Differential 3' processing of specific transcripts expands regulatory and protein diversity across neuronal cell types

  1. Saša Jereb
  2. Hun-Way Hwang
  3. Eric Van Otterloo
  4. Eve-Ellen Govek
  5. John J Fak
  6. Yuan Yuan
  7. Mary E Hatten
  8. Robert B Darnell  Is a corresponding author
  1. The Rockefeller University, United States
  2. University of Colorado, United States

Abstract

Alternative polyadenylation (APA) regulates mRNA translation, stability, and protein localization. However, it is unclear to what extent APA regulates these processes uniquely in specific cell types. Using a new technique, cTag-PAPERCLIP, we discovered significant differences in APA between the principal types of mouse cerebellar neurons, the Purkinje and granule cells, as well as between proliferating and differentiated granule cells. Transcripts that differed in APA in these comparisons were enriched in key neuronal functions and many differed in coding sequence in addition to 3'UTR length. We characterize Memo1, a transcript that shifted from expressing a short 3'UTR isoform to a longer one during granule cell differentiation. We show that Memo1 regulates granule cell precursor proliferation and that its long 3'TR isoform is targeted by miR-124, contributing to its downregulation during development. Our findings provide insight into roles for APA in specific cell types and establish a platform for further functional studies.

Data availability

The following data sets were generated
The following previously published data sets were used

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Saša Jereb

    Laboratory of Molecular Neuro-Oncology, The Rockefeller University, New York, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-6862-4475
  2. Hun-Way Hwang

    Laboratory of Molecular Neuro-Oncology, The Rockefeller University, New York, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  3. Eric Van Otterloo

    Department of Craniofacial Biology, University of Colorado, Aurora, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  4. Eve-Ellen Govek

    Laboratory of Developmental Neurobiology, The Rockefeller University, New York, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  5. John J Fak

    Laboratory of Molecular Neuro-Oncology, The Rockefeller University, New York, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  6. Yuan Yuan

    Laboratory of Molecular Neuro-Oncology, The Rockefeller University, New York, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-2718-8301
  7. Mary E Hatten

    Laboratory of Developmental Neurobiology, The Rockefeller University, New York, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-9059-660X
  8. Robert B Darnell

    Laboratory of Molecular Neuro-Oncology, The Rockefeller University, New York, United States
    For correspondence
    darnelr@rockefeller.edu
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-5134-8088

Funding

National Institutes of Health (NS034389)

  • Robert B Darnell

Howard Hughes Medical Institute

  • Robert B Darnell

Simons Foundation (SFARI 240432)

  • Robert B Darnell

National Institute of Dental and Craniofacial Research (K99DE026823)

  • Eric Van Otterloo

National Institutes of Health (NS081706)

  • Robert B Darnell

National Institutes of Health (NS097404)

  • Robert B Darnell

National Institutes of Health (1UM1HG008901)

  • Robert B Darnell

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Reviewing Editor

  1. Bin Tian, Rutgers University New Jersey Medical School, United States

Ethics

Animal experimentation: Animals were maintained in an AAALAC-approved animal facility and all procedures were performed in accordance with IACUC guidelines (protocol number 17013).

Version history

  1. Received: December 12, 2017
  2. Accepted: March 20, 2018
  3. Accepted Manuscript published: March 26, 2018 (version 1)
  4. Version of Record published: April 13, 2018 (version 2)

Copyright

© 2018, Jereb et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 2,393
    Page views
  • 419
    Downloads
  • 17
    Citations

Article citation count generated by polling the highest count across the following sources: Crossref, PubMed Central, Scopus.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Saša Jereb
  2. Hun-Way Hwang
  3. Eric Van Otterloo
  4. Eve-Ellen Govek
  5. John J Fak
  6. Yuan Yuan
  7. Mary E Hatten
  8. Robert B Darnell
(2018)
Differential 3' processing of specific transcripts expands regulatory and protein diversity across neuronal cell types
eLife 7:e34042.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.34042

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.34042

Further reading

    1. Neuroscience
    Kiwamu Kudo, Kamalini G Ranasinghe ... Srikantan S Nagarajan
    Research Article

    Alzheimer’s disease (AD) is characterized by the accumulation of amyloid-β and misfolded tau proteins causing synaptic dysfunction, and progressive neurodegeneration and cognitive decline. Altered neural oscillations have been consistently demonstrated in AD. However, the trajectories of abnormal neural oscillations in AD progression and their relationship to neurodegeneration and cognitive decline are unknown. Here, we deployed robust event-based sequencing models (EBMs) to investigate the trajectories of long-range and local neural synchrony across AD stages, estimated from resting-state magnetoencephalography. The increases in neural synchrony in the delta-theta band and the decreases in the alpha and beta bands showed progressive changes throughout the stages of the EBM. Decreases in alpha and beta band synchrony preceded both neurodegeneration and cognitive decline, indicating that frequency-specific neuronal synchrony abnormalities are early manifestations of AD pathophysiology. The long-range synchrony effects were greater than the local synchrony, indicating a greater sensitivity of connectivity metrics involving multiple regions of the brain. These results demonstrate the evolution of functional neuronal deficits along the sequence of AD progression.

    1. Medicine
    2. Neuroscience
    Luisa Fassi, Shachar Hochman ... Roi Cohen Kadosh
    Research Article

    In recent years, there has been debate about the effectiveness of treatments from different fields, such as neurostimulation, neurofeedback, brain training, and pharmacotherapy. This debate has been fuelled by contradictory and nuanced experimental findings. Notably, the effectiveness of a given treatment is commonly evaluated by comparing the effect of the active treatment versus the placebo on human health and/or behaviour. However, this approach neglects the individual’s subjective experience of the type of treatment she or he received in establishing treatment efficacy. Here, we show that individual differences in subjective treatment - the thought of receiving the active or placebo condition during an experiment - can explain variability in outcomes better than the actual treatment. We analysed four independent datasets (N = 387 participants), including clinical patients and healthy adults from different age groups who were exposed to different neurostimulation treatments (transcranial magnetic stimulation: Studies 1 and 2; transcranial direct current stimulation: Studies 3 and 4). Our findings show that the inclusion of subjective treatment can provide a better model fit either alone or in interaction with objective treatment (defined as the condition to which participants are assigned in the experiment). These results demonstrate the significant contribution of subjective experience in explaining the variability of clinical, cognitive, and behavioural outcomes. We advocate for existing and future studies in clinical and non-clinical research to start accounting for participants’ subjective beliefs and their interplay with objective treatment when assessing the efficacy of treatments. This approach will be crucial in providing a more accurate estimation of the treatment effect and its source, allowing the development of effective and reproducible interventions.