1. Neuroscience
Download icon

ON selectivity in Drosophila vision is a multisynaptic process involving both glutamatergic and GABAergic inhibition

  1. Sebastian Molina-Obando
  2. Juan Felipe Vargas-Fique
  3. Miriam Henning
  4. Burak Gür
  5. T Moritz Schladt
  6. Junaid Akhtar
  7. Thomas K Berger
  8. Marion Silies  Is a corresponding author
  1. Johannes Gutenberg Universität Mainz, Germany
  2. Center of Advanced European Research (Caesar), Germany
Research Article
  • Cited 5
  • Views 1,977
  • Annotations
Cite this article as: eLife 2019;8:e49373 doi: 10.7554/eLife.49373

Abstract

Sensory systems sequentially extract increasingly complex features. ON and OFF pathways, for example, encode increases or decreases of a stimulus from a common input. This ON/OFF pathway split is thought to occur at individual synaptic connections through a sign-inverting synapse in one of the pathways. Here, we show that ON selectivity is a multisynaptic process in the Drosophila visual system. A pharmacogenetics approach demonstrates that both glutamatergic inhibition through GluClα and GABAergic inhibition through Rdl mediate ON responses. Although neurons postsynaptic to the glutamatergic ON pathway input L1 lose all responses in GluClα mutants, they are resistant to a cell-type-specific loss of GluClα. This shows that ON selectivity is distributed across multiple synapses, and raises the possibility that cell-type-specific manipulations might reveal similar strategies in other sensory systems. Thus, sensory coding is more distributed than predicted by simple circuit motifs, allowing for robust neural processing.

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Sebastian Molina-Obando

    Institute of Developmental Biology and Neurobiology, Johannes Gutenberg Universität Mainz, Mainz, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-1222-723X
  2. Juan Felipe Vargas-Fique

    Institute of Developmental Biology and Neurobiology, Johannes Gutenberg Universität Mainz, Mainz, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  3. Miriam Henning

    Institute of Developmental Biology and Neurobiology, Johannes Gutenberg Universität Mainz, Mainz, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  4. Burak Gür

    Institute of Developmental Biology and Neurobiology, Johannes Gutenberg Universität Mainz, Mainz, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-8221-9767
  5. T Moritz Schladt

    Center of Advanced European Research (Caesar), Bonn, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  6. Junaid Akhtar

    Institute of Developmental Biology and Neurobiology, Johannes Gutenberg Universität Mainz, Mainz, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  7. Thomas K Berger

    Center of Advanced European Research (Caesar), Bonn, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  8. Marion Silies

    Institute of Developmental Biology and Neurobiology, Johannes Gutenberg Universität Mainz, Mainz, Germany
    For correspondence
    msilies@uni-mainz.de
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-2810-9828

Funding

Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (Emmy Noether SI 1991/1-1)

  • Miriam Henning
  • Burak Gür
  • Junaid Akhtar
  • Marion Silies

Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (SFB889)

  • Sebastian Molina-Obando
  • Juan Felipe Vargas-Fique

Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (Project C08)

  • Sebastian Molina-Obando
  • Juan Felipe Vargas-Fique

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Reviewing Editor

  1. Claude Desplan, New York University, United States

Publication history

  1. Received: June 16, 2019
  2. Accepted: September 18, 2019
  3. Accepted Manuscript published: September 19, 2019 (version 1)
  4. Version of Record published: November 11, 2019 (version 2)

Copyright

© 2019, Molina-Obando et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 1,977
    Page views
  • 368
    Downloads
  • 5
    Citations

Article citation count generated by polling the highest count across the following sources: Crossref, PubMed Central, Scopus.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Download citations (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Further reading

    1. Computational and Systems Biology
    2. Neuroscience
    Chen Chen et al.
    Research Article

    While animals track or search for targets, sensory organs make small unexplained movements on top of the primary task-related motions. While multiple theories for these movements exist—in that they support infotaxis, gain adaptation, spectral whitening, and high-pass filtering—predicted trajectories show poor fit to measured trajectories. We propose a new theory for these movements called energy-constrained proportional betting, where the probability of moving to a location is proportional to an expectation of how informative it will be balanced against the movement’s predicted energetic cost. Trajectories generated in this way show good agreement with measured trajectories of fish tracking an object using electrosense, a mammal and an insect localizing an odor source, and a moth tracking a flower using vision. Our theory unifies the metabolic cost of motion with information theory. It predicts sense organ movements in animals and can prescribe sensor motion for robots to enhance performance.

    1. Ecology
    2. Neuroscience
    Felix JH Hol et al.
    Tools and Resources

    Female mosquitoes need a blood meal to reproduce, and in obtaining this essential nutrient they transmit deadly pathogens. Although crucial for the spread of mosquito-borne diseases, blood feeding remains poorly understood due to technological limitations. Indeed, studies often expose human subjects to assess biting behavior. Here, we present the biteOscope, a device that attracts mosquitoes to a host mimic which they bite to obtain an artificial blood meal. The host mimic is transparent, allowing high-resolution imaging of the feeding mosquito. Using machine learning we extract detailed behavioral statistics describing the locomotion, pose, biting, and feeding dynamics of Aedes aegypti, Aedes albopictus, Anopheles stephensi, and Anopheles coluzzii. In addition to characterizing behavioral patterns, we discover that the common insect repellent DEET repels Anopheles coluzzii upon contact with their legs. The biteOscope provides a new perspective on mosquito blood feeding, enabling the high-throughput quantitative characterization of this lethal behavior.