Fog signaling has diverse roles in epithelial morphogenesis in insects
Abstract
The Drosophila Fog pathway represents one of the best-understood signaling cascades controlling epithelial morphogenesis. During gastrulation, Fog induces apical cell constrictions that drive the invagination of mesoderm and posterior gut primordia. The cellular mechanisms underlying primordia internalization vary greatly among insects and recent work has suggested that Fog signaling is specific to the fast mode of gastrulation found in some flies. On the contrary, here we show in the beetle Tribolium, whose development is broadly representative for insects, that Fog has multiple morphogenetic functions. It modulates mesoderm internalization and controls a massive posterior infolding involved in gut and extraembryonic development. In addition, Fog signaling affects blastoderm cellularization, primordial germ cell positioning and cuboidal-to-squamous cell shape transitions in the extraembryonic serosa. Comparative analyses with two other distantly related insect species reveals that Fog's role during cellularisation is widely conserved and therefore might represent the ancestral function of the pathway.
Data availability
All data generated or analysed during this study are included in the manuscript and supporting files. The Supplemental Material File 1 contains all primers used to amplify sequences for production of antisense RNA (ISH) and dsRNA (RNAi).
Article and author information
Author details
Funding
Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (CRC 680)
- Nadine Frey
Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft
- Kai H Conrads
University of Cologne (Postdoctoral grant)
- Matthias Pechmann
Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (CRC 680)
- Siegfried Roth
Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG Research Fellowship 407643416)
- Matthew Alan Benton
FAPERJ
- Rodrigo Nunes da Fonseca
University of Cologne (International Graduate School in Genetics and Functional Genomics)
- Rodrigo Nunes da Fonseca
- Cornelia von Levetzow
CNPq
- Rodrigo Nunes da Fonseca
CAPES
- Rodrigo Nunes da Fonseca
Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (RU 1234)
- Muhammad Salim Hakeemi
Boehringer Ingelheim Fonds (PhD fellowship)
- Dominik Stappert
Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (Emmy Noether Program PA 2044/1-1))
- Kristen A Panfilio
National Institutes of Health (R03 HD078578)
- Jeremy A Lynch
Alexander von Humboldt Foundation (Postdoctoral Felloship)
- Matthew Alan Benton
The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.
Copyright
© 2019, Benton et al.
This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.
Metrics
-
- 2,054
- views
-
- 263
- downloads
-
- 27
- citations
Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.
Download links
Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)
Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)
Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)
Further reading
-
- Evolutionary Biology
Eyespot patterns have evolved in many prey species. These patterns were traditionally explained by the eye mimicry hypothesis, which proposes that eyespots resembling vertebrate eyes function as predator avoidance. However, it is possible that eyespots do not mimic eyes: according to the conspicuousness hypothesis, eyespots are just one form of vivid signals where only conspicuousness matters. They might work simply through neophobia or unfamiliarity, without necessarily implying aposematism or the unprofitability to potential predators. To test these hypotheses and explore factors influencing predators’ responses, we conducted a meta-analysis with 33 empirical papers that focused on bird responses to both real lepidopterans and artificial targets with conspicuous patterns (i.e. eyespots and non-eyespots). Supporting the latter hypothesis, the results showed no clear difference in predator avoidance efficacy between eyespots and non-eyespots. When comparing geometric pattern characteristics, bigger pattern sizes and smaller numbers of patterns were more effective in preventing avian predation. This finding indicates that single concentric patterns have stronger deterring effects than paired ones. Taken together, our study supports the conspicuousness hypothesis more than the eye mimicry hypothesis. Due to the number and species coverage of published studies so far, the generalisability of our conclusion may be limited. The findings highlight that pattern conspicuousness is key to eliciting avian avoidance responses, shedding a different light on this classic example of signal evolution.
-
- Evolutionary Biology
Studying the fecal microbiota of wild baboons helps provide new insight into the factors that influence biological aging.