Unique morphogenetic signatures define mammalian neck muscles and associated connective tissues

  1. Eglantine Heude
  2. Marketa Tesarova
  3. Elizabeth M Sefton
  4. Estelle Jullian
  5. Noritaka Adachi
  6. Alexandre Grimaldi
  7. Tomas Zikmund
  8. Jozef Kaiser
  9. Gabrielle Kardon
  10. Robert G Kelly
  11. Shahragim Tajbakhsh  Is a corresponding author
  1. Institut Pasteur, France
  2. Brno University of Technology, Czech Republic
  3. University of Utah, United States
  4. Aix-Marseille Université, France

Abstract

In vertebrates, head and trunk muscles develop from different mesodermal populations and are regulated by distinct genetic networks. Neck muscles at the head-trunk interface remain poorly defined due to their complex morphogenesis and dual mesodermal origins. Here, we use genetically modified mice to establish a 3D model that integrates regulatory genes, cell populations and morphogenetic events that define this transition zone. We show that the evolutionary conserved cucullaris-derived muscles originate from posterior cardiopharyngeal mesoderm, not lateral plate mesoderm, and we define new boundaries for neural crest and mesodermal contributions to neck connective tissue. Furthermore, lineage studies and functional analysis of Tbx1- and Pax3-null mice reveal a unique developmental program for somitic neck muscles that is distinct from that of somitic trunk muscles. Our findings unveil the embryological and developmental requirements underlying tetrapod neck myogenesis and provide a blueprint to investigate how muscle subsets are selectively affected in some human myopathies.

Data availability

All data generated or analysed during this study are included in the manuscript and supporting files.

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Eglantine Heude

    Department of Developmental and Stem Cell Biology, Institut Pasteur, Paris, France
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  2. Marketa Tesarova

    Central European Institute of Technology, Brno University of Technology, Brno, Czech Republic
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  3. Elizabeth M Sefton

    Department of Human Genetics, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-6481-612X
  4. Estelle Jullian

    CNRS UMR 7288, Aix-Marseille Université, Marseille, France
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  5. Noritaka Adachi

    CNRS UMR 7288, Aix-Marseille Université, Marseille, France
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-9482-8436
  6. Alexandre Grimaldi

    Department of Developmental and Stem Cell Biology, Institut Pasteur, Paris, France
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  7. Tomas Zikmund

    Central European Institute of Technology, Brno University of Technology, Brno, Czech Republic
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  8. Jozef Kaiser

    Central European Institute of Technology, Brno University of Technology, Brno, Czech Republic
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  9. Gabrielle Kardon

    Department of Human Genetics, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  10. Robert G Kelly

    CNRS UMR 7288, Aix-Marseille Université, Marseille, France
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  11. Shahragim Tajbakhsh

    Department of Developmental & Stem Cell Biology, Institut Pasteur, Paris, France
    For correspondence
    shahragim.tajbakhsh@pasteur.fr
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-1809-7202

Funding

Institut Pasteur

  • Eglantine Heude
  • Alexandre Grimaldi
  • Shahragim Tajbakhsh

National Institutes of Health

  • Elizabeth M Sefton
  • Gabrielle Kardon

Agence Nationale de la Recherche

  • Eglantine Heude
  • Alexandre Grimaldi
  • Shahragim Tajbakhsh

Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique

  • Eglantine Heude
  • Estelle Jullian
  • Noritaka Adachi
  • Alexandre Grimaldi
  • Robert G Kelly
  • Shahragim Tajbakhsh

Association Française contre les Myopathies

  • Eglantine Heude
  • Alexandre Grimaldi
  • Shahragim Tajbakhsh

Central European Institute of Technology

  • Marketa Tesarova
  • Tomas Zikmund
  • Jozef Kaiser

March of Dimes Foundation

  • Elizabeth M Sefton
  • Gabrielle Kardon

Fondation pour la Recherche Médicale

  • Estelle Jullian
  • Noritaka Adachi
  • Robert G Kelly

Fondation Leducq

  • Estelle Jullian
  • Noritaka Adachi
  • Robert G Kelly

Yamada Science Foundation

  • Noritaka Adachi
  • Robert G Kelly

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Reviewing Editor

  1. Clare Blackburn, MRC Centre for Regenerative Medicine, University of Edinburgh, United Kingdom

Ethics

Animal experimentation: Animals were handled as per European Community guidelines and the ethics committee of the Institut Pasteur (CTEA) approved protocols. (APAFIS#6354-20160809l2028839)

Version history

  1. Received: July 17, 2018
  2. Accepted: November 17, 2018
  3. Accepted Manuscript published: November 19, 2018 (version 1)
  4. Version of Record published: December 28, 2018 (version 2)

Copyright

© 2018, Heude et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 3,252
    views
  • 599
    downloads
  • 53
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Eglantine Heude
  2. Marketa Tesarova
  3. Elizabeth M Sefton
  4. Estelle Jullian
  5. Noritaka Adachi
  6. Alexandre Grimaldi
  7. Tomas Zikmund
  8. Jozef Kaiser
  9. Gabrielle Kardon
  10. Robert G Kelly
  11. Shahragim Tajbakhsh
(2018)
Unique morphogenetic signatures define mammalian neck muscles and associated connective tissues
eLife 7:e40179.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.40179

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.40179

Further reading

    1. Developmental Biology
    2. Structural Biology and Molecular Biophysics
    Samuel C Griffiths, Jia Tan ... Hsin-Yi Henry Ho
    Research Article Updated

    The receptor tyrosine kinase ROR2 mediates noncanonical WNT5A signaling to orchestrate tissue morphogenetic processes, and dysfunction of the pathway causes Robinow syndrome, brachydactyly B, and metastatic diseases. The domain(s) and mechanisms required for ROR2 function, however, remain unclear. We solved the crystal structure of the extracellular cysteine-rich (CRD) and Kringle (Kr) domains of ROR2 and found that, unlike other CRDs, the ROR2 CRD lacks the signature hydrophobic pocket that binds lipids/lipid-modified proteins, such as WNTs, suggesting a novel mechanism of ligand reception. Functionally, we showed that the ROR2 CRD, but not other domains, is required and minimally sufficient to promote WNT5A signaling, and Robinow mutations in the CRD and the adjacent Kr impair ROR2 secretion and function. Moreover, using function-activating and -perturbing antibodies against the Frizzled (FZ) family of WNT receptors, we demonstrate the involvement of FZ in WNT5A-ROR signaling. Thus, ROR2 acts via its CRD to potentiate the function of a receptor super-complex that includes FZ to transduce WNT5A signals.

    1. Cell Biology
    2. Developmental Biology
    Nicolas Loyer, Elizabeth KJ Hogg ... Jens Januschke
    Research Article Updated

    The generation of distinct cell fates during development depends on asymmetric cell division of progenitor cells. In the central and peripheral nervous system of Drosophila, progenitor cells respectively called neuroblasts or sensory organ precursors use PAR polarity during mitosis to control cell fate determination in their daughter cells. How polarity and the cell cycle are coupled, and how the cell cycle machinery regulates PAR protein function and cell fate determination is poorly understood. Here, we generate an analog sensitive allele of CDK1 and reveal that its partial inhibition weakens but does not abolish apical polarity in embryonic and larval neuroblasts and leads to defects in polarisation of fate determinants. We describe a novel in vivo phosphorylation of Bazooka, the Drosophila homolog of PAR-3, on Serine180, a consensus CDK phosphorylation site. In some tissular contexts, phosphorylation of Serine180 occurs in asymmetrically dividing cells but not in their symmetrically dividing neighbours. In neuroblasts, Serine180 phosphomutants disrupt the timing of basal polarisation. Serine180 phosphomutants also affect the specification and binary cell fate determination of sensory organ precursors as well as Baz localisation during their asymmetric cell divisions. Finally, we show that CDK1 phosphorylates Serine-S180 and an equivalent Serine on human PAR-3 in vitro.