Human macular Müller cells rely more on serine biosynthesis to combat oxidative stress than those from the periphery

  1. Ting Zhang
  2. Ling Zhu  Is a corresponding author
  3. Michele Catherine Madigan
  4. Wei Liu
  5. Weiyong Shen
  6. Svetlana Cherepanoff
  7. Fanfan Zhou
  8. Shaoxue Zeng
  9. Jianhai Du
  10. Mark Cedric Gillies
  1. The University of Sydney, Australia
  2. Sidra Medicine, Qatar
  3. St Vincent's Hospital, Australia
  4. West Virginia University, United States

Abstract

The human macula is more susceptible than the peripheral retina to developing blinding conditions such as age-related macular degeneration, diabetic retinopathy. A key difference between them may be the nature of their Müller cells. We found primary cultured Müller cells from macula and peripheral retina display significant morphological and transcriptomic differences. Macular Müller cells expressed more Phosphoglycerate Dehydrogenase (PHGDH, a rate-limiting enzyme in serine synthesis) than peripheral Müller cells. The serine synthesis, glycolytic and mitochondrial function were more activated in macular than peripheral Müller cells. Serine biosynthesis is critical in defending against oxidative stress. Intracellular reactive oxygen species and glutathione levels were increased in primary cultured macular Müller cells which were more susceptible to oxidative stress after inhibition of PHGDH. Our findings indicate serine biosynthesis is a critical part of the macular defence against oxidative stress and suggest dysregulation of this pathway as a potential cause of macular pathology.

Data availability

RNA sequencing data are included in the manuscript and Supplementary File. These data are also available at Dryad (https://datadryad.org/dx.doi:10.5061/dryad.hp60p89)

The following data sets were generated

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Ting Zhang

    Save Sight Institute, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  2. Ling Zhu

    Save Sight Institute, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
    For correspondence
    ling.zhu@sydney.edu.au
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-0776-1630
  3. Michele Catherine Madigan

    Save Sight Institute, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  4. Wei Liu

    Clinical Genomics Laboratory, Sidra Medicine, Doha, Qatar
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  5. Weiyong Shen

    Save Sight Institute, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  6. Svetlana Cherepanoff

    Department of Anatomical Pathology, St Vincent's Hospital, Sydney, Australia
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  7. Fanfan Zhou

    Faculty of Pharmacy, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  8. Shaoxue Zeng

    Save Sight Institute, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  9. Jianhai Du

    Department of Ophthalmology, West Virginia University, Morgantown, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  10. Mark Cedric Gillies

    Save Sight Institute, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.

Funding

National Health and Medical Research Council

  • Ling Zhu
  • Weiyong Shen
  • Mark Cedric Gillies

The Ophthalmic Research Institute of Australia

  • Ling Zhu
  • Mark Cedric Gillies

National Institutes of Health

  • Jianhai Du

Lowy Medical Research Institute

  • Ting Zhang
  • Ling Zhu
  • Weiyong Shen
  • Mark Cedric Gillies

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Reviewing Editor

  1. Jeremy Nathans, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, United States

Ethics

Human subjects: Human retinas were obtained from post-mortem donor eyes with ethical approval from Human Research Ethics Committee of the University of Sydney (HREC#:16/282).

Version history

  1. Received: November 15, 2018
  2. Accepted: April 8, 2019
  3. Accepted Manuscript published: April 30, 2019 (version 1)
  4. Version of Record published: May 23, 2019 (version 2)

Copyright

© 2019, Zhang et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 2,487
    views
  • 379
    downloads
  • 34
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Ting Zhang
  2. Ling Zhu
  3. Michele Catherine Madigan
  4. Wei Liu
  5. Weiyong Shen
  6. Svetlana Cherepanoff
  7. Fanfan Zhou
  8. Shaoxue Zeng
  9. Jianhai Du
  10. Mark Cedric Gillies
(2019)
Human macular Müller cells rely more on serine biosynthesis to combat oxidative stress than those from the periphery
eLife 8:e43598.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.43598

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.43598

Further reading

    1. Neuroscience
    Anna Seggewisse, Michael Winding
    Insight

    The first neuronal wiring diagram of an insect nerve cord, which includes biological information on cell type and organisation, enables further investigation into premotor circuit function.

    1. Neuroscience
    Petteri Stenroos, Isabelle Guillemain ... Emmanuel L Barbier
    Research Article

    In patients suffering absence epilepsy, recurring seizures can significantly decrease their quality of life and lead to yet untreatable comorbidities. Absence seizures are characterized by spike-and-wave discharges on the electroencephalogram associated with a transient alteration of consciousness. However, it is still unknown how the brain responds to external stimuli during and outside of seizures. This study aimed to investigate responsiveness to visual and somatosensory stimulation in Genetic Absence Epilepsy Rats from Strasbourg (GAERS), a well-established rat model for absence epilepsy. Animals were imaged under non-curarized awake state using a quiet, zero echo time, functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) sequence. Sensory stimulations were applied during interictal and ictal periods. Whole-brain hemodynamic responses were compared between these two states. Additionally, a mean-field simulation model was used to explain the changes of neural responsiveness to visual stimulation between states. During a seizure, whole-brain responses to both sensory stimulations were suppressed and spatially hindered. In the cortex, hemodynamic responses were negatively polarized during seizures, despite the application of a stimulus. The mean-field simulation revealed restricted propagation of activity due to stimulation and agreed well with fMRI findings. Results suggest that sensory processing is hindered or even suppressed by the occurrence of an absence seizure, potentially contributing to decreased responsiveness during this absence epileptic process.