-Weinzierl
  7. Thomas R Burkard
  8. Sonja Jacob
  9. Thomas Heuser
  10. Guenter P Resch
  11. David A Keays  Is a corresponding author
  1. Research Institute of Molecular Pathology, Austria
  2. Campus Science Support Facilities GmbH, Austria
  3. Nexperion, Austria
Research Article
  • Cited 5
  • Views 1,660
  • Annotations
Cite this article as: eLife 2017;6:e29959 doi: 10.7554/eLife.29959

Abstract

Hair cells are specialized sensors located in the inner ear that enable the transduction of sound, motion, and gravity into neuronal impulses. In birds some hair cells contain an iron-rich organelle, the cuticulosome, that has been implicated in the magnetic sense. Here, we exploit histological, transcriptomic and tomographic methods to investigate the development of cuticulosomes, as well as the molecular and subcellular architecture of cuticulosome positive hair cells. We show that this organelle forms rapidly after hatching in a process that involves vesicle fusion and nucleation of ferritin nanoparticles. We further report that transcripts involved in endocytosis, extracellular exosomes, and metal ion binding are differentially expressed in cuticulosome positive hair cells. These data suggest that the cuticulosome and the associated molecular machinery regulate the concentration of iron within the labyrinth of the inner ear, which might indirectly tune a magnetic sensor that relies on electromagnetic induction.

Data availability

The following data sets were generated

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Simon Nimpf

    Research Institute of Molecular Pathology, Vienna, Austria
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-6522-6172
  2. Erich Pascal Malkemper

    Research Institute of Molecular Pathology, Vienna, Austria
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  3. Mattias Lauwers

    Research Institute of Molecular Pathology, Vienna, Austria
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  4. Lyubov Ushakova

    Research Institute of Molecular Pathology, Vienna, Austria
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  5. Gregory Nordmann

    Research Institute of Molecular Pathology, Vienna, Austria
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  6. Andrea Wenninger-Weinzierl

    Research Institute of Molecular Pathology, Vienna, Austria
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  7. Thomas R Burkard

    Research Institute of Molecular Pathology, Vienna, Austria
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  8. Sonja Jacob

    Electron Microscopy Facility, Campus Science Support Facilities GmbH, Vienna, Austria
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  9. Thomas Heuser

    Electron Microscopy Facility, Campus Science Support Facilities GmbH, Vienna, Austria
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  10. Guenter P Resch

    Nexperion, Vienna, Austria
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  11. David A Keays

    Research Institute of Molecular Pathology, Vienna, Austria
    For correspondence
    keays@imp.ac.at
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-8343-8002

Funding

Austrian Science Fund (Y726)

  • Thomas R Burkard

Horizon 2020 Framework Programme (336724)

  • David A Keays

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Ethics

Animal experimentation: All experiments were conducted in accordance with an existing ethical framework GZ: 214635/2015/20 granted by the City of Vienna (Magistratsabteilung 58).

Reviewing Editor

  1. Jeremy Nathans, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, United States

Publication history

  1. Received: June 27, 2017
  2. Accepted: November 11, 2017
  3. Accepted Manuscript published: November 15, 2017 (version 1)
  4. Version of Record published: November 22, 2017 (version 2)
  5. Version of Record updated: November 23, 2017 (version 3)

Copyright

© 2017, Nimpf et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 1,660
    Page views
  • 215
    Downloads
  • 5
    Citations

Article citation count generated by polling the highest count across the following sources: Crossref, Scopus, PubMed Central.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Download citations (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Further reading

    1. Neuroscience
    2. Stem Cells and Regenerative Medicine
    Stephen Johnston et al.
    Research Article Updated

    Recombinant adeno-associated virus (rAAV) has been widely used as a viral vector across mammalian biology and has been shown to be safe and effective in human gene therapy. We demonstrate that neural progenitor cells (NPCs) and immature dentate granule cells (DGCs) within the adult murine hippocampus are particularly sensitive to rAAV-induced cell death. Cell loss is dose dependent and nearly complete at experimentally relevant viral titers. rAAV-induced cell death is rapid and persistent, with loss of BrdU-labeled cells within 18 hr post-injection and no evidence of recovery of adult neurogenesis at 3 months post-injection. The remaining mature DGCs appear hyperactive 4 weeks post-injection based on immediate early gene expression, consistent with previous studies investigating the effects of attenuating adult neurogenesis. In vitro application of AAV or electroporation of AAV2 inverted terminal repeats (ITRs) is sufficient to induce cell death. Efficient transduction of the dentategyrus (DG)– without ablating adult neurogenesis– can be achieved by injection of rAAV2-retro serotyped virus into CA3. rAAV2-retro results in efficient retrograde labeling of mature DGCs and permits in vivo two-photon calcium imaging of dentate activity while leaving adult neurogenesis intact. These findings expand on recent reports implicating rAAV-linked toxicity in stem cells and other cell types and suggest that future work using rAAV as an experimental tool in the DG and as a gene therapy for diseases of the central nervous system should be carefully evaluated.

    1. Neuroscience
    Steven R Sando et al.
    Research Article Updated

    Neural control of muscle function is fundamental to animal behavior. Many muscles can generate multiple distinct behaviors. Nonetheless, individual muscle cells are generally regarded as the smallest units of motor control. We report that muscle cells can alter behavior by contracting subcellularly. We previously discovered that noxious tastes reverse the net flow of particles through the C. elegans pharynx, a neuromuscular pump, resulting in spitting. We now show that spitting results from the subcellular contraction of the anterior region of the pm3 muscle cell. Subcellularly localized calcium increases accompany this contraction. Spitting is controlled by an ‘hourglass’ circuit motif: parallel neural pathways converge onto a single motor neuron that differentially controls multiple muscles and the critical subcellular muscle compartment. We conclude that subcellular muscle units enable modulatory motor control and propose that subcellular muscle contraction is a fundamental mechanism by which neurons can reshape behavior.