Signals from the brain and olfactory epithelium control shaping of the mammalian nasal capsule cartilage

  1. Marketa Kaucka
  2. Julian Petersen
  3. Marketa Tesarova
  4. Bara Szarowska
  5. Maria Eleni Kastriti
  6. Meng Xie
  7. Anna Kicheva
  8. Karl Annusver
  9. Maria Kasper
  10. Orsolya Symmons
  11. Leslie Pan
  12. Francois Spitz
  13. Jozef Kaiser
  14. Maria Hovorakova
  15. Tomas Zikmund
  16. Kazunori Sunadome
  17. Michael P Matise
  18. Hui Wang
  19. Ulrika Marklund
  20. Hind Abdo
  21. Patrik Ernfors
  22. Pascal Maire
  23. Maud Wurmser
  24. Andrei S Chagin
  25. Kaj Fried
  26. Igor Adameyko  Is a corresponding author
  1. Karolinska Institutet, Sweden
  2. Brno University of Technology, Czech Republic
  3. Medical University of Vienna, Austria
  4. Institute of Science and Technology, Austria
  5. University of Pennsylvania, United States
  6. European Molecular Biology Laboratory, Germany
  7. The Czech Academy of Sciences, Czech Republic
  8. Rutgers-Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, United States
  9. Institute Cochin, France

Abstract

Facial shape is the basis for facial recognition and categorization. Facial features reflect the underlying geometry of the skeletal structures. Here we reveal that cartilaginous nasal capsule (corresponding to upper jaw and face) is shaped by signals generated by neural structures: brain and olfactory epithelium. Brain-derived Sonic Hedgehog (SHH) enables the induction of nasal septum and posterior nasal capsule, whereas the formation of a capsule roof is controlled by signals from the olfactory epithelium. Unexpectedly, the cartilage of the nasal capsule turned out to be important for shaping membranous facial bones during development. This suggests that conserved neurosensory structures could benefit from protection and have evolved signals inducing cranial cartilages encasing them. Experiments with mutant mice revealed that the genomic regulatory regions controlling production of SHH in the nervous system contribute to facial cartilage morphogenesis, which might be a mechanism responsible for the adaptive evolution of animal faces and snouts.

Data availability

All data obtained including tomographic reconstructions will be freely available upon request since some datasets are considerably heavy (1TB and more) and depositing the full data is unfeasible. We have made a subset of the datasets available on the Dryad Digital Repository (http://datadryad.org/review?doi=doi:10.5061/dryad.f1s76f2).

The following data sets were generated

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Marketa Kaucka

    Department of Physiology and Pharmacology, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-8781-9769
  2. Julian Petersen

    Department of Physiology and Pharmacology, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  3. Marketa Tesarova

    Central European Institute of Technology, Brno University of Technology, Brno, Czech Republic
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  4. Bara Szarowska

    Department of Molecular Neurosciences, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  5. Maria Eleni Kastriti

    Department of Physiology and Pharmacology, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  6. Meng Xie

    Department of Physiology and Pharmacology, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  7. Anna Kicheva

    Institute of Science and Technology, Klosterneuburg, Austria
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  8. Karl Annusver

    Department of Biosciences and Nutrition, Karolinska Institutet, Huddinge, Sweden
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  9. Maria Kasper

    Department of Biosciences and Nutrition, Karolinska Institutet, Huddinge, Sweden
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  10. Orsolya Symmons

    Department of Bioengineering, University of Pennsylvania, Pennsylvania, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  11. Leslie Pan

    Developmental Biology Unit, European Molecular Biology Laboratory, Heidelberg, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  12. Francois Spitz

    Developmental Biology Unit, European Molecular Biology Laboratory, Heidelberg, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  13. Jozef Kaiser

    Central European Institute of Technology, Brno University of Technology, Brno, Czech Republic
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  14. Maria Hovorakova

    Department of Developmental Biology, The Czech Academy of Sciences, Prague, Czech Republic
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  15. Tomas Zikmund

    Central European Institute of Technology, Brno University of Technology, Brno, Czech Republic
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  16. Kazunori Sunadome

    Department of Physiology and Pharmacology, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  17. Michael P Matise

    Department of Neuroscience and Cell Biology, Rutgers-Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, Piscataway, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  18. Hui Wang

    Department of Neuroscience and Cell Biology, Rutgers-Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, Piscataway, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  19. Ulrika Marklund

    Department of Medical Biochemistry and Biophysics, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-1426-1271
  20. Hind Abdo

    Department of Medical Biochemistry and Biophysics, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  21. Patrik Ernfors

    Department of Medical Biochemistry and Biophysics, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  22. Pascal Maire

    Department of Development, Reproduction and Cancer, Institute Cochin, Paris, France
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  23. Maud Wurmser

    Department of Development, Reproduction and Cancer, Institute Cochin, Paris, France
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  24. Andrei S Chagin

    Department of Physiology and Pharmacology, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-2696-5850
  25. Kaj Fried

    Department of Neuroscience, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  26. Igor Adameyko

    Department of Physiology and Pharmacology, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
    For correspondence
    igor.adameyko@ki.se
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-5471-0356

Funding

Vetenskapsrådet

  • Julian Petersen
  • Andrei S Chagin
  • Igor Adameyko

Svenska Sällskapet för Medicinsk Forskning

  • Marketa Kaucka

Bertil Hållstens Forskningsstiftelse

  • Igor Adameyko

Åke Wiberg Stiftelse

  • Igor Adameyko

Karolinska Institutet

  • Ulrika Marklund
  • Andrei S Chagin
  • Kaj Fried
  • Igor Adameyko

Ministerstvo Vnitra České Republiky

  • Marketa Tesarova
  • Tomas Zikmund

Central European Institute of Technology

  • Marketa Tesarova
  • Tomas Zikmund

Grantová Agentura České Republiky

  • Maria Hovorakova

H2020 European Research Council (680037)

  • Anna Kicheva

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Reviewing Editor

  1. Richard M White, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, United States

Ethics

Animal experimentation: All animal work was approved and permitted by the Local Ethical Committee on Animal Experiments (North Stockholm Animal Ethics Committee) and conducted according to The Swedish Animal Agency´s Provisions and Guidelines for Animal Experimentation recommendations. Permit numbers S40/13 and N226/15, granted by South Stockholm Animal Ethics Committee.The part, which was done in Austria at the Medical University of Vienna and IST was performed in accordance with license BMWFW-66.018/0006-WF/V/3b/2016 and BMWFW-66.009/0163-WF/V/3b/2016 granted by the Austrian BMWFW.

Version history

  1. Received: December 19, 2017
  2. Accepted: June 12, 2018
  3. Accepted Manuscript published: June 13, 2018 (version 1)
  4. Version of Record published: June 26, 2018 (version 2)
  5. Version of Record updated: June 29, 2018 (version 3)

Copyright

© 2018, Kaucka et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 3,069
    views
  • 439
    downloads
  • 28
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Marketa Kaucka
  2. Julian Petersen
  3. Marketa Tesarova
  4. Bara Szarowska
  5. Maria Eleni Kastriti
  6. Meng Xie
  7. Anna Kicheva
  8. Karl Annusver
  9. Maria Kasper
  10. Orsolya Symmons
  11. Leslie Pan
  12. Francois Spitz
  13. Jozef Kaiser
  14. Maria Hovorakova
  15. Tomas Zikmund
  16. Kazunori Sunadome
  17. Michael P Matise
  18. Hui Wang
  19. Ulrika Marklund
  20. Hind Abdo
  21. Patrik Ernfors
  22. Pascal Maire
  23. Maud Wurmser
  24. Andrei S Chagin
  25. Kaj Fried
  26. Igor Adameyko
(2018)
Signals from the brain and olfactory epithelium control shaping of the mammalian nasal capsule cartilage
eLife 7:e34465.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.34465

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.34465

Further reading

    1. Computational and Systems Biology
    2. Developmental Biology
    Arya Y Nakhe, Prasanna K Dadi ... David A Jacobson
    Research Article

    The gain-of-function mutation in the TALK-1 K+ channel (p.L114P) is associated with maturity-onset diabetes of the young (MODY). TALK-1 is a key regulator of β-cell electrical activity and glucose-stimulated insulin secretion. The KCNK16 gene encoding TALK-1 is the most abundant and β-cell-restricted K+ channel transcript. To investigate the impact of KCNK16 L114P on glucose homeostasis and confirm its association with MODY, a mouse model containing the Kcnk16 L114P mutation was generated. Heterozygous and homozygous Kcnk16 L114P mice exhibit increased neonatal lethality in the C57BL/6J and the CD-1 (ICR) genetic background, respectively. Lethality is likely a result of severe hyperglycemia observed in the homozygous Kcnk16 L114P neonates due to lack of glucose-stimulated insulin secretion and can be reduced with insulin treatment. Kcnk16 L114P increased whole-cell β-cell K+ currents resulting in blunted glucose-stimulated Ca2+ entry and loss of glucose-induced Ca2+ oscillations. Thus, adult Kcnk16 L114P mice have reduced glucose-stimulated insulin secretion and plasma insulin levels, which significantly impairs glucose homeostasis. Taken together, this study shows that the MODY-associated Kcnk16 L114P mutation disrupts glucose homeostasis in adult mice resembling a MODY phenotype and causes neonatal lethality by inhibiting islet insulin secretion during development. These data suggest that TALK-1 is an islet-restricted target for the treatment for diabetes.

    1. Developmental Biology
    2. Structural Biology and Molecular Biophysics
    Arne Elofsson, Ling Han ... Luca Jovine
    Research Article

    A crucial event in sexual reproduction is when haploid sperm and egg fuse to form a new diploid organism at fertilization. In mammals, direct interaction between egg JUNO and sperm IZUMO1 mediates gamete membrane adhesion, yet their role in fusion remains enigmatic. We used AlphaFold to predict the structure of other extracellular proteins essential for fertilization to determine if they could form a complex that may mediate fusion. We first identified TMEM81, whose gene is expressed by mouse and human spermatids, as a protein having structural homologies with both IZUMO1 and another sperm molecule essential for gamete fusion, SPACA6. Using a set of proteins known to be important for fertilization and TMEM81, we then systematically searched for predicted binary interactions using an unguided approach and identified a pentameric complex involving sperm IZUMO1, SPACA6, TMEM81 and egg JUNO, CD9. This complex is structurally consistent with both the expected topology on opposing gamete membranes and the location of predicted N-glycans not modeled by AlphaFold-Multimer, suggesting that its components could organize into a synapse-like assembly at the point of fusion. Finally, the structural modeling approach described here could be more generally useful to gain insights into transient protein complexes difficult to detect experimentally.