A mechanism in Agrin signaling revealed by a prevalent Rapsyn mutation in congenital myasthenic syndrome

  1. Guanglin Xing
  2. Hongyang Jing
  3. Lei Zhang
  4. Yu Cao
  5. Lei Li
  6. Kai Zhao
  7. Zhaoqi Dong
  8. Wenbing Chen
  9. Hongsheng Wang
  10. Rangjuan Cao
  11. Wen-Cheng Xiong
  12. Lin Mei  Is a corresponding author
  1. Case Western Reserve University, United States
  2. Augusta University, United States

Abstract

Neuromuscular junction is a synapse between motoneurons and skeletal muscles, where acetylcholine receptors (AChRs) are concentrated to control muscle contraction. Studies of this synapse have contributed to our understanding of synapse assembly and pathological mechanisms of neuromuscular disorders. Nevertheless, underlying mechanisms of NMJ formation was not well understood. To this end, we took a novel approach - studying mutant genes implicated in congenital myasthenic syndrome (CMS). We showed that knock-in mice carrying N88K, a prevalent CMS mutation of Rapsyn (Rapsn), died soon after birth with profound NMJ deficits. Rapsn is an adapter protein that bridges AChRs to the cytoskeleton and possesses E3 ligase activity. In investigating how N88K impairs the NMJ, we uncovered a novel signaling pathway by which Agrin-LRP4-MuSK induces tyrosine phosphorylation of Rapsn, which is required for its self-association and E3 ligase activity. Our results also provide insight into pathological mechanisms of CMS.

Data availability

All data generated or analysed during this study are included in the manuscript and supporting files. Source data about statistical results are provided in excel files, including Figures 1E-J, 2E-H, 2M, 2N, 3A, 3B, 3D, 3E, 4B, 4F, 5D, 5F, 5H, 6D, 6G, 6I, 7B, 7F, 7H, 7J, 7L, 7N, 8B, 8C, 8D, ; Figure 1-figure supplement 1C, 1E, 1H, Figure 4-figure supplement 1B, Figure 4-figure supplement 2B and 2D, Figure 5-figure supplement 1D, Figure 7-figure supplement 1C and E.

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Guanglin Xing

    Department of Neurosciences, School of Medicine, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  2. Hongyang Jing

    Department of Neurosciences, School of Medicine, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  3. Lei Zhang

    Department of Neurosciences, School of Medicine, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  4. Yu Cao

    Department of Neuroscience and Regenerative Medicine, Augusta University, Augusta, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-3708-575X
  5. Lei Li

    Department of Neurosciences, School of Medicine, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  6. Kai Zhao

    Department of Neurosciences, School of Medicine, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  7. Zhaoqi Dong

    Department of Neurosciences, School of Medicine, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  8. Wenbing Chen

    Department of Neurosciences, School of Medicine, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  9. Hongsheng Wang

    Department of Neurosciences, School of Medicine, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  10. Rangjuan Cao

    Department of Neurosciences, School of Medicine, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  11. Wen-Cheng Xiong

    Department of Neurosciences, School of Medicine, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  12. Lin Mei

    Department of Neurosciences, School of Medicine, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, United States
    For correspondence
    lin.mei@case.edu
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-5772-1229

Funding

NIH Blueprint for Neuroscience Research (RES220572)

  • Lin Mei

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Ethics

Animal experimentation: This study was performed in strict accordance with the recommendations in the Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals of the National Institutes of Health. All of the animals were handled according to approved institutional animal care and use committee (IACUC) protocols (2017-0115) of the University of Case Western Reserve University. Animal protocols have been approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee of Case Western Reserve University.

Copyright

© 2019, Xing et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 2,723
    views
  • 410
    downloads
  • 21
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Guanglin Xing
  2. Hongyang Jing
  3. Lei Zhang
  4. Yu Cao
  5. Lei Li
  6. Kai Zhao
  7. Zhaoqi Dong
  8. Wenbing Chen
  9. Hongsheng Wang
  10. Rangjuan Cao
  11. Wen-Cheng Xiong
  12. Lin Mei
(2019)
A mechanism in Agrin signaling revealed by a prevalent Rapsyn mutation in congenital myasthenic syndrome
eLife 8:e49180.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.49180

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.49180

Further reading

    1. Neuroscience
    Sudhanvan Iyer, Kathryn Maxson Jones ... Mary A Majumder
    Review Article

    In this paper, we provide an overview and analysis of the BRAIN Initiative data-sharing ecosystem. First, we compare and contrast the characteristics of the seven BRAIN Initiative data archives germane to data sharing and reuse, namely data submission and access procedures and aspects of interoperability. Second, we discuss challenges, benefits, and future opportunities, focusing on issues largely specific to sharing human data and drawing on N = 34 interviews with diverse stakeholders. The BRAIN Initiative-funded archive ecosystem faces interoperability and data stewardship challenges, such as achieving and maintaining interoperability of data and archives and harmonizing research participants’ informed consents for tiers of access for human data across multiple archives. Yet, a benefit of this distributed archive ecosystem is the ability of more specialized archives to adapt to the needs of particular research communities. Finally, the multiple archives offer ample raw material for network evolution in response to the needs of neuroscientists over time. Our first objective in this paper is to provide a guide to the BRAIN Initiative data-sharing ecosystem for readers interested in sharing and reusing neuroscience data. Second, our analysis supports the development of empirically informed policy and practice aimed at making neuroscience data more findable, accessible, interoperable, and reusable.

    1. Neuroscience
    Gordon H Petty, Randy M Bruno
    Research Article

    Each sensory modality has its own primary and secondary thalamic nuclei. While the primary thalamic nuclei are well understood to relay sensory information from the periphery to the cortex, the role of secondary sensory nuclei is elusive. We trained head-fixed mice to attend to one sensory modality while ignoring a second modality, namely to attend to touch and ignore vision, or vice versa. Arrays were used to record simultaneously from the secondary somatosensory thalamus (POm) and secondary visual thalamus (LP). In mice trained to respond to tactile stimuli and ignore visual stimuli, POm was robustly activated by touch and largely unresponsive to visual stimuli. A different pattern was observed when mice were trained to respond to visual stimuli and ignore touch, with POm now more robustly activated during visual trials. This POm activity was not explained by differences in movements (i.e. whisking, licking, pupil dilation) resulting from the two tasks. Post hoc histological reconstruction of array tracks through POm revealed that subregions varied in their degree of plasticity. LP exhibited similar phenomena. We conclude that behavioral training reshapes activity in secondary thalamic nuclei. Secondary nuclei respond to the same behaviorally relevant, reward-predicting stimuli regardless of stimulus modality.