NOTCH activity differentially affects pituitary endocrine cell fate acquisition and maintenance

  1. Leonard Cheung
  2. Paul Le Tissier
  3. Sam GJ Goldsmith
  4. Mathias Treier
  5. Robin Lovell-Badge
  6. Karine Rizzoti  Is a corresponding author
  1. University of Michigan, United States
  2. University of Edinburgh, United Kingdom
  3. The Francis Crick Institute, United Kingdom
  4. Max Delbruck Center for Molecular Medicine, Germany

Abstract

The pituitary is an essential endocrine gland regulating multiple processes. Regeneration of endocrine cells is of therapeutic interest and recent studies are promising, but mechanisms of endocrine cell fate acquisition need to be better characterised. The NOTCH pathway is important during pituitary development. Here, we further characterise its role in the murine pituitary, revealing differential sensitivity within and between lineages. In progenitors, NOTCH activation blocks cell fate acquisition, with time-dependant modulation. In differentiating cells, response to activation is blunted in the POU1F1 lineage, with apparently normal cell fate specification, while POMC cells remain sensitive. Absence of apparent defects in Pou1f1-Cre; Rbpjfl/fl mice further suggests no direct role for NOTCH signalling in POU1F1 cell fate acquisition. In contrast, in the POMC lineage, NICD expression induces a regression towards a progenitor-like state, suggesting that the NOTCH pathway specifically blocks POMC cell differentiation. These results have implications for pituitary development, plasticity and regeneration.

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Leonard Cheung

    Department of Human Genetics, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-0912-9594
  2. Paul Le Tissier

    Centre for Discovery Brain Science, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  3. Sam GJ Goldsmith

    Stem Cell Biology and Developmental Genetics, The Francis Crick Institute, London, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  4. Mathias Treier

    Genetics of Metabolic and Reproductive Disorders, Max Delbruck Center for Molecular Medicine, Berlin, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  5. Robin Lovell-Badge

    Stem Cell Biology and Developmental Genetics, The Francis Crick Institute, London, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  6. Karine Rizzoti

    Stem Cell Biology and Developmental Genetics, The Francis Crick Institute, London, United Kingdom
    For correspondence
    Karine.Rizzoti@crick.ac.uk
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-0711-5452

Funding

Medical Research Council (U117562207)

  • Paul Le Tissier

Cancer Research UK (FC001107)

  • Robin Lovell-Badge

Medical Research Council (U117512772)

  • Robin Lovell-Badge

Medical Research Council (FC001107)

  • Robin Lovell-Badge

Wellcome (FC001107)

  • Robin Lovell-Badge

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Ethics

Animal experimentation: All experiments carried out on mice were approved under the UK Animal (scientific procedures) Act (Project licence 80/2405 and 70/8560).

Copyright

© 2018, Cheung et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 1,672
    views
  • 295
    downloads
  • 17
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Leonard Cheung
  2. Paul Le Tissier
  3. Sam GJ Goldsmith
  4. Mathias Treier
  5. Robin Lovell-Badge
  6. Karine Rizzoti
(2018)
NOTCH activity differentially affects pituitary endocrine cell fate acquisition and maintenance
eLife 7:e33318.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.33318

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.33318

Further reading

    1. Developmental Biology
    Wei Yan
    Editorial

    The articles in this special issue highlight the diversity and complexity of research into reproductive health, including the need for a better understanding of the fundamental biology of reproduction and for new treatments for a range of reproductive disorders.

    1. Developmental Biology
    Anastasiia Lozovska, Ana Casaca ... Moises Mallo
    Research Article

    During the trunk to tail transition the mammalian embryo builds the outlets for the intestinal and urogenital tracts, lays down the primordia for the hindlimb and external genitalia, and switches from the epiblast/primitive streak (PS) to the tail bud as the driver of axial extension. Genetic and molecular data indicate that Tgfbr1 is a key regulator of the trunk to tail transition. Tgfbr1 has been shown to control the switch of the neuromesodermal competent cells from the epiblast to the chordoneural hinge to generate the tail bud. We now show that in mouse embryos Tgfbr1 signaling also controls the remodeling of the lateral plate mesoderm (LPM) and of the embryonic endoderm associated with the trunk to tail transition. In the absence of Tgfbr1, the two LPM layers do not converge at the end of the trunk, extending instead as separate layers until the caudal embryonic extremity, and failing to activate markers of primordia for the hindlimb and external genitalia. The vascular remodeling involving the dorsal aorta and the umbilical artery leading to the connection between embryonic and extraembryonic circulation was also affected in the Tgfbr1 mutant embryos. Similar alterations in the LPM and vascular system were also observed in Isl1 null mutants, indicating that this factor acts in the regulatory cascade downstream of Tgfbr1 in LPM-derived tissues. In addition, in the absence of Tgfbr1 the embryonic endoderm fails to expand to form the endodermal cloaca and to extend posteriorly to generate the tail gut. We present evidence suggesting that the remodeling activity of Tgfbr1 in the LPM and endoderm results from the control of the posterior PS fate after its regression during the trunk to tail transition. Our data, together with previously reported observations, place Tgfbr1 at the top of the regulatory processes controlling the trunk to tail transition.