Crucial role for T cell-intrinsic IL-18R-MyD88 signaling in cognate immune response to intracellular parasite infection

  1. Ana-Carolina Oliveira
  2. João Francisco Gomes-Neto
  3. Carlos-Henrique Dantas Barbosa
  4. Alessandra Granato
  5. Bernardo S Reis
  6. Bruno Maia Santos
  7. Rita Fucs
  8. Fábio B Canto
  9. Helder I Nakaya
  10. Alberto Nóbrega
  11. Maria Bellio  Is a corresponding author
  1. Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro (UFRJ), Brazil
  2. The Rockefeller University, United States
  3. Universidade Federal Fluminense (UFF), Brazil
  4. Universidade de São Paulo (USP), Brazil

Abstract

MyD88 is the main adaptor molecule for TLR and IL-1R family members. Here, we demonstrated that T-cell intrinsic MyD88 signaling is required for proliferation, protection from apoptosis and expression of activation/memory genes during infection with the intracellular parasite Trypanosoma cruzi, as evidenced by transcriptome and cytometry analyses in mixed bone-marrow (BM) chimeras. The lack of direct IL-18R signaling in T cells, but not of IL-1R, phenocopied the absence of the MyD88 pathway, indicating that IL-18R is a critical MyD88-upstream pathway involved in the establishment of the Th1 response against an in vivo infection, a presently controvert subject. Accordingly, Il18r1-/- mice display lower levels of Th1 cells and are highly susceptible to infection, but can be rescued from mortality by the adoptive transfer of WT CD4+ T cells. Our findings establish the T-cell intrinsic IL-18R/MyD88 pathway as a crucial element for induction of cognate Th1 responses against an important human pathogen.

Data availability

The following data sets were generated

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Ana-Carolina Oliveira

    Instituto de Biofísica Carlos Chagas Filho, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro (UFRJ), Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  2. João Francisco Gomes-Neto

    Instituto de Microbiologia Paulo de Góes, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro (UFRJ), Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  3. Carlos-Henrique Dantas Barbosa

    Instituto de Microbiologia Paulo de Góes, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro (UFRJ), Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  4. Alessandra Granato

    Instituto de Microbiologia Paulo de Góes, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro (UFRJ), Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  5. Bernardo S Reis

    The Rockefeller University, New York, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  6. Bruno Maia Santos

    Instituto de Microbiologia Paulo de Góes, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro (UFRJ), Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  7. Rita Fucs

    Instituto de Biologia, Universidade Federal Fluminense (UFF), Niteroi, Brazil
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  8. Fábio B Canto

    Instituto de Microbiologia Paulo de Góes, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro (UFRJ), Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  9. Helder I Nakaya

    Faculdade de Ciências Farmacêuticas, Universidade de São Paulo (USP), Sao Paulo, Brazil
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  10. Alberto Nóbrega

    Instituto de Microbiologia Paulo de Góes, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro (UFRJ), Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  11. Maria Bellio

    Instituto de Microbiologia Paulo de Góes, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro (UFRJ), Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
    For correspondence
    mariabellioufrj@gmail.com
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-3360-2740

Funding

Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (402932/2012-9)

  • Maria Bellio

Fundação Carlos Chagas Filho de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado do Rio de Janeiro (103.078/2011 and 110.168/2013)

  • Maria Bellio

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Reviewing Editor

  1. Urszula Krzych, Walter Reed Army Institute of Research, United States

Ethics

Animal experimentation: Experiments were conducted in strict accordance with guidelines of the Animal Care and Use Committee of the Federal University of Rio de Janeiro (Comitê de Ética do Centro de Ciências da Saúde CEUA-CCS/UFRJ). Procedures and animal protocols were approved by CEUA-CCS/UFRJ license n.: IMPPG022. Every effort was made to minimize suffering.

Version history

  1. Received: July 30, 2017
  2. Accepted: September 12, 2017
  3. Accepted Manuscript published: September 12, 2017 (version 1)
  4. Version of Record published: September 29, 2017 (version 2)

Copyright

© 2017, Oliveira et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 7,574
    views
  • 508
    downloads
  • 21
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Ana-Carolina Oliveira
  2. João Francisco Gomes-Neto
  3. Carlos-Henrique Dantas Barbosa
  4. Alessandra Granato
  5. Bernardo S Reis
  6. Bruno Maia Santos
  7. Rita Fucs
  8. Fábio B Canto
  9. Helder I Nakaya
  10. Alberto Nóbrega
  11. Maria Bellio
(2017)
Crucial role for T cell-intrinsic IL-18R-MyD88 signaling in cognate immune response to intracellular parasite infection
eLife 6:e30883.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.30883

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.30883

Further reading

    1. Cell Biology
    2. Immunology and Inflammation
    Kevin Portmann, Aline Linder, Klaus Eyer
    Research Article

    Cytokine polyfunctionality is a well-established concept in immune cells, especially T cells, and their ability to concurrently produce multiple cytokines has been associated with better immunological disease control and subsequent effectiveness during infection and disease. To date, only little is known about the secretion dynamics of those cells, masked by the widespread deployment of mainly time-integrated endpoint measurement techniques that do not easily differentiate between concurrent and sequential secretion. Here, we employed a single-cell microfluidic platform capable of resolving the secretion dynamics of individual PBMCs. To study the dynamics of poly-cytokine secretion, as well as the dynamics of concurrent and sequential polyfunctionality, we analyzed the response at different time points after ex vivo activation. First, we observed the simultaneous secretion of cytokines over the measurement time for most stimulants in a subpopulation of cells only. Second, polyfunctionality generally decreased with prolonged stimulation times and revealed no correlation with the concentration of secreted cytokines in response to stimulation. However, we observed a general trend towards higher cytokine secretion in polyfunctional cells, with their secretion dynamics being distinctly different from mono-cytokine-secreting cells. This study provided insights into the distinct secretion behavior of heterogenous cell populations after stimulation with well-described agents and such a system could provide a better understanding of various immune dynamics in therapy and disease.

    1. Immunology and Inflammation
    2. Medicine
    Joanna C Porter, Jamie Inshaw ... Venizelos Papayannopoulos
    Research Article

    Background:

    Prinflammatory extracellular chromatin from neutrophil extracellular traps (NETs) and other cellular sources is found in COVID-19 patients and may promote pathology. We determined whether pulmonary administration of the endonuclease dornase alfa reduced systemic inflammation by clearing extracellular chromatin.

    Methods:

    Eligible patients were randomized (3:1) to the best available care including dexamethasone (R-BAC) or to BAC with twice-daily nebulized dornase alfa (R-BAC + DA) for seven days or until discharge. A 2:1 ratio of matched contemporary controls (CC-BAC) provided additional comparators. The primary endpoint was the improvement in C-reactive protein (CRP) over time, analyzed using a repeated-measures mixed model, adjusted for baseline factors.

    Results:

    We recruited 39 evaluable participants: 30 randomized to dornase alfa (R-BAC +DA), 9 randomized to BAC (R-BAC), and included 60 CC-BAC participants. Dornase alfa was well tolerated and reduced CRP by 33% compared to the combined BAC groups (T-BAC). Least squares (LS) mean post-dexamethasone CRP fell from 101.9 mg/L to 23.23 mg/L in R-BAC +DA participants versus a 99.5 mg/L to 34.82 mg/L reduction in the T-BAC group at 7 days; p=0.01. The anti-inflammatory effect of dornase alfa was further confirmed with subgroup and sensitivity analyses on randomised participants only, mitigating potential biases associated with the use of CC-BAC participants. Dornase alfa increased live discharge rates by 63% (HR 1.63, 95% CI 1.01–2.61, p=0.03), increased lymphocyte counts (LS mean: 1.08 vs 0.87, p=0.02) and reduced circulating cf-DNA and the coagulopathy marker D-dimer (LS mean: 570.78 vs 1656.96 μg/mL, p=0.004).

    Conclusions:

    Dornase alfa reduces pathogenic inflammation in COVID-19 pneumonia, demonstrating the benefit of cost-effective therapies that target extracellular chromatin.

    Funding:

    LifeArc, Breathing Matters, The Francis Crick Institute (CRUK, Medical Research Council, Wellcome Trust).

    Clinical trial number:

    NCT04359654.