PACAP neurons in the ventral premammillary nucleus regulate reproductive function in the female mouse

  1. Rachel A Ross  Is a corresponding author
  2. Silvia Leon
  3. Joseph C Madara
  4. Danielle Schafer
  5. Chrysanthi Fergani
  6. Caroline A Maguire
  7. Anne MJ Verstegen
  8. Emily Brengle
  9. Dong Kong
  10. Allan E Herbison
  11. Ursula B Kaiser
  12. Bradford B Lowell
  13. Victor M Navarro  Is a corresponding author
  1. Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, United States
  2. Harvard Medical School, United States
  3. University of Otago, New Zealand
  4. Brigham and Women's Hospital, United States
  5. Tufts University School of Medicine, United States

Abstract

Pituitary adenylate cyclase activating polypeptide (PACAP, Adcyap1) is a neuromodulator implicated in anxiety, metabolism and reproductive behavior. PACAP global knockout mice have decreased fertility and PACAP modulates LH release. However, its source and role at the hypothalamic level remain unknown. We demonstrate that PACAP-expressing neurons of the ventral premamillary nucleus of the hypothalamus (PMVPACAP) project to, and make direct contact with, kisspeptin neurons in the arcuate and AVPV/PeN nuclei and a subset of these neurons respond to PACAP exposure. Targeted deletion of PACAP from the PMV through stereotaxic virally mediated cre- injection or genetic cross to LepR-i-cre mice with Adcyap1fl/fl mice led to delayed puberty onset and impaired reproductive function in female, but not male, mice. We propose a new role for PACAP-expressing neurons in the PMV in the relay of nutritional state information to regulate GnRH release by modulating the activity of kisspeptin neurons, thereby regulating reproduction in female mice.

Data availability

All data generated or analysed during this study are included in the manuscript and supporting files.

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Rachel A Ross

    Department of Psychiatry, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, United States
    For correspondence
    rross4@partners.org
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  2. Silvia Leon

    Harvard Medical School, Boston, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  3. Joseph C Madara

    Department of Medicine, Division of Endocrinology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  4. Danielle Schafer

    Centre for Neuroendocrinology, Department of Physiology, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  5. Chrysanthi Fergani

    Harvard Medical School, Boston, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  6. Caroline A Maguire

    Division of Endocrinology, Diabetes and Hypertension, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  7. Anne MJ Verstegen

    Department of Medicine, Division of Endocrinology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  8. Emily Brengle

    Department of Medicine, Division of Endocrinology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  9. Dong Kong

    Department of Neuroscience, Tufts University School of Medicine, Boston, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  10. Allan E Herbison

    Centre for Neuroendocrinology, Department of Physiology, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-9615-3022
  11. Ursula B Kaiser

    Harvard Medical School, Boston, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  12. Bradford B Lowell

    Department of Medicine, Division of Endocrinology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  13. Victor M Navarro

    Harvard Medical School, Boston, United States
    For correspondence
    vnavarro@bwh.harvard.edu
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-5799-219X

Funding

National Institutes of Health (R01 HD090151-A1)

  • Victor M Navarro

National Institutes of Health (P30 DK057521)

  • Bradford B Lowell

National Institutes of Health (R01 HD082314)

  • Ursula B Kaiser

National Institutes of Health (R01 HD019938)

  • Ursula B Kaiser

National Institutes of Health (R00 HD071970)

  • Victor M Navarro

National Institutes of Health (5T32HL007374-36)

  • Rachel A Ross

National Institutes of Health (R01 DK075632)

  • Bradford B Lowell

National Institutes of Health (R01 DK089044)

  • Bradford B Lowell

National Institutes of Health (R01 DK111401)

  • Bradford B Lowell

National Institutes of Health (P30 DK046200)

  • Bradford B Lowell

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Ethics

Animal experimentation: All animal care and experimental procedures were approved by the National Institute of Health, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center and Brigham and Women's Hospital Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee . protocol #05165.

Copyright

© 2018, Ross et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 2,575
    views
  • 433
    downloads
  • 66
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Rachel A Ross
  2. Silvia Leon
  3. Joseph C Madara
  4. Danielle Schafer
  5. Chrysanthi Fergani
  6. Caroline A Maguire
  7. Anne MJ Verstegen
  8. Emily Brengle
  9. Dong Kong
  10. Allan E Herbison
  11. Ursula B Kaiser
  12. Bradford B Lowell
  13. Victor M Navarro
(2018)
PACAP neurons in the ventral premammillary nucleus regulate reproductive function in the female mouse
eLife 7:e35960.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.35960

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.35960

Further reading

    1. Neuroscience
    Samyogita Hardikar, Bronte Mckeown ... Jonathan Smallwood
    Research Article

    Complex macro-scale patterns of brain activity that emerge during periods of wakeful rest provide insight into the organisation of neural function, how these differentiate individuals based on their traits, and the neural basis of different types of self-generated thoughts. Although brain activity during wakeful rest is valuable for understanding important features of human cognition, its unconstrained nature makes it difficult to disentangle neural features related to personality traits from those related to the thoughts occurring at rest. Our study builds on recent perspectives from work on ongoing conscious thought that highlight the interactions between three brain networks – ventral and dorsal attention networks, as well as the default mode network. We combined measures of personality with state-of-the-art indices of ongoing thoughts at rest and brain imaging analysis and explored whether this ‘tri-partite’ view can provide a framework within which to understand the contribution of states and traits to observed patterns of neural activity at rest. To capture macro-scale relationships between different brain systems, we calculated cortical gradients to describe brain organisation in a low-dimensional space. Our analysis established that for more introverted individuals, regions of the ventral attention network were functionally more aligned to regions of the somatomotor system and the default mode network. At the same time, a pattern of detailed self-generated thought was associated with a decoupling of regions of dorsal attention from regions in the default mode network. Our study, therefore, establishes that interactions between attention systems and the default mode network are important influences on ongoing thought at rest and highlights the value of integrating contemporary perspectives on conscious experience when understanding patterns of brain activity at rest.

    1. Neuroscience
    John P Grogan, Matthias Raemaekers ... Sanjay G Manohar
    Research Article

    Motivation depends on dopamine, but might be modulated by acetylcholine which influences dopamine release in the striatum, and amplifies motivation in animal studies. A corresponding effect in humans would be important clinically, since anticholinergic drugs are frequently used in Parkinson’s disease, a condition that can also disrupt motivation. Reward and dopamine make us more ready to respond, as indexed by reaction times (RT), and move faster, sometimes termed vigour. These effects may be controlled by preparatory processes that can be tracked using electroencephalography (EEG). We measured vigour in a placebo-controlled, double-blinded study of trihexyphenidyl (THP), a muscarinic antagonist, with an incentivised eye movement task and EEG. Participants responded faster and with greater vigour when incentives were high, but THP blunted these motivational effects, suggesting that muscarinic receptors facilitate invigoration by reward. Preparatory EEG build-up (contingent negative variation [CNV]) was strengthened by high incentives and by muscarinic blockade, although THP reduced the incentive effect. The amplitude of preparatory activity predicted both vigour and RT, although over distinct scalp regions; frontal activity predicted vigour, whereas a larger, earlier, central component predicted RT. The incentivisation of RT was partly mediated by the CNV, though vigour was not. Moreover, the CNV mediated the drug’s effect on dampening incentives, suggesting that muscarinic receptors underlie the motivational influence on this preparatory activity. Taken together, these findings show that a muscarinic blocker impairs motivated action in healthy people, and that medial frontal preparatory neural activity mediates this for RT.