Uncovering temporal structure in hippocampal output patterns

  1. Kourosh Maboudi
  2. Etienne Ackermann
  3. Laurel Watkins de Jong
  4. Brad Pfeiffer
  5. David Foster
  6. Kamran Diba  Is a corresponding author
  7. Caleb Kemere  Is a corresponding author
  1. University of Michigan, United States
  2. Rice University, United States
  3. University of Texas Southwestern, United States
  4. University of California, Berkeley, United States

Abstract

Place cell activity of hippocampal pyramidal cells has been described as the cognitive substrate of spatial memory. Replay is observed during hippocampal sharp-wave-ripple-associated population burst events (PBEs) and is critical for consolidation and recall-guided behaviors. PBE activity has historically been analyzed as a phenomenon subordinate to the place code. Here, we use hidden Markov models to study PBEs observed in rats during exploration of both linear mazes and open fields. We demonstrate that estimated models are consistent with a spatial map of the environment, and can even decode animals' positions during behavior. Moreover, we demonstrate the model can be used to identify hippocampal replay without recourse to the place code, using only PBE model congruence. These results suggest that downstream regions may rely on PBEs to provide a substrate for memory. Additionally, by forming models independent of animal behavior, we lay the groundwork for studies of non-spatial memory.

Data availability

We analyzed data from neural recording experiments. Data for Figures 1-5 has been previously reported in [1]. These data and also data for Figure 8 are available from Kamran Diba on request. Data for Figure 6 was previously reported in [2] and is available from Brad Pfeiffer and David Foster on request. Data for Figure 7 was previously reported in [3] is available from the CRCNS.org archive ('hc-6'). [1] Diba and Buzsaki, Nature Neuroscience, 2007 [2] Pfeiffer and Foster, Science, 2015 [3] Karlsson and Frank, Nature Neuroscience, 2009.All analysis code and sample recording epochs for Figures 1-7 are available on https://github.com/kemerelab/UncoveringTemporalStructureHippocampus. These make use of our broader open-source Python analysis software https://github.com/nelpy.

The following previously published data sets were used

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Kourosh Maboudi

    Department of Anesthesiology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  2. Etienne Ackermann

    Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Rice University, Houston, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  3. Laurel Watkins de Jong

    Department of Anesthesiology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  4. Brad Pfeiffer

    Department of Neuroscience, University of Texas Southwestern, Dallas, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  5. David Foster

    Department of Psychology, University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  6. Kamran Diba

    Department of Anesthesiology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, United States
    For correspondence
    kdiba@umich.edu
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-5128-4478
  7. Caleb Kemere

    Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Rice University, Houston, United States
    For correspondence
    caleb.kemere@rice.edu
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-2054-0234

Funding

National Science Foundation (IOS-1550994)

  • Etienne Ackermann
  • Caleb Kemere

Human Frontier Science Program (RGY0088)

  • Etienne Ackermann
  • Caleb Kemere

Ken Kennedy Institute (ERIT)

  • Caleb Kemere

National Institute of Mental Health (R01MH109170)

  • Kourosh Maboudi
  • Kamran Diba

National Institute of Mental Health (R01MH085823)

  • Brad Pfeiffer
  • David Foster

Alfred P. Sloan Foundation

  • Brad Pfeiffer
  • David Foster

Brain and Behavior Research Foundation (NARSAD Young Investigator Grant)

  • Brad Pfeiffer
  • David Foster

McKnight Endowment Fund for Neuroscience

  • David Foster

National Science Foundation (CBET-1351692)

  • Etienne Ackermann

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Reviewing Editor

  1. Laura Colgin, The University of Texas at Austin, Center for Learning and Memory, United States

Ethics

Animal experimentation: As reported previously, all procedures were approved by the Johns Hopkins University, Rutgers University, and University of California, San Francisco Animal Care and Use Committees and followed US National Institutes of Health animal use guidelines (protocol 90-042).

Version history

  1. Received: December 20, 2017
  2. Accepted: May 14, 2018
  3. Accepted Manuscript published: June 5, 2018 (version 1)
  4. Version of Record published: June 21, 2018 (version 2)

Copyright

© 2018, Maboudi et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 52
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Kourosh Maboudi
  2. Etienne Ackermann
  3. Laurel Watkins de Jong
  4. Brad Pfeiffer
  5. David Foster
  6. Kamran Diba
  7. Caleb Kemere
(2018)
Uncovering temporal structure in hippocampal output patterns
eLife 7:e34467.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.34467

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.34467

Further reading

    1. Neuroscience
    Olivier Codol, Jonathan A Michaels ... Paul L Gribble
    Tools and Resources

    Artificial neural networks (ANNs) are a powerful class of computational models for unravelling neural mechanisms of brain function. However, for neural control of movement, they currently must be integrated with software simulating biomechanical effectors, leading to limiting impracticalities: (1) researchers must rely on two different platforms and (2) biomechanical effectors are not generally differentiable, constraining researchers to reinforcement learning algorithms despite the existence and potential biological relevance of faster training methods. To address these limitations, we developed MotorNet, an open-source Python toolbox for creating arbitrarily complex, differentiable, and biomechanically realistic effectors that can be trained on user-defined motor tasks using ANNs. MotorNet is designed to meet several goals: ease of installation, ease of use, a high-level user-friendly application programming interface, and a modular architecture to allow for flexibility in model building. MotorNet requires no dependencies outside Python, making it easy to get started with. For instance, it allows training ANNs on typically used motor control models such as a two joint, six muscle, planar arm within minutes on a typical desktop computer. MotorNet is built on PyTorch and therefore can implement any network architecture that is possible using the PyTorch framework. Consequently, it will immediately benefit from advances in artificial intelligence through PyTorch updates. Finally, it is open source, enabling users to create and share their own improvements, such as new effector and network architectures or custom task designs. MotorNet’s focus on higher-order model and task design will alleviate overhead cost to initiate computational projects for new researchers by providing a standalone, ready-to-go framework, and speed up efforts of established computational teams by enabling a focus on concepts and ideas over implementation.

    1. Neuroscience
    Meike E van der Heijden, Amanda M Brown ... Roy V Sillitoe
    Research Article

    The cerebellum contributes to a diverse array of motor conditions, including ataxia, dystonia, and tremor. The neural substrates that encode this diversity are unclear. Here, we tested whether the neural spike activity of cerebellar output neurons is distinct between movement disorders with different impairments, generalizable across movement disorders with similar impairments, and capable of causing distinct movement impairments. Using in vivo awake recordings as input data, we trained a supervised classifier model to differentiate the spike parameters between mouse models for ataxia, dystonia, and tremor. The classifier model correctly assigned mouse phenotypes based on single-neuron signatures. Spike signatures were shared across etiologically distinct but phenotypically similar disease models. Mimicking these pathophysiological spike signatures with optogenetics induced the predicted motor impairments in otherwise healthy mice. These data show that distinct spike signatures promote the behavioral presentation of cerebellar diseases.