Inhibition of oxidative stress in cholinergic projection neurons fully rescues aging associated olfactory circuit degeneration in Drosophila

  1. Ashiq Hussain
  2. Atefeh Pooryasin
  3. Mo Zhang
  4. Laura F Loschek
  5. Marco La Fortezza
  6. Anja B Friedrich
  7. Catherine-Marie Blais
  8. Habibe K Üçpunar
  9. Vicente A Yépez
  10. Martin Lehmann
  11. Nicolas Gompel
  12. Julien Gagneur
  13. Stephan J Sigrist
  14. Ilona C Grunwald Kadow  Is a corresponding author
  1. Technical University of Munich, Germany
  2. Free University of Berlin, Germany
  3. Max-Planck Institute of Neurobiology, Germany
  4. Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, Germany
  5. Leibniz-Forschungsinstitut für Molekulare Pharmakologie, Germany

Abstract

Loss of the sense of smell is among the first signs of natural aging and neurodegenerative diseases such as Alzheimer's and Parkinson's. Cellular and molecular mechanisms promoting this smell loss are not understood. Here, we show that Drosophila melanogaster also loses olfaction before vision with age. Within the olfactory circuit, cholinergic projection neurons show a reduced odor response accompanied by a defect in axonal integrity and reduction in synaptic marker proteins. Using behavioral functional screening, we pinpoint that expression of the mitochondrial reactive oxygen scavenger SOD2 in cholinergic projection neurons is necessary and sufficient to prevent smell degeneration in aging flies. Together, our data show that oxidative stress induced axonal degeneration in a single class of neurons drives the functional decline of an entire neural network and the behavior it controls. Given the important role of the cholinergic system in neurodegeneration, the fly olfactory system could be a useful model for the identification of drug targets.

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Ashiq Hussain

    School of Life Sciences, Technical University of Munich, Freising, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  2. Atefeh Pooryasin

    Institute of Biology, Free University of Berlin, Berlin, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  3. Mo Zhang

    Max-Planck Institute of Neurobiology, Martinsried, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  4. Laura F Loschek

    Max-Planck Institute of Neurobiology, Martinsried, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  5. Marco La Fortezza

    Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, Martinsried, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  6. Anja B Friedrich

    School of Life Sciences, Technical University of Munich, Freising, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  7. Catherine-Marie Blais

    School of Life Sciences, Technical University of Munich, Freising, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  8. Habibe K Üçpunar

    Max-Planck Institute of Neurobiology, Martinsried, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  9. Vicente A Yépez

    Department of Informatics, Technical University of Munich, Garching, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  10. Martin Lehmann

    Department of Molecular Pharmacology and Cell Biology, Leibniz-Forschungsinstitut für Molekulare Pharmakologie, Berlin, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  11. Nicolas Gompel

    Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, Martinsried, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  12. Julien Gagneur

    Department of Informatics, Technical University of Munich, Garching, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-8924-8365
  13. Stephan J Sigrist

    Institute of Biology, Free University of Berlin, Berlin, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  14. Ilona C Grunwald Kadow

    School of Life Sciences, Technical University of Munich, Freising, Germany
    For correspondence
    ilona.grunwald@tum.de
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-9085-4274

Funding

H2020 European Research Council (FlyContext)

  • Ilona C Grunwald Kadow

European Molecular Biology Organization (EMBO Young Investigator Small Grant)

  • Ilona C Grunwald Kadow

Max-Planck-Gesellschaft (Open-access funding)

  • Ilona C Grunwald Kadow

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Reviewing Editor

  1. Patrik Verstreken, VIB-KU Leuven, Belgium

Version history

  1. Received: September 14, 2017
  2. Accepted: January 16, 2018
  3. Accepted Manuscript published: January 18, 2018 (version 1)
  4. Version of Record published: January 30, 2018 (version 2)

Copyright

© 2018, Hussain et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 4,649
    views
  • 586
    downloads
  • 20
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Ashiq Hussain
  2. Atefeh Pooryasin
  3. Mo Zhang
  4. Laura F Loschek
  5. Marco La Fortezza
  6. Anja B Friedrich
  7. Catherine-Marie Blais
  8. Habibe K Üçpunar
  9. Vicente A Yépez
  10. Martin Lehmann
  11. Nicolas Gompel
  12. Julien Gagneur
  13. Stephan J Sigrist
  14. Ilona C Grunwald Kadow
(2018)
Inhibition of oxidative stress in cholinergic projection neurons fully rescues aging associated olfactory circuit degeneration in Drosophila
eLife 7:e32018.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.32018

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.32018

Further reading

    1. Neuroscience
    Yu-Feng Xie, Jane Yang ... Steven A Prescott
    Research Article

    Nociceptive sensory neurons convey pain-related signals to the CNS using action potentials. Loss-of-function mutations in the voltage-gated sodium channel NaV1.7 cause insensitivity to pain (presumably by reducing nociceptor excitability) but clinical trials seeking to treat pain by inhibiting NaV1.7 pharmacologically have struggled. This may reflect the variable contribution of NaV1.7 to nociceptor excitability. Contrary to claims that NaV1.7 is necessary for nociceptors to initiate action potentials, we show that nociceptors can achieve similar excitability using different combinations of NaV1.3, NaV1.7, and NaV1.8. Selectively blocking one of those NaV subtypes reduces nociceptor excitability only if the other subtypes are weakly expressed. For example, excitability relies on NaV1.8 in acutely dissociated nociceptors but responsibility shifts to NaV1.7 and NaV1.3 by the fourth day in culture. A similar shift in NaV dependence occurs in vivo after inflammation, impacting ability of the NaV1.7-selective inhibitor PF-05089771 to reduce pain in behavioral tests. Flexible use of different NaV subtypes exemplifies degeneracy – achieving similar function using different components – and compromises reliable modulation of nociceptor excitability by subtype-selective inhibitors. Identifying the dominant NaV subtype to predict drug efficacy is not trivial. Degeneracy at the cellular level must be considered when choosing drug targets at the molecular level.

    1. Neuroscience
    Mischa Vance Bandet, Ian Robert Winship
    Research Article

    Despite substantial progress in mapping the trajectory of network plasticity resulting from focal ischemic stroke, the extent and nature of changes in neuronal excitability and activity within the peri-infarct cortex of mice remains poorly defined. Most of the available data have been acquired from anesthetized animals, acute tissue slices, or infer changes in excitability from immunoassays on extracted tissue, and thus may not reflect cortical activity dynamics in the intact cortex of an awake animal. Here, in vivo two-photon calcium imaging in awake, behaving mice was used to longitudinally track cortical activity, network functional connectivity, and neural assembly architecture for 2 months following photothrombotic stroke targeting the forelimb somatosensory cortex. Sensorimotor recovery was tracked over the weeks following stroke, allowing us to relate network changes to behavior. Our data revealed spatially restricted but long-lasting alterations in somatosensory neural network function and connectivity. Specifically, we demonstrate significant and long-lasting disruptions in neural assembly architecture concurrent with a deficit in functional connectivity between individual neurons. Reductions in neuronal spiking in peri-infarct cortex were transient but predictive of impairment in skilled locomotion measured in the tapered beam task. Notably, altered neural networks were highly localized, with assembly architecture and neural connectivity relatively unaltered a short distance from the peri-infarct cortex, even in regions within ‘remapped’ forelimb functional representations identified using mesoscale imaging with anaesthetized preparations 8 weeks after stroke. Thus, using longitudinal two-photon microscopy in awake animals, these data show a complex spatiotemporal relationship between peri-infarct neuronal network function and behavioral recovery. Moreover, the data highlight an apparent disconnect between dramatic functional remapping identified using strong sensory stimulation in anaesthetized mice compared to more subtle and spatially restricted changes in individual neuron and local network function in awake mice during stroke recovery.