A virtual burrow assay for head–fixed mice measures habituation, discrimination, exploration and avoidance without training

  1. Andrew JP Fink  Is a corresponding author
  2. Richard Axel
  3. Carl E Schoonover  Is a corresponding author
  1. Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Columbia University, United States
7 figures, 1 table and 1 additional file

Figures

Figure 1 with 4 supplements
The Virtual Burrow Assay.

(A) Left; diagram of ingress (top) and egress (bottom). Right, photograph of mouse in ingress position (top) and egress position (bottom). (B) Instrument diagram. The mouse’s head is fixed by a …

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.45658.002
Figure 1—figure supplement 1
Persistence of stereotyped behavior across multiple days.

(A) Distribution of tube position during open loop mode on four separate days over a 16 day interval for the same cohort of N = 5 mice. We used a Wilcoxon rank-sum test to evaluate whether burrow …

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.45658.004
Figure 1—figure supplement 2
Schematic and flow diagram.

(A) Schematic of the virtual burrow control system. Control inputs and outputs, black. Devices, gray. (B) Finite state machine diagram. During the intertrial interval (ITI), a linear actuator …

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.45658.003
Figure 1—video 1
Spontaneous behavior of a mouse in the Virtual Burrow Assay.

Video recorded immediately following the mouse’s first introduction into the Virtual Burrow Assay.

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.45658.005
Figure 1—video 2
Burrow pulled to egress position.

Left: video of the same mouse shown in Figure 1—video 1 taken approximately two minutes later during the first instances in which it was pulled out to the egress position when the command software …

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.45658.006
Figure 2 with 1 supplement
Reliable, short-latency ingress to noxious air puff.

(A) Diagram of experimental set up. The mouse is head-fixed in the virtual burrow and an air puff is delivered to the nose. (B) Left, burrow position over time showing a single ingress in response …

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.45658.007
Figure 2—video 1
Ingress in response to strong air puff.

White square: stimulus epoch (250 msec, 80 psi, 2 mm distance from the snout).

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.45658.008
Figure 3 with 1 supplement
Flight-inducing visual stimuli selectively elicit ingress.

(A) An expanding black disk (left, orange), a contracting black disk (middle, pink), and a sweeping black disk of constant size (right, green), were presented on a visual display positioned directly …

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.45658.009
Figure 3—video 1
Ingress in response to visual looming stimulus.

Top left panel: visual stimulus presented on a screen positioned above the animal’s head (see diagram in Figure 3A); bottom panel: video of a mouse head-fixed in the VBA; top right panel: position …

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.45658.010
Figure 4 with 1 supplement
Habituation to unanticipated stimuli.

(A) Three odorant stimuli were delivered to mice in the virtual burrow assay. (B) Habituating responses to repeated presentation of odorant stimuli from a representative mouse. Color map corresponds …

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.45658.011
Figure 4—video 1
Egress in response to unanticipated odorant stimulus.

Responses to the first two presentations of an odorant stimulus. White square: stimulus epoch (8 s).

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.45658.012
Figure 5 with 2 supplements
Ingress in response to aversively conditioned odorant stimuli.

(A) Three odorant stimuli were presented to mice head fixed in the VBA on day 1 (Pre-test) and day 3 (Test). On day 2 (Conditioning), animals were placed in a fear conditioning chamber and two of …

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.45658.013
Figure 5—figure supplement 1
Trembling in response to aversively conditioned odorant stimuli.

Tube position during three individual trials recorded during Test in response to CS + and CS-. Odorant stimulus epoch denoted by the black bar (top); dashed box at left demarcates epoch in which …

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.45658.014
Figure 5—figure supplement 2
Robustness of statistical test to choice of ingress threshold.

Effect of maximum displacement threshold on the two-proportion z-test p value for the pooled test data (nine mice, six trials per mouse). Dashed line indicates p=0.05.

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.45658.015
Latency of ingress to aversively conditioned odorant stimuli.

(A) Distribution of ingress onset latency during CS+ trials for all mice. Ingress onset defined as the first sample in which displacement exceeded 0.75 mm following stimulus onset. (B) Ingress onset …

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.45658.016
Simultaneous measurement of behavior and neuronal activity.

(A) Top to bottom: position, velocity, force, mean firing rate and raster plot of 133 simultaneously recorded single-units in anterior piriform cortex of an awake mouse in the VBA. Left; 2 min epoch …

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.45658.017

Tables

Table 1
Animals used in this study.

Identifying information for all animals used in this study.

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.45658.018
Animal numberAge at surgeryAge at expt.DataNotes
201702271117 wks31 wksIngress, Figure 1C,D-
201702271217 wks31 wksIngress, Figure 1C,DAlso used for air puff expt.
201703130210 wks22 wksIngress, Figure 1C,DAlso used for air puff expt.
201703210111 wks22 wksIngress, Figure 1C,D-
20170324018 wks19 wksIngress, Figure 1C,D-
201703240211 wks22 wksIngress, Figure 1C,D-
20170330019 wks20 wksIngress, Figure 1C,DAlso used for air puff expt.
20170330029 wks20 wksIngress, Figure 1C,DAlso used for air puff expt.
201704210312 wks20 wksIngress, Figure 1C,D-
201704210512 wks20 wksIngress, Figure 1C,DAlso used for air puff expt.
20180326028 wks14–16 wksFigure 1—figure supplement 1
20180402049 wks15–17 wksFigure 1—figure supplement 1
20180402069 wks15–17 wksFigure 1—figure supplement 1
20180402089 wks15–17 wksFigure 1—figure supplement 1
20180402129 wks15–17 wksFigure 1—figure supplement 1
201608220711 wks18 wksAir puff, Figure 2Figure 2B,C from this animal
201702271217 wks31 wksAir puff, Figure 2Also used for Figure 1C,D
201703130210 wks22 wksAir puff, Figure 2Also used for Figure 1C,D
20170330019 wks20 wksAir puff, Figure 2Also used for Figure 1C,D
20170330029 wks20 wksAir puff, Figure 2Also used for Figure 1C,D
201704210512 wks20 wksAir puff, Figure 2Also used for Figure 1C,D
20180615017 wks15 wksAir puff, Figure 2-
20180612017 wks15 wksAir puff, Figure 2-
20180612027 wks15 wksAir puff, Figure 2-
20180613017 wks15 wksAir puff, Figure 2-
201607140115 wks21 wksVisual stimuli, Figure 3Expanding disk
201607240116 wks21 wksVisual stimuli, Figure 3Expanding disk
201607270217 wks21 wksVisual stimuli, Figure 3Expanding disk
201608190110 wks11 wksVisual stimuli, Figure 3Receding disk
201608190210 wks11 wksVisual stimuli, Figure 3Receding disk
201608190310 wks11 wksVisual stimuli, Figure 3Receding disk
201511130115 wks56 wksVisual stimuli, Figure 3Sweeping disk
201511160212 wks52 wksVisual stimuli, Figure 3Sweeping disk
201511170112 wks52 wksVisual stimuli, Figure 3Sweeping disk
201608230211 wks18 wksOdor habituation, Figure 4A–DO1: Lim. O2: Oct. O3: Hex.
201608240114 wks21 wksOdor habituation, Figure 4A–DO1: Oct. O2: Hex. O3: Lim.
201608240214 wks21 wksOdor habituation, Figure 4A–DO1: Hex. O2: Oct. O3: Lim.
201608240414 wks21 wksOdor habituation, Figure 4A–DO1: Hex. O2: Oct. O3: Lim
201608240514 wks21 wksOdor habituation, Figure 4A–DO1: Oct. O2: Hex. O3: Lim.
201707160313 wks34 wksOdor habituation, Figure 4E–H-
201707140113 wks34 wksOdor habituation, Figure 4E–H-
201707160513 wks34 wksOdor habituation, Figure 4E–H-
201707160113 wks34 wksOdor habituation, Figure 4E–H-
201707160213 wks34 wksOdor habituation, Figure 4E–H-
201608200611 wks21 wksAversive odor learning, Figure 5, 6-
201608200511 wks21 wksAversive odor learning, Figure 5, 6-
201608200311 wks21 wksAversive odor learning, Figure 5, 6-
201608200111 wks21 wksAversive odor learning, Figure 5, 6-
201607140115 wks30 wksAversive odor learning, Figure 5, 6Also used for Figure 3
201608190310 wks20 wksAversive odor learning, Figure 5, 6Also used for Figure 3
201608190210 wks20 wksAversive odor learning, Figure 5, 6Also used for Figure 3
201608190110 wks20 wksAversive odor learning, Figure 5, 6Also used for Figure 3
201608260214 wks23 wksAversive odor learning, Figure 5, 6-
201709210115 wks26 wksNeurophysiology recording, Figure 7

Additional files

Download links