TEADs, Yap, Taz, Vgll4s transcription factors control the establishment of Left-Right asymmetry in Zebrafish

  1. Jonathan Fillatre
  2. Jean-Daniel Fauny
  3. Jasmine Alexandra Fels
  4. Cheng Li
  5. Mary Goll
  6. Christine Thisse
  7. Bernard Thisse  Is a corresponding author
  1. University of Virginia, United States
  2. CNRS/INSERM/Université de Strasbourg, France
  3. University of Georgia, United States

Abstract

In many vertebrates, establishment of Left-Right (LR) asymmetry results from the activity of a ciliated organ functioning as the LR Organizer (LRO). While regulation of the formation of this structure by major signaling pathways has been described, the transcriptional control of LRO formation is poorly understood. Using the zebrafish model, we show that the transcription factors and cofactors mediating or regulating the transcriptional outcome of the Hippo signaling pathway play a pivotal role in controlling the expression of genes essential to the formation of the LRO including ligands and receptors of signaling pathways involved in this process and most genes required for motile ciliogenesis. Moreover, the transcription cofactor, Vgll4l regulates epigenetic programming in LRO progenitors by controlling the expression of writers and readers of DNA methylation marks. Altogether, our study uncovers a novel and essential role for the transcriptional effectors and regulators of the Hippo pathway in establishing LR asymmetry.

Data availability

RNA sequencing data that support the findings of this study have been deposited in the Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) under accession code GSE119623 and are also provided in Supplementary File 1.All data generated or analysed during this study are included in the manuscript and supporting files.Source data for Figure 1, 2, 3, 9 and Figure Supplement 1 are provided in source data 1.

The following data sets were generated

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Jonathan Fillatre

    Department of Cell Biology, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  2. Jean-Daniel Fauny

    Institut de Génétique et de Biologie Moléculaire et Cellulaire, CNRS/INSERM/Université de Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  3. Jasmine Alexandra Fels

    Department of Cell Biology, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  4. Cheng Li

    Department of Genetics, University of Georgia, Athens, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  5. Mary Goll

    Department of Genetics, University of Georgia, Athens, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-5003-6958
  6. Christine Thisse

    Department of Cell Biology, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  7. Bernard Thisse

    Department of Cell Biology, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, United States
    For correspondence
    bernardthisse@virginia.edu
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-8365-1081

Funding

Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique

  • Christine Thisse

National Institutes of Health (R01GM110092)

  • Mary Goll

Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale

  • Christine Thisse

University of Virginia

  • Christine Thisse

National Science Foundation (1455901)

  • Bernard Thisse

Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique

  • Bernard Thisse

Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale

  • Bernard Thisse

University of Virginia

  • Bernard Thisse

National Institutes of Health (R01GM132131)

  • Christine Thisse

National Institutes of Health (R01GM132131)

  • Jonathan Fillatre

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Ethics

Animal experimentation: This study was performed in strict accordance with the recommendationsin the Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals of the National Institutes of Health. All ofthe animals were handled according to approved institutional animal care and use committee(IACUC) protocols (#3661) of the University of Virginia. All surgery was performed under tricain anesthesia and every effort was made to minimize suffering.

Copyright

© 2019, Fillatre et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 3,762
    views
  • 472
    downloads
  • 17
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Jonathan Fillatre
  2. Jean-Daniel Fauny
  3. Jasmine Alexandra Fels
  4. Cheng Li
  5. Mary Goll
  6. Christine Thisse
  7. Bernard Thisse
(2019)
TEADs, Yap, Taz, Vgll4s transcription factors control the establishment of Left-Right asymmetry in Zebrafish
eLife 8:e45241.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.45241

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.45241

Further reading

    1. Developmental Biology
    2. Genetics and Genomics
    Debashish U Menon, Prabuddha Chakraborty ... Terry Magnuson
    Research Article

    We present evidence implicating the BAF (BRG1/BRM Associated Factor) chromatin remodeler in meiotic sex chromosome inactivation (MSCI). By immunofluorescence (IF), the putative BAF DNA binding subunit, ARID1A (AT-rich Interaction Domain 1 a), appeared enriched on the male sex chromosomes during diplonema of meiosis I. Germ cells showing a Cre-induced loss of ARID1A arrested in pachynema and failed to repress sex-linked genes, indicating a defective MSCI. Mutant sex chromosomes displayed an abnormal presence of elongating RNA polymerase II coupled with an overall increase in chromatin accessibility detectable by ATAC-seq. We identified a role for ARID1A in promoting the preferential enrichment of the histone variant, H3.3, on the sex chromosomes, a known hallmark of MSCI. Without ARID1A, the sex chromosomes appeared depleted of H3.3 at levels resembling autosomes. Higher resolution analyses by CUT&RUN revealed shifts in sex-linked H3.3 associations from discrete intergenic sites and broader gene-body domains to promoters in response to the loss of ARID1A. Several sex-linked sites displayed ectopic H3.3 occupancy that did not co-localize with DMC1 (DNA meiotic recombinase 1). This observation suggests a requirement for ARID1A in DMC1 localization to the asynapsed sex chromatids. We conclude that ARID1A-directed H3.3 localization influences meiotic sex chromosome gene regulation and DNA repair.

    1. Cell Biology
    2. Developmental Biology
    Sofía Suárez Freire, Sebastián Perez-Pandolfo ... Mariana Melani
    Research Article

    Eukaryotic cells depend on exocytosis to direct intracellularly synthesized material toward the extracellular space or the plasma membrane, so exocytosis constitutes a basic function for cellular homeostasis and communication between cells. The secretory pathway includes biogenesis of secretory granules (SGs), their maturation and fusion with the plasma membrane (exocytosis), resulting in release of SG content to the extracellular space. The larval salivary gland of Drosophila melanogaster is an excellent model for studying exocytosis. This gland synthesizes mucins that are packaged in SGs that sprout from the trans-Golgi network and then undergo a maturation process that involves homotypic fusion, condensation, and acidification. Finally, mature SGs are directed to the apical domain of the plasma membrane with which they fuse, releasing their content into the gland lumen. The exocyst is a hetero-octameric complex that participates in tethering of vesicles to the plasma membrane during constitutive exocytosis. By precise temperature-dependent gradual activation of the Gal4-UAS expression system, we have induced different levels of silencing of exocyst complex subunits, and identified three temporarily distinctive steps of the regulated exocytic pathway where the exocyst is critically required: SG biogenesis, SG maturation, and SG exocytosis. Our results shed light on previously unidentified functions of the exocyst along the exocytic pathway. We propose that the exocyst acts as a general tethering factor in various steps of this cellular process.