Gq activity- and β-arrestin-1 scaffolding-mediated ADGRG2/CFTR coupling are required for male fertility

  1. Dao-Lai Zhang
  2. Yu-Jing Sun
  3. Ming-Liang Ma
  4. Yi-jing Wang
  5. Hui Lin
  6. Rui-Rui Li
  7. Zong-Lai Liang
  8. Yuan Gao
  9. Zhao Yang
  10. Dong-Fang He
  11. Amy Lin
  12. Hui Mo
  13. Yu-Jing Lu
  14. Meng-Jing Li
  15. Wei Kong
  16. Ka Young Chung
  17. Fan Yi
  18. Jian-Yuan Li
  19. Ying-Ying Qin
  20. Jingxin Li
  21. Alex R B Thomsen
  22. Alem W Kahsai
  23. Zi-Jiang Chen
  24. Zhi-Gang Xu
  25. Mingyao Liu
  26. Dali Li  Is a corresponding author
  27. Xiao Yu  Is a corresponding author
  28. Jin-Peng Sun  Is a corresponding author
  1. Shandong University School of Medicine, China
  2. Duke University, United States
  3. Peking University, China
  4. Sungkyunkwan University, Republic of Korea
  5. Yantai Yuhuangding Hospital, China
  6. Shandong University, China
  7. East China Normal University, China

Abstract

Luminal fluid reabsorption plays a fundamental role in male fertility. We demonstrated that the ubiquitous GPCR signaling proteins Gq and β-arrestin-1 are essential for fluid reabsorption because they mediate coupling between an orphan receptor ADGRG2 (GPR64) and the ion channel CFTR. A reduction in protein level or deficiency of ADGRG2, Gq or β-arrestin-1 in a mouse model led to an imbalance in pH homeostasis in the efferent ductules due to decreased constitutive CFTR currents. Efferent ductule dysfunction was rescued by the specific activation of another GPCR, AGTR2. Further mechanistic analysis revealed that β-arrestin-1 acts as a scaffold for ADGRG2/CFTR complex formation in apical membranes, whereas specific residues of ADGRG2 confer coupling specificity for different G protein subtypes; this specificity is critical for male fertility. Therefore, manipulation of the signaling components of the ADGRG2-Gq/β-arrestin-1/CFTR complex by small molecules may be an effective therapeutic strategy for male infertility.

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Dao-Lai Zhang

    Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Shandong University School of Medicine, Jinan, China
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  2. Yu-Jing Sun

    Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Shandong University School of Medicine, Jinan, China
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  3. Ming-Liang Ma

    Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Shandong University School of Medicine, Jinan, China
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  4. Yi-jing Wang

    Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Shandong University School of Medicine, Jinan, China
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  5. Hui Lin

    Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Shandong University School of Medicine, Jinan, China
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  6. Rui-Rui Li

    Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Shandong University School of Medicine, Jinan, China
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  7. Zong-Lai Liang

    Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Shandong University School of Medicine, Jinan, China
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  8. Yuan Gao

    Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Shandong University School of Medicine, Jinan, China
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  9. Zhao Yang

    Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Shandong University School of Medicine, Jinan, China
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  10. Dong-Fang He

    Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Shandong University School of Medicine, Jinan, China
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  11. Amy Lin

    Department of Biochemistry, Duke University, Durham, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-6723-5443
  12. Hui Mo

    Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Shandong University School of Medicine, Jinan, China
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  13. Yu-Jing Lu

    Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Shandong University School of Medicine, Jinan, China
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  14. Meng-Jing Li

    Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Shandong University School of Medicine, Jinan, China
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  15. Wei Kong

    Department of Physiology and Pathophysiology, School of Basic Medical Sciences, Peking University, Beijing, China
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  16. Ka Young Chung

    School of Pharmacy, Sungkyunkwan University, Suwon, Republic of Korea
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  17. Fan Yi

    Department of Pharmacology, Shandong University School of Medicine, Jinan, China
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  18. Jian-Yuan Li

    Shandong Stem Cell Engineering Technology Research Center, Yantai Yuhuangding Hospital, Yantai, China
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  19. Ying-Ying Qin

    National Research Center for Assisted Reproductive Technology and Reproductive Genetics, Shandong University, Jinan, China
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  20. Jingxin Li

    Department of Physiology, Shandong University School of Medicine, Jinan, China
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  21. Alex R B Thomsen

    Department of Biochemistry, Duke University, Durham, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  22. Alem W Kahsai

    Department of Biochemistry, Duke University, Durham, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  23. Zi-Jiang Chen

    National Research Center for Assisted Reproductive Technology and Reproductive Genetics, Shandong University, Jinan, China
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  24. Zhi-Gang Xu

    Shandong Provincial Key Laboratory of Animal Cells and Developmental Biology, School of Life Sciences, Shandong University, Jinan, China
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  25. Mingyao Liu

    Shanghai Key Laboratory of Regulatory Biology, East China Normal University, Shanghai, China
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  26. Dali Li

    Shanghai Key Laboratory of Regulatory Biology, East China Normal University, Shanghai, China
    For correspondence
    dlli@bio.ecnu.edu.cn
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  27. Xiao Yu

    Department of Physiology, Shandong University School of Medicine, Jinan, China
    For correspondence
    yuxiao@sdu.edu.cn
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  28. Jin-Peng Sun

    Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Shandong University School of Medicine, Jinan, China
    For correspondence
    sunjinpeng@sdu.edu.cn
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-3572-1580

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China (31470789)

  • Jin-Peng Sun

Funds for International cooperation and exchange of the national natural science foundation of China (31611540337)

  • Ka Young Chung
  • Jin-Peng Sun

National Natural Science Foundation of China (81773704)

  • Jin-Peng Sun

Shandong Natural Science Fund for Distinguished Young Scholars (JQ201517)

  • Jin-Peng Sun

Shandong Provincial Natural Science Foundation (ZR2014CP007)

  • Dao-Lai Zhang

National Natural Science Foundation of China (31671197)

  • Xiao Yu

The Program for Changjiang Scholars and Innovative Research Team in University (IRT13028)

  • Xiao Yu

National Natural Science Foundation of China (31471102)

  • Xiao Yu

National Science Fund for Distinguished Young Scholars (81525005)

  • Fan Yi

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Ethics

Animal experimentation: Mice were individually housed in the Shandong university on a 12:12 light:dark cycle with access to food and water ad libitum.The use of mice was approved by the animal ethics committee of Shandong university medical school (protocol LL-201502036). All animal care and experiments were reviewed and approved by the Animal Use Committee of Shandong University School of Medicine.

Copyright

© 2018, Zhang et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 3,372
    views
  • 610
    downloads
  • 73
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Dao-Lai Zhang
  2. Yu-Jing Sun
  3. Ming-Liang Ma
  4. Yi-jing Wang
  5. Hui Lin
  6. Rui-Rui Li
  7. Zong-Lai Liang
  8. Yuan Gao
  9. Zhao Yang
  10. Dong-Fang He
  11. Amy Lin
  12. Hui Mo
  13. Yu-Jing Lu
  14. Meng-Jing Li
  15. Wei Kong
  16. Ka Young Chung
  17. Fan Yi
  18. Jian-Yuan Li
  19. Ying-Ying Qin
  20. Jingxin Li
  21. Alex R B Thomsen
  22. Alem W Kahsai
  23. Zi-Jiang Chen
  24. Zhi-Gang Xu
  25. Mingyao Liu
  26. Dali Li
  27. Xiao Yu
  28. Jin-Peng Sun
(2018)
Gq activity- and β-arrestin-1 scaffolding-mediated ADGRG2/CFTR coupling are required for male fertility
eLife 7:e33432.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.33432

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.33432

Further reading

    1. Biochemistry and Chemical Biology
    Parnian Arafi, Sujan Devkota ... Michael S Wolfe
    Research Article

    Missense mutations in the amyloid precursor protein (APP) and presenilin-1 (PSEN1) cause early-onset familial Alzheimer’s disease (FAD) and alter proteolytic production of secreted 38-to-43-residue amyloid β-peptides (Aβ) by the PSEN1-containing γ-secretase complex, ostensibly supporting the amyloid hypothesis of pathogenesis. However, proteolysis of APP substrate by γ-secretase is processive, involving initial endoproteolysis to produce long Aβ peptides of 48 or 49 residues followed by carboxypeptidase trimming in mostly tripeptide increments. We recently reported evidence that FAD mutations in APP and PSEN1 cause deficiencies in early steps in processive proteolysis of APP substrate C99 and that this results from stalled γ-secretase enzyme-substrate and/or enzyme-intermediate complexes. These stalled complexes triggered synaptic degeneration in a Caenorhabditis elegans model of FAD independently of Aβ production. Here, we conducted full quantitative analysis of all proteolytic events on APP substrate by γ-secretase with six additional PSEN1 FAD mutations and found that all six are deficient in multiple processing steps. However, only one of these (F386S) was deficient in certain trimming steps but not in endoproteolysis. Fluorescence lifetime imaging microscopy in intact cells revealed that all six PSEN1 FAD mutations lead to stalled γ-secretase enzyme-substrate/intermediate complexes. The F386S mutation, however, does so only in Aβ-rich regions of the cells, not in C99-rich regions, consistent with the deficiencies of this mutant enzyme only in trimming of Aβ intermediates. These findings provide further evidence that FAD mutations lead to stalled and stabilized γ-secretase enzyme-substrate and/or enzyme-intermediate complexes and are consistent with the stalled process rather than the products of γ-secretase proteolysis as the pathogenic trigger.

    1. Biochemistry and Chemical Biology
    2. Chromosomes and Gene Expression
    Kira A Cozzolino, Lynn Sanford ... Dylan J Taatjes
    Research Article

    Hyperactive interferon (IFN) signaling is a hallmark of Down syndrome (DS), a condition caused by Trisomy 21 (T21); strategies that normalize IFN signaling could benefit this population. Mediator-associated kinases CDK8 and CDK19 drive inflammatory responses through incompletely understood mechanisms. Using sibling-matched cell lines with/without T21, we investigated Mediator kinase function in the context of hyperactive IFN in DS over a 75 min to 24 hr timeframe. Activation of IFN-response genes was suppressed in cells treated with the CDK8/CDK19 inhibitor cortistatin A (CA), via rapid suppression of IFN-responsive transcription factor (TF) activity. We also discovered that CDK8/CDK19 affect splicing, a novel means by which Mediator kinases control gene expression. To further probe Mediator kinase function, we completed cytokine screens and metabolomics experiments. Cytokines are master regulators of inflammatory responses; by screening 105 different cytokine proteins, we show that Mediator kinases help drive IFN-dependent cytokine responses at least in part through transcriptional regulation of cytokine genes and receptors. Metabolomics revealed that Mediator kinase inhibition altered core metabolic pathways in cell type-specific ways, and broad upregulation of anti-inflammatory lipid mediators occurred specifically in kinase-inhibited cells during hyperactive IFNγ signaling. A subset of these lipids (e.g. oleamide, desmosterol) serve as ligands for nuclear receptors PPAR and LXR, and activation of these receptors occurred specifically during hyperactive IFN signaling in CA-treated cells, revealing mechanistic links between Mediator kinases, lipid metabolism, and nuclear receptor function. Collectively, our results establish CDK8/CDK19 as context-specific metabolic regulators, and reveal that these kinases control gene expression not only via TFs, but also through metabolic changes and splicing. Moreover, we establish that Mediator kinase inhibition antagonizes IFN signaling through transcriptional, metabolic, and cytokine responses, with implications for DS and other chronic inflammatory conditions.