Dephosphorylation of the NPR2 guanylyl cyclase contributes to inhibition of bone growth by fibroblast growth factor

  1. Leia C Shuhaibar  Is a corresponding author
  2. Jerid W Robinson
  3. Giulia Vigone
  4. Ninna P Shuhaibar
  5. Jeremy R Egbert
  6. Valentina Baena
  7. Tracy F Uliasz
  8. Deborah Kaback
  9. Siu-Pok Yee
  10. Robert Feil
  11. Melanie C Fisher
  12. Caroline N Dealy
  13. Lincoln R Potter  Is a corresponding author
  14. Laurinda A Jaffe  Is a corresponding author
  1. University of Connecticut Health Center, United States
  2. University of Minnesota, United States
  3. University of Tübingen, Germany

Abstract

Activating mutations in fibroblast growth factor (FGF) receptor 3 and inactivating mutations in the NPR2 guanylyl cyclase both cause severe short stature, but how these two signaling systems interact to regulate bone growth is poorly understood. Here, we show that bone elongation is increased when NPR2 cannot be dephosphorylated and thus produces more cyclic GMP. By developing an in vivo imaging system to measure cyclic GMP production in intact tibia, we show that FGF-induced dephosphorylation of NPR2 decreases its guanylyl cyclase activity in growth plate chondrocytes in living bone. Thus FGF signaling lowers cyclic GMP production in the growth plate, which counteracts bone elongation. These results define a new component of the signaling network by which activating mutations in the FGF receptor inhibit bone growth.

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Leia C Shuhaibar

    Department of Cell Biology, University of Connecticut Health Center, Farmington, United States
    For correspondence
    shuhaibar@uchc.edu
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  2. Jerid W Robinson

    Department of Biochemistry, Molecular Biology, and Biophysics, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  3. Giulia Vigone

    Department of Cell Biology, University of Connecticut Health Center, Farmington, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  4. Ninna P Shuhaibar

    Department of Cell Biology, University of Connecticut Health Center, Farmington, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  5. Jeremy R Egbert

    Department of Cell Biology, University of Connecticut Health Center, Farmington, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  6. Valentina Baena

    Department of Cell Biology, University of Connecticut Health Center, Farmington, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  7. Tracy F Uliasz

    Department of Cell Biology, University of Connecticut Health Center, Farmington, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  8. Deborah Kaback

    Department of Cell Biology, University of Connecticut Health Center, Farmington, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  9. Siu-Pok Yee

    Department of Cell Biology, University of Connecticut Health Center, Farmington, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  10. Robert Feil

    Department of Biochemistry, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  11. Melanie C Fisher

    Center for Regenerative Medicine and Skeletal Development, University of Connecticut Health Center, Farmington, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  12. Caroline N Dealy

    Center for Regenerative Medicine and Skeletal Development, University of Connecticut Health Center, Farmington, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  13. Lincoln R Potter

    Department of Biochemistry, Molecular Biology, and Biophysics, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, United States
    For correspondence
    potter@umn.edu
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  14. Laurinda A Jaffe

    Department of Cell Biology, University of Connecticut Health Center, Farmington, United States
    For correspondence
    ljaffe@uchc.edu
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-2636-5721

Funding

Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (R37HD014939)

  • Laurinda A Jaffe

National Institute of General Medical Sciences (R01GM098309)

  • Lincoln R Potter

National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (Postdoctoral training grant:T32DK007203)

  • Jerid W Robinson

National Institute of Dental and Craniofacial Research (Postdoctoral training grant:R90DE022526)

  • Ninna P Shuhaibar

Fund for Science (Postdoctoral scholarship (mentor)))

  • Laurinda A Jaffe

Fund for Science (Postdoctoral scholarship (postdoc)))

  • Leia C Shuhaibar

Fund for Science (Research grant)

  • Caroline N Dealy

Fund for Science (Research grant)

  • Lincoln R Potter

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Ethics

Animal experimentation: All experiments were conducted as approved by the animal care committees of the University of Connecticut Health Center (101395-0519) and the University of Minnesota (1507-32769A).

Copyright

© 2017, Shuhaibar et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 1,796
    views
  • 276
    downloads
  • 27
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.31343

Further reading

    1. Developmental Biology
    Kayleigh Bozon, Hartmut Cuny ... Sally L Dunwoodie
    Research Article

    Congenital malformations can originate from numerous genetic or non-genetic factors but in most cases the causes are unknown. Genetic disruption of nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide (NAD) de novo synthesis causes multiple malformations, collectively termed Congenital NAD Deficiency Disorder (CNDD), highlighting the necessity of this pathway during embryogenesis. Previous work in mice shows that NAD deficiency perturbs embryonic development specifically when organs are forming. While the pathway is predominantly active in the liver postnatally, the site of activity prior to and during organogenesis is unknown. Here, we used a mouse model of human CNDD and assessed pathway functionality in embryonic livers and extraembryonic tissues via gene expression, enzyme activity and metabolic analyses. We found that the extra-embryonic visceral yolk sac endoderm exclusively synthesises NAD de novo during early organogenesis before the embryonic liver takes over this function. Under CNDD-inducing conditions, visceral yolk sacs had reduced NAD levels and altered NAD-related metabolic profiles, affecting embryo metabolism. Expression of requisite pathway genes is conserved in the equivalent yolk sac cell type in humans. Our findings show that visceral yolk sac-mediated NAD de novo synthesis activity is essential for mouse embryogenesis and its perturbation causes CNDD. As mouse and human yolk sacs are functionally homologous, our data improve the understanding of human congenital malformation causation.

    1. Developmental Biology
    Yanlin Hou, Zhengwen Nie ... Hans R Scholer
    Research Article

    During the first lineage segregation, mammalian embryos generate the inner cell mass (ICM) and trophectoderm (TE). ICM gives rise to the epiblast (EPI) that forms all cell types of the body, an ability referred to as pluripotency. The molecular mechanisms that induce pluripotency in embryos remain incompletely elucidated. Using knockout (KO) mouse models in conjunction with low-input ATAC-seq and RNA-seq, we found that Oct4 and Sox2 gradually come into play in the early ICM, coinciding with the initiation of Sox2 expression. Oct4 and Sox2 activate the pluripotency-related genes through the putative OCT-SOX enhancers in the early ICM. Furthermore, we observed a substantial reorganization of chromatin landscape and transcriptome from the morula to the early ICM stages, which was partially driven by Oct4 and Sox2, highlighting their pivotal role in promoting the developmental trajectory toward the ICM. Our study provides new insights into the establishment of the pluripotency network in mouse preimplantation embryos.