Wilms Tumor 1b defines a wound-specific sheath cell subpopulation associated with notochord repair

  1. Juan Carlos Lopez-Baez
  2. Daniel J Simpson
  3. Laura LLeras Forero
  4. Zhiqiang Zeng
  5. Hannah Brunsdon
  6. Angela Salzano
  7. Alessandro Brombin
  8. Cameron Wyatt
  9. Witold Rybski
  10. Leonie F A Huitema
  11. Rodney M Dale
  12. Koichi Kawakami
  13. Christoph Englert
  14. Tamir Chandra
  15. Stefan Schulte-Merker
  16. Nicholas D Hastie  Is a corresponding author
  17. E Elizabeth Patton  Is a corresponding author
  1. University of Edinburgh, United Kingdom
  2. Hubrecht Institute, Netherlands
  3. Loyola University Chicago Quinlan, United States
  4. National Institute of Genetics, Japan
  5. Leibniz Institute for Age Research-Fritz Lipmann Institute, Germany

Abstract

Regenerative therapy for degenerative spine disorders requires the identification of cells that can slow down and possibly reverse degenerative processes. Here, we identify an unanticipated wound-specific notochord sheath cell subpopulation that expresses Wilms Tumor (WT) 1b following injury in zebrafish. We show that localized damage leads to Wt1b expression in sheath cells, and that wt1b+ cells migrate into the wound to form a stopper-like structure, likely to maintain structural integrity. Wt1b+ sheath cells are distinct in expressing cartilage and vacuolar genes, and in repressing a Wt1b-p53 transcriptional programme. At the wound, wt1b+ and entpd5+ cells constitute separate, tightly-associated subpopulations. Surprisingly, wt1b expression at the site of injury is maintained even into adult stages in developing vertebra, which forms in an untypical manner via a cartilage intermediate. Given that notochord cells are retained in adult intervertebral discs, the identification of novel subpopulations may have important implications for regenerative spine disorder treatments.

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Juan Carlos Lopez-Baez

    MRC Human Genetics Unit, MRC Institute for Genetics and Molecular Medicine, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  2. Daniel J Simpson

    MRC Human Genetics Unit, MRC Institute for Genetics and Molecular Medicine, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  3. Laura LLeras Forero

    KNAW and UMC Utrecht, Hubrecht Institute, Utrecht, Netherlands
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  4. Zhiqiang Zeng

    MRC Human Genetics Unit, MRC Institute for Genetics and Molecular Medicine, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  5. Hannah Brunsdon

    MRC Human Genetics Unit, MRC Institute for Genetics and Molecular Medicine, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  6. Angela Salzano

    MRC Human Genetics Unit, MRC Institute for Genetics and Molecular Medicine, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  7. Alessandro Brombin

    MRC Human Genetics Unit, MRC Institute for Genetics and Molecular Medicine, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  8. Cameron Wyatt

    MRC Human Genetics Unit, MRC Institute for Genetics and Molecular Medicine, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  9. Witold Rybski

    MRC Human Genetics Unit, MRC Institute for Genetics and Molecular Medicine, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-6025-2918
  10. Leonie F A Huitema

    KNAW and UMC Utrecht, Hubrecht Institute, Utrecht, Netherlands
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  11. Rodney M Dale

    Department of Biology, Loyola University Chicago Quinlan, Chicago, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-4255-4741
  12. Koichi Kawakami

    Division of Molecular and Developmental Biology, National Institute of Genetics, Mishima, Japan
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-9993-1435
  13. Christoph Englert

    Department of Molecular Genetics, Leibniz Institute for Age Research-Fritz Lipmann Institute, Jena, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-5931-3189
  14. Tamir Chandra

    MRC Human Genetics Unit, MRC Institute for Genetics and Molecular Medicine, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  15. Stefan Schulte-Merker

    KNAW and UMC Utrecht, Hubrecht Institute, Utrecht, Netherlands
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-3617-8807
  16. Nicholas D Hastie

    MRC Human Genetics Unit, MRC Institute for Genetics and Molecular Medicine, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom
    For correspondence
    Nick.Hastie@igmm.ed.ac.uk
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  17. E Elizabeth Patton

    MRC Human Genetics Unit, MRC Institute for Genetics and Molecular Medicine, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom
    For correspondence
    e.patton@igmm.ed.ac.uk
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-2570-0834

Funding

Medical Research Council University Unit Award to the University of Edinburgh for the MRC Human Genetics Unit (U127527202)

  • Juan Carlos Lopez-Baez
  • Zhiqiang Zeng
  • Alessandro Brombin
  • Witold Rybski
  • Nicholas D Hastie
  • E Elizabeth Patton

Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (15H02370)

  • Koichi Kawakami

Japan Agency for Medical Research and Development (National BioResource Project)

  • Koichi Kawakami

H2020 European Research Council (ZF-MEL-CHEMBIO - 648489)

  • Hannah Brunsdon
  • Alessandro Brombin
  • E Elizabeth Patton

Melanoma Research Alliance (401181)

  • Alessandro Brombin
  • E Elizabeth Patton

L'Oreal USA (401181)

  • Alessandro Brombin
  • E Elizabeth Patton

Cells in Motion - Cluster of Excellence

  • Stefan Schulte-Merker

Leibniz-Gemeinschaft

  • Christoph Englert

Medical Research Council (Discovery Award MC_PC_15075)

  • Angela Salzano

University Of Edinburgh (Chancellor's Fellowship)

  • Tamir Chandra

Medical Research Council (Doctoral Training Programme in Percision Medicine)

  • Daniel J Simpson

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Ethics

Animal experimentation: All work presented in this study has been performed in accordance with the UK legal requirements for the protection of animals used for experimental or other scientific research under the Animal (Scientific Procedures) Act 1986. All experiments were approved by the University of Edinburgh Ethics Committee, and performed under the Home Office Project License 70/800 to EEP. Zebrafish welfare and husbandry were closely monitored by the MRC Human Genetics Unit Zebrafish Facility staff.

Copyright

© 2018, Lopez-Baez et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 2,593
    views
  • 287
    downloads
  • 22
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Juan Carlos Lopez-Baez
  2. Daniel J Simpson
  3. Laura LLeras Forero
  4. Zhiqiang Zeng
  5. Hannah Brunsdon
  6. Angela Salzano
  7. Alessandro Brombin
  8. Cameron Wyatt
  9. Witold Rybski
  10. Leonie F A Huitema
  11. Rodney M Dale
  12. Koichi Kawakami
  13. Christoph Englert
  14. Tamir Chandra
  15. Stefan Schulte-Merker
  16. Nicholas D Hastie
  17. E Elizabeth Patton
(2018)
Wilms Tumor 1b defines a wound-specific sheath cell subpopulation associated with notochord repair
eLife 7:e30657.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.30657

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.30657

Further reading

    1. Developmental Biology
    2. Stem Cells and Regenerative Medicine
    Nikola Sekulovski, Jenna C Wettstein ... Kenichiro Taniguchi
    Research Article

    Amniogenesis, a process critical for continuation of healthy pregnancy, is triggered in a collection of pluripotent epiblast cells as the human embryo implants. Previous studies have established that bone morphogenetic protein (BMP) signaling is a major driver of this lineage specifying process, but the downstream BMP-dependent transcriptional networks that lead to successful amniogenesis remain to be identified. This is, in part, due to the current lack of a robust and reproducible model system that enables mechanistic investigations exclusively into amniogenesis. Here, we developed an improved model of early amnion specification, using a human pluripotent stem cell-based platform in which the activation of BMP signaling is controlled and synchronous. Uniform amniogenesis is seen within 48 hr after BMP activation, and the resulting cells share transcriptomic characteristics with amnion cells of a gastrulating human embryo. Using detailed time-course transcriptomic analyses, we established a previously uncharacterized BMP-dependent amniotic transcriptional cascade, and identified markers that represent five distinct stages of amnion fate specification; the expression of selected markers was validated in early post-implantation macaque embryos. Moreover, a cohort of factors that could potentially control specific stages of amniogenesis was identified, including the transcription factor TFAP2A. Functionally, we determined that, once amniogenesis is triggered by the BMP pathway, TFAP2A controls the progression of amniogenesis. This work presents a temporally resolved transcriptomic resource for several previously uncharacterized amniogenesis states and demonstrates a critical intermediate role for TFAP2A during amnion fate specification.

    1. Stem Cells and Regenerative Medicine
    Sarah Duchamp de Chastaigne, Catherine M Sawai
    Insight

    A new mathematical model can estimate the number of precursor cells that contribute to regenerating blood cells in mice.