Otoferlin acts as a Ca2+ sensor for vesicle fusion and vesicle pool replenishment at auditory hair cell ribbon synapses

  1. Nicolas Antoine Michalski  Is a corresponding author
  2. Juan D Goutman
  3. Sarah Marie Auclair
  4. Jacques Boutet de Monvel
  5. Margot Tertrais
  6. Alice Emptoz
  7. Alexandre Parrin
  8. Sylvie Nouaille
  9. Marc Guillon
  10. Martin Sachse
  11. Danica Ciric
  12. Amel Bahloul
  13. Jean-Pierre Hardelin
  14. Roger Bryan Sutton
  15. Paul Avan
  16. Shyam S Krishnakumar
  17. James E Rothman
  18. Didier Dulon
  19. Saaid Safieddine
  20. Christine Petit  Is a corresponding author
  1. Institut Pasteur, France
  2. Universidad de Buenos Aires, Argentina
  3. Yale University School of Medicine, United States
  4. UMRS 1120, Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale (INSERM), France
  5. Université Paris Descartes, Sorbonne Paris Cité, France
  6. Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center, United States
  7. Université d'Auvergne, France

Abstract

Hearing relies on rapid, temporally precise, and sustained neurotransmitter release at the ribbon synapses of sensory cells, the inner hair cells (IHCs). This process requires otoferlin, a six C2-domain, Ca2+-binding transmembrane protein of synaptic vesicles. To decipher the role of otoferlin in the synaptic vesicle cycle, we produced knock-in mice (OtofAla515,Ala517/Ala515,Ala517) with lower Ca2+-binding affinity of the C2C domain. The IHC ribbon synapse structure, synaptic Ca2+ currents, and otoferlin distribution were unaffected in these mutant mice, but auditory brainstem response wave-I amplitude was reduced. Lower Ca2+ sensitivity and delay of the fast and sustained components of synaptic exocytosis were revealed by membrane capacitance measurement upon modulations of intracellular Ca2+ concentration, by varying Ca2+ influx through voltage-gated Ca2+-channels or Ca2+ uncaging. Otoferlin thus functions as a Ca2+ sensor, setting the rates of primed vesicle fusion with the presynaptic plasma membrane and synaptic vesicle pool replenishment in the IHC active zone.

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Nicolas Antoine Michalski

    Unité de Génétique et Physiologie de l'Audition, Institut Pasteur, Paris, France
    For correspondence
    nicolas.michalski@pasteur.fr
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  2. Juan D Goutman

    Instituto de Investigaciones en Ingeniería Genética y Biología Molecular, Universidad de Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  3. Sarah Marie Auclair

    Department of Cell Biology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  4. Jacques Boutet de Monvel

    Unité de Génétique et Physiologie de l'Audition, Institut Pasteur, Paris, France
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  5. Margot Tertrais

    UMRS 1120, Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale (INSERM), Paris, France
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  6. Alice Emptoz

    Unité de Génétique et Physiologie de l'Audition, Institut Pasteur, Paris, France
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  7. Alexandre Parrin

    Unité de Génétique et Physiologie de l'Audition, Institut Pasteur, Paris, France
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  8. Sylvie Nouaille

    Unité de Génétique et Physiologie de l'Audition, Institut Pasteur, Paris, France
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  9. Marc Guillon

    Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique UMR 8250, Université Paris Descartes, Sorbonne Paris Cité, Paris, France
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  10. Martin Sachse

    Center for Innovation and Technological Research, Ultrapole, Institut Pasteur, Paris, France
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  11. Danica Ciric

    Unité de Génétique et Physiologie de l'Audition, Institut Pasteur, Paris, France
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  12. Amel Bahloul

    Unité de Génétique et Physiologie de l'Audition, Institut Pasteur, Paris, France
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  13. Jean-Pierre Hardelin

    Unité de Génétique et Physiologie de l'Audition, Institut Pasteur, Paris, France
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  14. Roger Bryan Sutton

    Department of Cell Physiology and Molecular Biophysics, Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center, Lubbock, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  15. Paul Avan

    Laboratoire de Biophysique Sensorielle, Université d'Auvergne, Clermont-Ferrand, France
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  16. Shyam S Krishnakumar

    Department of Cell Biology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-6148-3251
  17. James E Rothman

    Department of Cell Biology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-8653-8650
  18. Didier Dulon

    UMRS 1120, Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale (INSERM), Paris, France
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  19. Saaid Safieddine

    Unité de Génétique et Physiologie de l'Audition, Institut Pasteur, Paris, France
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  20. Christine Petit

    Unité de Génétique et Physiologie de l'Audition, Institut Pasteur, Paris, France
    For correspondence
    christine.petit@pasteur.fr
    Competing interests
    Christine Petit, Reviewing editor, eLife.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-9069-002X

Funding

Foundation Raymonde et Guy Strittmatter (Research project grant)

  • Christine Petit

Foundation BNP Parisbas (Research project grant)

  • Christine Petit

LHW-Stiftung (Research project grant)

  • Christine Petit

LabExLifesenses (ANR‐10‐LABX‐65)

  • Christine Petit

Investissements d'Avenir (ANR‐11‐IDEX‐0004‐02)

  • Christine Petit

Agir pour l'Audition (Prix Emergence scientifique)

  • Nicolas Antoine Michalski

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Reviewing Editor

  1. Christian Rosenmund, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Germany

Ethics

Animal experimentation: Animal experiments were carried out in accordance with European Community Council Directive 2010/63/UE under authorizations 2012-028, 2012-038, and 2014-005 from the Institut Pasteur ethics committee for animal experimentation.

Version history

  1. Received: August 11, 2017
  2. Accepted: November 6, 2017
  3. Accepted Manuscript published: November 7, 2017 (version 1)
  4. Version of Record published: November 23, 2017 (version 2)

Copyright

© 2017, Michalski et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 3,120
    views
  • 593
    downloads
  • 90
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Nicolas Antoine Michalski
  2. Juan D Goutman
  3. Sarah Marie Auclair
  4. Jacques Boutet de Monvel
  5. Margot Tertrais
  6. Alice Emptoz
  7. Alexandre Parrin
  8. Sylvie Nouaille
  9. Marc Guillon
  10. Martin Sachse
  11. Danica Ciric
  12. Amel Bahloul
  13. Jean-Pierre Hardelin
  14. Roger Bryan Sutton
  15. Paul Avan
  16. Shyam S Krishnakumar
  17. James E Rothman
  18. Didier Dulon
  19. Saaid Safieddine
  20. Christine Petit
(2017)
Otoferlin acts as a Ca2+ sensor for vesicle fusion and vesicle pool replenishment at auditory hair cell ribbon synapses
eLife 6:e31013.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.31013

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.31013

Further reading

    1. Neuroscience
    Zahid Padamsey, Danai Katsanevaki ... Nathalie L Rochefort
    Research Article

    Mammals have evolved sex-specific adaptations to reduce energy usage in times of food scarcity. These adaptations are well described for peripheral tissue, though much less is known about how the energy-expensive brain adapts to food restriction, and how such adaptations differ across the sexes. Here, we examined how food restriction impacts energy usage and function in the primary visual cortex (V1) of adult male and female mice. Molecular analysis and RNA sequencing in V1 revealed that in males, but not in females, food restriction significantly modulated canonical, energy-regulating pathways, including pathways associated waith AMP-activated protein kinase, peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor alpha, mammalian target of rapamycin, and oxidative phosphorylation. Moreover, we found that in contrast to males, food restriction in females did not significantly affect V1 ATP usage or visual coding precision (assessed by orientation selectivity). Decreased serum leptin is known to be necessary for triggering energy-saving changes in V1 during food restriction. Consistent with this, we found significantly decreased serum leptin in food-restricted males but no significant change in food-restricted females. Collectively, our findings demonstrate that cortical function and energy usage in female mice are more resilient to food restriction than in males. The neocortex, therefore, contributes to sex-specific, energy-saving adaptations in response to food restriction.

    1. Neuroscience
    Jack W Lindsey, Elias B Issa
    Research Article

    Object classification has been proposed as a principal objective of the primate ventral visual stream and has been used as an optimization target for deep neural network models (DNNs) of the visual system. However, visual brain areas represent many different types of information, and optimizing for classification of object identity alone does not constrain how other information may be encoded in visual representations. Information about different scene parameters may be discarded altogether (‘invariance’), represented in non-interfering subspaces of population activity (‘factorization’) or encoded in an entangled fashion. In this work, we provide evidence that factorization is a normative principle of biological visual representations. In the monkey ventral visual hierarchy, we found that factorization of object pose and background information from object identity increased in higher-level regions and strongly contributed to improving object identity decoding performance. We then conducted a large-scale analysis of factorization of individual scene parameters – lighting, background, camera viewpoint, and object pose – in a diverse library of DNN models of the visual system. Models which best matched neural, fMRI, and behavioral data from both monkeys and humans across 12 datasets tended to be those which factorized scene parameters most strongly. Notably, invariance to these parameters was not as consistently associated with matches to neural and behavioral data, suggesting that maintaining non-class information in factorized activity subspaces is often preferred to dropping it altogether. Thus, we propose that factorization of visual scene information is a widely used strategy in brains and DNN models thereof.