Two-photon imaging in mice shows striosomes and matrix have overlapping but differential reinforcement-related responses

  1. Bernard Bloem
  2. Rafiq Huda
  3. Mriganka Sur
  4. Ann M Graybiel  Is a corresponding author
  1. Massachusetts Institute of Technology, United States

Abstract

Despite the discovery of striosomes several decades ago, technical hurdles have hampered the study of the functions of these striatal compartments. Here we used 2-photon calcium imaging in neuronal birthdate-labeled Mash1-CreER;Ai14 mice to image simultaneously the activity of striosomal and matrix neurons as mice performed an auditory conditioning task. With this method, we were able to identify circumscribed zones of tdTomato-labeled neuropil that correspond to striosomes as verified immunohistochemically. Neurons in both striosomes and matrix responded to reward-predicting cues and were active during or after consummatory licking. However, we found quantitative differences in response strength: striosomal neurons fired more to reward-predicting cues and encoded more information about expected outcome as mice learned the task, whereas matrix neurons were more strongly modulated by recent reward history. These findings open the possibility of harnessing in vivo imaging to determine the contributions of striosomes and matrix to striatal circuit function.

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Bernard Bloem

    McGovern Institute for Brain Reseach, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  2. Rafiq Huda

    Department of Brain and Cognitive Sciences, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  3. Mriganka Sur

    Department of Brain and Cognitive Sciences, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  4. Ann M Graybiel

    McGovern Institute for Brain Reseach, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, United States
    For correspondence
    graybiel@MIT.EDU
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-9197-7711

Funding

Simons Foundation (306140)

  • Ann M Graybiel

National Science Foundation (EF1451125)

  • Mriganka Sur

Simons Foundation Autism Research Initiative

  • Mriganka Sur

National Eye Institute (F32 EY024857)

  • Rafiq Huda

National Institute of Mental Health (K99 MH112855)

  • Rafiq Huda

Nancy Lurie Marks Family Foundation

  • Ann M Graybiel

William N. & Bernice E. Bumpus foundation (RRDA pilot 2013.1)

  • Ann M Graybiel

William N. & Bernice E. Bumpus foundation

  • Bernard Bloem

National Institute of Mental Health (R01 MH060379)

  • Ann M Graybiel

Saks Kavanaugh Foundation

  • Ann M Graybiel

Bachmann-Strauss Dystonia and Parkinson Foundation

  • Ann M Graybiel

Netherlands Organization for Scientific Research - Rubicon

  • Bernard Bloem

National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (U01 NS090473)

  • Mriganka Sur

National Eye Institute (R01 EY007023)

  • Mriganka Sur

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Ethics

Animal experimentation: All experiments were conducted in accordance with the National Institute of Health guidelines and with the approval of the Committee on Animal Care at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (protocol #: 1114-122-17).

Copyright

© 2017, Bloem et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 4,596
    views
  • 680
    downloads
  • 65
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Bernard Bloem
  2. Rafiq Huda
  3. Mriganka Sur
  4. Ann M Graybiel
(2017)
Two-photon imaging in mice shows striosomes and matrix have overlapping but differential reinforcement-related responses
eLife 6:e32353.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.32353

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.32353

Further reading

    1. Neuroscience
    Kiichi Watanabe, Hui Chiu, David J Anderson
    Tools and Resources

    Monitoring neuronal activity at single-cell resolution in freely moving Drosophila engaged in social behaviors is challenging because of their small size and lack of transparency. Extant methods, such as Flyception, are highly invasive. Whole-brain calcium imaging in head-fixed, walking flies is feasible but the animals cannot perform the consummatory phases of social behaviors like aggression or mating under these conditions. This has left open the fundamental question of whether neurons identified as functionally important for such behaviors using loss- or gain-of-function screens are actually active during the natural performance of such behaviors, and if so during which phase(s). Here, we perform brain-wide mapping of active cells expressing the Immediate Early Gene hr38 using a high-sensitivity/low background fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) amplification method called HCR-3.0. Using double-labeling for hr38 mRNA and for GFP, we describe the activity of several classes of aggression-promoting neurons during courtship and aggression, including P1a cells, an intensively studied population of male-specific interneurons. Using HI-FISH in combination with optogenetic activation of aggression-promoting neurons (opto-HI-FISH), we identify candidate downstream functional targets of these cells in a brain-wide, unbiased manner. Finally, we compare the activity of P1a neurons during sequential performance of courtship and aggression, using intronic vs. exonic hr38 probes to differentiate newly synthesized nuclear transcripts from cytoplasmic transcripts synthesized at an earlier time. These data provide evidence suggesting that different subsets of P1a neurons may be active during courtship vs. aggression. HI-FISH and associated methods may help to fill an important lacuna in the armamentarium of tools for neural circuit analysis in Drosophila.

    1. Neuroscience
    Mohsen Alavash
    Insight

    Combining electrophysiological, anatomical and functional brain maps reveals networks of beta neural activity that align with dopamine uptake.