Motoneuron Wnts regulate neuromuscular junction development

  1. Chengyong Shen  Is a corresponding author
  2. Lei Li
  3. Kai Zhao
  4. Lei Bai
  5. Ailian Wang
  6. Xiaoqiu Shu
  7. Yatao Xiao
  8. Jianmin Zhang
  9. Kejing Zhang
  10. Tiankun Hui
  11. Wenbing Chen
  12. Bin Zhang
  13. Wei Hsu
  14. Wen-Cheng Xiong
  15. Lin Mei  Is a corresponding author
  1. Zhejiang University, China
  2. Case Western Reserve University, United States
  3. Augusta University, United States
  4. Nanchang University, China
  5. Huazhong University of Science and Technologyy, China
  6. University of Rochester Medical Center, United States

Abstract

The neuromuscular junction (NMJ) is a synapse between motoneurons and skeletal muscles to control motor behavior. Unlike extensively investigated postsynaptic differentiation, less is known about mechanisms of presynaptic assembly. Genetic evidence of Wnt in mammalian NMJ development was missing due to the existence of multiple Wnts and their receptors. We show when Wnt secretion is abolished from motoneurons by mutating the Wnt ligand secretion mediator (Wls) gene, mutant mice showed muscle weakness and neurotransmission impairment. NMJs were unstable with reduced synaptic junctional folds and fragmented AChR clusters. Nerve terminals were swollen; synaptic vesicles were fewer and mislocated. The presynaptic deficits occurred earlier than postsynaptic deficits. Intriguingly, these phenotypes were not observed when deleting Wls in muscles or Schwann cells. We identified Wnt7A and Wnt7B as major Wnts for nerve terminal development in rescue experiments. These observations demonstrate a necessary role of motoneuron Wnts in NMJ development, in particular presynaptic differentiation.

Data availability

All data generated or analysed during this study are included in the manuscript and supporting files.

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Chengyong Shen

    Institute of Translational Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China
    For correspondence
    cshen@zju.edu.cn
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  2. Lei Li

    Department of Neuroscience, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  3. Kai Zhao

    Department of Neuroscience and Regenerative Medicine, Augusta University, Georgia, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  4. Lei Bai

    Institute of Translational Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  5. Ailian Wang

    Institute of Translational Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  6. Xiaoqiu Shu

    Institute of Translational Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  7. Yatao Xiao

    Institute of Translational Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  8. Jianmin Zhang

    Institute of Translational Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  9. Kejing Zhang

    Institute of Translational Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  10. Tiankun Hui

    Institute of Life Science, Nanchang University, Jiangxi, China
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  11. Wenbing Chen

    Department of Neuroscience, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  12. Bin Zhang

    Department of Physiology, Huazhong University of Science and Technologyy, Wuhan, China
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  13. Wei Hsu

    Department of Biomedical Genetics, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  14. Wen-Cheng Xiong

    Department of Neuroscience, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-9071-7598
  15. Lin Mei

    Department of Neuroscience, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, United States
    For correspondence
    lin.mei@case.edu
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.

Funding

National key research and development program of china (2017YFA0104903)

  • Chengyong Shen

Zhejiang provincial Natural Sciences Foundation of China (LR17H090001)

  • Chengyong Shen

National Natural Science Foundation of China (31671040)

  • Chengyong Shen

National Natural Science Foundation of China (31701036)

  • Kejing Zhang

National Institutes of Health

  • Lin Mei

National Institutes of Health

  • Wen-Cheng Xiong

Muscular Dystrophy Association

  • Lin Mei

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Ethics

Animal experimentation: Experiments with animals were approved by Institutional Animal Care andUse Committees of Augusta University (2011-0393), Case Western Reserve University (2017-0115), and Zhejiang University (10262).

Copyright

© 2018, Shen et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 3,914
    views
  • 677
    downloads
  • 45
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Chengyong Shen
  2. Lei Li
  3. Kai Zhao
  4. Lei Bai
  5. Ailian Wang
  6. Xiaoqiu Shu
  7. Yatao Xiao
  8. Jianmin Zhang
  9. Kejing Zhang
  10. Tiankun Hui
  11. Wenbing Chen
  12. Bin Zhang
  13. Wei Hsu
  14. Wen-Cheng Xiong
  15. Lin Mei
(2018)
Motoneuron Wnts regulate neuromuscular junction development
eLife 7:e34625.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.34625

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.34625

Further reading

    1. Neuroscience
    Tian Yuan, Li Wang, Yi Jiang
    Research Article

    Perceiving emotions from the movements of other biological entities is critical for human survival and interpersonal interactions. Here, we report that emotional information conveyed by point-light biological motion (BM) triggered automatic physiological responses as reflected in pupil size. Specifically, happy BM evoked larger pupil size than neutral and sad BM, while sad BM induced a smaller pupil response than neutral BM. Moreover, this happy over sad pupil dilation effect is negatively correlated with individual autistic traits. Notably, emotional BM with only local motion features retained could also exert modulations on pupils. Compared with intact BM, both happy and sad local BM evoked stronger pupil responses than neutral local BM starting from an earlier time point, with no difference between the happy and sad conditions. These results revealed a fine-grained pupil-related emotional modulation induced by intact BM and a coarse but rapid modulation by local BM, demonstrating multi-level processing of emotions in life motion signals. Taken together, our findings shed new light on BM emotion processing, and highlight the potential of utilizing the emotion-modulated pupil response to facilitate the diagnosis of social cognitive disorders.

    1. Neuroscience
    Ilya A Rybak, Natalia A Shevtsova ... Alain Frigon
    Research Article

    Locomotion in mammals is directly controlled by the spinal neuronal network, operating under the control of supraspinal signals and somatosensory feedback that interact with each other. However, the functional architecture of the spinal locomotor network, its operation regimes, and the role of supraspinal and sensory feedback in different locomotor behaviors, including at different speeds, remain unclear. We developed a computational model of spinal locomotor circuits receiving supraspinal drives and limb sensory feedback that could reproduce multiple experimental data obtained in intact and spinal-transected cats during tied-belt and split-belt treadmill locomotion. We provide evidence that the spinal locomotor network operates in different regimes depending on locomotor speed. In an intact system, at slow speeds (<0.4 m/s), the spinal network operates in a non-oscillating state-machine regime and requires sensory feedback or external inputs for phase transitions. Removing sensory feedback related to limb extension prevents locomotor oscillations at slow speeds. With increasing speed and supraspinal drives, the spinal network switches to a flexor-driven oscillatory regime and then to a classical half-center regime. Following spinal transection, the model predicts that the spinal network can only operate in the state-machine regime. Our results suggest that the spinal network operates in different regimes for slow exploratory and fast escape locomotor behaviors, making use of different control mechanisms.