First of all, Rhodococcus fascians is defined by its effect on shoots, so it is peculiar that in this work root development was chosen as a phenotype. The alleged beneficial effect of isolates without a linear plasmid is only quantitatively demonstrated at the root hair formation level, the accuracy of which can be questioned given the data on GIC26 (Figure 5 in Savory et al., 2017). Root hair formation can be triggered by many factors one of which is growth on medium as opposed to in medium (Figure 1). Given that the seedlings were grown vertically, this could explain the observed effect. To rule out that the root hair induction is not an artifact of the experimental setup, the percentage of plants showing this effect for all of the treatments has to be provided. The claim that lateral roots developed earlier and more numerous with the nonpathogenic isolates is not supported by quantitative data. The images in the corrected version of Figure 5—figure supplement 1 (Savory et al., 2018) do not suffice to make this point since more control plants have a single secondary root than infected plants. Additionally, the primary root length remains unchanged or is even reduced upon inoculation by all isolates. This is hard to reconciled with a benign effect. Plant development was examined up to two months after inoculation. If the modification of the root system truly has a beneficial effect, the impact on plant development at the end of the experiment must be significant. Indeed, Francis et al. (2016) reported a condition-dependent increase in fresh shoot weight of Arabidopsis of 58% after infection with D188-5 at 19 dpi, so data should be provided to substantiate this point in N. benthamiana.

Figure 1

Download asset Open asset

Savory et al. prematurely assume that PBTS-associated Rhodococcus isolates have the same mode of action as leafy-gall inducers, although the current knowledge of the PBTS (pistachio bushy top syndrome) species is in its infancy (Stamler et al., 2015a, 2015b, 2016). In contrast, the epidemiology of the leafy gall-inducing R. fascians isolates could be understood only because the genomes of 60 isolates were analyzed. It is not possible to draw any definitive conclusions for PBTS based on the analysis of two single isolates.

The conclusion that the PBTS isolates do not cause disease on different hosts, but stimulate root development, is unsupported. For N. benthamiana, in Figure 4C, nearly no effect of PBTS1 and PBTS2 is seen on root elongation, yet in Figure 7B and Figure 7—figure supplement 1; panel B there is a significant reduction in root length; Figure 6C is inconclusive because the control is missing. For pistachio, 30 days after inoculation, the plants were only 5 cm tall and none of the plants grew for the last two time points (Figure 7—figure supplement 1; panel E). Given that the rootstock UCB-1 has a very high vigor, these observations indicate that there was something wrong with the plants or the growth conditions.

The remark that the bacterial titer used in previous work was too high is not substantiated by the presented data, unless statistics are provided to show that the observed decrease in root length with increasing titers is significant.

The statement that the molecular detection of the virulence genes was an artifact is based on the fact that the PBTS fasD sequences are identical, implying this feature is unusual. However, the fasD gene over its entire sequence is identical for most sequenced isolates (Creason et al., 2014) and Savory et al. could not detect any informative SNPs in the linear plasmids.

Repeatedly, the data reported by Nikolaeva et al. (2009) are rejected by Savory et al. to support the statement that plasmid loss cannot be at the basis for the occurrence of nonpathogenic (PBTS) isolates. Nikolaeva et al. obtained pure isolates – and not populations as stated by Savory et al. – from symptomatic ornamental plants that, when reinoculated as pure cultures on axenically grown peas, had a varying degree of pathogenicity (Nikolaeva et al., 2009). Further, the reisolated bacteria from isolates exhibiting variable pathogenicity now consisted of two subpopulations, one with fasD and one without. Importantly, in the context of PBTS, one in three isolates had an unstable virulence replicon and one in three was nonpathogenic. Thus, different genetic lineages cannot be at the basis of presence/absence of virulence genes as suggested. Still, these two processes – plasmid loss and occurrence of different genetic lineages – are not mutually exclusive, a conclusion not considered.

The assay to evaluate attenuation considers differences in gall morphology and variability in the capacity to produce dense galls (Maes et al., 2001). Savory et al. did not analyze these parameters, but merely looked at presence/absence of gall induction, which is not sufficient. Similarly, for seedling infection, the published attenuation assay is based on shoot length (Maes et al., 2001) and not root length as used by Savory et al. It would be more appropriate to use the assays commonly used by others, which would permit comparisons to be made in a more robust manner.

Taking into account the expression data that indicate that AttR has a negative effect on its own expression (Maes et al., 2001), the lack of symptom persistence obtained with D188 +L5::attR illustrates that by overexpressing AttR, att gene expression is repressed which results in an attenuated phenotype; it does not demonstrate a role for att in symptom maintenance.

In the many experiments done with D188-5, growth defects have never been reported (e.g. Figure 4 in Vereecke et al., 2002), not even by Creason et al. (2014) of the same lab as Savory et al.. Additionally, D188-5 has been successfully used as an acceptor to identify mutations in pFiD188 (Crespi et al., 1992), is able to colonize plants very well (Cornelis et al., 2001), and has clear plant growth-promoting effects (Francis et al., 2016), implying that a putative deletion in D188-5 does not compromise its interaction with the plant. In the attesting growth experiment (Figure 6—figure supplement 2), the start inoculum for D188-5 is lower than that of the two other strains and no error bars are given, so no conclusions can be drawn.

Savory et al. challenge the current working model without providing data or an alternative hypothesis by summing up arguments that have been reviewed before by Goethals et al., 2001, but fail to refer to a key paper that likely provides the missing link in the ‘trick-with-the-mix’ model (Radhika et al., 2015). Additionally, the wealth of supporting information is entirely ignored (e.g. Klämbt et al., 1966; Thimann and Sachs, 1966; Rathbone and Hall, 1972; Balázs and Sziráki, 1974; Armstrong et al., 1976; Murai et al., 1980; Crespi et al., 1992; Eason et al., 1996; Stange et al., 1996; Depuydt et al., 2008; 2009; Nikolaeva et al., 2009; Pertry et al., 2009; 2010; Stes et al., 2011; Creason et al., 2014; Radhika et al., 2015).

The fact that 6-benzylaminopurine (BA, which is not produced by R. fascians, did not affect the shoot of N. benthamiana is worrisome (a photograph should be included in Figure 7C to support this statement), since in a similar experiment I obtained a clear response with N. tabacum (Figure 1).

The messages extracted from various references are absent, wrong or misleading.

1. … hosts enrich for members of Rhodococcus because of the beneficial traits … .' The enrichment process is not described and the isolates are not related to R. fascians.

2. ‘… the use of vicA to confirm pathogenic Rhodococcus (Stamler et al., 2015a, 2015b).' In both papers, the presence of virulence genes is also evaluated.

3. ‘… challenge previous conclusions that Rhodococcus isolates lacking virulence genes are causative agents …' Stamler et al. stated that Rhodococcus isolates with virulence genes were in part responsible for PBTS.

4. The Rhodococcus species is introduced as being repeatedly recovered from various plant species to support its mutualistic nature, but the ten citations deal with three plant species only.

5. It is stated that the linear plasmid has only three virulence loci and the chromosome only one, but these are the only four loci identified/studied so far.

No sources are given for the following claims: (a) ‘A second incidence of pistachio bushy top syndrome occurred in 2016’; (b) ‘The misdiagnosis perpetuated the unnecessary removal of trees and exacerbated economic losses’; (c) ‘The detection of vicA was used as evidence […] to guide management practices’.

1. 1. Armstrong DJ
   2. Scarbrough E
   3. Skoog F
   4. Cole DL
   5. Leonard NJ

   (1976) Cytokinins in Corynebacterium fascians cultures: isolation and identification of 6-(4-Hydroxy-3-methyl-cis-2-butenylamino)-2-methylthiopurine

   Plant Physiology 58:749–752.

   https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.58.6.749

   • PubMed
   • Google Scholar
2. 1. Balázs E
   2. Sziráki I

   (1974)

   Altered levels of indoleacetic acid and cytokinin in geranium stems infected with Corynebacterium fascians

   Acta Phytopathologica Academiae Scientiarum Hungaricae 9:287–292.

   • Google Scholar
3. 1. Cornelis K
   2. Ritsema T
   3. Nijsse J
   4. Holsters M
   5. Goethals K
   6. Jaziri M

   (2001) The plant pathogen Rhodococcus fascians colonizes the exterior and interior of the aerial parts of plants

   Molecular Plant-Microbe Interactions 14:599–608.

   https://doi.org/10.1094/MPMI.2001.14.5.599

   • PubMed
   • Google Scholar
4. 1. Creason AL
   2. Vandeputte OM
   3. Savory EA
   4. Davis EW
   5. Putnam ML
   6. Hu E
   7. Swader-Hines D
   8. Mol A
   9. Baucher M
   10. Prinsen E
   11. Zdanowska M
   12. Givan SA
   13. El Jaziri M
   14. Loper JE
   15. Mahmud T
   16. Chang JH

   (2014) Analysis of genome sequences from plant pathogenic Rhodococcus reveals genetic novelties in virulence loci

   PLoS One 9:e101996.

   https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0101996

   • PubMed
   • Google Scholar
5. 1. Crespi M
   2. Messens E
   3. Caplan AB
   4. van Montagu M
   5. Desomer J

   (1992)

   Fasciation induction by the phytopathogen Rhodococcus fascians depends upon a linear plasmid encoding a cytokinin synthase gene

   The EMBO Journal 11:795–804.

   • PubMed
   • Google Scholar
6. 1. Depuydt S
   2. Dolezal K
   3. Van Lijsebettens M
   4. Moritz T
   5. Holsters M
   6. Vereecke D

   (2008) Modulation of the hormone setting by Rhodococcus fascians results in ectopic KNOX activation in Arabidopsis

   Plant Physiology 146:1267–1281.

   https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.107.113969

   • PubMed
   • Google Scholar
7. 1. Depuydt S
   2. Trenkamp S
   3. Fernie AR
   4. Elftieh S
   5. Renou JP
   6. Vuylsteke M
   7. Holsters M
   8. Vereecke D

   (2009) An integrated genomics approach to define niche establishment by Rhodococcus fascians

   Plant Physiology 149:1366–1386.

   https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.108.131805

   • PubMed
   • Google Scholar
8. 1. Desomer J
   2. Dhaese P
   3. Van Montagu M

   (1988) Conjugative transfer of cadmium resistance plasmids in Rhodococcus fascians strains

   Journal of Bacteriology 170:2401–2405.

   https://doi.org/10.1128/jb.170.5.2401-2405.1988

   • PubMed
   • Google Scholar
9. 1. Eason JR
   2. Morris RO
   3. Jameson PE

   (1996) The relationship between virulence and cytokinin production by Rhodococcus fascians

   Plant Pathology 45:323–331.

   https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-3059.1996.d01-130.x

   • Google Scholar
10. 1. Francis IM
    2. Stes E
    3. Zhang Y
    4. Rangel D
    5. Audenaert K
    6. Vereecke D

    (2016) Mining the genome of Rhodococcus fascians, a plant growth-promoting bacterium gone astray

    New Biotechnology 33:706–717.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nbt.2016.01.009

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
11. 1. Goethals K
    2. Vereecke D
    3. Jaziri M
    4. Van Montagu M
    5. Holsters M

    (2001) Leafy gall formation by Rhodococcus fascians

    Annual Review of Phytopathology 39:27–52.

    https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.phyto.39.1.27

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
12. 1. Klämbt D
    2. Thies G
    3. Skoog F

    (1966) Isolation of cytokinins from Corynebacterium fascians

    PNAS 56:52–59.

    https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.56.1.52

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
13. 1. Maes T
    2. Vereecke D
    3. Ritsema T
    4. Cornelis K
    5. Thu HN
    6. Van Montagu M
    7. Holsters M
    8. Goethals K

    (2001) The att locus of Rhodococcus fascians strain D188 is essential for full virulence on tobacco through the production of an autoregulatory compound

    Molecular Microbiology 42:13–28.

    https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2958.2001.02615.x

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
14. 1. Murai N
    2. Skoog F
    3. Doyle ME
    4. Hanson RS

    (1980) Relationships between cytokinin production, presence of plasmids, and fasciation caused by strains of Corynebacterium fascians

    PNAS 77:619–623.

    https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.77.1.619

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
15. 1. Nikolaeva EV
    2. Park S-Y
    3. Kang S
    4. Olson TN
    5. Kim SH

    (2009) Ratios of cells with and without virulence genes in rhodococcus fascians populations correlate with degrees of symptom development

    Plant Disease 93:499–506.

    https://doi.org/10.1094/PDIS-93-5-0499

    • Google Scholar
16. 1. Pertry I
    2. Václavíková K
    3. Depuydt S
    4. Galuszka P
    5. Spíchal L
    6. Temmerman W
    7. Stes E
    8. Schmülling T
    9. Kakimoto T
    10. Van Montagu MC
    11. Strnad M
    12. Holsters M
    13. Tarkowski P
    14. Vereecke D

    (2009) Identification of Rhodococcus fascians cytokinins and their modus operandi to reshape the plant

    PNAS 106:929–934.

    https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0811683106

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
17. 1. Pertry I
    2. Václavíková K
    3. Gemrotová M
    4. Spíchal L
    5. Galuszka P
    6. Depuydt S
    7. Temmerman W
    8. Stes E
    9. De Keyser A
    10. Riefler M
    11. Biondi S
    12. Novák O
    13. Schmülling T
    14. Strnad M
    15. Tarkowski P
    16. Holsters M
    17. Vereecke D

    (2010) Rhodococcus fascians impacts plant development through the dynamic fas-mediated production of a cytokinin mix

    Molecular Plant-Microbe Interactions 23:1164–1174.

    https://doi.org/10.1094/MPMI-23-9-1164

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
18. 1. Qin S
    2. Li J
    3. Chen HH
    4. Zhao GZ
    5. Zhu WY
    6. Jiang CL
    7. Xu LH
    8. Li WJ
    9. Lh X
    10. Wj L

    (2009) Isolation, diversity, and antimicrobial activity of rare actinobacteria from medicinal plants of tropical rain forests in Xishuangbanna, China

    Applied and Environmental Microbiology 75:6176–6186.

    https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.01034-09

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
19. 1. Radhika V
    2. Ueda N
    3. Tsuboi Y
    4. Kojima M
    5. Kikuchi J
    6. Kudo T
    7. Sakakibara H

    (2015) Methylated cytokinins from the phytopathogen rhodococcus fascians mimic plant hormone activity

    Plant Physiology 169:1118–1126.

    https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.15.00787

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
20. 1. Rathbone MP
    2. Hall RH

    (1972) Concerning the presence of the cytokinin, N (6)-(Δ (2)-isopentnyl) adenine, in cultures of Corynebacterium fascians

    Planta 108:93–102.

    https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00386072

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
21. 1. Savory EA
    2. Fuller SL
    3. Weisberg AJ
    4. Thomas WJ
    5. Gordon MI
    6. Stevens DM
    7. Creason AL
    8. Belcher MS
    9. Serdani M
    10. Wiseman MS
    11. Grünwald NJ
    12. Putnam ML
    13. Chang JH

    (2017) Evolutionary transitions between beneficial and phytopathogenic Rhodococcus challenge disease management

    eLife 6:e30925.

    https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.30925

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
22. 1. Savory EA
    2. Fuller SL
    3. Weisberg AJ
    4. Thomas WJ
    5. Gordon MI
    6. Stevens DM
    7. Creason AL
    8. Belcher MS
    9. Serdani M
    10. Wiseman MS
    11. Grünwald NJ
    12. Putnam ML
    13. Chang JH

    (2018) Correction: Evolutionary transitions between beneficial and phytopathogenic rhodococcus challenge disease management

    eLife 7:e36350.

    https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.36350

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
23. 1. Stamler RA
    2. Heerema R
    3. Randall JJ

    (2015a) First report of phytopathogenic Rhodococcus isolates on Pistachio Bushy Top Syndrome ‘UCB-1’ rootstock in New Mexico

    Plant Disease 99:1854.

    https://doi.org/10.1094/PDIS-04-15-0471-PDN

    • Google Scholar
24. 1. Stamler RA
    2. Kilcrease J
    3. Kallsen C
    4. Fichtner EJ
    5. Cooke P
    6. Heerema RJ
    7. Randall JJ

    (2015b) First report of Rhodococcus isolates causing Pistachio Bushy Top Syndrome on ‘UCB-1’ rootstock in California and Arizona

    Plant Disease 99:1468–1476.

    https://doi.org/10.1094/PDIS-12-14-1340-RE

    • Google Scholar
25. 1. Stamler RA
    2. Vereecke D
    3. Zhang Y
    4. Schilkey F
    5. Devitt N
    6. Randall JJ

    (2016) Complete genome and plasmid sequences for Rhodococcus fascians D188 and draft sequences for Rhodococcus isolates PBTS 1 and PBTS 2

    Genome Announcements 4:e00495.

    https://doi.org/10.1128/genomeA.00495-16

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
26. 1. Stange RR
    2. Jeffares D
    3. Young C
    4. Scott DB
    5. Eason JR
    6. Jameson PE

    (1996) PCR amplification of the fas-1 gene for the detection of virulent strains of Rhodococcus fascians

    Plant Pathology 45:407–417.

    https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-3059.1996.d01-154.x

    • Google Scholar
27. 1. Stes E
    2. Vandeputte OM
    3. El Jaziri M
    4. Holsters M
    5. Vereecke D

    (2011) A successful bacterial coup d'état: how Rhodococcus fascians redirects plant development

    Annual Review of Phytopathology 49:69–86.

    https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-phyto-072910-095217

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
28. 1. Thimann KV
    2. Sachs T

    (1966) The role of cytokinins in the “fasciation” disease caused by Corynebacterium fascians

    American Journal of Botany 53:731–739.

    https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1537-2197.1966.tb14030.x

    • Google Scholar
29. 1. Vereecke D
    2. Cornelis K
    3. Temmerman W
    4. Jaziri M
    5. Van Montagu M
    6. Holsters M
    7. Goethals K

    (2002) Chromosomal locus that affects pathogenicity of Rhodococcus fascians

    Journal of Bacteriology 184:1112–1120.

    https://doi.org/10.1128/jb.184.4.1112-1120.2002

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar

Author details

1. Danny Vereecke

   Department of Applied Biosciences, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium

   Contribution

   Conceptualization, Writing—original draft

   For correspondence

   danny.vereecke@ugent.be

   Competing interests

   No competing interests declared

   "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-3706-780X

• 701

  Page views

• 38

  Downloads

• 5

  Citations

Article citation count generated by polling the highest count across the following sources: Crossref, PubMed Central, Scopus.