Two-photon imaging in mice shows striosomes and matrix have overlapping but differential reinforcement-related responses

  1. Bernard Bloem
  2. Rafiq Huda
  3. Mriganka Sur
  4. Ann M Graybiel  Is a corresponding author
  1. Massachusetts Institute of Technology, United States

Abstract

Despite the discovery of striosomes several decades ago, technical hurdles have hampered the study of the functions of these striatal compartments. Here we used 2-photon calcium imaging in neuronal birthdate-labeled Mash1-CreER;Ai14 mice to image simultaneously the activity of striosomal and matrix neurons as mice performed an auditory conditioning task. With this method, we were able to identify circumscribed zones of tdTomato-labeled neuropil that correspond to striosomes as verified immunohistochemically. Neurons in both striosomes and matrix responded to reward-predicting cues and were active during or after consummatory licking. However, we found quantitative differences in response strength: striosomal neurons fired more to reward-predicting cues and encoded more information about expected outcome as mice learned the task, whereas matrix neurons were more strongly modulated by recent reward history. These findings open the possibility of harnessing in vivo imaging to determine the contributions of striosomes and matrix to striatal circuit function.

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Bernard Bloem

    McGovern Institute for Brain Reseach, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  2. Rafiq Huda

    Department of Brain and Cognitive Sciences, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  3. Mriganka Sur

    Department of Brain and Cognitive Sciences, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  4. Ann M Graybiel

    McGovern Institute for Brain Reseach, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, United States
    For correspondence
    graybiel@MIT.EDU
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-9197-7711

Funding

Simons Foundation (306140)

  • Ann M Graybiel

National Science Foundation (EF1451125)

  • Mriganka Sur

Simons Foundation Autism Research Initiative

  • Mriganka Sur

National Eye Institute (F32 EY024857)

  • Rafiq Huda

National Institute of Mental Health (K99 MH112855)

  • Rafiq Huda

Nancy Lurie Marks Family Foundation

  • Ann M Graybiel

William N. & Bernice E. Bumpus foundation (RRDA pilot 2013.1)

  • Ann M Graybiel

William N. & Bernice E. Bumpus foundation

  • Bernard Bloem

National Institute of Mental Health (R01 MH060379)

  • Ann M Graybiel

Saks Kavanaugh Foundation

  • Ann M Graybiel

Bachmann-Strauss Dystonia and Parkinson Foundation

  • Ann M Graybiel

Netherlands Organization for Scientific Research - Rubicon

  • Bernard Bloem

National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (U01 NS090473)

  • Mriganka Sur

National Eye Institute (R01 EY007023)

  • Mriganka Sur

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Ethics

Animal experimentation: All experiments were conducted in accordance with the National Institute of Health guidelines and with the approval of the Committee on Animal Care at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (protocol #: 1114-122-17).

Copyright

© 2017, Bloem et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 4,697
    views
  • 685
    downloads
  • 68
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Bernard Bloem
  2. Rafiq Huda
  3. Mriganka Sur
  4. Ann M Graybiel
(2017)
Two-photon imaging in mice shows striosomes and matrix have overlapping but differential reinforcement-related responses
eLife 6:e32353.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.32353

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.32353

Further reading

    1. Neuroscience
    Yi-Yun Ho, Qiuwei Yang ... Melissa R Warden
    Research Article

    The infralimbic cortex (IL) is essential for flexible behavioral responses to threatening environmental events. Reactive behaviors such as freezing or flight are adaptive in some contexts, but in others a strategic avoidance behavior may be more advantageous. IL has been implicated in avoidance, but the contribution of distinct IL neural subtypes with differing molecular identities and wiring patterns is poorly understood. Here, we study IL parvalbumin (PV) interneurons in mice as they engage in active avoidance behavior, a behavior in which mice must suppress freezing in order to move to safety. We find that activity in inhibitory PV neurons increases during movement to avoid the shock in this behavioral paradigm, and that PV activity during movement emerges after mice have experienced a single shock, prior to learning avoidance. PV neural activity does not change during movement toward cued rewards or during general locomotion in the open field, behavioral paradigms where freezing does not need to be suppressed to enable movement. Optogenetic suppression of PV neurons increases the duration of freezing and delays the onset of avoidance behavior, but does not affect movement toward rewards or general locomotion. These data provide evidence that IL PV neurons support strategic avoidance behavior by suppressing freezing.

    1. Neuroscience
    David C Williams, Amanda Chu ... Michael A McDannald
    Research Advance Updated

    Recognizing and responding to threat cues is essential to survival. Freezing is a predominant threat behavior in rats. We have recently shown that a threat cue can organize diverse behaviors beyond freezing, including locomotion (Chu et al., 2024). However, that experimental design was complex, required many sessions, and had rats receive many foot shock presentations. Moreover, the findings were descriptive. Here, we gave female and male Long Evans rats cue light illumination paired or unpaired with foot shock (eight total) in a conditioned suppression setting using a range of shock intensities (0.15, 0.25, 0.35, or 0.50 mA). We found that conditioned suppression was only observed at higher foot shock intensities (0.35 mA and 0.50 mA). We constructed comprehensive temporal ethograms by scoring 22,272 frames across 12 behavior categories in 200-ms intervals around cue light illumination. The 0.50 mA and 0.35 mA shock-paired visual cues suppressed reward seeking, rearing, and scaling, as well as light-directed rearing and light-directed scaling. These shock-paired visual cues further elicited locomotion and freezing. Linear discriminant analyses showed that ethogram data could accurately classify rats into paired and unpaired groups. Using complete ethogram data produced superior classification compared to behavior subsets, including an immobility subset featuring freezing. The results demonstrate diverse threat behaviors – in a short and simple procedure – containing sufficient information to distinguish the visual fear conditioning status of individual rats.