Acute control of the sleep switch in Drosophila reveals a role for gap junctions in regulating behavioral responsiveness

Abstract

Sleep is a dynamic process in most animals, involving distinct stages that probably achieve multiple functions for the brain. Before sleep functions can be initiated, it is likely that behavioral responsiveness to the outside world needs to be reduced first, even while animals are still awake. Recent work in Drosophila has uncovered a sleep switch in the dorsal fan-shaped body (dFB) of the fly's central brain, but it is unknown if these sleep-promoting neurons also govern the acute need to ignore salient stimuli in the environment during sleep transitions. We found that optogenetic activation of the sleep switch suppressed behavioral responsiveness to mechanical stimuli, even in awake flies, indicating a broader role for these neurons in regulating arousal. The dFB-mediated suppression mechanism and its associated neural correlates requires innexin6 expression, suggesting that the acute need to reduce sensory perception when flies fall asleep is mediated in part by electrical synapses.

Data availability

All data generated or analysed during this study are included in the manuscript and supporting files.

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Michael Troup

    Queensland Brain Institute, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  2. Melvyn HW Yap

    Queensland Brain Institute, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  3. Chelsie Rohrscheib

    Queensland Brain Insitute, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  4. Martyna J Grabowska

    Queensland Brain Institute, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-1727-7714
  5. Deniz Ertekin

    Queensland Brain Institute, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  6. Roshini Randeniya

    Queensland Brain Institute, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-1340-750X
  7. Benjamin Kottler

    Queensland Brain Institute, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-4551-5791
  8. Aoife Larkin

    Queensland Brain Institute, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  9. Kelly Munro

    Queensland Brain Institute, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  10. Paul Shaw

    School of Medicine, Washington University in St. Louis, St Louis, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  11. Bruno van Swinderen

    Queensland Brain Institute, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia
    For correspondence
    b.vanswinderen@uq.edu.au
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-6552-7418

Funding

National Institutes of Health (R01 NS076980)

  • Melvyn HW Yap
  • Paul Shaw
  • Bruno van Swinderen

National Health and Medical Research Council (GNT1065713)

  • Michael Troup
  • Chelsie Rohrscheib
  • Aoife Larkin
  • Bruno van Swinderen

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Reviewing Editor

  1. Mani Ramaswami, Trinity College Dublin, Ireland

Version history

  1. Received: April 22, 2018
  2. Accepted: August 14, 2018
  3. Accepted Manuscript published: August 15, 2018 (version 1)
  4. Version of Record published: August 30, 2018 (version 2)

Copyright

© 2018, Troup et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 15,085
    views
  • 669
    downloads
  • 30
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Michael Troup
  2. Melvyn HW Yap
  3. Chelsie Rohrscheib
  4. Martyna J Grabowska
  5. Deniz Ertekin
  6. Roshini Randeniya
  7. Benjamin Kottler
  8. Aoife Larkin
  9. Kelly Munro
  10. Paul Shaw
  11. Bruno van Swinderen
(2018)
Acute control of the sleep switch in Drosophila reveals a role for gap junctions in regulating behavioral responsiveness
eLife 7:e37105.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.37105

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.37105

Further reading

    1. Genetics and Genomics
    2. Neuroscience
    Kenneth Chiou, Noah Snyder-Mackler
    Insight

    Single-cell RNA sequencing reveals the extent to which marmosets carry genetically distinct cells from their siblings.

    1. Neuroscience
    Flavio J Schmidig, Simon Ruch, Katharina Henke
    Research Article

    We are unresponsive during slow-wave sleep but continue monitoring external events for survival. Our brain wakens us when danger is imminent. If events are non-threatening, our brain might store them for later consideration to improve decision-making. To test this hypothesis, we examined whether novel vocabulary consisting of simultaneously played pseudowords and translation words are encoded/stored during sleep, and which neural-electrical events facilitate encoding/storage. An algorithm for brain-state-dependent stimulation selectively targeted word pairs to slow-wave peaks or troughs. Retrieval tests were given 12 and 36 hr later. These tests required decisions regarding the semantic category of previously sleep-played pseudowords. The sleep-played vocabulary influenced awake decision-making 36 hr later, if targeted to troughs. The words’ linguistic processing raised neural complexity. The words’ semantic-associative encoding was supported by increased theta power during the ensuing peak. Fast-spindle power ramped up during a second peak likely aiding consolidation. Hence, new vocabulary played during slow-wave sleep was stored and influenced decision-making days later.