Abstract

Glial support is critical for normal axon function and can become dysregulated in white matter (WM) disease. In humans, loss-of-function mutations of KCNJ10, which encodes the inward-rectifying potassium channel KIR4.1, causes seizures and progressive neurological decline. We investigated Kir4.1 functions in oligodendrocytes (OLs) during development, adulthood and after WM injury. We observed that Kir4.1 channels localized to perinodal areas and the inner myelin tongue, suggesting roles in juxta-axonal K+ removal. Conditional knockout (cKO) of OL-Kcnj10 resulted in late onset mitochondrial damage and axonal degeneration. This was accompanied by neuronal loss and neuro-axonal dysfunction in adult OL-Kcnj10 cKO mice as shown by delayed visual evoked potentials, inner retinal thinning and progressive motor deficits. Axon pathologies in OL-Kcnj10 cKO were exacerbated after WM injury in the spinal cord. Our findings point towards a critical role of OL-Kir4.1 for long-term maintenance of axon function and integrity during adulthood and after WM injury.

Data availability

All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in the manuscript and supporting files.

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Lucas Schirmer

    Eli and Edythe Broad Center of Regeneration Medicine and Stem Cell Research, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, United States
    Competing interests
    Lucas Schirmer, filed a patent for the detection of antibodies against KIR4.1 in a subpopulation of patients with multiple sclerosis (WO2015166057A1).
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-7142-4116
  2. Wiebke Möbius

    Department of Neurogenetics, Max Planck Institute of Experimental Medicine, Göttingen, Germany
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-2902-7165
  3. Chao Zhao

    Wellcome Trust-MRC Cambridge Stem Cell Institute, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-1144-1621
  4. Andrés Cruz-Herranz

    Department of Neurology, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  5. Lucile Ben Haim

    Eli and Edythe Broad Center of Regeneration Medicine and Stem Cell Research, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  6. Christian Cordano

    Department of Neurology, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  7. Lawrence R Shiow

    Eli and Edythe Broad Center of Regeneration Medicine and Stem Cell Research, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  8. Kevin W Kelley

    Eli and Edythe Broad Center of Regeneration Medicine and Stem Cell Research, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  9. Boguslawa Sadowski

    Department of Neurogenetics, Max Planck Institute of Experimental Medicine, Göttingen, Germany
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  10. Garrett Timmons

    Department of Neurology, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  11. Anne-Katrin Pröbstel

    Department of Neurology, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  12. Jackie N Wright

    Eli and Edythe Broad Center of Regeneration Medicine and Stem Cell Research, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  13. Jung Hyung Sin

    Department of Neurology, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  14. Michael Devereux

    Department of Neurology, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  15. Daniel E Morrison

    Wellcome Trust-MRC Cambridge Stem Cell Institute, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  16. Sandra M Chang

    Eli and Edythe Broad Center of Regeneration Medicine and Stem Cell Research, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  17. Khalida Sabeur

    Eli and Edythe Broad Center of Regeneration Medicine and Stem Cell Research, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  18. Ari Green

    Department of Neurology, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  19. Klaus-Armin Nave

    Department of Neurogenetics, Max Planck Institute of Experimental Medicine, Göttingen, Germany
    Competing interests
    Klaus-Armin Nave, Reviewing editor, eLife.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-8724-9666
  20. Robin JM Franklin

    Wellcome Trust-MRC Cambridge Stem Cell Institute, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  21. David H Rowitch

    Wellcome Trust-MRC Cambridge Stem Cell Institute, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom
    For correspondence
    dhr25@medschl.cam.ac.uk
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-0079-0060

Funding

National Multiple Sclerosis Society (FG-1607-25111)

  • Lucas Schirmer

European Commission (ERC advanced grant - AxoGLIA)

  • Klaus-Armin Nave

National Multiple Sclerosis Society (FG-20102-A-1)

  • Andrés Cruz-Herranz

Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (EXC171)

  • Wiebke Möbius
  • Klaus-Armin Nave

Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung (P300PB_177927)

  • Anne-Katrin Pröbstel

European Commission (ERC advanced grant - MyeliNANO)

  • Klaus-Armin Nave

Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (TR43)

  • Wiebke Möbius

Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (SCHI 1330/1-1)

  • Lucas Schirmer

Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung (P2SKP3_164938/1)

  • Anne-Katrin Pröbstel

Associazione Italiana Sclerosi Multipla (2013/B/4)

  • Christian Cordano

Multiple Sclerosis Society (Project grant)

  • Robin JM Franklin

Wellcome (Senior investigator grant)

  • David H Rowitch

Dr. Miriam and Sheldon G. Adelson Medical Research Foundation (Collaborative research grant)

  • Klaus-Armin Nave
  • Robin JM Franklin
  • David H Rowitch

National Institutes of Health (NS040511)

  • David H Rowitch

California Institute of Regenerative Medicine (Medical Scientist Training Program)

  • Kevin W Kelley

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Ethics

Animal experimentation: All mouse strains were maintained at the University of California, San Francisco (UCSF) specific pathogen-free animal facility under protocol number AN110094. All animal protocols were approved by and in accordance with the guidelines established by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee and Laboratory Animal Resource Center.

Copyright

© 2018, Schirmer et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 4,623
    views
  • 967
    downloads
  • 69
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Lucas Schirmer
  2. Wiebke Möbius
  3. Chao Zhao
  4. Andrés Cruz-Herranz
  5. Lucile Ben Haim
  6. Christian Cordano
  7. Lawrence R Shiow
  8. Kevin W Kelley
  9. Boguslawa Sadowski
  10. Garrett Timmons
  11. Anne-Katrin Pröbstel
  12. Jackie N Wright
  13. Jung Hyung Sin
  14. Michael Devereux
  15. Daniel E Morrison
  16. Sandra M Chang
  17. Khalida Sabeur
  18. Ari Green
  19. Klaus-Armin Nave
  20. Robin JM Franklin
  21. David H Rowitch
(2018)
Oligodendrocyte-encoded Kir4.1 function is required for axonal integrity
eLife 7:e36428.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.36428

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.36428

Further reading

    1. Cancer Biology
    2. Neuroscience
    Jeffrey Barr, Austin Walz ... Paola D Vermeer
    Research Article

    Cancer patients often experience changes in mental health, prompting an exploration into whether nerves infiltrating tumors contribute to these alterations by impacting brain functions. Using a mouse model for head and neck cancer and neuronal tracing, we show that tumor-infiltrating nerves connect to distinct brain areas. The activation of this neuronal circuitry altered behaviors (decreased nest-building, increased latency to eat a cookie, and reduced wheel running). Tumor-infiltrating nociceptor neurons exhibited heightened calcium activity and brain regions receiving these neural projections showed elevated Fos as well as increased calcium responses compared to non-tumor-bearing counterparts. The genetic elimination of nociceptor neurons decreased brain Fos expression and mitigated the behavioral alterations induced by the presence of the tumor. While analgesic treatment restored nesting and cookie test behaviors, it did not fully restore voluntary wheel running indicating that pain is not the exclusive driver of such behavioral shifts. Unraveling the interaction between the tumor, infiltrating nerves, and the brain is pivotal to developing targeted interventions to alleviate the mental health burdens associated with cancer.

    1. Neuroscience
    Xinlin Hou, Peng Zhang ... Dandan Zhang
    Research Article

    Emotional responsiveness in neonates, particularly their ability to discern vocal emotions, plays an evolutionarily adaptive role in human communication and adaptive behaviors. The developmental trajectory of emotional sensitivity in neonates is crucial for understanding the foundations of early social-emotional functioning. However, the precise onset of this sensitivity and its relationship with gestational age (GA) remain subjects of investigation. In a study involving 120 healthy neonates categorized into six groups based on their GA (ranging from 35 and 40 weeks), we explored their emotional responses to vocal stimuli. These stimuli encompassed disyllables with happy and neutral prosodies, alongside acoustically matched nonvocal control sounds. The assessments occurred during natural sleep states using the odd-ball paradigm and event-related potentials. The results reveal a distinct developmental change at 37 weeks GA, marking the point at which neonates exhibit heightened perceptual acuity for emotional vocal expressions. This newfound ability is substantiated by the presence of the mismatch response, akin to an initial form of adult mismatch negativity, elicited in response to positive emotional vocal prosody. Notably, this perceptual shift’s specificity becomes evident when no such discrimination is observed in acoustically matched control sounds. Neonates born before 37 weeks GA do not display this level of discrimination ability. This developmental change has important implications for our understanding of early social-emotional development, highlighting the role of gestational age in shaping early perceptual abilities. Moreover, while these findings introduce the potential for a valuable screening tool for conditions like autism, characterized by atypical social-emotional functions, it is important to note that the current data are not yet robust enough to fully support this application. This study makes a substantial contribution to the broader field of developmental neuroscience and holds promise for future research on early intervention in neurodevelopmental disorders.