1. Neuroscience
Download icon

mPFC spindle cycles organize sparse thalamic activation and recently active CA1 cells during non-REM sleep

  1. Carmen Varela  Is a corresponding author
  2. Matthew A Wilson  Is a corresponding author
  1. Florida Atlantic University, United States
  2. Massachusetts Institute of Technology, United States
Research Article
  • Cited 5
  • Views 1,319
  • Annotations
Cite this article as: eLife 2020;9:e48881 doi: 10.7554/eLife.48881

Abstract

Sleep oscillations in the neocortex and hippocampus are critical for the integration of new memories into stable generalized representations in neocortex. However, the role of the thalamus in this process is poorly understood. To determine the thalamic contribution to non-REM oscillations (sharp-wave ripples, SWRs; slow/delta; spindles), we recorded units and local field potentials (LFPs) simultaneously in the limbic thalamus, mPFC, and CA1 in rats. We report that the cycles of neocortical spindles provide a key temporal window that coordinates CA1 SWRs with sparse but consistent activation of thalamic units. Thalamic units were phase-locked to delta and spindles in mPFC, and fired at consistent lags with other thalamic units within spindles, while CA1 units that were active during spatial exploration were engaged in SWR-coupled spindles after behavior. The sparse thalamic firing could promote an incremental integration of recently acquired memory traces into neocortical schemas through the interleaved activation of thalamocortical cells.

Data availability

Data files are available through the CRCNS website ('HC-24'); this includes data sets with raw data (LFP and units) recorded from 3 sessions, derived data (such as sleep-related events, like K-complexes, ripples and spindle cycles) as well as several matlab code to illustrate the main findings in the current manuscript. The data set and the documentation that describes it in detail is available through the CRCNS website ('HC-19' data set).

The following data sets were generated

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Carmen Varela

    Psychology, Florida Atlantic University, Jupiter, United States
    For correspondence
    varelac@fau.edu
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-0398-2567
  2. Matthew A Wilson

    Department of Brain and Cognitive Sciences, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, United States
    For correspondence
    mwilson@mit.edu
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.

Funding

Caja Madrid Foundation (Convocatoria 2008)

  • Carmen Varela

Brain & Behavior Research Foundation (22852)

  • Carmen Varela

NSF STC award CCF-1231216 (CCF-1231216)

  • Matthew A Wilson

NIH grant TR01-GM10498 (TR01-GM10498)

  • Matthew A Wilson

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Reviewing Editor

  1. Laura L Colgin, University of Texas at Austin, United States

Publication history

  1. Received: May 29, 2019
  2. Accepted: June 11, 2020
  3. Accepted Manuscript published: June 11, 2020 (version 1)
  4. Version of Record published: June 26, 2020 (version 2)

Copyright

© 2020, Varela & Wilson

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 1,319
    Page views
  • 256
    Downloads
  • 5
    Citations

Article citation count generated by polling the highest count across the following sources: Crossref, PubMed Central, Scopus.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Download citations (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Further reading

    1. Neuroscience
    Attila Ozsvár et al.
    Research Article

    Summation of ionotropic receptor-mediated responses is critical in neuronal computation by shaping input-output characteristics of neurons. However, arithmetics of summation for metabotropic signals are not known. We characterized the combined ionotropic and metabotropic output of neocortical neurogliaform cells (NGFCs) using electrophysiological and anatomical methods in the rat cerebral cortex. These experiments revealed that GABA receptors are activated outside release sites and confirmed coactivation of putative NGFCs in superficial cortical layers in vivo. Triple recordings from presynaptic NGFCs converging to a postsynaptic neuron revealed sublinear summation of ionotropic GABAA responses and linear summation of metabotropic GABAB responses. Based on a model combining properties of volume transmission and distributions of all NGFC axon terminals, we predict that in 83% of cases one or two NGFCs can provide input to a point in the neuropil. We suggest that interactions of metabotropic GABAergic responses remain linear even if most superficial layer interneurons specialized to recruit GABAB receptors are simultaneously active.

    1. Neuroscience
    Qiaoli Huang et al.
    Research Article

    In memory experiences, events do not exist independently but are linked with each other via structure-based organization. Structure context largely influences memory behavior, but how it is implemented in the brain remains unknown. Here, we combined magnetoencephalogram (MEG) recordings, computational modeling, and impulse-response approaches to probe the latent states when subjects held a list of items in working memory (WM). We demonstrate that sequence context reorganizes WM items into distinct latent states, i.e., being reactivated at different latencies during WM retention, and the reactivation profiles further correlate with recency behavior. In contrast, memorizing the same list of items without sequence task requirements weakens the recency effect and elicits comparable neural reactivations. Computational modeling further reveals a dominant function of sequence context, instead of passive memory decaying, in characterizing recency effect. Taken together, sequence structure context shapes the way WM items are stored in the human brain and essentially influences memory behavior.