Structure-based nuclear import mechanism of histones H3 and H4 mediated by Kap123

  1. Sojin An
  2. Jungmin Yoon
  3. Hanseong Kim
  4. Ji-Joon Song
  5. Uhn-soo Cho  Is a corresponding author
  1. University of Michigan Medical School, United States
  2. Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology, Korea (South), Republic of

Abstract

Kap123, a major karyopherin protein of budding yeast, recognizes the nuclear localization signals (NLSs) of cytoplasmic histones H3 and H4 and translocates them into the nucleus during DNA replication. Mechanistic questions include H3- and H4-NLS redundancy toward Kap123 and the role of the conserved diacetylation of cytoplasmic H4 (K5ac and K12ac) in Kap123-mediated histone nuclear translocation. Here, we report crystal structures of full-length Kluyveromyces lactis Kap123 alone and in complex with H3- and H4-NLSs. Structures reveal the unique feature of Kap123 that possesses two discrete lysine-binding pockets for NLS recognition. Structural comparison illustrates that H3- and H4-NLSs share at least one of two lysine-binding pockets, suggesting that H3- and H4-NLSs are mutually exclusive. Additionally, acetylation of key lysine residues at NLS, particularly H4-NLS diacetylation, weakens the interaction with Kap123. These data support that cytoplasmic histone H4 diacetylation weakens the Kap123-H4-NLS interaction thereby facilitating histone Kap123-H3-dependent H3:H4/Asf1 complex nuclear translocation.

Data availability

The following data sets were generated

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Sojin An

    Department of Biological Chemistry, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  2. Jungmin Yoon

    Structural Biology Laboratory of Epigenetics, Department of Biological Sciences, Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology, Daejeon, Korea (South), Republic of
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  3. Hanseong Kim

    Department of Biological Chemistry, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  4. Ji-Joon Song

    Structural Biology Laboratory of Epigenetics, Department of Biological Sciences, Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology, Daejeon, Korea (South), Republic of
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  5. Uhn-soo Cho

    Department of Biological Chemistry, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, United States
    For correspondence
    uhnsoo@med.umich.edu
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-6992-2455

Funding

National Institutes of Health (DK111465)

  • Uhn-soo Cho

American Diabetes Association (1-16-JDF-017)

  • Uhn-soo Cho

National Institutes of Health (AG050903)

  • Uhn-soo Cho

March of Dimes Foundation (N019154-00)

  • Uhn-soo Cho

National Research Foundation of Korea (2016R1A2B3006293)

  • Ji-Joon Song

National Research Foundation of Korea (2013R1A1A2055605)

  • Ji-Joon Song

National Research Foundation of Korea (2014K2A3A1000137)

  • Ji-Joon Song

National Research Foundation of Korea (2011-0031955)

  • Ji-Joon Song

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Copyright

© 2017, An et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 2,530
    views
  • 387
    downloads
  • 19
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Sojin An
  2. Jungmin Yoon
  3. Hanseong Kim
  4. Ji-Joon Song
  5. Uhn-soo Cho
(2017)
Structure-based nuclear import mechanism of histones H3 and H4 mediated by Kap123
eLife 6:e30244.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.30244

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.30244

Further reading

    1. Biochemistry and Chemical Biology
    2. Structural Biology and Molecular Biophysics
    Yamato Niitani, Kohei Matsuzaki ... Michio Tomishige
    Research Article

    The two identical motor domains (heads) of dimeric kinesin-1 move in a hand-over-hand process along a microtubule, coordinating their ATPase cycles such that each ATP hydrolysis is tightly coupled to a step and enabling the motor to take many steps without dissociating. The neck linker, a structural element that connects the two heads, has been shown to be essential for head–head coordination; however, which kinetic step(s) in the chemomechanical cycle is ‘gated’ by the neck linker remains unresolved. Here, we employed pre-steady-state kinetics and single-molecule assays to investigate how the neck-linker conformation affects kinesin’s motility cycle. We show that the backward-pointing configuration of the neck linker in the front kinesin head confers higher affinity for microtubule, but does not change ATP binding and dissociation rates. In contrast, the forward-pointing configuration of the neck linker in the rear kinesin head decreases the ATP dissociation rate but has little effect on microtubule dissociation. In combination, these conformation-specific effects of the neck linker favor ATP hydrolysis and dissociation of the rear head prior to microtubule detachment of the front head, thereby providing a kinetic explanation for the coordinated walking mechanism of dimeric kinesin.

    1. Structural Biology and Molecular Biophysics
    Christopher T Schafer, Raymond F Pauszek III ... David P Millar
    Research Article

    The canonical chemokine receptor CXCR4 and atypical receptor ACKR3 both respond to CXCL12 but induce different effector responses to regulate cell migration. While CXCR4 couples to G proteins and directly promotes cell migration, ACKR3 is G-protein-independent and scavenges CXCL12 to regulate extracellular chemokine levels and maintain CXCR4 responsiveness, thereby indirectly influencing migration. The receptors also have distinct activation requirements. CXCR4 only responds to wild-type CXCL12 and is sensitive to mutation of the chemokine. By contrast, ACKR3 recruits GPCR kinases (GRKs) and β-arrestins and promiscuously responds to CXCL12, CXCL12 variants, other peptides and proteins, and is relatively insensitive to mutation. To investigate the role of conformational dynamics in the distinct pharmacological behaviors of CXCR4 and ACKR3, we employed single-molecule FRET to track discrete conformational states of the receptors in real-time. The data revealed that apo-CXCR4 preferentially populates a high-FRET inactive state, while apo-ACKR3 shows little conformational preference and high transition probabilities among multiple inactive, intermediate and active conformations, consistent with its propensity for activation. Multiple active-like ACKR3 conformations are populated in response to agonists, compared to the single CXCR4 active-state. This and the markedly different conformational landscapes of the receptors suggest that activation of ACKR3 may be achieved by a broader distribution of conformational states than CXCR4. Much of the conformational heterogeneity of ACKR3 is linked to a single residue that differs between ACKR3 and CXCR4. The dynamic properties of ACKR3 may underly its inability to form productive interactions with G proteins that would drive canonical GPCR signaling.