Spatiotemporal constraints on optogenetic inactivation in cortical circuits

  1. Nuo Li  Is a corresponding author
  2. Susu Chen
  3. Zengcai V Guo
  4. Han Chen
  5. Yan Huo
  6. Hidehiko K Inagaki
  7. Guang Chen
  8. Courtney Davis
  9. David Hansel
  10. Caiying Guo
  11. Karel Svoboda  Is a corresponding author
  1. Baylor College of Medicine, United States
  2. Janelia Research Campus, Howard Hughes Medical Institute, United States
  3. Tsinghua University, China
  4. CNRS-UMR8119, France

Abstract

Optogenetics allows manipulations of genetically and spatially defined neuronal populations with excellent temporal control. However, neurons are coupled with other neurons over multiple length scales, and the effects of localized manipulations thus spread beyond the targeted neurons. We benchmarked several optogenetic methods to inactivate small regions of neocortex. Optogenetic excitation of GABAergic neurons produced more effective inactivation than light-gated ion pumps. Transgenic mice expressing the light-dependent chloride channel GtACR1 produced the most potent inactivation. Generally, inactivation spread substantially beyond the photostimulation light, caused by strong coupling between cortical neurons. Over some range of light intensity, optogenetic excitation of inhibitory neurons reduced activity in these neurons, together with pyramidal neurons, a signature of inhibition-stabilized neural networks ('paradoxical effect'). The offset of optogenetic inactivation was followed by rebound excitation in a light dose-dependent manner, limiting temporal resolution. Our data offer guidance for the design of in vivo optogenetics experiments.

Data availability

Rosa26-CAG-LNL-GtACR1-ts-FRed-Kv2.1 mice are available at The Jackson Laboratory (stock #033089). Electrophysiology data and code used are available at Github (https://github.com/NuoBCM/PhotoinhibitionCharaterization).

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Nuo Li

    Department of Neuroscience, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, United States
    For correspondence
    nuol@bcm.edu
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-6613-5018
  2. Susu Chen

    Janelia Research Campus, Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Ashburn, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  3. Zengcai V Guo

    Janelia Research Campus, Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Ashburn, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  4. Han Chen

    School of Medicine, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  5. Yan Huo

    School of Medicine, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  6. Hidehiko K Inagaki

    Janelia Research Campus, Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Ashburn, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  7. Guang Chen

    Department of Neuroscience, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  8. Courtney Davis

    Department of Neuroscience, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  9. David Hansel

    Center of Neurophysics, Physiology and Pathologies, CNRS-UMR8119, Paris, France
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-1352-6592
  10. Caiying Guo

    Janelia Research Campus, Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Ashburn, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  11. Karel Svoboda

    Janelia Research Campus, Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Ashburn, United States
    For correspondence
    svobodak@janelia.hhmi.org
    Competing interests
    Karel Svoboda, Reviewing editor, eLife.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-6670-7362

Funding

Howard Hughes Medical Institute

  • Karel Svoboda

Pew Charitable Trusts

  • Nuo Li

Simons Foundation

  • Nuo Li
  • Karel Svoboda

Helen Hay Whitney Foundation

  • Nuo Li
  • Hidehiko K Inagaki

Wellcome

  • Susu Chen

Robert and Janice McNair Foundation

  • Nuo Li

Whitehall Foundation

  • Nuo Li

Alfred P. Sloan Foundation

  • Nuo Li

Kinship Foundation

  • Nuo Li

National Institutes of Health (NS104781)

  • Nuo Li

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Reviewing Editor

  1. John Huguenard, Stanford University School of Medicine, United States

Ethics

Animal experimentation: All procedures were in accordance with protocols approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committees at Baylor College of Medicine (protocol AN7012), Janelia Research Campus (protocol 14-115).

Version history

  1. Received: May 21, 2019
  2. Accepted: November 16, 2019
  3. Accepted Manuscript published: November 18, 2019 (version 1)
  4. Version of Record published: December 4, 2019 (version 2)

Copyright

© 2019, Li et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 11,808
    views
  • 1,725
    downloads
  • 156
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Nuo Li
  2. Susu Chen
  3. Zengcai V Guo
  4. Han Chen
  5. Yan Huo
  6. Hidehiko K Inagaki
  7. Guang Chen
  8. Courtney Davis
  9. David Hansel
  10. Caiying Guo
  11. Karel Svoboda
(2019)
Spatiotemporal constraints on optogenetic inactivation in cortical circuits
eLife 8:e48622.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.48622

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.48622

Further reading

    1. Neuroscience
    Alexandra L Jellinger, Rebecca L Suthard ... Steve Ramirez
    Research Article

    Negative memories engage a brain and body-wide stress response in humans that can alter cognition and behavior. Prolonged stress responses induce maladaptive cellular, circuit, and systems-level changes that can lead to pathological brain states and corresponding disorders in which mood and memory are affected. However, it is unclear if repeated activation of cells processing negative memories induces similar phenotypes in mice. In this study, we used an activity-dependent tagging method to access neuronal ensembles and assess their molecular characteristics. Sequencing memory engrams in mice revealed that positive (male-to-female exposure) and negative (foot shock) cells upregulated genes linked to anti- and pro-inflammatory responses, respectively. To investigate the impact of persistent activation of negative engrams, we chemogenetically activated them in the ventral hippocampus over 3 months and conducted anxiety and memory-related tests. Negative engram activation increased anxiety behaviors in both 6- and 14-month-old mice, reduced spatial working memory in older mice, impaired fear extinction in younger mice, and heightened fear generalization in both age groups. Immunohistochemistry revealed changes in microglial and astrocytic structure and number in the hippocampus. In summary, repeated activation of negative memories induces lasting cellular and behavioral abnormalities in mice, offering insights into the negative effects of chronic negative thinking-like behaviors on human health.

    1. Neuroscience
    Alexandra H Leighton, Juliette E Cheyne, Christian Lohmann
    Research Article

    Synaptic inputs to cortical neurons are highly structured in adult sensory systems, such that neighboring synapses along dendrites are activated by similar stimuli. This organization of synaptic inputs, called synaptic clustering, is required for high-fidelity signal processing, and clustered synapses can already be observed before eye opening. However, how clustered inputs emerge during development is unknown. Here, we employed concurrent in vivo whole-cell patch-clamp and dendritic calcium imaging to map spontaneous synaptic inputs to dendrites of layer 2/3 neurons in the mouse primary visual cortex during the second postnatal week until eye opening. We found that the number of functional synapses and the frequency of transmission events increase several fold during this developmental period. At the beginning of the second postnatal week, synapses assemble specifically in confined dendritic segments, whereas other segments are devoid of synapses. By the end of the second postnatal week, just before eye opening, dendrites are almost entirely covered by domains of co-active synapses. Finally, co-activity with their neighbor synapses correlates with synaptic stabilization and potentiation. Thus, clustered synapses form in distinct functional domains presumably to equip dendrites with computational modules for high-capacity sensory processing when the eyes open.