Transgenerational dynamics of rDNA copy number in Drosophila male germline stem cells

8 figures, 1 table and 4 additional files

Figures

Drosophila male GSCs exhibit perturbations in nucleolar morphology with age.

(A) Illustration of rDNA destabilization through intra-chromatid recombination. (B) Apical tip of the testes stained for Fibrillarin (red, nucleolus), Vasa (green, germ cells), Fas III (white, hub) and DAPI (blue). The hub, a major component of the GSC niche, is denoted by the asterisk. GSCs with representative nucleolar morphologies are outlined. Bar: 5 μm. (C) Distribution of GSC nucleolar morphology during aging, as a percentage of total GSCs scored (n, number of GSCs scored). P-values from chi-squared test (see methods) is shown.

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.32421.002
Figure 2 with 1 supplement
Transcriptional activation of X rDNA in GSCs with atypical nucleolar morphology.

(A) Illustration of rDNA loci on Drosophila X and Y chromosomes. Y rDNA locus is juxtaposed to (AATAAAC)n satellite repeats (cyan), whereas X rDNA locus is juxtaposed to 359 bp satellite repeats (magenta). (B–D) DNA FISH for the 359 bp satellite repeats (magenta) and (AATAAAC)n satellite repeats (cyan), combined with immunofluorescence staining for Vasa (white), FasIII/Fibrillarin (green), DAPI (blue). B: typical nucleolus, C: fragmented nucleoli, D: deformed nucleolus. The hub is denoted by (*). GSCs with typical nucleoli are indicated by yellow dotted lines, GSCs with atypical nucleoli are indicated by red dotted lines. Arrows indicate the position of nucleoli. (E) SNP in situ hybridization with Y and X chromosome-specific rRNA probes combined with Nopp140-GFP to mark nucleolar morphology. Y rRNA (green), X rRNA (red), Nopp140-GFP (white), DAPI (blue). Bar: 7.5 μm. (F, G) SNP in situ hybridization in the testes from 0 day (F) and 40 day (G) old flies. GSCs with only Y rRNA (yellow outline) and with both X and Y rRNA transcription (red outline). Y rRNA (green), X rRNA (red), DAPI (blue). (H) XY rRNA transcription during aging of GSCs, as a percentage of total GSCs scored (n, number of GSCs scored). Mean ±SD (p-value of t-test is indicated). Note that ‘X-only’ rRNA transcription was never observed.

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.32421.003
Figure 2—figure supplement 1
SNP-FISH is highly specific for rRNA transcribed from the Y vs X chromosomes.

(A) Schematic of the principle behind SNP-FISH for detecting rRNA transcripts. Shown is an example of a SNP in the 18S coding region of the X and Y rDNA. (B) Detection of X and Y rRNA using SNP-FISH in X/O (containing only X rDNA) and C(1)DX/Y (containing only Y rDNA) flies shows minimal cross-hybridization between probes. DAPI (blue), Y rRNA (green), X rRNA (red). Bars: 25 μm.

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.32421.004
Figure 3 with 1 supplement
rRNA gene copy number decreases in germ cells during aging.

(A) rRNA gene copy number quantification by qPCR from 0 day and 40 day old testes. Mean ±SD (p-value *≤0.05 t-test). (B–D) FISH on testis mitotic chromosome spreads. DAPI (white), 18S rDNA (red), 240 bp IGS (green), (AATAAAC)n (blue). Bar: 2.5 μm. Y chromosome, identified by the presence of (AATAAAC)n, is indicated by cyan outline, and X chromosome is indicated by yellow outline. (E) Y:X signal intensity ratio for the 18S rDNA in mitotic germ cells in day 0, day 40 old wild type (yw) testes, and X/Df(YS)bb testes. Bracket indicates mean ±SD. p-values from Student’s t-test is shown. (F) Y:X signal intensity ratio for the IGS in mitotic germ cells in day 0, day 40 old wild type (yw) testes, and X/Df(YS)bb testes. Bracket indicates mean ±SD. p-values from Student’s t-test is shown. Note that different Y:X ratios for 18S vs. IGS probes indicates that Y rDNA locus might have higher number of IGS repeats per rDNA unit. (G) Examples of GSCs with atypical nucleolar morphology from X/Df(YS)bb flies at 0 days (red outline). Fibrillarin (red), DAPI (blue), Vasa (green), FasIII (white). The hub is denoted by (*). Bar: 5 μm. (H) Distribution of GSC nucleolar morphologies in X/Df(YS)bb flies compared to 0 and 40-day-old WT flies, as a percentage of total GSCs scored (n, number of GSCs scored). Chi-squared test, p-values listed.

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.32421.005
Figure 3—source data 1

Pixel intensity measurement and its ratio from DNA FISH plotted in Figure 3E,F.

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.32421.007
Figure 3—figure supplement 1
The Df(YS)bb- from Kyoto Stock Center chromosome does not have any detectable 240-IGS sequence.

(A) Chromosome spread from animals containing Df(YS)bb- chromosome shows a near complete loss of Y rDNA. The Y chromosome is marked with probes for the Y-specific AATAC (blue) and AATAAAC (red) satellite sequences. rDNA is marked by probes for the 240-IGS sequence (green). DAPI is shown in white. (A’) 240-IGS channel only.

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.32421.006
GSC nucleolar morphology and rDNA copy number decrease is heritable.

(A) Scheme for aging of flies and collection of F1 progeny from old parents. (B) rDNA quantification from testes by qPCR in P0 at 0 and 40 days, and F1 at 0 days. Mean ±SD (p-value *≤0.05, t-test). (C) GSC nucleolar morphology in young P0, old P0 and young F1, as a percentage of total GSCs scored (n, number of GSCs scored). p-values from chi-squared test are shown. (D) Nucleolar dominance assessed by SNP in situ in GSCs from young P0, old P0 and young F1 (n, number of GSCs scored). Mean ±SD. p-value of t-test is shown. Note that ‘X-only’ rRNA transcription was never observed. (E) Y:X signal intensity ratio for the 18S rDNA and 240-IGS in mitotic germ cells comparing day 0 P0 Y and day 0 F1 Y (from day 40 father). Day 0 vs. day 40 fathers (P0) were mated to day 0 old females to yield P0 Y/X vs. F1 Y/X ratio, where X comes from the same source (day 0 yw female). Bracket indicates mean ±SD. p-values from Student’s t-test is shown. (F) Effect of X and Y chromosome inheritance from young vs. old parents on nucleolar morphology, as a percentage of total GSCs scored (n, number of GSCs scored). P-value from chi-squared test is shown.

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.32421.008
Figure 4—source data 1

Pixel intensity measurement and its ratio from DNA FISH plotted in Figure 4E.

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.32421.009
Recovery of GSC nucleolar morphology, Y rDNA dominance and Y rDNA copy number in F1 flies.

(A) Changes in GSC nucleolar morphology in F1 flies from old parents, as a percentage of total GSCs scored (n, number of GSCs scored). p-value from chi-squared test is shown. (B) Nucleolar dominance in GSCs from day 0 and day 10 old F1 testes assessed by SNP in situ hybridization. DAPI (blue), Y rRNA (green), X rRNA (red). The hub is denoted by (*). Bars: 5 µm. Co-dominant GSCs are indicated by red dotted lines, Y-dominant GSCs are indicated by yellow dotted lines. Arrows indicate X rRNA signal, thus co-dominance. (C) Nucleolar dominance in F1 GSCs during aging, as a percentage of total GSCs scored (n, number of GSCs scored). Mean ±SD. P-value of t-test is shown. Note that X-only rRNA transcription was never observed, except for once (out of 770 cells) at day 0, which is included in the graph. (D) Ratio of Y:X signal intensity for the 18S rDNA from mitotic chromosome spread of germ cells in F1 flies. Mean ±SD, t-test.

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.32421.010
Figure 5—source data 1

Pixel intensity measurement and its ratio from DNA FISH plotted in Figure 5D.

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.32421.011
Recovery of GSC nucleolar morphology requires mus-101 and mei-41.

(A) Mating scheme to assess the ability to recover nucleolar morphology after inheriting compromised Y chromosome from old fathers. yw males (0 or 40 days old) were mated to 0 day old mus-101D1, mei-41D12, or mus-102D1 mutant females. GSC nucleolar morphology in F1 mutant males was examined by anti-Fibrillarin antibody at day 0 or 10. (B–D) GSC nucleolar morphology in 0 and 10 day-old F1 mus-101D1 (B), mei-41D12 (C), and mus-102D1 (D) mutants, as a percentage of total GSCs scored (n, number of GSCs scored). P-values from chi-squared test between indicated conditions are shown.

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.32421.012
mus-101 is required for rDNA maintenance during aging.

(A) Mating scheme to compare rDNA loss during aging between yw control and mus-101D1 mutant flies. Males with the same Y chromosome are mated to either yw or mus-101D1 females. mus-101D1 and yw F1 males are mated to young females with the same X chromosome at 0 and 40 days old. All F2 males have X and Y chromosomes from the same source, independent of paternal age or genotype. (B) GSC nucleolar morphology in the sons of 0 and 40-day-old yw and mus-101D1 F1, as a percentage of total GSCs scored (n, number of GSCs scored). P-values from chi-squared test between indicated conditions are shown.

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.32421.013

Tables

Key resources table
Reagent type (species) or resourceDesignationSource or referenceIdentifiers
Strain, strain background (D. melanogaster)ywBloomington Stock CenterID_BSC: 1495
strain, strain background (D. melanogaster)Nopp140-GFPPMCID: 16158326
strain, strain background (D. melanogaster)C(1)RM/C(1;Y)6, y1 w1 f1/0Bloomington Stock CenterID_BSC: 9640
strain, strain background (D. melanogaster)FM6/C(1)DX, y* f1Bloomington Stock CenterID_BSC: 784
strain, strain background (D. melanogaster)Df(YS)bb/w1sn1bb*/C(1)RM, y1v1f1Bloomington Stock CenterID_BSC: 4491
strain, strain background (D. melanogaster)y[1] eq[1]/Df(YS)bb[-]Kyoto Stock CenterDGRC#: 101–260
strain, strain background (D. melanogaster)w[1] mus-101[D1]Bloomington Stock CenterID_BSC: 2310
strain, strain background (D. melanogaster)w[1] mei-41[D12]Bloomington Stock CenterID_BSC: 6789
strain, strain background (D. melanogaster)w[1] mus-102[D1]Bloomington Stock CenterID_BSC: 2317
antibodyanti-FibrillarinAbcamID_abcam: ab5821
antibodyanti-Fibrillarin [38F3]AbcamID_abcam: ab4566
antibodyanti-H3K9 dimethylAbcamID_abcam: ab32521
antibodyanti-vasaSanta Cruz BiotechnologyID_SCB: d-26
antibodyanti-Adducin-like 1B1Developmental Studies Hybridoma Bank
antibodyanti-vasaDevelopmental Studies Hybridoma Bank
antibodyanti-Fasciclin IIIDevelopmental Studies Hybridoma Bank

Additional files

Supplementary file 1

Probe sequences for rRNA SNP in situ hybridization.

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.32421.014
Supplementary file 2

Primer sequences for genomic rDNA qPCR.

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.32421.015
Supplementary file 3

Probe sequences for rDNA DNA FISH.

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.32421.016
Transparent reporting form
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.32421.017

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Kevin L Lu
  2. Jonathan O Nelson
  3. George J Watase
  4. Natalie Warsinger-Pepe
  5. Yukiko M Yamashita
(2018)
Transgenerational dynamics of rDNA copy number in Drosophila male germline stem cells
eLife 7:e32421.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.32421