Regional complexity in enteric neuron wiring reflects diversity of motility patterns in the mouse large intestine

  1. Zhiling Li
  2. Marlene M Hao
  3. Chris Van den Haute
  4. Veerle Baekelandt
  5. Werend Boesmans  Is a corresponding author
  6. Pieter Vanden Berghe  Is a corresponding author
  1. University of Leuven, Belgium
  2. University of Melbourne, Australia

Abstract

The enteric nervous system controls a variety of gastrointestinal functions including intestinal motility. The minimal neuronal circuit necessary to direct peristalsis is well-characterized but several intestinal regions display also other motility patterns for which the underlying circuits and connectivity schemes that coordinate the transition between those patterns are poorly understood. We investigated whether in regions with a richer palette of motility patterns, the underlying nerve circuits reflect this complexity. Using Ca2+ imaging, we determined the location and response fingerprint of large populations of enteric neurons upon focal network stimulation. Complemented by neuronal tracing and volumetric reconstructions of synaptic contacts, this shows that the multifunctional proximal colon requires specific additional circuit components as compared to the distal colon, where peristalsis is the predominant motility pattern. Our study reveals that motility control is hard-wired in the enteric neural networks and that circuit complexity matches the motor pattern portfolio of specific intestinal regions.

Data availability

All data generated or analysed during this study are included in the manuscript and supporting files. Source data files have been provided for each of the figures.

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Zhiling Li

    Laboratory for Enteric NeuroScience (LENS), University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  2. Marlene M Hao

    Department of Anatomy and Neuroscience, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  3. Chris Van den Haute

    Laboratory for Neurobiology and Gene Therapy, Department of Neurosciences, University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  4. Veerle Baekelandt

    Laboratory for Neurobiology and Gene Therapy, Department of Neurosciences, University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  5. Werend Boesmans

    Laboratory for Enteric NeuroScience (LENS), University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
    For correspondence
    werend.boesmans@kuleuven.be
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-2426-0451
  6. Pieter Vanden Berghe

    Laboratory for Enteric NeuroScience (LENS), University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
    For correspondence
    pieter.vandenberghe@med.kuleuven.be
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-0009-2094

Funding

Fonds Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek (G.0921.15)

  • Werend Boesmans
  • Pieter Vanden Berghe

Hercules Foundation (AKUL/15/37)

  • Werend Boesmans
  • Pieter Vanden Berghe

Chinese Scholarship Council (201408370078)

  • Zhiling Li

KULeuven (C32/15/031)

  • Veerle Baekelandt

Hercules Foundation (AKUL/11/37)

  • Werend Boesmans
  • Pieter Vanden Berghe

Fonds Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek (SBO/S006617N)

  • Veerle Baekelandt

Postdoctoral fellowship of the Fund for Scientific Research Flanders

  • Marlene M Hao

Fund for Scientific Research Flanders (G.0921.15 SBO/S006617N)

  • Pieter Vanden Berghe

IWT (SBO/130065)

  • Pieter Vanden Berghe

Hercules Foundation (AKUL/13/37)

  • Werend Boesmans
  • Pieter Vanden Berghe

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Ethics

Animal experimentation: All experiments were approved by the animal ethics committee of the KU Leuven guidelines for the use and care of animals (specific license numbers: P192-2013; P017-2013; P021-2015)

Copyright

© 2019, Li et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 5,340
    views
  • 631
    downloads
  • 74
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Zhiling Li
  2. Marlene M Hao
  3. Chris Van den Haute
  4. Veerle Baekelandt
  5. Werend Boesmans
  6. Pieter Vanden Berghe
(2019)
Regional complexity in enteric neuron wiring reflects diversity of motility patterns in the mouse large intestine
eLife 8:e42914.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.42914

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.42914

Further reading

    1. Neuroscience
    Sam E Benezra, Kripa B Patel ... Randy M Bruno
    Research Article

    Learning alters cortical representations and improves perception. Apical tuft dendrites in cortical layer 1, which are unique in their connectivity and biophysical properties, may be a key site of learning-induced plasticity. We used both two-photon and SCAPE microscopy to longitudinally track tuft-wide calcium spikes in apical dendrites of layer 5 pyramidal neurons in barrel cortex as mice learned a tactile behavior. Mice were trained to discriminate two orthogonal directions of whisker stimulation. Reinforcement learning, but not repeated stimulus exposure, enhanced tuft selectivity for both directions equally, even though only one was associated with reward. Selective tufts emerged from initially unresponsive or low-selectivity populations. Animal movement and choice did not account for changes in stimulus selectivity. Enhanced selectivity persisted even after rewards were removed and animals ceased performing the task. We conclude that learning produces long-lasting realignment of apical dendrite tuft responses to behaviorally relevant dimensions of a task.

    1. Neuroscience
    Lian Hollander-Cohen, Omer Cohen ... Berta Levavi-Sivan
    Research Article

    Life histories of oviparous species dictate high metabolic investment in the process of gonadal development leading to ovulation. In vertebrates, these two distinct processes are controlled by the gonadotropins follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) and luteinizing hormone (LH), respectively. While it was suggested that a common secretagogue, gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH), oversees both functions, the generation of loss-of-function fish challenged this view. Here, we reveal that the satiety hormone cholecystokinin (CCK) is the primary regulator of this axis in zebrafish. We found that FSH cells express a CCK receptor, and our findings demonstrate that mutating this receptor results in a severe hindrance to ovarian development. Additionally, it causes a complete shutdown of both gonadotropins secretion. Using in-vivo and ex-vivo calcium imaging of gonadotrophs, we show that GnRH predominantly activates LH cells, whereas FSH cells respond to CCK stimulation, designating CCK as the bona fide FSH secretagogue. These findings indicate that the control of gametogenesis in fish was placed under different neural circuits, that are gated by CCK.