Abstract

Glial support is critical for normal axon function and can become dysregulated in white matter (WM) disease. In humans, loss-of-function mutations of KCNJ10, which encodes the inward-rectifying potassium channel KIR4.1, causes seizures and progressive neurological decline. We investigated Kir4.1 functions in oligodendrocytes (OLs) during development, adulthood and after WM injury. We observed that Kir4.1 channels localized to perinodal areas and the inner myelin tongue, suggesting roles in juxta-axonal K+ removal. Conditional knockout (cKO) of OL-Kcnj10 resulted in late onset mitochondrial damage and axonal degeneration. This was accompanied by neuronal loss and neuro-axonal dysfunction in adult OL-Kcnj10 cKO mice as shown by delayed visual evoked potentials, inner retinal thinning and progressive motor deficits. Axon pathologies in OL-Kcnj10 cKO were exacerbated after WM injury in the spinal cord. Our findings point towards a critical role of OL-Kir4.1 for long-term maintenance of axon function and integrity during adulthood and after WM injury.

Data availability

All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in the manuscript and supporting files.

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Lucas Schirmer

    Eli and Edythe Broad Center of Regeneration Medicine and Stem Cell Research, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, United States
    Competing interests
    Lucas Schirmer, filed a patent for the detection of antibodies against KIR4.1 in a subpopulation of patients with multiple sclerosis (WO2015166057A1).
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-7142-4116
  2. Wiebke Möbius

    Department of Neurogenetics, Max Planck Institute of Experimental Medicine, Göttingen, Germany
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-2902-7165
  3. Chao Zhao

    Wellcome Trust-MRC Cambridge Stem Cell Institute, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-1144-1621
  4. Andrés Cruz-Herranz

    Department of Neurology, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  5. Lucile Ben Haim

    Eli and Edythe Broad Center of Regeneration Medicine and Stem Cell Research, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  6. Christian Cordano

    Department of Neurology, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  7. Lawrence R Shiow

    Eli and Edythe Broad Center of Regeneration Medicine and Stem Cell Research, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  8. Kevin W Kelley

    Eli and Edythe Broad Center of Regeneration Medicine and Stem Cell Research, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  9. Boguslawa Sadowski

    Department of Neurogenetics, Max Planck Institute of Experimental Medicine, Göttingen, Germany
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  10. Garrett Timmons

    Department of Neurology, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  11. Anne-Katrin Pröbstel

    Department of Neurology, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  12. Jackie N Wright

    Eli and Edythe Broad Center of Regeneration Medicine and Stem Cell Research, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  13. Jung Hyung Sin

    Department of Neurology, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  14. Michael Devereux

    Department of Neurology, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  15. Daniel E Morrison

    Wellcome Trust-MRC Cambridge Stem Cell Institute, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  16. Sandra M Chang

    Eli and Edythe Broad Center of Regeneration Medicine and Stem Cell Research, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  17. Khalida Sabeur

    Eli and Edythe Broad Center of Regeneration Medicine and Stem Cell Research, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  18. Ari Green

    Department of Neurology, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  19. Klaus-Armin Nave

    Department of Neurogenetics, Max Planck Institute of Experimental Medicine, Göttingen, Germany
    Competing interests
    Klaus-Armin Nave, Reviewing editor, eLife.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-8724-9666
  20. Robin JM Franklin

    Wellcome Trust-MRC Cambridge Stem Cell Institute, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  21. David H Rowitch

    Wellcome Trust-MRC Cambridge Stem Cell Institute, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom
    For correspondence
    dhr25@medschl.cam.ac.uk
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-0079-0060

Funding

National Multiple Sclerosis Society (FG-1607-25111)

  • Lucas Schirmer

European Commission (ERC advanced grant - AxoGLIA)

  • Klaus-Armin Nave

National Multiple Sclerosis Society (FG-20102-A-1)

  • Andrés Cruz-Herranz

Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (EXC171)

  • Wiebke Möbius
  • Klaus-Armin Nave

Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung (P300PB_177927)

  • Anne-Katrin Pröbstel

European Commission (ERC advanced grant - MyeliNANO)

  • Klaus-Armin Nave

Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (TR43)

  • Wiebke Möbius

Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (SCHI 1330/1-1)

  • Lucas Schirmer

Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung (P2SKP3_164938/1)

  • Anne-Katrin Pröbstel

Associazione Italiana Sclerosi Multipla (2013/B/4)

  • Christian Cordano

Multiple Sclerosis Society (Project grant)

  • Robin JM Franklin

Wellcome (Senior investigator grant)

  • David H Rowitch

Dr. Miriam and Sheldon G. Adelson Medical Research Foundation (Collaborative research grant)

  • Klaus-Armin Nave
  • Robin JM Franklin
  • David H Rowitch

National Institutes of Health (NS040511)

  • David H Rowitch

California Institute of Regenerative Medicine (Medical Scientist Training Program)

  • Kevin W Kelley

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Ethics

Animal experimentation: All mouse strains were maintained at the University of California, San Francisco (UCSF) specific pathogen-free animal facility under protocol number AN110094. All animal protocols were approved by and in accordance with the guidelines established by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee and Laboratory Animal Resource Center.

Copyright

© 2018, Schirmer et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 4,767
    views
  • 979
    downloads
  • 76
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Lucas Schirmer
  2. Wiebke Möbius
  3. Chao Zhao
  4. Andrés Cruz-Herranz
  5. Lucile Ben Haim
  6. Christian Cordano
  7. Lawrence R Shiow
  8. Kevin W Kelley
  9. Boguslawa Sadowski
  10. Garrett Timmons
  11. Anne-Katrin Pröbstel
  12. Jackie N Wright
  13. Jung Hyung Sin
  14. Michael Devereux
  15. Daniel E Morrison
  16. Sandra M Chang
  17. Khalida Sabeur
  18. Ari Green
  19. Klaus-Armin Nave
  20. Robin JM Franklin
  21. David H Rowitch
(2018)
Oligodendrocyte-encoded Kir4.1 function is required for axonal integrity
eLife 7:e36428.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.36428

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.36428

Further reading

    1. Neuroscience
    David C Williams, Amanda Chu ... Michael A McDannald
    Research Advance

    Recognizing and responding to threat cues is essential to survival. Freezing is a predominant threat behavior in rats. We have recently shown that a threat cue can organize diverse behaviors beyond freezing, including locomotion (Chu et al., 2024). However, that experimental design was complex, required many sessions, and had rats receive many foot shock presentations. Moreover, the findings were descriptive. Here, we gave female and male Long Evans rats cue light illumination paired or unpaired with foot shock (8 total) in a conditioned suppression setting, using a range of shock intensities (0.15, 0.25, 0.35, or 0.50 mA). We found that conditioned suppression was only observed at higher foot shock intensities (0.35 mA and 0.50 mA). We constructed comprehensive temporal ethograms by scoring 22,272 frames across 12 behavior categories in 200-ms intervals around cue light illumination. The 0.50 mA and 0.35 mA shock-paired visual cues suppressed reward seeking, rearing, and scaling, as well as light-directed rearing and light-directed scaling. The shock-paired visual cue further elicited locomotion and freezing. Linear discriminant analyses showed that ethogram data could accurately classify rats into paired and unpaired groups. Using complete ethogram data produced superior classification compared to behavior subsets, including an Immobility subset featuring freezing. The results demonstrate diverse threat behaviors – in a short and simple procedure – containing sufficient information to distinguish the visual fear conditioning status of individual rats.

    1. Neuroscience
    Agnieszka Glica, Katarzyna Wasilewska ... Katarzyna Jednoróg
    Research Article

    The neural noise hypothesis of dyslexia posits an imbalance between excitatory and inhibitory (E/I) brain activity as an underlying mechanism of reading difficulties. This study provides the first direct test of this hypothesis using both electroencephalography (EEG) power spectrum measures in 120 Polish adolescents and young adults (60 with dyslexia, 60 controls) and glutamate (Glu) and gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA) concentrations from magnetic resonance spectroscopy (MRS) at 7T MRI scanner in half of the sample. Our results, supported by Bayesian statistics, show no evidence of E/I balance differences between groups, challenging the hypothesis that cortical hyperexcitability underlies dyslexia. These findings suggest that alternative mechanisms must be explored and highlight the need for further research into the E/I balance and its role in neurodevelopmental disorders.