1. Developmental Biology
Download icon

Branching morphogenesis in the developing kidney is not impacted by nephron formation or integration

  1. Kieran M Short
  2. Alexander Combes
  3. Valerie Lisnyak
  4. James Lefevre
  5. Lynelle Jones
  6. Melissa H Little
  7. Nicholas Hamilton
  8. Ian Macleod Smyth  Is a corresponding author
  1. Monash University, Australia
  2. Murdoch Childrens Research Institute, Australia
  3. University of Queensland, Australia
Short Report
  • Cited 11
  • Views 2,053
  • Annotations
Cite this article as: eLife 2018;7:e38992 doi: 10.7554/eLife.38992

Abstract

Branching morphogenesis of the ureteric bud is integral to kidney development; establishing the collecting ducts of the adult organ and driving organ expansion via peripheral interactions with nephron progenitor cells. A recent study suggested that termination of tip branching within the developing kidney involved stochastic exhaustion in response to nephron formation, with such a termination event representing a unifying developmental process evident in many organs. To examine this possibility we have profiled the impact of nephron formation and maturation on elaboration of the ureteric bud during mouse kidney development. We find a distinct absence of random branch termination events within the kidney or evidence that nephrogenesis impacts the branching program or cell proliferation in either tip or progenitor cell niches. Instead, organogenesis proceeds in a manner indifferent to the development of these structures. Hence stochastic cessation of branching is not a unifying developmental feature in all branching organs.

Data availability

All data generated or analysed during this study are included in the manuscript and supporting files - see appended Excel files.

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Kieran M Short

    Department of Anatomy and Developmental Biology, Monash Biomedicine Discovery Institute, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  2. Alexander Combes

    Developmental Nephrology, Murdoch Childrens Research Institute, Melbourne, Australia
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  3. Valerie Lisnyak

    Department of Anatomy and Developmental Biology, Monash Biomedicine Discovery Institute, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  4. James Lefevre

    Division of Genomics and Development of Disease, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  5. Lynelle Jones

    Department of Anatomy and Developmental Biology, Monash Biomedicine Discovery Institute, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  6. Melissa H Little

    Kidney Development, Disease and Regeneration, Murdoch Childrens Research Institute, Melbourne, Australia
    Competing interests
    Melissa H Little, has consulted for and received research funding from Organovo Inc..
  7. Nicholas Hamilton

    Division of Genomics and Development of Disease, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  8. Ian Macleod Smyth

    Department of Anatomy and Developmental Biology, Monash Biomedicine Discovery Institute, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia
    For correspondence
    ian.smyth@monash.edu
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-1727-7829

Funding

National Health and Medical Research Council (1002748)

  • Melissa H Little

Australian Research Council (DP160103100)

  • Nicholas Hamilton
  • Ian Macleod Smyth

Human Frontier Science Program (RGP0039/2011)

  • Melissa H Little
  • Ian Macleod Smyth

National Health and Medical Research Council (1063696)

  • Melissa H Little

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Ethics

Animal experimentation: All animal experiments in this study were assessed and approved by Monash University or the Murdoch Children's Research Institute Animal Ethics Committees (MARP/2016/144) and were conducted under applicable Australian laws governing the care and use of animals for scientific purposes.

Reviewing Editor

  1. Andrew Ewald, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, United States

Publication history

  1. Received: June 7, 2018
  2. Accepted: July 31, 2018
  3. Accepted Manuscript published: July 31, 2018 (version 1)
  4. Version of Record published: August 29, 2018 (version 2)

Copyright

© 2018, Short et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 2,053
    Page views
  • 304
    Downloads
  • 11
    Citations

Article citation count generated by polling the highest count across the following sources: Crossref, Scopus, PubMed Central.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Download citations (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Further reading

    1. Developmental Biology
    Sounak Sahu et al.
    Short Report Updated

    Mechanical stress during cell migration may be a previously unappreciated source of genome instability, but the extent to which this happens in any animal in vivo remains unknown. We consider an in vivo system where the adult stem cells of planarian flatworms are required to migrate to a distal wound site. We observe a relationship between adult stem cell migration and ongoing DNA damage and repair during tissue regeneration. Migrating planarian stem cells undergo changes in nuclear shape and exhibit increased levels of DNA damage. Increased DNA damage levels reduce once stem cells reach the wound site. Stem cells in which DNA damage is induced prior to wounding take longer to initiate migration and migrating stem cell populations are more sensitive to further DNA damage than stationary stem cells. RNAi-mediated knockdown of DNA repair pathway components blocks normal stem cell migration, confirming that active DNA repair pathways are required to allow successful migration to a distal wound site. Together these findings provide evidence that levels of migration-coupled-DNA-damage are significant in adult stem cells and that ongoing migration requires DNA repair mechanisms. Our findings reveal that migration of normal stem cells in vivo represents an unappreciated source of damage, which could be a significant source of mutations in animals during development or during long-term tissue homeostasis.

    1. Developmental Biology
    2. Plant Biology
    Elvira Hernandez-Lagana et al.
    Research Article

    In multicellular organisms, sexual reproduction requires the separation of the germline from the soma. In flowering plants, the female germline precursor differentiates as a single spore mother cell (SMC) as the ovule primordium forms. Here, we explored how organ growth contributes to SMC differentiation. We generated 92 annotated 3D images at cellular resolution in Arabidopsis. We identified the spatio-temporal pattern of cell division that acts in a domain-specific manner as the primordium forms. Tissue growth models uncovered plausible morphogenetic principles involving a spatially confined growth signal, differential mechanical properties, and cell growth anisotropy. Our analysis revealed that SMC characteristics first arise in more than one cell but SMC fate becomes progressively restricted to a single cell during organ growth. Altered primordium geometry coincided with a delay in the fate restriction process in katanin mutants. Altogether, our study suggests that tissue geometry channels reproductive cell fate in the Arabidopsis ovule primordium.