Quantification of gene expression patterns to reveal the origins of abnormal morphogenesis

  1. Neus Martínez-Abadías  Is a corresponding author
  2. Roger Mateu Estivill
  3. Jaume Sastre Tomas
  4. Susan Motch Perrine
  5. Melissa Yoon
  6. Alex Robert-Moreno
  7. Jim Swoger
  8. Lucia Russo
  9. Kazuhiko Kawasaki
  10. Joan Richtsmeier
  11. James Sharpe  Is a corresponding author
  1. The Barcelona Institute for Science and Technology, Spain
  2. Universitat de Barcelona, Spain
  3. Universitat de les Illes Balears, Spain
  4. Pennsylvania State University, United States

Abstract

The earliest developmental origins of dysmorphologies are poorly understood in many congenital diseases. They often remain elusive because the first signs of genetic misregulation may initiate as subtle changes in gene expression, which are hard to detect and can be obscured later in development by secondary effects. Here, we develop a method to trace the origins of phenotypic abnormalities by accurately quantifying the 3D spatial distribution of gene expression domains in developing organs. By applying geometric morphometrics to 3D gene expression data obtained by Optical Projection Tomography, we determined that our approach is sensitive enough to find regulatory abnormalities that have never been detected previously. We identified subtle but significant differences in the gene expression of a downstream target of the Fgfr2 mutation that were associated with Apert syndrome, demonstrating that these mouse models can further our understanding of limb defects in the human condition. Our method can be applied to different organ systems and models to investigate the etiology of malformations.

Data availability

Our dataset has been deposited to Dryad (doi:10.5061/dryad.8h646s0)

The following data sets were generated

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Neus Martínez-Abadías

    Centre for Genomic Regulation (CRG), The Barcelona Institute for Science and Technology, Barcelona, Spain
    For correspondence
    nieves.martinez@embl.es
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-3061-2123
  2. Roger Mateu Estivill

    Universitat de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-4728-2239
  3. Jaume Sastre Tomas

    Universitat de les Illes Balears, Palma de Mallorca, Spain
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-9053-2390
  4. Susan Motch Perrine

    Pennsylvania State University, University Park, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  5. Melissa Yoon

    Pennsylvania State University, University Park, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  6. Alex Robert-Moreno

    Centre for Genomic Regulation (CRG), The Barcelona Institute for Science and Technology, Barcelona, Spain
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-9042-1316
  7. Jim Swoger

    Centre for Genomic Regulation (CRG), The Barcelona Institute for Science and Technology, Barcelona, Spain
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-3805-0073
  8. Lucia Russo

    Centre for Genomic Regulation (CRG), The Barcelona Institute for Science and Technology, Barcelona, Spain
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  9. Kazuhiko Kawasaki

    Pennsylvania State University, University Park, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  10. Joan Richtsmeier

    Pennsylvania State University, University Park, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  11. James Sharpe

    Centre for Genomic Regulation (CRG), The Barcelona Institute for Science and Technology, Barcelona, Spain
    For correspondence
    james.sharpe@crg.eu
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-1434-9743

Funding

European Commission (FP7‐PEOPLE‐2012‐ 597 IIF 327382)

  • Neus Martínez-Abadías

National Institute for Health Research (NICHD P01HD078233)

  • Joan Richtsmeier

National Institute for Health Research (NIDCR R01DE02298)

  • Joan Richtsmeier

Burroughs Wellcome Fund (2013 Collaborative Research Travel Grant)

  • Joan Richtsmeier

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Ethics

Animal experimentation: All the experiments were performed in compliance with the animal welfare guidelines approved by the Pennsylvania State University Animal Care and Use Committees (IACUC46558, IBC46590).

Copyright

© 2018, Martínez-Abadías et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 3,518
    views
  • 423
    downloads
  • 10
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Neus Martínez-Abadías
  2. Roger Mateu Estivill
  3. Jaume Sastre Tomas
  4. Susan Motch Perrine
  5. Melissa Yoon
  6. Alex Robert-Moreno
  7. Jim Swoger
  8. Lucia Russo
  9. Kazuhiko Kawasaki
  10. Joan Richtsmeier
  11. James Sharpe
(2018)
Quantification of gene expression patterns to reveal the origins of abnormal morphogenesis
eLife 7:e36405.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.36405

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.36405

Further reading

    1. Developmental Biology
    Wenyue Guan, Ziyan Nie ... Jonathan Enriquez
    Research Article

    Neuronal stem cells generate a limited and consistent number of neuronal progenies, each possessing distinct morphologies and functions, which are crucial for optimal brain function. Our study focused on a neuroblast (NB) lineage in Drosophila known as Lin A/15, which generates motoneurons (MNs) and glia. Intriguingly, Lin A/15 NB dedicates 40% of its time to producing immature MNs (iMNs) that are subsequently eliminated through apoptosis. Two RNA-binding proteins, Imp and Syp, play crucial roles in this process. Imp+ MNs survive, while Imp−, Syp+ MNs undergo apoptosis. Genetic experiments show that Imp promotes survival, whereas Syp promotes cell death in iMNs. Late-born MNs, which fail to express a functional code of transcription factors (mTFs) that control their morphological fate, are subject to elimination. Manipulating the expression of Imp and Syp in Lin A/15 NB and progeny leads to a shift of TF code in late-born MNs toward that of early-born MNs, and their survival. Additionally, introducing the TF code of early-born MNs into late-born MNs also promoted their survival. These findings demonstrate that the differential expression of Imp and Syp in iMNs links precise neuronal generation and distinct identities through the regulation of mTFs. Both Imp and Syp are conserved in vertebrates, suggesting that they play a fundamental role in precise neurogenesis across species.

    1. Computational and Systems Biology
    2. Developmental Biology
    Juan Manuel Gomez, Hendrik Nolte ... Maria Leptin
    Research Article Updated

    The initially homogeneous epithelium of the early Drosophila embryo differentiates into regional subpopulations with different behaviours and physical properties that are needed for morphogenesis. The factors at top of the genetic hierarchy that control these behaviours are known, but many of their targets are not. To understand how proteins work together to mediate differential cellular activities, we studied in an unbiased manner the proteomes and phosphoproteomes of the three main cell populations along the dorso-ventral axis during gastrulation using mutant embryos that represent the different populations. We detected 6111 protein groups and 6259 phosphosites of which 3398 and 3433 were differentially regulated, respectively. The changes in phosphosite abundance did not correlate with changes in host protein abundance, showing phosphorylation to be a regulatory step during gastrulation. Hierarchical clustering of protein groups and phosphosites identified clusters that contain known fate determinants such as Doc1, Sog, Snail, and Twist. The recovery of the appropriate known marker proteins in each of the different mutants we used validated the approach, but also revealed that two mutations that both interfere with the dorsal fate pathway, Toll10B and serpin27aex do this in very different manners. Diffused network analyses within each cluster point to microtubule components as one of the main groups of regulated proteins. Functional studies on the role of microtubules provide the proof of principle that microtubules have different functions in different domains along the DV axis of the embryo.