Sonic hedgehog signaling in astrocytes mediates cell-type-specific synaptic organization

  1. Steven A Hill
  2. Andrew S Blaeser
  3. Austin A Coley
  4. Yajun Xie
  5. Katherine A Shepard
  6. Corey C Harwell
  7. Wen-Jun Gao
  8. A Denise R Garcia  Is a corresponding author
  1. Drexel University, United States
  2. Drexel University College of Medicine, United States
  3. Harvard Medical School, United States

Abstract

Astrocytes have emerged as integral partners with neurons in regulating synapse formation and function, but the mechanisms that mediate these interactions are not well understood. Here, we show that Sonic hedgehog (Shh) signaling in mature astrocytes is required for establishing structural organization and remodeling of cortical synapses in a cell type-specific manner. In the postnatal cortex, Shh signaling is active in a subpopulation of mature astrocytes localized primarily in deep cortical layers. Selective disruption of Shh signaling in astrocytes produces a dramatic increase in synapse number specifically on layer V apical dendrites that emerges during adolescence and persists into adulthood. Dynamic turnover of dendritic spines is impaired in mutant mice and is accompanied by an increase in neuronal excitability and a reduction of the glial-specific, inward-rectifying K+ channel Kir4.1. These data identify a critical role for Shh signaling in astrocyte-mediated modulation of neuronal activity required for sculpting synapses.

Data availability

All data generated or analysed during this study are included in the manuscript and supporting files. Source data files have been provided for Figures 1-6.

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Steven A Hill

    Department of Biology, Drexel University, Philadelphia, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  2. Andrew S Blaeser

    Department of Biology, Drexel University, Philadelphia, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  3. Austin A Coley

    Department of Neurobiology and Anatomy, Drexel University College of Medicine, Philadelphia, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  4. Yajun Xie

    Department of Neurobiology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  5. Katherine A Shepard

    Department of Biology, Drexel University, Philadelphia, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  6. Corey C Harwell

    Department of Neurobiology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  7. Wen-Jun Gao

    Department of Neurobiology and Anatomy, Drexel University College of Medicine, Philadelphia, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  8. A Denise R Garcia

    Department of Biology, Drexel University, Philadelphia, United States
    For correspondence
    adg82@drexel.edu
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-5809-3543

Funding

National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (1R01NS096100)

  • A Denise R Garcia

Louis Perry Jones (Postdoctoral Fellowship)

  • Yajun Xie

National Institute of Mental Health (7K01MH097957)

  • A Denise R Garcia

National Institute of Mental Health (5R21MH110724)

  • A Denise R Garcia

PA Department of Health, CURE

  • Wen-Jun Gao
  • A Denise R Garcia

National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (F99NS105185)

  • Austin A Coley

National Institute of Mental Health (R01MH085666)

  • Wen-Jun Gao

National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (K01NS089720)

  • Corey C Harwell

National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (R01NS102228)

  • Corey C Harwell

Genise Goldenson (Junior Faculty Award)

  • Corey C Harwell

Alice and Joseph Brooks Fund (Postdoctoral Fellowship)

  • Yajun Xie

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Reviewing Editor

  1. Dwight E Bergles, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, United States

Ethics

Animal experimentation: This study was performed in strict accordance with the recommendations in the Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals of the National Institutes of Health. All of the animals were handled according to approved institutional animal care and use committee (IACUC) protocols (#20476) of Drexel University. All surgery was performed under isoflurane or ketamine/xylazine anesthesia, and every effort was made to minimize suffering.

Version history

  1. Received: January 26, 2019
  2. Accepted: June 13, 2019
  3. Accepted Manuscript published: June 13, 2019 (version 1)
  4. Version of Record published: July 15, 2019 (version 2)

Copyright

© 2019, Hill et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 4,857
    Page views
  • 650
    Downloads
  • 44
    Citations

Article citation count generated by polling the highest count across the following sources: Crossref, PubMed Central, Scopus.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Steven A Hill
  2. Andrew S Blaeser
  3. Austin A Coley
  4. Yajun Xie
  5. Katherine A Shepard
  6. Corey C Harwell
  7. Wen-Jun Gao
  8. A Denise R Garcia
(2019)
Sonic hedgehog signaling in astrocytes mediates cell-type-specific synaptic organization
eLife 8:e45545.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.45545

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.45545

Further reading

    1. Medicine
    2. Neuroscience
    Flora Moujaes, Jie Lisa Ji ... Alan Anticevic
    Research Article

    Background:

    Ketamine has emerged as one of the most promising therapies for treatment-resistant depression. However, inter-individual variability in response to ketamine is still not well understood and it is unclear how ketamine’s molecular mechanisms connect to its neural and behavioral effects.

    Methods:

    We conducted a single-blind placebo-controlled study, with participants blinded to their treatment condition. 40 healthy participants received acute ketamine (initial bolus 0.23 mg/kg, continuous infusion 0.58 mg/kg/hr). We quantified resting-state functional connectivity via data-driven global brain connectivity and related it to individual ketamine-induced symptom variation and cortical gene expression targets.

    Results:

    We found that: (i) both the neural and behavioral effects of acute ketamine are multi-dimensional, reflecting robust inter-individual variability; (ii) ketamine’s data-driven principal neural gradient effect matched somatostatin (SST) and parvalbumin (PVALB) cortical gene expression patterns in humans, while the mean effect did not; and (iii) behavioral data-driven individual symptom variation mapped onto distinct neural gradients of ketamine, which were resolvable at the single-subject level.

    Conclusions:

    These results highlight the importance of considering individual behavioral and neural variation in response to ketamine. They also have implications for the development of individually precise pharmacological biomarkers for treatment selection in psychiatry.

    Funding:

    This study was supported by NIH grants DP5OD012109-01 (A.A.), 1U01MH121766 (A.A.), R01MH112746 (J.D.M.), 5R01MH112189 (A.A.), 5R01MH108590 (A.A.), NIAAA grant 2P50AA012870-11 (A.A.); NSF NeuroNex grant 2015276 (J.D.M.); Brain and Behavior Research Foundation Young Investigator Award (A.A.); SFARI Pilot Award (J.D.M., A.A.); Heffter Research Institute (Grant No. 1–190420) (FXV, KHP); Swiss Neuromatrix Foundation (Grant No. 2016–0111) (FXV, KHP); Swiss National Science Foundation under the framework of Neuron Cofund (Grant No. 01EW1908) (KHP); Usona Institute (2015 – 2056) (FXV).

    Clinical trial number:

    NCT03842800

    1. Neuroscience
    Lies Deceuninck, Fabian Kloosterman
    Research Article Updated

    Storing and accessing memories is required to successfully perform day-to-day tasks, for example for engaging in a meaningful conversation. Previous studies in both rodents and primates have correlated hippocampal cellular activity with behavioral expression of memory. A key role has been attributed to awake hippocampal replay – a sequential reactivation of neurons representing a trajectory through space. However, it is unclear if awake replay impacts immediate future behavior, gradually creates and stabilizes long-term memories over a long period of time (hours and longer), or enables the temporary memorization of relevant events at an intermediate time scale (seconds to minutes). In this study, we aimed to address the uncertainty around the timeframe of impact of awake replay by collecting causal evidence from behaving rats. We detected and disrupted sharp wave ripples (SWRs) - signatures of putative replay events - using electrical stimulation of the ventral hippocampal commissure in rats that were trained on three different spatial memory tasks. In each task, rats were required to memorize a new set of locations in each trial or each daily session. Interestingly, the rats performed equally well with or without SWR disruptions. These data suggest that awake SWRs - and potentially replay - does not affect the immediate behavior nor the temporary memorization of relevant events at a short timescale that are required to successfully perform the spatial tasks. Based on these results, we hypothesize that the impact of awake replay on memory and behavior is long-term and cumulative over time.