Pancreatic Cell Fate: To be or not to be
Chromatin remodeling processes can drive acinar cell fate decisions.
- University Medical Center Goettingen, Germany
Every single cell in the body contains the same genetic information. However, different types of cells activate distinct sets of genes at different times and locations, which allows them to carry out their precise roles. How do cells achieve this?
The answer lies in a specific structure called chromatin, which is formed of nucleosome units, in which a defined amount of DNA is wrapped around a core of histone proteins. To activate a specific gene, the chromatin first needs to be remodeled to provide access to the transcription machinery (Strahl and Allis, 2000). This process is firmly controlled by chromatin remodeling proteins, which disrupt the tight contact between DNA and histones, and mobilize the nucleosomes to reveal the ‘hidden’ genes (Owen-Hughes, 2003; Bossen et al., 2015).
Failures in the chromatin remodeling machinery can severely hamper the function of a cell, or worse, foster malignant transformations that can lead to cancer (Feinberg et al., 2016; Plass et al., 2013; Wilson and Roberts, 2011). This affects in particular the subunits of the chromatin remodeling complex called SWI/SNF (Kadoch et al., 2013). So far, it has remained unclear how mutations within this structure can lead to the development of tumors. Now, in eLife, Scott Lowe and colleagues from the Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, the Hannover Medical School and the University of Michigan – including Geulah Livshits as first author – report how a subunit of SWI/SNF, called Arid1a, is involved in the development of pancreatic cancer (Livshits et al., 2018).
Pancreatic cancer is one of the most aggressive types of cancer, with a five-year survival rate of less than 8% (Siegel et al., 2016). Around a quarter of pancreatic cancers contain mutations in the SWI/SNF complex, which are commonly accompanied by mutations in a gene called Kras (Hingorani et al., 2003). Now, Livshits et al. elegantly introduce the subunit Arid1a as a pivotal player in directing the fate of acinar cells – the cells that produce digestive enzymes to help break down food – in the presence of the cancer-causing or oncogenic Kras.
The researchers engineered a mouse model with a Kras mutation that allowed them to turn off Arid1a specifically in the acinar cells by feeding the mice antibiotics. When comparing the pancreas of adult mice with either a Kras mutation only, with deactivated Arid1a only, or with both a Kras mutation and deactivated Arid1a, the results revealed that the consequences of removing Arid1a were determined by the Kras mutation status and the time point of Arid1a depletion in relation to oncogenic activation of Kras (Figure 1).
Figure 1
Schematic illustration of the molecular changes that can alter the identity of acinar cells in the pancreas.
Livshits et al. show that a subunit of the chromatin remodeling protein SWI/SNF, called Arid1a, could contribute to the development of pancreatic cancer. (A) Mice without a Kras mutation and without Arid1a (yellow) did not show any cancer symptoms, suggesting that a lack of Arid1a alone cannot drive the reprogramming of acinar cells (pink). (B) Inactivating Arid1a in the context of a preexisting Kras mutation irreversibly boosts the development of pancreatic cancer (PDAC). (C) Removing Arid1a at the same time as activating the Kras mutation (KrasG12D, red) does not accelerate the formation of precursor lesions that could lead to pancreatic cancer.
Mice without a Kras mutation and without Arid1a did not show any precancerous lesions in their cells, suggesting that the SWI/SNF protein may be dispensable for maintaining the architecture of acinar cells in the absence of oncogenic Kras (Figure 1A). However, inactivating Arid1a in the context of a preexisting Kras mutation significantly accelerated the symptoms of the mice within two weeks: the acinar cells of these mice started to transform into a different phenotype and stopped producing digestive enzymes – instead, they started making other proteins, such as mucins, which are typically found in precancerous or cancerous cells in the pancreas (Figure 1B). Most importantly, these symptoms remained irreversible, even when the antibiotics were removed.
Removing Arid1a in mice embryos at the same time as activating the Kras mutation did not have the same effect (Figure 1C): as the Kras mutation alone eventually leads to formation of pancreatic cancer. The thorough histological and molecular analyses of Livshits et al. demonstrate that a lack of Arid1a can increase the sensitivity of acinar cells to oncogenic signals, leading to the formation of pancreatic cancer. Nevertheless, Arid1a’s contribution to pancreatic carcinogenesis strongly depends on the molecular (mutated Kras) and temporal context (when the Kras mutation occurs).
Due to Arid1a’s ability to influence cell fate, a loss of Arid1a combined with a Kras mutation may therefore severely alter the composition of chromatin. Indeed, when Livshits et al. looked at the chromatin organization, it showed that mice without Arid1a had an abnormal chromatin structure, with genes encoding digestive enzymes being less accessible than in mice with normal Arid1a levels.
Together, the data by Livshits et al. characterize Arid1a as a critical but context-dependent gate keeper of acinar cell fate and pancreatic carcinogenesis. Since chromatin regulatory proteins control reversible processes, they represent promising targets for new therapeutic approaches in cancer treatment. Hence, disentangling the interdependence of the chromatin regulatory protein and context-defining molecular changes in the development of pancreatic cancer and other malignancies, constitutes a difficult but crucial challenge of future studies in the field.
References
-
Epigenetic modulators, modifiers and mediators in cancer aetiology and progressionNature Reviews Genetics 17:284–299.https://doi.org/10.1038/nrg.2016.13
-
Pathways for remodelling chromatinBiochemical Society Transactions 31:893–905.https://doi.org/10.1042/bst0310893
-
Mutations in regulators of the epigenome and their connections to global chromatin patterns in cancerNature Reviews Genetics 14:765–780.https://doi.org/10.1038/nrg3554
-
Cancer statistics, 2016CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians 66:7–30.https://doi.org/10.3322/caac.21332
-
SWI/SNF nucleosome remodellers and cancerNature Reviews Cancer 11:481–492.https://doi.org/10.1038/nrc3068
Article and author information
Author details
Elisabeth Hessmann
Publication history
- Version of Record published: July 17, 2018 (version 1)
Copyright
© 2018, Zhang et al.
This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.
Metrics
-
- 1,145
- views
-
- 117
- downloads
-
- 1
- citations
Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.
Download links
A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.
Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)
Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)
Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)
Pancreatic Cell Fate: To be or not to be
eLife 7:e38967.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.38967
Further reading
-
- Cancer Biology
Tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI) directed against MET have been recently approved to treat advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) harbouring activating MET mutations. This success is the consequence of a long characterization of MET mutations in cancers, which we propose to outline in this review. MET, a receptor tyrosine kinase (RTK), displays in a broad panel of cancers many deregulations liable to promote tumour progression. The first MET mutation was discovered in 1997, in hereditary papillary renal cancer (HPRC), providing the first direct link between MET mutations and cancer development. As in other RTKs, these mutations are located in the kinase domain, leading in most cases to ligand-independent MET activation. In 2014, novel MET mutations were identified in several advanced cancers, including lung cancers. These mutations alter splice sites of exon 14, causing in-frame exon 14 skipping and deletion of a regulatory domain. Because these mutations are not located in the kinase domain, they are original and their mode of action has yet to be fully elucidated. Less than five years after the discovery of such mutations, the efficacy of a MET TKI was evidenced in NSCLC patients displaying MET exon 14 skipping. Yet its use led to a resistance mechanism involving acquisition of novel and already characterized MET mutations. Furthermore, novel somatic MET mutations are constantly being discovered. The challenge is no longer to identify them but to characterize them in order to predict their transforming activity and their sensitivity or resistance to MET TKIs, in order to adapt treatment.
-
- Cancer Biology
- Genetics and Genomics
Relapse of acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is highly aggressive and often treatment refractory. We analyzed previously published AML relapse cohorts and found that 40% of relapses occur without changes in driver mutations, suggesting that non-genetic mechanisms drive relapse in a large proportion of cases. We therefore characterized epigenetic patterns of AML relapse using 26 matched diagnosis-relapse samples with ATAC-seq. This analysis identified a relapse-specific chromatin accessibility signature for mutationally stable AML, suggesting that AML undergoes epigenetic evolution at relapse independent of mutational changes. Analysis of leukemia stem cell (LSC) chromatin changes at relapse indicated that this leukemic compartment underwent significantly less epigenetic evolution than non-LSCs, while epigenetic changes in non-LSCs reflected overall evolution of the bulk leukemia. Finally, we used single-cell ATAC-seq paired with mitochondrial sequencing (mtscATAC) to map clones from diagnosis into relapse along with their epigenetic features. We found that distinct mitochondrially-defined clones exhibit more similar chromatin accessibility at relapse relative to diagnosis, demonstrating convergent epigenetic evolution in relapsed AML. These results demonstrate that epigenetic evolution is a feature of relapsed AML and that convergent epigenetic evolution can occur following treatment with induction chemotherapy.
