Visual cue-related activity of cells in the medial entorhinal cortex during navigation in virtual reality

  1. Amina A Kinkhabwala  Is a corresponding author
  2. Yi Gu  Is a corresponding author
  3. Dmitriy Aronov
  4. David W Tank  Is a corresponding author
  1. Caltech, United States
  2. Princeton University, United States

Abstract

During spatial navigation, animals use self-motion to estimate positions through path integration. However, estimation errors accumulate over time and it is unclear how they are corrected. Here we report a new cell class ('cue cell') encoding visual cues that could be used to correct errors in path integration in mouse medial entorhinal cortex (MEC). During virtual navigation, individual cue cells exhibited firing fields only near visual cues and their population response formed sequences repeated at each cue. These cells consistently responded to cues across multiple environments. On a track with cues on left and right sides, most cue cells responded to cues only one side. During navigation in a real arena, they showed spatially stable activity and accounted for 32% of unidentified, spatially stable MEC cells. These cue cell properties demonstrate that the MEC contains a code representing spatial landmarks, which could be important for error correction during path integration.

Data availability

All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in the manuscript and supporting files.

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Amina A Kinkhabwala

    Biology and Biological Engineering, Caltech, Pasadena, United States
    For correspondence
    amina.kinkhabwala@gmail.com
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  2. Yi Gu

    Princeton Neuroscience Institute, Princeton University, Princeton, United States
    For correspondence
    guyi.thu@gmail.com
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  3. Dmitriy Aronov

    Princeton Neuroscience Institute, Princeton University, Princeton, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  4. David W Tank

    Princeton Neuroscience Institute, Princeton University, Princeton, United States
    For correspondence
    dwtank@princeton.edu
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-9423-4267

Funding

National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (5R37NS081242)

  • David W Tank

National Institute of Mental Health (5R01MH083686)

  • David W Tank

National Institutes of Health (F32NS070514-01A1)

  • Amina A Kinkhabwala

The funders had no role in the experiments or analysis in this publication.

Reviewing Editor

  1. Sachin Deshmukh, Indian Institute of Science Bangalore, India

Ethics

Animal experimentation: All procedures were approved by the Princeton University Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC protocol# 1910-15) and were in compliance with the Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals.

Version history

  1. Received: October 26, 2018
  2. Accepted: March 6, 2020
  3. Accepted Manuscript published: March 9, 2020 (version 1)
  4. Version of Record published: March 23, 2020 (version 2)

Copyright

© 2020, Kinkhabwala et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 3,606
    Page views
  • 576
    Downloads
  • 15
    Citations

Article citation count generated by polling the highest count across the following sources: Crossref, PubMed Central, Scopus.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Amina A Kinkhabwala
  2. Yi Gu
  3. Dmitriy Aronov
  4. David W Tank
(2020)
Visual cue-related activity of cells in the medial entorhinal cortex during navigation in virtual reality
eLife 9:e43140.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.43140

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.43140

Further reading

    1. Neuroscience
    Kiwamu Kudo, Kamalini G Ranasinghe ... Srikantan S Nagarajan
    Research Article

    Alzheimer’s disease (AD) is characterized by the accumulation of amyloid-β and misfolded tau proteins causing synaptic dysfunction, and progressive neurodegeneration and cognitive decline. Altered neural oscillations have been consistently demonstrated in AD. However, the trajectories of abnormal neural oscillations in AD progression and their relationship to neurodegeneration and cognitive decline are unknown. Here, we deployed robust event-based sequencing models (EBMs) to investigate the trajectories of long-range and local neural synchrony across AD stages, estimated from resting-state magnetoencephalography. The increases in neural synchrony in the delta-theta band and the decreases in the alpha and beta bands showed progressive changes throughout the stages of the EBM. Decreases in alpha and beta band synchrony preceded both neurodegeneration and cognitive decline, indicating that frequency-specific neuronal synchrony abnormalities are early manifestations of AD pathophysiology. The long-range synchrony effects were greater than the local synchrony, indicating a greater sensitivity of connectivity metrics involving multiple regions of the brain. These results demonstrate the evolution of functional neuronal deficits along the sequence of AD progression.

    1. Medicine
    2. Neuroscience
    Luisa Fassi, Shachar Hochman ... Roi Cohen Kadosh
    Research Article

    In recent years, there has been debate about the effectiveness of treatments from different fields, such as neurostimulation, neurofeedback, brain training, and pharmacotherapy. This debate has been fuelled by contradictory and nuanced experimental findings. Notably, the effectiveness of a given treatment is commonly evaluated by comparing the effect of the active treatment versus the placebo on human health and/or behaviour. However, this approach neglects the individual’s subjective experience of the type of treatment she or he received in establishing treatment efficacy. Here, we show that individual differences in subjective treatment - the thought of receiving the active or placebo condition during an experiment - can explain variability in outcomes better than the actual treatment. We analysed four independent datasets (N = 387 participants), including clinical patients and healthy adults from different age groups who were exposed to different neurostimulation treatments (transcranial magnetic stimulation: Studies 1 and 2; transcranial direct current stimulation: Studies 3 and 4). Our findings show that the inclusion of subjective treatment can provide a better model fit either alone or in interaction with objective treatment (defined as the condition to which participants are assigned in the experiment). These results demonstrate the significant contribution of subjective experience in explaining the variability of clinical, cognitive, and behavioural outcomes. We advocate for existing and future studies in clinical and non-clinical research to start accounting for participants’ subjective beliefs and their interplay with objective treatment when assessing the efficacy of treatments. This approach will be crucial in providing a more accurate estimation of the treatment effect and its source, allowing the development of effective and reproducible interventions.