Gq activity- and β-arrestin-1 scaffolding-mediated ADGRG2/CFTR coupling are required for male fertility

  1. Dao-Lai Zhang
  2. Yu-Jing Sun
  3. Ming-Liang Ma
  4. Yi-jing Wang
  5. Hui Lin
  6. Rui-Rui Li
  7. Zong-Lai Liang
  8. Yuan Gao
  9. Zhao Yang
  10. Dong-Fang He
  11. Amy Lin
  12. Hui Mo
  13. Yu-Jing Lu
  14. Meng-Jing Li
  15. Wei Kong
  16. Ka Young Chung
  17. Fan Yi
  18. Jian-Yuan Li
  19. Ying-Ying Qin
  20. Jingxin Li
  21. Alex R B Thomsen
  22. Alem W Kahsai
  23. Zi-Jiang Chen
  24. Zhi-Gang Xu
  25. Mingyao Liu
  26. Dali Li  Is a corresponding author
  27. Xiao Yu  Is a corresponding author
  28. Jin-Peng Sun  Is a corresponding author
  1. Shandong University School of Medicine, China
  2. Duke University, United States
  3. Peking University, China
  4. Sungkyunkwan University, Republic of Korea
  5. Yantai Yuhuangding Hospital, China
  6. Shandong University, China
  7. East China Normal University, China

Abstract

Luminal fluid reabsorption plays a fundamental role in male fertility. We demonstrated that the ubiquitous GPCR signaling proteins Gq and β-arrestin-1 are essential for fluid reabsorption because they mediate coupling between an orphan receptor ADGRG2 (GPR64) and the ion channel CFTR. A reduction in protein level or deficiency of ADGRG2, Gq or β-arrestin-1 in a mouse model led to an imbalance in pH homeostasis in the efferent ductules due to decreased constitutive CFTR currents. Efferent ductule dysfunction was rescued by the specific activation of another GPCR, AGTR2. Further mechanistic analysis revealed that β-arrestin-1 acts as a scaffold for ADGRG2/CFTR complex formation in apical membranes, whereas specific residues of ADGRG2 confer coupling specificity for different G protein subtypes; this specificity is critical for male fertility. Therefore, manipulation of the signaling components of the ADGRG2-Gq/β-arrestin-1/CFTR complex by small molecules may be an effective therapeutic strategy for male infertility.

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Dao-Lai Zhang

    Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Shandong University School of Medicine, Jinan, China
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  2. Yu-Jing Sun

    Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Shandong University School of Medicine, Jinan, China
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  3. Ming-Liang Ma

    Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Shandong University School of Medicine, Jinan, China
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  4. Yi-jing Wang

    Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Shandong University School of Medicine, Jinan, China
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  5. Hui Lin

    Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Shandong University School of Medicine, Jinan, China
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  6. Rui-Rui Li

    Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Shandong University School of Medicine, Jinan, China
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  7. Zong-Lai Liang

    Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Shandong University School of Medicine, Jinan, China
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  8. Yuan Gao

    Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Shandong University School of Medicine, Jinan, China
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  9. Zhao Yang

    Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Shandong University School of Medicine, Jinan, China
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  10. Dong-Fang He

    Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Shandong University School of Medicine, Jinan, China
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  11. Amy Lin

    Department of Biochemistry, Duke University, Durham, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-6723-5443
  12. Hui Mo

    Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Shandong University School of Medicine, Jinan, China
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  13. Yu-Jing Lu

    Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Shandong University School of Medicine, Jinan, China
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  14. Meng-Jing Li

    Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Shandong University School of Medicine, Jinan, China
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  15. Wei Kong

    Department of Physiology and Pathophysiology, School of Basic Medical Sciences, Peking University, Beijing, China
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  16. Ka Young Chung

    School of Pharmacy, Sungkyunkwan University, Suwon, Republic of Korea
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  17. Fan Yi

    Department of Pharmacology, Shandong University School of Medicine, Jinan, China
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  18. Jian-Yuan Li

    Shandong Stem Cell Engineering Technology Research Center, Yantai Yuhuangding Hospital, Yantai, China
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  19. Ying-Ying Qin

    National Research Center for Assisted Reproductive Technology and Reproductive Genetics, Shandong University, Jinan, China
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  20. Jingxin Li

    Department of Physiology, Shandong University School of Medicine, Jinan, China
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  21. Alex R B Thomsen

    Department of Biochemistry, Duke University, Durham, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  22. Alem W Kahsai

    Department of Biochemistry, Duke University, Durham, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  23. Zi-Jiang Chen

    National Research Center for Assisted Reproductive Technology and Reproductive Genetics, Shandong University, Jinan, China
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  24. Zhi-Gang Xu

    Shandong Provincial Key Laboratory of Animal Cells and Developmental Biology, School of Life Sciences, Shandong University, Jinan, China
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  25. Mingyao Liu

    Shanghai Key Laboratory of Regulatory Biology, East China Normal University, Shanghai, China
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  26. Dali Li

    Shanghai Key Laboratory of Regulatory Biology, East China Normal University, Shanghai, China
    For correspondence
    dlli@bio.ecnu.edu.cn
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  27. Xiao Yu

    Department of Physiology, Shandong University School of Medicine, Jinan, China
    For correspondence
    yuxiao@sdu.edu.cn
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  28. Jin-Peng Sun

    Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Shandong University School of Medicine, Jinan, China
    For correspondence
    sunjinpeng@sdu.edu.cn
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-3572-1580

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China (31470789)

  • Jin-Peng Sun

Funds for International cooperation and exchange of the national natural science foundation of China (31611540337)

  • Ka Young Chung
  • Jin-Peng Sun

National Natural Science Foundation of China (81773704)

  • Jin-Peng Sun

Shandong Natural Science Fund for Distinguished Young Scholars (JQ201517)

  • Jin-Peng Sun

Shandong Provincial Natural Science Foundation (ZR2014CP007)

  • Dao-Lai Zhang

National Natural Science Foundation of China (31671197)

  • Xiao Yu

The Program for Changjiang Scholars and Innovative Research Team in University (IRT13028)

  • Xiao Yu

National Natural Science Foundation of China (31471102)

  • Xiao Yu

National Science Fund for Distinguished Young Scholars (81525005)

  • Fan Yi

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Ethics

Animal experimentation: Mice were individually housed in the Shandong university on a 12:12 light:dark cycle with access to food and water ad libitum.The use of mice was approved by the animal ethics committee of Shandong university medical school (protocol LL-201502036). All animal care and experiments were reviewed and approved by the Animal Use Committee of Shandong University School of Medicine.

Copyright

© 2018, Zhang et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 3,313
    views
  • 569
    downloads
  • 72
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Dao-Lai Zhang
  2. Yu-Jing Sun
  3. Ming-Liang Ma
  4. Yi-jing Wang
  5. Hui Lin
  6. Rui-Rui Li
  7. Zong-Lai Liang
  8. Yuan Gao
  9. Zhao Yang
  10. Dong-Fang He
  11. Amy Lin
  12. Hui Mo
  13. Yu-Jing Lu
  14. Meng-Jing Li
  15. Wei Kong
  16. Ka Young Chung
  17. Fan Yi
  18. Jian-Yuan Li
  19. Ying-Ying Qin
  20. Jingxin Li
  21. Alex R B Thomsen
  22. Alem W Kahsai
  23. Zi-Jiang Chen
  24. Zhi-Gang Xu
  25. Mingyao Liu
  26. Dali Li
  27. Xiao Yu
  28. Jin-Peng Sun
(2018)
Gq activity- and β-arrestin-1 scaffolding-mediated ADGRG2/CFTR coupling are required for male fertility
eLife 7:e33432.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.33432

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.33432

Further reading

    1. Biochemistry and Chemical Biology
    2. Structural Biology and Molecular Biophysics
    Jie Luo, Jeff Ranish
    Tools and Resources

    Dynamic conformational and structural changes in proteins and protein complexes play a central and ubiquitous role in the regulation of protein function, yet it is very challenging to study these changes, especially for large protein complexes, under physiological conditions. Here, we introduce a novel isobaric crosslinker, Qlinker, for studying conformational and structural changes in proteins and protein complexes using quantitative crosslinking mass spectrometry. Qlinkers are small and simple, amine-reactive molecules with an optimal extended distance of ~10 Å, which use MS2 reporter ions for relative quantification of Qlinker-modified peptides derived from different samples. We synthesized the 2-plex Q2linker and showed that the Q2linker can provide quantitative crosslinking data that pinpoints key conformational and structural changes in biosensors, binary and ternary complexes composed of the general transcription factors TBP, TFIIA, and TFIIB, and RNA polymerase II complexes.

    1. Biochemistry and Chemical Biology
    2. Stem Cells and Regenerative Medicine
    Alejandro J Brenes, Eva Griesser ... Angus I Lamond
    Research Article

    Human induced pluripotent stem cells (hiPSCs) have great potential to be used as alternatives to embryonic stem cells (hESCs) in regenerative medicine and disease modelling. In this study, we characterise the proteomes of multiple hiPSC and hESC lines derived from independent donors and find that while they express a near-identical set of proteins, they show consistent quantitative differences in the abundance of a subset of proteins. hiPSCs have increased total protein content, while maintaining a comparable cell cycle profile to hESCs, with increased abundance of cytoplasmic and mitochondrial proteins required to sustain high growth rates, including nutrient transporters and metabolic proteins. Prominent changes detected in proteins involved in mitochondrial metabolism correlated with enhanced mitochondrial potential, shown using high-resolution respirometry. hiPSCs also produced higher levels of secreted proteins, including growth factors and proteins involved in the inhibition of the immune system. The data indicate that reprogramming of fibroblasts to hiPSCs produces important differences in cytoplasmic and mitochondrial proteins compared to hESCs, with consequences affecting growth and metabolism. This study improves our understanding of the molecular differences between hiPSCs and hESCs, with implications for potential risks and benefits for their use in future disease modelling and therapeutic applications.