Abstract

The access of Transcription Factors (TFs) to their cognate DNA binding motifs requires a precise control over nucleosome positioning. This is especially important following DNA replication and during mitosis, both resulting in profound changes in nucleosome organization over TF binding regions. Using mouse Embryonic Stem (ES) cells, we show that the TF CTCF displaces nucleosomes from its binding site and locally organizes large and phased nucleosomal arrays, not only in interphase steady-state but also immediately after replication and during mitosis. Correlative analyses suggest this is associated with fast gene reactivation following replication and mitosis. While regions bound by other TFs (Oct4/Sox2), display major rearrangement, the post-replication and mitotic nucleosome positioning activity of CTCF is not unique: Esrrb binding regions are also characterized by persistent nucleosome positioning. Therefore, selected TFs such as CTCF and Esrrb act as resilient TFs governing the inheritance of nucleosome positioning at regulatory regions throughout the cell-cycle.

Data availability

Sequencing data generated for this study have been deposited in GEO with accession GSE131356.Publicly available datasets used here: Festuccia et al. 2019; GEO accession: GSE122589; Teves et al. 2018; GEO accession: GSE109963; Stewart-Morgan et al. 2019; GEO accession: GSE128643

The following data sets were generated
The following previously published data sets were used

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Nick Owens

    Epigenomics, Proliferation, and the Identity of Cells, Department of Developmental and Stem Cell Biology, Institut Pasteur, Paris, France
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-2151-9923
  2. Thaleia Papadopoulou

    Epigenomics, Proliferation, and the Identity of Cells, Department of Developmental and Stem Cell Biology, Institut Pasteur, Paris, France
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  3. Nicola Festuccia

    Epigenomics, Proliferation, and the Identity of Cells, Department of Developmental and Stem Cell Biology, Institut Pasteur, Paris, France
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  4. Alexandra Tachtsidi

    Epigenomics, Proliferation, and the Identity of Cells, Department of Developmental and Stem Cell Biology, Institut Pasteur, Paris, France
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  5. Inma Gonzalez

    Epigenomics, Proliferation, and the Identity of Cells, Department of Developmental and Stem Cell Biology, Institut Pasteur, Paris, France
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  6. Agnes Dubois

    Epigenomics, Proliferation, and the Identity of Cells, Department of Developmental and Stem Cell Biology, Institut Pasteur, Paris, France
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  7. Sandrine Vandormael-Pournin

    Epigenomics, Proliferation, and the Identity of Cells, Department of Developmental and Stem Cell Biology, Institut Pasteur, Paris, France
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  8. Elphège P Nora

    Gladstone Institutes, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  9. Benoit Bruneau

    Gladstone Institutes, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-0804-7597
  10. Michel Cohen-Tannoudji

    Epigenomics, Proliferation, and the Identity of Cells, Department of Developmental and Stem Cell Biology, Institut Pasteur, Paris, France
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-6405-2657
  11. Pablo Navarro

    Epigenomics, Proliferation, and the Identity of Cells, Department of Developmental and Stem Cell Biology, Institut Pasteur, Paris, France
    For correspondence
    pablo.navarro-gil@pasteur.fr
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-2700-6598

Funding

Institut Pasteur

  • Michel Cohen-Tannoudji
  • Pablo Navarro

Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique

  • Michel Cohen-Tannoudji
  • Pablo Navarro

Agence Nationale de la Recherche (Investissement d'Avenir; Revive Labex; ANR-10-LABX-73)

  • Pablo Navarro

Agence Nationale de la Recherche (ANR 16 CE12 0004 01 MITMAT)

  • Pablo Navarro

Ligue Contre le Cancer (LNCC EL2018 NAVARRO)

  • Pablo Navarro

European Research Council (ERC-CoG-2017 BIND)

  • Pablo Navarro

European Molecular Biology Organization (ALTF523-2013)

  • Elphège P Nora

Human Frontier Science Program

  • Elphège P Nora

Fondation Schlumberger (FRM FSER 2017)

  • Pablo Navarro

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Ethics

Animal experimentation: All experiments were conducted according to the French and European regulations on care and protection of laboratory animals (EC Directive 86/609, French Law 2001-486 issued on June 6, 2001) and were approved by the Institut Pasteur ethics committee (n{degree sign} dha180008).

Copyright

© 2019, Owens et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 5,259
    views
  • 733
    downloads
  • 67
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Nick Owens
  2. Thaleia Papadopoulou
  3. Nicola Festuccia
  4. Alexandra Tachtsidi
  5. Inma Gonzalez
  6. Agnes Dubois
  7. Sandrine Vandormael-Pournin
  8. Elphège P Nora
  9. Benoit Bruneau
  10. Michel Cohen-Tannoudji
  11. Pablo Navarro
(2019)
CTCF confers local nucleosome resiliency after DNA replication and during mitosis
eLife 8:e47898.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.47898

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.47898

Further reading

    1. Chromosomes and Gene Expression
    2. Computational and Systems Biology
    Miguel Martinez-Ara, Federico Comoglio, Bas van Steensel
    Research Article

    Genes are often regulated by multiple enhancers. It is poorly understood how the individual enhancer activities are combined to control promoter activity. Anecdotal evidence has shown that enhancers can combine sub-additively, additively, synergistically, or redundantly. However, it is not clear which of these modes are more frequent in mammalian genomes. Here, we systematically tested how pairs of enhancers activate promoters using a three-way combinatorial reporter assay in mouse embryonic stem cells. By assaying about 69,000 enhancer-enhancer-promoter combinations we found that enhancer pairs generally combine near-additively. This behaviour was conserved across seven developmental promoters tested. Surprisingly, these promoters scale the enhancer signals in a non-linear manner that depends on promoter strength. A housekeeping promoter showed an overall different response to enhancer pairs, and a smaller dynamic range. Thus, our data indicate that enhancers mostly act additively, but promoters transform their collective effect non-linearly.

    1. Chromosomes and Gene Expression
    2. Medicine
    Xianghong Xie, Mingyue Gao ... Xiaojun Liu
    Research Article

    LncRNAs are involved in modulating the individual risk and the severity of progression in metabolic dysfunction-associated fatty liver disease (MASLD), but their precise roles remain largely unknown. This study aimed to investigate the role of lncRNA Snhg3 in the development and progression of MASLD, along with the underlying mechanisms. The result showed that Snhg3 was significantly downregulated in the liver of high-fat diet-induced obesity (DIO) mice. Notably, palmitic acid promoted the expression of Snhg3 and overexpression of Snhg3 increased lipid accumulation in primary hepatocytes. Furthermore, hepatocyte-specific Snhg3 deficiency decreased body and liver weight, alleviated hepatic steatosis and promoted hepatic fatty acid metabolism in DIO mice, whereas overexpression induced the opposite effect. Mechanistically, Snhg3 promoted the expression, stability and nuclear localization of SND1 protein via interacting with SND1, thereby inducing K63-linked ubiquitination modification of SND1. Moreover, Snhg3 decreased the H3K27me3 level and induced SND1-mediated chromatin loose remodeling, thus reducing H3K27me3 enrichment at the Pparg promoter and enhancing PPARγ expression. The administration of PPARγ antagonist T0070907 improved Snhg3-aggravated hepatic steatosis. Our study revealed a new signaling pathway, Snhg3/SND1/H3K27me3/PPARγ, responsible for mice MASLD and indicates that lncRNA-mediated epigenetic modification has a crucial role in the pathology of MASLD.