Liquid-crystal organization of liver tissue

  1. Hernán Morales-Navarrete
  2. Hidenori Nonaka
  3. Andre Scholich
  4. Fabián Segovia-Miranda
  5. Walter de Back
  6. Kirstin Meyer
  7. Roman L Bogorad
  8. Victor Koteliansky
  9. Lutz Brusch
  10. Yannis Kalaidzidis  Is a corresponding author
  11. Frank Jülicher  Is a corresponding author
  12. Benjamin M Friedrich  Is a corresponding author
  13. Marino Zerial  Is a corresponding author
  1. Max Planck Institute for Cell Biology and Genetics, Germany
  2. Max Planck Institute for the Physics of Complex Systems, Germany
  3. Technische Universität Dresden, Germany
  4. Massachusetts Institute of Technology, United States
  5. Skolkovo Institute of Science and Technology, Russian Federation

Abstract

Functional tissue architecture originates by self-assembly of distinct cell types, following tissue-specific rules of cell-cell interactions. In the liver, a structural model of the lobule was pioneered by Elias in 1949. This model, however, is in contrast with the apparent random 3D arrangement of hepatocytes. Since then, no significant progress has been made to derive the organizing principles of liver tissue. To solve this outstanding problem, we computationally reconstructed 3D tissue geometry from microscopy images of mouse liver tissue and analyzed it applying soft-condensed-matter-physics concepts. Surprisingly, analysis of the spatial organization of cell polarity revealed that hepatocytes are not randomly oriented but follow a long-range liquid-crystal order. This does not depend exclusively on hepatocytes receiving instructive signals by endothelial cells, since silencing Integrin-β1 disrupted both liquid-crystal order and organization of the sinusoidal network. Our results suggest that bi-directional communication between hepatocytes and sinusoids underlies the self-organization of liver tissue.

Data availability

All data generated or analysed during this study are included in the manuscript and supporting files. Source data files have been provided for Figure 1-figure supplement 2 and Figure 1-figure supplement 3

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Hernán Morales-Navarrete

    Max Planck Institute for Cell Biology and Genetics, Dresden, Germany
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-9578-2556
  2. Hidenori Nonaka

    Max Planck Institute for Cell Biology and Genetics, Dresden, Germany
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  3. Andre Scholich

    Max Planck Institute for the Physics of Complex Systems, Dresden, Germany
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-9393-5459
  4. Fabián Segovia-Miranda

    Max Planck Institute for Cell Biology and Genetics, Dresden, Germany
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-1546-0475
  5. Walter de Back

    Institute for Medical Informatics and Biometry, Faculty of Medicine Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-4641-8472
  6. Kirstin Meyer

    Max Planck Institute for Cell Biology and Genetics, Dresden, Germany
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  7. Roman L Bogorad

    David H Koch Institute for Integrative Cancer Research, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  8. Victor Koteliansky

    Skolkovo Institute of Science and Technology, Skolkovo, Russian Federation
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  9. Lutz Brusch

    Center for Information Services and High Performance Computing, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-0137-5106
  10. Yannis Kalaidzidis

    Max Planck Institute for the Physics of Complex Systems, Dresden, Germany
    For correspondence
    kalaidzi@mpi-cbg.de
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  11. Frank Jülicher

    Max Planck Institute for the Physics of Complex Systems, Dresden, Germany
    For correspondence
    julicher@pks.mpg.de
    Competing interests
    Frank Jülicher, Reviewing editor, eLife.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-4731-9185
  12. Benjamin M Friedrich

    Center for Advancing Electronics, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany
    For correspondence
    benjamin.m.friedrich@tu-dresden.de
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-9742-6555
  13. Marino Zerial

    Max Planck Institute for Cell Biology and Genetics, Dresden, Germany
    For correspondence
    zerial@mpi-cbg.de
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-7490-4235

Funding

H2020 European Research Council (Grant number 695646)

  • Hernán Morales-Navarrete

Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung (LiSyM-031L0038)

  • Fabián Segovia-Miranda
  • Kirstin Meyer

Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (Cluster of Excellence EXC 1056 cfaed)

  • Benjamin M Friedrich

Max-Planck-Gesellschaft (Open-access funding)

  • Hidenori Nonaka

Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung (SYSBIO II-031L0044)

  • Fabián Segovia-Miranda
  • Kirstin Meyer

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Reviewing Editor

  1. Pierre Sens, Institut Curie, PSL Research University, CNRS, France

Ethics

Animal experimentation: All procedures were performed in compliance with German animal welfarelegislation and in pathogen-free conditions in the animal facility ofthe MPI-CBG, Dresden, Germany. Protocols were approved by theInstitutional Animal Welfare Officer (Tierschutzbeauftragter) and allnecessary licenses were obtained from the regional Ethical Commissionfor Animal Experimentation of Dresden, Germany (Tierversuchskommission,Landesdirektion Dresden)(License number: DD24-5131/338/50).

Version history

  1. Received: January 4, 2019
  2. Accepted: June 14, 2019
  3. Accepted Manuscript published: June 17, 2019 (version 1)
  4. Version of Record published: June 28, 2019 (version 2)

Copyright

© 2019, Morales-Navarrete et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 4,678
    views
  • 712
    downloads
  • 41
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Hernán Morales-Navarrete
  2. Hidenori Nonaka
  3. Andre Scholich
  4. Fabián Segovia-Miranda
  5. Walter de Back
  6. Kirstin Meyer
  7. Roman L Bogorad
  8. Victor Koteliansky
  9. Lutz Brusch
  10. Yannis Kalaidzidis
  11. Frank Jülicher
  12. Benjamin M Friedrich
  13. Marino Zerial
(2019)
Liquid-crystal organization of liver tissue
eLife 8:e44860.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.44860

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.44860

Further reading

    1. Computational and Systems Biology
    2. Physics of Living Systems
    Taegon Chung, Iksoo Chang, Sangyeol Kim
    Research Article

    Locomotion is a fundamental behavior of Caenorhabditis elegans (C. elegans). Previous works on kinetic simulations of animals helped researchers understand the physical mechanisms of locomotion and the muscle-controlling principles of neuronal circuits as an actuator part. It has yet to be understood how C. elegans utilizes the frictional forces caused by the tension of its muscles to perform sequenced locomotive behaviors. Here, we present a two-dimensional rigid body chain model for the locomotion of C. elegans by developing Newtonian equations of motion for each body segment of C. elegans. Having accounted for friction-coefficients of the surrounding environment, elastic constants of C. elegans, and its kymogram from experiments, our kinetic model (ElegansBot) reproduced various locomotion of C. elegans such as, but not limited to, forward-backward-(omega turn)-forward locomotion constituting escaping behavior and delta-turn navigation. Additionally, ElegansBot precisely quantified the forces acting on each body segment of C. elegans to allow investigation of the force distribution. This model will facilitate our understanding of the detailed mechanism of various locomotive behaviors at any given friction-coefficients of the surrounding environment. Furthermore, as the model ensures the performance of realistic behavior, it can be used to research actuator-controller interaction between muscles and neuronal circuits.

    1. Physics of Living Systems
    Giulio Facchini, Alann Rathery ... Andrea Perna
    Research Article

    Termites build complex nests which are an impressive example of self-organization. We know that the coordinated actions involved in the construction of these nests by multiple individuals are primarily mediated by signals and cues embedded in the structure of the nest itself. However, to date there is still no scientific consensus about the nature of the stimuli that guide termite construction, and how they are sensed by termites. In order to address these questions, we studied the early building behavior of Coptotermes gestroi termites in artificial arenas, decorated with topographic cues to stimulate construction. Pellet collections were evenly distributed across the experimental setup, compatible with a collection mechanism that is not affected by local topography, but only by the distribution of termite occupancy (termites pick pellets at the positions where they are). Conversely, pellet depositions were concentrated at locations of high surface curvature and at the boundaries between different types of substrate. The single feature shared by all pellet deposition regions was that they correspond to local maxima in the evaporation flux. We can show analytically and we confirm experimentally that evaporation flux is directly proportional to the local curvature of nest surfaces. Taken together, our results indicate that surface curvature is sufficient to organize termite building activity and that termites likely sense curvature indirectly through substrate evaporation. Our findings reconcile the apparently discordant results of previous studies.