Forniceal deep brain stimulation induces gene expression and splicing changes that promote neurogenesis and plasticity
- Baylor College of Medicine, United States
- Texas Children's Hospital, United States
Abstract
Clinical trials are currently underway to assess the efficacy of forniceal deep brain stimulation (DBS) for improvement of memory in Alzheimer's patients, and forniceal DBS has been shown to improve learning and memory in a mouse model of Rett syndrome (RTT), an intellectual disability disorder caused by loss-of-function mutations in MECP2. The mechanism of DBS benefits has been elusive, however, so we assessed changes in gene expression, splice isoforms, DNA methylation, and proteome following acute forniceal DBS in wild-type mice and mice lacking Mecp2. We found that DBS upregulates genes involved in synaptic function, cell survival, and neurogenesis and normalized expression of ~25% of the genes altered in Mecp2-null mice. Moreover, DBS induced expression of 17-24% of the genes downregulated in other intellectual disability mouse models and in post-mortem human brain tissue from patients with Major Depressive Disorder, suggesting forniceal DBS could benefit individuals with a variety of neuropsychiatric disorders.
Data availability
-
RNA-Sequencing data - acute DBSPublicly available at the NCBI Gene Expression Omnibus (accession no: GSE107357).
-
Whole-Genome bisulfite sequencingPublicly available at the NCBI Gene Expression Omnibus (accession no: GSE107383).
-
RNA-Sequencing data - chronic DBSPublicly available at the NCBI Gene Expression Omnibus (accession no: GSE111703).
-
Altered expression of synapse and glutamate related genes in post-mortem hippocampus of depressed subjects.Publicly available at the NCBI Gene Expression Omnibus (accession no: GSE24095).
-
Conserved molecular signatures of neurogenesis in the hippocampal subgranular zone of rodents and primatesPublicly available at the NCBI Gene Expression Omnibus (accession no: GSE39697).
-
Genome-wide analysis of MEF2 transcriptional program reveals synaptic target genes and neuronal activity-dependent polyadenylation site selectionPublicly available at the NCBI Gene Expression Omnibus (accession no: GSE13539).
-
Neuronal activity modifies the DNA methylation landscape in the adult brain.Publicly available at the NCBI Gene Expression Omnibus (accession no: GSE30493).
-
DNA methylation changes in plasticity genes accompany the formation and maintenance of memoryPublicly available at the NCBI Gene Expression Omnibus (accession no: GSE74971).
-
Widespread transcription at neuronal activity-regulated enhancersPublicly available at the NCBI Gene Expression Omnibus (accession no: GSE21161).
-
Nuclear RNA-seq of single neurons reveals molecular signatures of activation.Publicly available at the NCBI Gene Expression Omnibus (accession no: GSE77067).
-
Activity-dependent regulation of inhibitory synapse development by Npas4.Publicly available at the NCBI Gene Expression Omnibus (accession no: GSE11261).
-
Identification of activity-dependent gene expression profiles reveals specific subsets of genes induced by different routes of Ca(2+) entry in cultured rat cortical neurons.Publicly available at the NCBI Gene Expression Omnibus (accession no: GSE6254).
-
Activity-Induced DNA Breaks Govern the Expression of Neuronal Early-Response Genes.Publicly available at the NCBI Gene Expression Omnibus (accession no: GSE61887).
-
Global state measures of the dentate gyrus gene expression system predict antidepressant-sensitive behaviors.Publicly available at the NCBI Gene Expression Omnibus (accession no: GSE43261).
-
Transcriptome profile reveals AMPA receptor dysfunction in the hippocampus of the Rsk2-knockout mice, an animal model of Coffin-Lowry syndrome.Publicly available at the NCBI Gene Expression Omnibus (accession no: GSE22137).
-
Ptchd1 deficiency induces excitatory synaptic and cognitive dysfunctions in mousePublicly available at the NCBI Gene Expression Omnibus (accession no: GSE80312).
Article and author information
Author details
Funding
National Institutes of Health (5R01NS057819)
- Huda Y Zoghbi
Howard Hughes Medical Institute (HHMI Investigator)
- Huda Y Zoghbi
Robert and Janice McNair Foundation (Student Scholar)
- Amy E Pohodich
Baylor Research Advocates for Student Scientists (Student Scholar)
- Amy E Pohodich
The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.
Reviewing Editor
- Anne E West, Duke University School of Medicine, United States
Ethics
Animal experimentation: This study was performed in strict accordance with the recommendations in the Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals of the National Institutes of Health. All research and animal care procedures were approved by the Baylor College of Medicine Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (approved protocols: AN-1013 and AN-5585). All surgery was performed under isofluorane anesthesia, and every effort was made to minimize pain and suffering.
Version history
- Received: December 4, 2017
- Accepted: March 22, 2018
- Accepted Manuscript published: March 23, 2018 (version 1)
- Version of Record published: April 18, 2018 (version 2)
Copyright
© 2018, Pohodich et al.
This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.
Metrics
-
- 3,299
- views
-
- 586
- downloads
-
- 41
- citations
Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.
Download links
A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.
Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)
Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)
Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)
Forniceal deep brain stimulation induces gene expression and splicing changes that promote neurogenesis and plasticity
eLife 7:e34031.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.34031
Further reading
-
- Neuroscience
Natural behaviors have redundancy, which implies that humans and animals can achieve their goals with different strategies. Given only observations of behavior, is it possible to infer the control objective that the subject is employing? This challenge is particularly acute in animal behavior because we cannot ask or instruct the subject to use a particular strategy. This study presents a three-pronged approach to infer an animal’s control objective from behavior. First, both humans and monkeys performed a virtual balancing task for which different control strategies could be utilized. Under matched experimental conditions, corresponding behaviors were observed in humans and monkeys. Second, a generative model was developed that represented two main control objectives to achieve the task goal. Model simulations were used to identify aspects of behavior that could distinguish which control objective was being used. Third, these behavioral signatures allowed us to infer the control objective used by human subjects who had been instructed to use one control objective or the other. Based on this validation, we could then infer objectives from animal subjects. Being able to positively identify a subject’s control objective from observed behavior can provide a powerful tool to neurophysiologists as they seek the neural mechanisms of sensorimotor coordination.
-
- Neuroscience
The retina consumes massive amounts of energy, yet its metabolism and substrate exploitation remain poorly understood. Here, we used a murine explant model to manipulate retinal energy metabolism under entirely controlled conditions and utilised 1H-NMR spectroscopy-based metabolomics, in situ enzyme detection, and cell viability readouts to uncover the pathways of retinal energy production. Our experimental manipulations resulted in varying degrees of photoreceptor degeneration, while the inner retina and retinal pigment epithelium were essentially unaffected. This selective vulnerability of photoreceptors suggested very specific adaptations in their energy metabolism. Rod photoreceptors were found to rely strongly on oxidative phosphorylation, but only mildly on glycolysis. Conversely, cone photoreceptors were dependent on glycolysis but insensitive to electron transport chain decoupling. Importantly, photoreceptors appeared to uncouple glycolytic and Krebs-cycle metabolism via three different pathways: (1) the mini-Krebs-cycle, fuelled by glutamine and branched chain amino acids, generating N-acetylaspartate; (2) the alanine-generating Cahill-cycle; (3) the lactate-releasing Cori-cycle. Moreover, the metabolomics data indicated a shuttling of taurine and hypotaurine between the retinal pigment epithelium and photoreceptors, likely resulting in an additional net transfer of reducing power to photoreceptors. These findings expand our understanding of retinal physiology and pathology and shed new light on neuronal energy homeostasis and the pathogenesis of neurodegenerative diseases.
