Phase transitioned nuclear Oskar promotes cell division of Drosophila primordial germ cells

  1. Kathryn E Kistler
  2. Tatjana Trcek  Is a corresponding author
  3. Thomas R Hurd
  4. Ruoyu Chen
  5. Feng-Xia Liang
  6. Joseph Sall
  7. Masato Kato
  8. Ruth Lehmann  Is a corresponding author
  1. New York University School of Medicine, United States
  2. NYU Langone Health, United States
  3. University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, United States

Abstract

Germ granules are non-membranous ribonucleoprotein granules deemed the hubs for post-transcriptional gene regulation and functionally linked to germ cell fate across species. Little is known about the physical properties of germ granules and how these relate to germ cell function. Here we study two types of germ granules in the Drosophila embryo: cytoplasmic germ granules that instruct primordial germ cells (PGCs) formation and nuclear germ granules within early PGCs with unknown function. We show that cytoplasmic and nuclear germ granules are phase transitioned condensates nucleated by Oskar protein that display liquid as well as hydrogel-like properties. Focusing on nuclear granules, we find that Oskar drives their formation in heterologous cell systems. Multiple, independent Oskar protein domains synergize to promote granule phase separation. Deletion of Oskar's nuclear localization sequence specifically ablates nuclear granules in cell systems. In the embryo, nuclear germ granules promote germ cell divisions thereby increasing PGC number for the next generation.

Data availability

All data generated or analysed during this study are included in the manuscript and supporting files. Source data has been provided for Figure 3 and Figure 3-figure supplement 1 (Supplementary file 1).

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Kathryn E Kistler

    Department of Cell Biology, New York University School of Medicine, New York, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  2. Tatjana Trcek

    Department of Cell Biology, New York University School of Medicine, New York, United States
    For correspondence
    Tatjana.TrcekPulisic@med.nyu.edu
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-4405-8733
  3. Thomas R Hurd

    Department of Cell Biology, New York University School of Medicine, New York, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  4. Ruoyu Chen

    Department of Cell Biology, New York University School of Medicine, New York, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  5. Feng-Xia Liang

    DART Microscopy Laboratory, NYU Langone Health, New York, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  6. Joseph Sall

    DART Microscopy Laboratory, NYU Langone Health, New York, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  7. Masato Kato

    Department of Biochemistry, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  8. Ruth Lehmann

    Department of Cell Biology, New York University School of Medicine, New York, United States
    For correspondence
    lehmann@saturn.med.nyu.edu
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-8454-5651

Funding

Howard Hughes Medical Institute

  • Ruth Lehmann

Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (K99HD088675)

  • Tatjana Trcek

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Copyright

© 2018, Kistler et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 5,403
    views
  • 896
    downloads
  • 88
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Kathryn E Kistler
  2. Tatjana Trcek
  3. Thomas R Hurd
  4. Ruoyu Chen
  5. Feng-Xia Liang
  6. Joseph Sall
  7. Masato Kato
  8. Ruth Lehmann
(2018)
Phase transitioned nuclear Oskar promotes cell division of Drosophila primordial germ cells
eLife 7:e37949.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.37949

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.37949

Further reading

    1. Cell Biology
    2. Developmental Biology
    Sofía Suárez Freire, Sebastián Perez-Pandolfo ... Mariana Melani
    Research Article

    Eukaryotic cells depend on exocytosis to direct intracellularly synthesized material toward the extracellular space or the plasma membrane, so exocytosis constitutes a basic function for cellular homeostasis and communication between cells. The secretory pathway includes biogenesis of secretory granules (SGs), their maturation and fusion with the plasma membrane (exocytosis), resulting in release of SG content to the extracellular space. The larval salivary gland of Drosophila melanogaster is an excellent model for studying exocytosis. This gland synthesizes mucins that are packaged in SGs that sprout from the trans-Golgi network and then undergo a maturation process that involves homotypic fusion, condensation, and acidification. Finally, mature SGs are directed to the apical domain of the plasma membrane with which they fuse, releasing their content into the gland lumen. The exocyst is a hetero-octameric complex that participates in tethering of vesicles to the plasma membrane during constitutive exocytosis. By precise temperature-dependent gradual activation of the Gal4-UAS expression system, we have induced different levels of silencing of exocyst complex subunits, and identified three temporarily distinctive steps of the regulated exocytic pathway where the exocyst is critically required: SG biogenesis, SG maturation, and SG exocytosis. Our results shed light on previously unidentified functions of the exocyst along the exocytic pathway. We propose that the exocyst acts as a general tethering factor in various steps of this cellular process.

    1. Cell Biology
    Fatima Tleiss, Martina Montanari ... C Leopold Kurz
    Research Article

    Multiple gut antimicrobial mechanisms are coordinated in space and time to efficiently fight foodborne pathogens. In Drosophila melanogaster, production of reactive oxygen species (ROS) and antimicrobial peptides (AMPs) together with intestinal cell renewal play a key role in eliminating gut microbes. A complementary mechanism would be to isolate and treat pathogenic bacteria while allowing colonization by commensals. Using real-time imaging to follow the fate of ingested bacteria, we demonstrate that while commensal Lactiplantibacillus plantarum freely circulate within the intestinal lumen, pathogenic strains such as Erwinia carotovora or Bacillus thuringiensis, are blocked in the anterior midgut where they are rapidly eliminated by antimicrobial peptides. This sequestration of pathogenic bacteria in the anterior midgut requires the Duox enzyme in enterocytes, and both TrpA1 and Dh31 in enteroendocrine cells. Supplementing larval food with hCGRP, the human homolog of Dh31, is sufficient to block the bacteria, suggesting the existence of a conserved mechanism. While the immune deficiency (IMD) pathway is essential for eliminating the trapped bacteria, it is dispensable for the blockage. Genetic manipulations impairing bacterial compartmentalization result in abnormal colonization of posterior midgut regions by pathogenic bacteria. Despite a functional IMD pathway, this ectopic colonization leads to bacterial proliferation and larval death, demonstrating the critical role of bacteria anterior sequestration in larval defense. Our study reveals a temporal orchestration during which pathogenic bacteria, but not innocuous, are confined in the anterior part of the midgut in which they are eliminated in an IMD-pathway-dependent manner.