Glutathione de novo synthesis but not recycling process coordinates with glutamine catabolism to control redox homeostasis and directs murine T cell differentiation

  1. Gaojian Lian
  2. JN Rashida Gnanaprakasam
  3. Tingting Wang
  4. Ruohan Wu
  5. Xuyong Chen
  6. Lingling Liu
  7. Yuqing Shen
  8. Mao Yang
  9. Jun Yang
  10. Ying Chen
  11. Vasilis Vasiliou
  12. Teresa A Cassel
  13. Douglas R Green
  14. Yusen Liu
  15. Teresa Fan
  16. Ruoning Wang  Is a corresponding author
  1. The Research Institute at Nationwide Children's Hospital, United States
  2. St Jude Children's Research Hospital, United States
  3. Yale School of Public Health, Yale University, United States
  4. University of Kentucky, United States

Abstract

Upon antigen stimulation, T lymphocytes undergo dramatic changes in metabolism to fulfill the bioenergetic, biosynthetic and redox demands of proliferation and differentiation. Glutathione (GSH) plays an essential role in controlling redox balance and cell fate. While GSH can be recycled from Glutathione disulfide (GSSG), the inhibition of this recycling pathway does not impact GSH content and murine T cell fate. By contrast, the inhibition of the de novo synthesis of GSH, by deleting either the catalytic (Gclc) or the modifier (Gclm) subunit of glutamate-cysteine ligase (Gcl), dampens intracellular GSH, increases ROS, and impact T cell differentiation. Moreover, the inhibition of GSH de novo synthesis dampened the pathological progression of experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis (EAE). We further reveal that glutamine provides essential precursors for GSH biosynthesis. Our findings suggest that glutamine catabolism fuels de novo synthesis of GSH and directs the lineage choice in T cells.

Data availability

All data generated or analysed during this study are included in the manuscript and supporting files.

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Gaojian Lian

    Center for Childhood Cancer and Blood Disease, The Research Institute at Nationwide Children's Hospital, Columbus, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  2. JN Rashida Gnanaprakasam

    Center for Childhood Cancer and Blood Disease, The Research Institute at Nationwide Children's Hospital, Columbus, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  3. Tingting Wang

    Center for Childhood Cancer and Blood Disease, The Research Institute at Nationwide Children's Hospital, Columbus, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  4. Ruohan Wu

    Center for Childhood Cancer and Blood Disease, The Research Institute at Nationwide Children's Hospital, Columbus, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  5. Xuyong Chen

    Center for Childhood Cancer and Blood Disease, The Research Institute at Nationwide Children's Hospital, Columbus, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  6. Lingling Liu

    Center for Childhood Cancer and Blood Disease, The Research Institute at Nationwide Children's Hospital, Columbus, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  7. Yuqing Shen

    Center for Childhood Cancer and Blood Disease, The Research Institute at Nationwide Children's Hospital, Columbus, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  8. Mao Yang

    Department of Immunology, St Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  9. Jun Yang

    Department of Surgery, St Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  10. Ying Chen

    Department of Environmental Health Sciences, Yale School of Public Health, Yale University, New Haven, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  11. Vasilis Vasiliou

    Department of Environmental Health Sciences, Yale School of Public Health, Yale University, New Haven, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  12. Teresa A Cassel

    Department of Toxicology and Cancer Biology, University of Kentucky, Lexington, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  13. Douglas R Green

    Department of Immunology, St Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  14. Yusen Liu

    Center for Perinatal Research, The Research Institute at Nationwide Children's Hospital, Columbus, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  15. Teresa Fan

    Department of Toxicology and Cancer Biology, University of Kentucky, Lexington, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  16. Ruoning Wang

    Center for Childhood Cancer and Blood Disease, The Research Institute at Nationwide Children's Hospital, Columbus, United States
    For correspondence
    ruoning.wang@nationwidechildrens.org
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-9798-8032

Funding

National Institutes of Health (R21AI117547)

  • Ruoning Wang

American Cancer Society (128436-RSG-15-180-01-LIB)

  • Ruoning Wang

National Institutes of Health (1R01AI114581)

  • Ruoning Wang

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Ethics

Animal experimentation: Animal protocols were approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee of the Research Institute at Nationwide Children's Hospital (AR13-00055)

Copyright

© 2018, Lian et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 4,135
    views
  • 684
    downloads
  • 136
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Gaojian Lian
  2. JN Rashida Gnanaprakasam
  3. Tingting Wang
  4. Ruohan Wu
  5. Xuyong Chen
  6. Lingling Liu
  7. Yuqing Shen
  8. Mao Yang
  9. Jun Yang
  10. Ying Chen
  11. Vasilis Vasiliou
  12. Teresa A Cassel
  13. Douglas R Green
  14. Yusen Liu
  15. Teresa Fan
  16. Ruoning Wang
(2018)
Glutathione de novo synthesis but not recycling process coordinates with glutamine catabolism to control redox homeostasis and directs murine T cell differentiation
eLife 7:e36158.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.36158

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.36158

Further reading

    1. Immunology and Inflammation
    Miki Kume, Hanako Koguchi-Yoshioka ... Rei Watanabe
    Research Article

    Psoriasis is a multifactorial disorder mediated by IL-17-producing T cells, involving immune cells and skin-constituting cells. Semaphorin 4A (Sema4A), an immune semaphorin, is known to take part in T helper type 1/17 differentiation and activation. However, Sema4A is also crucial for maintaining peripheral tissue homeostasis and its involvement in skin remains unknown. Here, we revealed that while Sema4A expression was pronounced in psoriatic blood lymphocytes and monocytes, it was downregulated in the keratinocytes of both psoriatic lesions and non-lesions compared to controls. Imiquimod application induced more severe dermatitis in Sema4A knockout (KO) mice compared to wild-type (WT) mice. The naïve skin of Sema4A KO mice showed increased T cell infiltration and IL-17A expression along with thicker epidermis and distinct cytokeratin expression compared to WT mice, which are hallmarks of psoriatic non-lesions. Analysis of bone marrow chimeric mice suggested that Sema4A expression in keratinocytes plays a regulatory role in imiquimod-induced dermatitis. The epidermis of psoriatic non-lesion and Sema4A KO mice demonstrated mTOR complex 1 upregulation, and the application of mTOR inhibitors reversed the skewed expression of cytokeratins in Sema4A KO mice. Conclusively, Sema4A-mediated signaling cascades can be triggers for psoriasis and targets in the treatment and prevention of psoriasis.

    1. Immunology and Inflammation
    Nincy Debeuf, Sahine Lameire ... Bart N Lambrecht
    Research Article

    Since the precursor frequency of naive T cells is extremely low, investigating the early steps of antigen-specific T cell activation is challenging. To overcome this detection problem, adoptive transfer of a cohort of T cells purified from T cell receptor (TCR) transgenic donors has been extensively used but is not readily available for emerging pathogens. Constructing TCR transgenic mice from T cell hybridomas is a labor-intensive and sometimes erratic process, since the best clones are selected based on antigen-induced CD69 upregulation or IL-2 production in vitro, and TCR chains are polymerase chain reaction (PCR)-cloned into expression vectors. Here, we exploited the rapid advances in single-cell sequencing and TCR repertoire analysis to select the best clones without hybridoma selection, and generated CORSET8 mice (CORona Spike Epitope specific CD8 T cell), carrying a TCR specific for the Spike protein of SARS-CoV-2. Implementing newly created DALI software for TCR repertoire analysis in single-cell analysis enabled the rapid selection of the ideal responder CD8 T cell clone, based on antigen reactivity, proliferation, and immunophenotype in vivo. Identified TCR sequences were inserted as synthetic DNA into an expression vector and transgenic CORSET8 donor mice were created. After immunization with Spike/CpG-motifs, mRNA vaccination or SARS-CoV-2 infection, CORSET8 T cells strongly proliferated and showed signs of T cell activation. Thus, a combination of TCR repertoire analysis and scRNA immunophenotyping allowed rapid selection of antigen-specific TCR sequences that can be used to generate TCR transgenic mice.