Inhibition of oxidative stress in cholinergic projection neurons fully rescues aging associated olfactory circuit degeneration in Drosophila

  1. Ashiq Hussain
  2. Atefeh Pooryasin
  3. Mo Zhang
  4. Laura F Loschek
  5. Marco La Fortezza
  6. Anja B Friedrich
  7. Catherine-Marie Blais
  8. Habibe K Üçpunar
  9. Vicente A Yépez
  10. Martin Lehmann
  11. Nicolas Gompel
  12. Julien Gagneur
  13. Stephan J Sigrist
  14. Ilona C Grunwald Kadow  Is a corresponding author
  1. Technical University of Munich, Germany
  2. Free University of Berlin, Germany
  3. Max-Planck Institute of Neurobiology, Germany
  4. Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, Germany
  5. Leibniz-Forschungsinstitut für Molekulare Pharmakologie, Germany

Abstract

Loss of the sense of smell is among the first signs of natural aging and neurodegenerative diseases such as Alzheimer's and Parkinson's. Cellular and molecular mechanisms promoting this smell loss are not understood. Here, we show that Drosophila melanogaster also loses olfaction before vision with age. Within the olfactory circuit, cholinergic projection neurons show a reduced odor response accompanied by a defect in axonal integrity and reduction in synaptic marker proteins. Using behavioral functional screening, we pinpoint that expression of the mitochondrial reactive oxygen scavenger SOD2 in cholinergic projection neurons is necessary and sufficient to prevent smell degeneration in aging flies. Together, our data show that oxidative stress induced axonal degeneration in a single class of neurons drives the functional decline of an entire neural network and the behavior it controls. Given the important role of the cholinergic system in neurodegeneration, the fly olfactory system could be a useful model for the identification of drug targets.

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Ashiq Hussain

    School of Life Sciences, Technical University of Munich, Freising, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  2. Atefeh Pooryasin

    Institute of Biology, Free University of Berlin, Berlin, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  3. Mo Zhang

    Max-Planck Institute of Neurobiology, Martinsried, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  4. Laura F Loschek

    Max-Planck Institute of Neurobiology, Martinsried, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  5. Marco La Fortezza

    Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, Martinsried, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  6. Anja B Friedrich

    School of Life Sciences, Technical University of Munich, Freising, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  7. Catherine-Marie Blais

    School of Life Sciences, Technical University of Munich, Freising, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  8. Habibe K Üçpunar

    Max-Planck Institute of Neurobiology, Martinsried, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  9. Vicente A Yépez

    Department of Informatics, Technical University of Munich, Garching, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  10. Martin Lehmann

    Department of Molecular Pharmacology and Cell Biology, Leibniz-Forschungsinstitut für Molekulare Pharmakologie, Berlin, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  11. Nicolas Gompel

    Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, Martinsried, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  12. Julien Gagneur

    Department of Informatics, Technical University of Munich, Garching, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-8924-8365
  13. Stephan J Sigrist

    Institute of Biology, Free University of Berlin, Berlin, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  14. Ilona C Grunwald Kadow

    School of Life Sciences, Technical University of Munich, Freising, Germany
    For correspondence
    ilona.grunwald@tum.de
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-9085-4274

Funding

H2020 European Research Council (FlyContext)

  • Ilona C Grunwald Kadow

European Molecular Biology Organization (EMBO Young Investigator Small Grant)

  • Ilona C Grunwald Kadow

Max-Planck-Gesellschaft (Open-access funding)

  • Ilona C Grunwald Kadow

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Copyright

© 2018, Hussain et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 4,881
    views
  • 615
    downloads
  • 26
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Ashiq Hussain
  2. Atefeh Pooryasin
  3. Mo Zhang
  4. Laura F Loschek
  5. Marco La Fortezza
  6. Anja B Friedrich
  7. Catherine-Marie Blais
  8. Habibe K Üçpunar
  9. Vicente A Yépez
  10. Martin Lehmann
  11. Nicolas Gompel
  12. Julien Gagneur
  13. Stephan J Sigrist
  14. Ilona C Grunwald Kadow
(2018)
Inhibition of oxidative stress in cholinergic projection neurons fully rescues aging associated olfactory circuit degeneration in Drosophila
eLife 7:e32018.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.32018

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.32018

Further reading

    1. Neuroscience
    Roshani Nhuchhen Pradhan, Craig Montell, Youngseok Lee
    Research Article

    The question as to whether animals taste cholesterol taste is not resolved. This study investigates whether the fruit fly, Drosophila melanogaster, is capable of detecting cholesterol through their gustatory system. We found that flies are indifferent to low levels of cholesterol and avoid higher levels. The avoidance is mediated by gustatory receptor neurons (GRNs), demonstrating that flies can taste cholesterol. The cholesterol-responsive GRNs comprise a subset that also responds to bitter substances. Cholesterol detection depends on five ionotropic receptor (IR) family members, and disrupting any of these genes impairs the flies' ability to avoid cholesterol. Ectopic expressions of these IRs in GRNs reveals two classes of cholesterol receptors, each with three shared IRs and one unique subunit. Additionally, expressing cholesterol receptors in sugar-responsive GRNs confers attraction to cholesterol. This study reveals that flies can taste cholesterol, and that the detection depends on IRs in GRNs.

    1. Neuroscience
    Kayson Fakhar, Fatemeh Hadaeghi ... Claus C Hilgetag
    Research Article

    Efficient communication in brain networks is foundational for cognitive function and behavior. However, how communication efficiency is defined depends on the assumed model of signaling dynamics, e.g., shortest path signaling, random walker navigation, broadcasting, and diffusive processes. Thus, a general and model-agnostic framework for characterizing optimal neural communication is needed. We address this challenge by assigning communication efficiency through a virtual multi-site lesioning regime combined with game theory, applied to large-scale models of human brain dynamics. Our framework quantifies the exact influence each node exerts over every other, generating optimal influence maps given the underlying model of neural dynamics. These descriptions reveal how communication patterns unfold if regions are set to maximize their influence over one another. Comparing these maps with a variety of brain communication models showed that optimal communication closely resembles a broadcasting regime in which regions leverage multiple parallel channels for information dissemination. Moreover, we found that the brain’s most influential regions are its rich-club, exploiting their topological vantage point by broadcasting across numerous pathways that enhance their reach even if the underlying connections are weak. Altogether, our work provides a rigorous and versatile framework for characterizing optimal brain communication, and uncovers the most influential brain regions, and the topological features underlying their influence.