Differential 3' processing of specific transcripts expands regulatory and protein diversity across neuronal cell types

  1. Saša Jereb
  2. Hun-Way Hwang
  3. Eric Van Otterloo
  4. Eve-Ellen Govek
  5. John J Fak
  6. Yuan Yuan
  7. Mary E Hatten
  8. Robert B Darnell  Is a corresponding author
  1. The Rockefeller University, United States
  2. University of Colorado, United States

Abstract

Alternative polyadenylation (APA) regulates mRNA translation, stability, and protein localization. However, it is unclear to what extent APA regulates these processes uniquely in specific cell types. Using a new technique, cTag-PAPERCLIP, we discovered significant differences in APA between the principal types of mouse cerebellar neurons, the Purkinje and granule cells, as well as between proliferating and differentiated granule cells. Transcripts that differed in APA in these comparisons were enriched in key neuronal functions and many differed in coding sequence in addition to 3'UTR length. We characterize Memo1, a transcript that shifted from expressing a short 3'UTR isoform to a longer one during granule cell differentiation. We show that Memo1 regulates granule cell precursor proliferation and that its long 3'TR isoform is targeted by miR-124, contributing to its downregulation during development. Our findings provide insight into roles for APA in specific cell types and establish a platform for further functional studies.

Data availability

The following data sets were generated
The following previously published data sets were used

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Saša Jereb

    Laboratory of Molecular Neuro-Oncology, The Rockefeller University, New York, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-6862-4475
  2. Hun-Way Hwang

    Laboratory of Molecular Neuro-Oncology, The Rockefeller University, New York, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  3. Eric Van Otterloo

    Department of Craniofacial Biology, University of Colorado, Aurora, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  4. Eve-Ellen Govek

    Laboratory of Developmental Neurobiology, The Rockefeller University, New York, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  5. John J Fak

    Laboratory of Molecular Neuro-Oncology, The Rockefeller University, New York, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  6. Yuan Yuan

    Laboratory of Molecular Neuro-Oncology, The Rockefeller University, New York, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-2718-8301
  7. Mary E Hatten

    Laboratory of Developmental Neurobiology, The Rockefeller University, New York, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-9059-660X
  8. Robert B Darnell

    Laboratory of Molecular Neuro-Oncology, The Rockefeller University, New York, United States
    For correspondence
    darnelr@rockefeller.edu
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-5134-8088

Funding

National Institutes of Health (NS034389)

  • Robert B Darnell

Howard Hughes Medical Institute

  • Robert B Darnell

Simons Foundation (SFARI 240432)

  • Robert B Darnell

National Institute of Dental and Craniofacial Research (K99DE026823)

  • Eric Van Otterloo

National Institutes of Health (NS081706)

  • Robert B Darnell

National Institutes of Health (NS097404)

  • Robert B Darnell

National Institutes of Health (1UM1HG008901)

  • Robert B Darnell

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Ethics

Animal experimentation: Animals were maintained in an AAALAC-approved animal facility and all procedures were performed in accordance with IACUC guidelines (protocol number 17013).

Copyright

© 2018, Jereb et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 2,439
    views
  • 426
    downloads
  • 24
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Saša Jereb
  2. Hun-Way Hwang
  3. Eric Van Otterloo
  4. Eve-Ellen Govek
  5. John J Fak
  6. Yuan Yuan
  7. Mary E Hatten
  8. Robert B Darnell
(2018)
Differential 3' processing of specific transcripts expands regulatory and protein diversity across neuronal cell types
eLife 7:e34042.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.34042

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.34042

Further reading

    1. Neuroscience
    Lisa Reisinger, Gianpaolo Demarchi ... Nathan Weisz
    Research Article

    Phantom perceptions like tinnitus occur without any identifiable environmental or bodily source. The mechanisms and key drivers behind tinnitus are poorly understood. The dominant framework, suggesting that tinnitus results from neural hyperactivity in the auditory pathway following hearing damage, has been difficult to investigate in humans and has reached explanatory limits. As a result, researchers have tried to explain perceptual and potential neural aberrations in tinnitus within a more parsimonious predictive-coding framework. In two independent magnetoencephalography studies, participants passively listened to sequences of pure tones with varying levels of regularity (i.e. predictability) ranging from random to ordered. Aside from being a replication of the first study, the pre-registered second study, including 80 participants, ensured rigorous matching of hearing status, as well as age, sex, and hearing loss, between individuals with and without tinnitus. Despite some changes in the details of the paradigm, both studies equivalently reveal a group difference in neural representation, based on multivariate pattern analysis, of upcoming stimuli before their onset. These data strongly suggest that individuals with tinnitus engage anticipatory auditory predictions differently to controls. While the observation of different predictive processes is robust and replicable, the precise neurocognitive mechanism underlying it calls for further, ideally longitudinal, studies to establish its role as a potential contributor to, and/or consequence of, tinnitus.

    1. Neuroscience
    Sam E Benezra, Kripa B Patel ... Randy M Bruno
    Research Article

    Learning alters cortical representations and improves perception. Apical tuft dendrites in cortical layer 1, which are unique in their connectivity and biophysical properties, may be a key site of learning-induced plasticity. We used both two-photon and SCAPE microscopy to longitudinally track tuft-wide calcium spikes in apical dendrites of layer 5 pyramidal neurons in barrel cortex as mice learned a tactile behavior. Mice were trained to discriminate two orthogonal directions of whisker stimulation. Reinforcement learning, but not repeated stimulus exposure, enhanced tuft selectivity for both directions equally, even though only one was associated with reward. Selective tufts emerged from initially unresponsive or low-selectivity populations. Animal movement and choice did not account for changes in stimulus selectivity. Enhanced selectivity persisted even after rewards were removed and animals ceased performing the task. We conclude that learning produces long-lasting realignment of apical dendrite tuft responses to behaviorally relevant dimensions of a task.