Crucial role for T cell-intrinsic IL-18R-MyD88 signaling in cognate immune response to intracellular parasite infection

  1. Ana-Carolina Oliveira
  2. João Francisco Gomes-Neto
  3. Carlos-Henrique Dantas Barbosa
  4. Alessandra Granato
  5. Bernardo S Reis
  6. Bruno Maia Santos
  7. Rita Fucs
  8. Fábio B Canto
  9. Helder I Nakaya
  10. Alberto Nóbrega
  11. Maria Bellio  Is a corresponding author
  1. Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro (UFRJ), Brazil
  2. The Rockefeller University, United States
  3. Universidade Federal Fluminense (UFF), Brazil
  4. Universidade de São Paulo (USP), Brazil

Abstract

MyD88 is the main adaptor molecule for TLR and IL-1R family members. Here, we demonstrated that T-cell intrinsic MyD88 signaling is required for proliferation, protection from apoptosis and expression of activation/memory genes during infection with the intracellular parasite Trypanosoma cruzi, as evidenced by transcriptome and cytometry analyses in mixed bone-marrow (BM) chimeras. The lack of direct IL-18R signaling in T cells, but not of IL-1R, phenocopied the absence of the MyD88 pathway, indicating that IL-18R is a critical MyD88-upstream pathway involved in the establishment of the Th1 response against an in vivo infection, a presently controvert subject. Accordingly, Il18r1-/- mice display lower levels of Th1 cells and are highly susceptible to infection, but can be rescued from mortality by the adoptive transfer of WT CD4+ T cells. Our findings establish the T-cell intrinsic IL-18R/MyD88 pathway as a crucial element for induction of cognate Th1 responses against an important human pathogen.

Data availability

The following data sets were generated

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Ana-Carolina Oliveira

    Instituto de Biofísica Carlos Chagas Filho, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro (UFRJ), Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  2. João Francisco Gomes-Neto

    Instituto de Microbiologia Paulo de Góes, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro (UFRJ), Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  3. Carlos-Henrique Dantas Barbosa

    Instituto de Microbiologia Paulo de Góes, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro (UFRJ), Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  4. Alessandra Granato

    Instituto de Microbiologia Paulo de Góes, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro (UFRJ), Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  5. Bernardo S Reis

    The Rockefeller University, New York, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  6. Bruno Maia Santos

    Instituto de Microbiologia Paulo de Góes, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro (UFRJ), Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  7. Rita Fucs

    Instituto de Biologia, Universidade Federal Fluminense (UFF), Niteroi, Brazil
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  8. Fábio B Canto

    Instituto de Microbiologia Paulo de Góes, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro (UFRJ), Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  9. Helder I Nakaya

    Faculdade de Ciências Farmacêuticas, Universidade de São Paulo (USP), Sao Paulo, Brazil
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  10. Alberto Nóbrega

    Instituto de Microbiologia Paulo de Góes, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro (UFRJ), Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  11. Maria Bellio

    Instituto de Microbiologia Paulo de Góes, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro (UFRJ), Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
    For correspondence
    mariabellioufrj@gmail.com
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-3360-2740

Funding

Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (402932/2012-9)

  • Maria Bellio

Fundação Carlos Chagas Filho de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado do Rio de Janeiro (103.078/2011 and 110.168/2013)

  • Maria Bellio

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Reviewing Editor

  1. Urszula Krzych, Walter Reed Army Institute of Research, United States

Ethics

Animal experimentation: Experiments were conducted in strict accordance with guidelines of the Animal Care and Use Committee of the Federal University of Rio de Janeiro (Comitê de Ética do Centro de Ciências da Saúde CEUA-CCS/UFRJ). Procedures and animal protocols were approved by CEUA-CCS/UFRJ license n.: IMPPG022. Every effort was made to minimize suffering.

Version history

  1. Received: July 30, 2017
  2. Accepted: September 12, 2017
  3. Accepted Manuscript published: September 12, 2017 (version 1)
  4. Version of Record published: September 29, 2017 (version 2)

Copyright

© 2017, Oliveira et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 7,521
    views
  • 504
    downloads
  • 20
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Ana-Carolina Oliveira
  2. João Francisco Gomes-Neto
  3. Carlos-Henrique Dantas Barbosa
  4. Alessandra Granato
  5. Bernardo S Reis
  6. Bruno Maia Santos
  7. Rita Fucs
  8. Fábio B Canto
  9. Helder I Nakaya
  10. Alberto Nóbrega
  11. Maria Bellio
(2017)
Crucial role for T cell-intrinsic IL-18R-MyD88 signaling in cognate immune response to intracellular parasite infection
eLife 6:e30883.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.30883

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.30883

Further reading

    1. Immunology and Inflammation
    Xiuyuan Lu, Hiroki Hayashi ... Sho Yamasaki
    Research Article

    SARS-CoV-2 vaccines have been used worldwide to combat COVID-19 pandemic. To elucidate the factors that determine the longevity of spike (S)-specific antibodies, we traced the characteristics of S-specific T cell clonotypes together with their epitopes and anti-S antibody titers before and after BNT162b2 vaccination over time. T cell receptor (TCR) αβ sequences and mRNA expression of the S-responded T cells were investigated using single-cell TCR- and RNA-sequencing. Highly expanded 199 TCR clonotypes upon stimulation with S peptide pools were reconstituted into a reporter T cell line for the determination of epitopes and restricting HLAs. Among them, we could determine 78 S epitopes, most of which were conserved in variants of concern (VOCs). After the 2nd vaccination, T cell clonotypes highly responsive to recall S stimulation were polarized to follicular helper T (Tfh)-like cells in donors exhibiting sustained anti-S antibody titers (designated as ‘sustainers’), but not in ‘decliners’. Even before vaccination, S-reactive CD4+ T cell clonotypes did exist, most of which cross-reacted with environmental or symbiotic microbes. However, these clonotypes contracted after vaccination. Conversely, S-reactive clonotypes dominated after vaccination were undetectable in pre-vaccinated T cell pool, suggesting that highly responding S-reactive T cells were established by vaccination from rare clonotypes. These results suggest that de novo acquisition of memory Tfh-like cells upon vaccination may contribute to the longevity of anti-S antibody titers.

    1. Chromosomes and Gene Expression
    2. Immunology and Inflammation
    Rajan M Thomas, Matthew C Pahl ... Andrew D Wells
    Research Article

    Ikaros is a transcriptional factor required for conventional T cell development, differentiation, and anergy. While the related factors Helios and Eos have defined roles in regulatory T cells (Treg), a role for Ikaros has not been established. To determine the function of Ikaros in the Treg lineage, we generated mice with Treg-specific deletion of the Ikaros gene (Ikzf1). We find that Ikaros cooperates with Foxp3 to establish a major portion of the Treg epigenome and transcriptome. Ikaros-deficient Treg exhibit Th1-like gene expression with abnormal production of IL-2, IFNg, TNFa, and factors involved in Wnt and Notch signaling. While Ikzf1-Treg-cko mice do not develop spontaneous autoimmunity, Ikaros-deficient Treg are unable to control conventional T cell-mediated immune pathology in response to TCR and inflammatory stimuli in models of IBD and organ transplantation. These studies establish Ikaros as a core factor required in Treg for tolerance and the control of inflammatory immune responses.