Estrogenic-dependent glutamatergic neurotransmission from kisspeptin neurons governs feeding circuits in females

  1. Jian Qiu
  2. Heidi M Rivera
  3. Martha A Bosch
  4. Stephanie L Padilla
  5. Todd L Stincic
  6. Richard D Palmiter
  7. Martin J Kelly
  8. Oline K Rønnekleiv  Is a corresponding author
  1. Oregon Health and Science University, United States
  2. Howard Hughes Medical Institute, University of Washington, United States

Abstract

The neuropeptides tachykinin2 (Tac2) and kisspeptin (Kiss1) in hypothalamic arcuate nucleus Kiss1 (Kiss1ARH) neurons are essential for pulsatile release of GnRH and reproduction. Since 17β-estradiol (E2) decreases Kiss1 and Tac2 mRNA expression in Kiss1ARH neurons, the role of Kiss1ARH neurons during E2-driven anorexigenic states and their coordination of POMC and NPY/AgRP feeding circuits have been largely ignored. Presently, we show that E2 augmented the excitability of Kiss1ARH neurons by amplifying Cacna1g, Hcn1 and Hcn2 mRNA expression and T-type calcium and h-currents. E2 increased Slc17a6 mRNA expression and glutamatergic synaptic input to arcuate neurons, which excited POMC and inhibited NPY/AgRP neurons via metabotropic receptors. Deleting Slc17a6 in Kiss1 neurons eliminated glutamate release and led to conditioned place preference for sucrose in E2-treated KO female mice. Therefore, the E2-driven increase in Kiss1 neuronal excitability and glutamate neurotransmission may play a key role in governing the motivational drive for palatable food in females.

Data availability

All data generated or analysed during this study are included in the manuscript and supporting files.

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Jian Qiu

    Department of Physiology and Pharmacology, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-4988-8587
  2. Heidi M Rivera

    Department of Physiology and Pharmacology, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  3. Martha A Bosch

    Department of Physiology and Pharmacology, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  4. Stephanie L Padilla

    Department of Biochemistry, Howard Hughes Medical Institute, University of Washington, Seattle, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  5. Todd L Stincic

    Department of Physiology and Pharmacology, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  6. Richard D Palmiter

    Department of Biochemistry, Howard Hughes Medical Institute, University of Washington, Seattle, United States
    Competing interests
    Richard D Palmiter, Reviewing editor, eLife.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-6587-0582
  7. Martin J Kelly

    Department of Physiology and Pharmacology, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-8633-2510
  8. Oline K Rønnekleiv

    Department of Physiology and Pharmacology, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, United States
    For correspondence
    ronnekle@ohsu.edu
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-1841-4386

Funding

National Institutes of Health (R01-DK068098)

  • Martin J Kelly
  • Oline K Rønnekleiv

National Institutes of Health (R01-NS043330)

  • Oline K Rønnekleiv

National Institutes of Health (R01-NS038809)

  • Martin J Kelly

National Institutes of Health (R01-DA024908)

  • Richard D Palmiter

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Ethics

Animal experimentation: Animal experimentation: This study was performed in strict accordance with the recommendations from the National Institutes of Health Guide for the care and use of Laboratory Animals. All animal procedures were conducted according to the approved institutional animal care and use committee (IACUC) protocols (#IP00000585; #IP00000382) at Oregon health and Science University and (#2183-02) at University of Washington. All surgeries were performed using aseptic techniques under isoflurane anesthesia, and every effort was made to minimize suffering.

Reviewing Editor

  1. Catherine Dulac, Harvard University, United States

Publication history

  1. Received: February 3, 2018
  2. Accepted: July 24, 2018
  3. Accepted Manuscript published: August 6, 2018 (version 1)
  4. Version of Record published: August 21, 2018 (version 2)

Copyright

© 2018, Qiu et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 2,023
    Page views
  • 447
    Downloads
  • 39
    Citations

Article citation count generated by polling the highest count across the following sources: Scopus, Crossref, PubMed Central.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Jian Qiu
  2. Heidi M Rivera
  3. Martha A Bosch
  4. Stephanie L Padilla
  5. Todd L Stincic
  6. Richard D Palmiter
  7. Martin J Kelly
  8. Oline K Rønnekleiv
(2018)
Estrogenic-dependent glutamatergic neurotransmission from kisspeptin neurons governs feeding circuits in females
eLife 7:e35656.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.35656

Further reading

    1. Neuroscience
    Arefeh Sherafati et al.
    Research Article Updated

    Cochlear implants are neuroprosthetic devices that can restore hearing in people with severe to profound hearing loss by electrically stimulating the auditory nerve. Because of physical limitations on the precision of this stimulation, the acoustic information delivered by a cochlear implant does not convey the same level of acoustic detail as that conveyed by normal hearing. As a result, speech understanding in listeners with cochlear implants is typically poorer and more effortful than in listeners with normal hearing. The brain networks supporting speech understanding in listeners with cochlear implants are not well understood, partly due to difficulties obtaining functional neuroimaging data in this population. In the current study, we assessed the brain regions supporting spoken word understanding in adult listeners with right unilateral cochlear implants (n=20) and matched controls (n=18) using high-density diffuse optical tomography (HD-DOT), a quiet and non-invasive imaging modality with spatial resolution comparable to that of functional MRI. We found that while listening to spoken words in quiet, listeners with cochlear implants showed greater activity in the left prefrontal cortex than listeners with normal hearing, specifically in a region engaged in a separate spatial working memory task. These results suggest that listeners with cochlear implants require greater cognitive processing during speech understanding than listeners with normal hearing, supported by compensatory recruitment of the left prefrontal cortex.

    1. Neuroscience
    Mohammad Ali Salehinejad et al.
    Research Article Updated

    Sleep strongly affects synaptic strength, making it critical for cognition, especially learning and memory formation. Whether and how sleep deprivation modulates human brain physiology and cognition is not well understood. Here we examined how overnight sleep deprivation vs overnight sufficient sleep affects (a) cortical excitability, measured by transcranial magnetic stimulation, (b) inducibility of long-term potentiation (LTP)- and long-term depression (LTD)-like plasticity via transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS), and (c) learning, memory, and attention. The results suggest that sleep deprivation upscales cortical excitability due to enhanced glutamate-related cortical facilitation and decreases and/or reverses GABAergic cortical inhibition. Furthermore, tDCS-induced LTP-like plasticity (anodal) abolishes while the inhibitory LTD-like plasticity (cathodal) converts to excitatory LTP-like plasticity under sleep deprivation. This is associated with increased EEG theta oscillations due to sleep pressure. Finally, we show that learning and memory formation, behavioral counterparts of plasticity, and working memory and attention, which rely on cortical excitability, are impaired during sleep deprivation. Our data indicate that upscaled brain excitability and altered plasticity, due to sleep deprivation, are associated with impaired cognitive performance. Besides showing how brain physiology and cognition undergo changes (from neurophysiology to higher-order cognition) under sleep pressure, the findings have implications for variability and optimal application of noninvasive brain stimulation.