Mesolimbic dopamine projections mediate cue-motivated reward seeking but not reward retrieval in rats

  1. Briac Halbout  Is a corresponding author
  2. Andrew T Marshall
  3. Ali Azimi
  4. Mimi Liljeholm
  5. Stephen V Mahler
  6. Kate M Wassum
  7. Sean B Ostlund  Is a corresponding author
  1. University of California, Irvine, United States
  2. University of California, Los Angeles, United States

Abstract

Efficient foraging requires an ability to coordinate discrete reward-seeking and reward-retrieval behaviors. We used pathway-specific chemogenetic inhibition to investigate how rats' mesolimbic and mesocortical dopamine circuits contribute to the expression and modulation of reward seeking and retrieval. Inhibiting ventral tegmental area dopamine neurons disrupted the tendency for reward-paired cues to motivate reward seeking, but spared their ability to increase attempts to retrieve reward. Similar effects were produced by inhibiting dopamine inputs to nucleus accumbens, but not medial prefrontal cortex. Inhibiting dopamine neurons spared the suppressive effect of reward devaluation on reward seeking, an assay of goal-directed behavior. Attempts to retrieve reward persisted after devaluation, indicating they were habitually performed as part of a fixed action sequence. Our findings show that complete bouts of reward seeking and retrieval are behaviorally and neurally dissociable from bouts of reward seeking without retrieval. This dichotomy may prove useful for uncovering mechanisms of maladaptive behavior.

Data availability

All data generated and analyzed during this study are included in supporting files. Source data files have been provided for Figures 1, 3, 4 and 5, as well as their respective supplemental figures.

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Briac Halbout

    Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Care, University of California, Irvine, Irvine, United States
    For correspondence
    halboutb@uci.edu
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-6128-2601
  2. Andrew T Marshall

    Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Care, University of California, Irvine, Irvine, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  3. Ali Azimi

    Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Care, University of California, Irvine, Irvine, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  4. Mimi Liljeholm

    Department of Cognitive Sciences, University of California, Irvine, Irvine, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-9066-6989
  5. Stephen V Mahler

    Department of Neurobiology and Behavior, University of California, Irvine, Irvine, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  6. Kate M Wassum

    Department of Psychology, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, United States
    Competing interests
    Kate M Wassum, Reviewing editor, eLife.
  7. Sean B Ostlund

    Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Care, University of California, Irvine, Irvine, United States
    For correspondence
    sostlund@uci.edu
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.

Funding

National Institute of Mental Health (106972)

  • Kate M Wassum
  • Sean B Ostlund

National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (098709)

  • Sean B Ostlund

National Institute on Drug Abuse (029035)

  • Sean B Ostlund

National Institute on Aging (045380)

  • Sean B Ostlund

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Ethics

Animal experimentation: All experimental procedures that involved rats were approved by the UC Irvine Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (protocol AUP-17-68) and were in accordance with the National Research Council Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals.

Copyright

© 2019, Halbout et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 5,215
    views
  • 693
    downloads
  • 42
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Briac Halbout
  2. Andrew T Marshall
  3. Ali Azimi
  4. Mimi Liljeholm
  5. Stephen V Mahler
  6. Kate M Wassum
  7. Sean B Ostlund
(2019)
Mesolimbic dopamine projections mediate cue-motivated reward seeking but not reward retrieval in rats
eLife 8:e43551.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.43551

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.43551

Further reading

    1. Neuroscience
    Nishal Pradeepbhai Shah, AJ Phillips ... EJ Chichilnisky
    Tools and Resources

    Neural implants have the potential to restore lost sensory function by electrically evoking the complex naturalistic activity patterns of neural populations. However, it can be difficult to predict and control evoked neural responses to simultaneous multi-electrode stimulation due to nonlinearity of the responses. We present a solution to this problem and demonstrate its utility in the context of a bidirectional retinal implant for restoring vision. A dynamically optimized stimulation approach encodes incoming visual stimuli into a rapid, greedily chosen, temporally dithered and spatially multiplexed sequence of simple stimulation patterns. Stimuli are selected to optimize the reconstruction of the visual stimulus from the evoked responses. Temporal dithering exploits the slow time scales of downstream neural processing, and spatial multiplexing exploits the independence of responses generated by distant electrodes. The approach was evaluated using an experimental laboratory prototype of a retinal implant: large-scale, high-resolution multi-electrode stimulation and recording of macaque and rat retinal ganglion cells ex vivo. The dynamically optimized stimulation approach substantially enhanced performance compared to existing approaches based on static mapping between visual stimulus intensity and current amplitude. The modular framework enabled parallel extensions to naturalistic viewing conditions, incorporation of perceptual similarity measures, and efficient implementation for an implantable device. A direct closed-loop test of the approach supported its potential use in vision restoration.

    1. Neuroscience
    Chad Heer, Mark Sheffield
    Research Article

    Neuromodulatory inputs to the hippocampus play pivotal roles in modulating synaptic plasticity, shaping neuronal activity, and influencing learning and memory. Recently, it has been shown that the main sources of catecholamines to the hippocampus, ventral tegmental area (VTA) and locus coeruleus (LC), may have overlapping release of neurotransmitters and effects on the hippocampus. Therefore, to dissect the impacts of both VTA and LC circuits on hippocampal function, a thorough examination of how these pathways might differentially operate during behavior and learning is necessary. We therefore utilized two-photon microscopy to functionally image the activity of VTA and LC axons within the CA1 region of the dorsal hippocampus in head-fixed male mice navigating linear paths within virtual reality (VR) environments. We found that within familiar environments some VTA axons and the vast majority of LC axons showed a correlation with the animals’ running speed. However, as mice approached previously learned rewarded locations, a large majority of VTA axons exhibited a gradual ramping-up of activity, peaking at the reward location. In contrast, LC axons displayed a pre-movement signal predictive of the animal’s transition from immobility to movement. Interestingly, a marked divergence emerged following a switch from the familiar to novel VR environments. Many LC axons showed large increases in activity that remained elevated for over a minute, while the previously observed VTA axon ramping-to-reward dynamics disappeared during the same period. In conclusion, these findings highlight distinct roles of VTA and LC catecholaminergic inputs in the dorsal CA1 hippocampal region. These inputs encode unique information, with reward information in VTA inputs and novelty and kinematic information in LC inputs, likely contributing to differential modulation of hippocampal activity during behavior and learning.