Coordinated neuronal ensembles in primary auditory cortical columns
Abstract
Synchronous activity of groups of neurons is increasingly thought to be important in cortical information processing and transmission. However, most studies of processing in the primary auditory cortex (AI) have viewed neurons as independent filters; little is known about how coordinated AI neuronal activity is expressed throughout cortical columns and how it might enhance the processing of auditory information. To address this, we recorded from populations of neurons in AI cortical columns of anesthetized rats and, using dimensionality reduction techniques, identified multiple coordinated neuronal ensembles (cNEs), i.e. groups of neurons with reliable synchronous activity. We show that cNEs reflect local network configurations with enhanced information encoding properties that cannot be accounted for by stimulus-driven synchronization alone. Furthermore, similar cNEs were identified in both spontaneous and evoked activity, indicating that columnar cNEs are stable functional constructs that may represent principal units of information processing in AI.
Data availability
Single-unit extracellular electrophysiological data have been deposited in CRCNS.org under DOI citation http://dx.doi.org/10.6080/K09021X1
-
High-density extracellular recordings from the primary auditory cortex in anesthetized rats listening to dynamic broadband stimuli.Publicly available at the Collaborative Research in Computational Neuroscience data sharing website (http://crcns.org/).
Article and author information
Author details
Funding
National Institute on Deafness and Other Communication Disorders (DC02260)
- Craig A Atencio
- Christoph E Schreiner
Coleman Memorial Fund
- Craig A Atencio
- Christoph E Schreiner
Hearing Research Incorporate, San Francisco
- Craig A Atencio
- Christoph E Schreiner
Agency for Science, Technology and Research, Singapore (National Science Scholarship)
- Jermyn Z See
The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.
Ethics
Animal experimentation: This study was performed in strict accordance with the recommendations in the Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals of the National Institutes of Health. All of the animals were handled according to approved institutional animal care and use committee (IACUC) protocols (#100-17) of the University of California, San Francisco. The protocol was approved by the IACUC of the University of California, San Francisco (Protocol Number: AN165706-02). All surgery was performed under ketamine/xylazine anesthesia, and every effort was made to minimize suffering.
Reviewing Editor
- Catherine Emily Carr, University of Maryland, United States
Version history
- Received: February 1, 2018
- Accepted: June 3, 2018
- Accepted Manuscript published: June 5, 2018 (version 1)
- Version of Record published: June 25, 2018 (version 2)
Copyright
© 2018, See et al.
This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.
Metrics
-
- 3,611
- Page views
-
- 554
- Downloads
-
- 24
- Citations
Article citation count generated by polling the highest count across the following sources: Crossref, PubMed Central, Scopus.
Download links
Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)
Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)
Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)
Further reading
-
- Neuroscience
How does the human brain combine information across the eyes? It has been known for many years that cortical normalization mechanisms implement ‘ocularity invariance’: equalizing neural responses to spatial patterns presented either monocularly or binocularly. Here, we used a novel combination of electrophysiology, psychophysics, pupillometry, and computational modeling to ask whether this invariance also holds for flickering luminance stimuli with no spatial contrast. We find dramatic violations of ocularity invariance for these stimuli, both in the cortex and also in the subcortical pathways that govern pupil diameter. Specifically, we find substantial binocular facilitation in both pathways with the effect being strongest in the cortex. Near-linear binocular additivity (instead of ocularity invariance) was also found using a perceptual luminance matching task. Ocularity invariance is, therefore, not a ubiquitous feature of visual processing, and the brain appears to repurpose a generic normalization algorithm for different visual functions by adjusting the amount of interocular suppression.
-
- Neuroscience
Tastes typically evoke innate behavioral responses that can be broadly categorized as acceptance or rejection. However, research in Drosophila melanogaster indicates that taste responses also exhibit plasticity through experience-dependent changes in mushroom body circuits. In this study, we develop a novel taste learning paradigm using closed-loop optogenetics. We find that appetitive and aversive taste memories can be formed by pairing gustatory stimuli with optogenetic activation of sensory neurons or dopaminergic neurons encoding reward or punishment. As with olfactory memories, distinct dopaminergic subpopulations drive the parallel formation of short- and long-term appetitive memories. Long-term memories are protein synthesis-dependent and have energetic requirements that are satisfied by a variety of caloric food sources or by direct stimulation of MB-MP1 dopaminergic neurons. Our paradigm affords new opportunities to probe plasticity mechanisms within the taste system and understand the extent to which taste responses depend on experience.