Single cell analysis reveals immune cell-adipocyte crosstalk regulating the transcription of thermogenic adipocytes

Abstract

Immune cells are vital constituents of the adipose microenvironment that influence both local and systemic lipid metabolism. Mice lacking IL10 have enhanced thermogenesis, but the roles of specific cell types in the metabolic response to IL10 remain to be defined. We demonstrate here that selective loss of IL10 receptor a in adipocytes recapitulates the beneficial effects of global IL10 deletion, and that local crosstalk between IL10-producing immune cells and adipocytes is a determinant of thermogenesis and systemic energy balance. Single Nuclei Adipocyte RNA-sequencing (SNAP-seq) of subcutaneous adipose tissue defined a metabolically-active mature adipocyte subtype characterized by robust expression of genes involved in thermogenesis whose transcriptome was selectively responsive to IL10Ra deletion. Furthermore, single-cell transcriptomic analysis of adipose stromal populations identified lymphocytes as a key source of IL10 production in response to thermogenic stimuli. These findings implicate adaptive immune cell-adipocyte communication in the maintenance of adipose subtype identity and function.

Data availability

Sequencing data have been deposited to GEO.

The following data sets were generated

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Prashant Rajbhandari

    Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, United States
    For correspondence
    prashant.rajbhandari@gmail.com
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  2. Douglas Arneson

    Department of Integrative Biology and Physiology, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  3. Sydney K Hart

    Diabetes, Obesity, and Metabolism Institute, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  4. In Sook Ahn

    Department of Integrative Biology and Physiology, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  5. Graciel Diamante

    Department of Integrative Biology and Physiology, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  6. Luis C Santos

    Diabetes, Obesity, and Metabolism Institute, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  7. Nima Zaghari

    Bioinformatics Interdepartmental Program, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  8. An-Chieh Feng

    Department of Microbiology, Immunology, and Molecular Genetics, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  9. Brandon J Thomas

    Department of Microbiology, Immunology, and Molecular Genetics, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  10. Laurent Vergnes

    Department of Human Genetics, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  11. Stephen D Lee

    Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  12. Abha K Rajbhandari

    Department of Psychiatry and Neuroscience, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  13. Karen Reue

    Molecular Biology Institute, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  14. Stephen T Smale

    Molecular Biology Institute, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  15. Xia Yang

    Molecular Biology Institute, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  16. Peter Tontonoz

    Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, United States
    For correspondence
    ptontonoz@mednet.ucla.edu
    Competing interests
    Peter Tontonoz, Reviewing editor, eLife.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-1259-0477

Funding

National Institutes of Health (K99 DK114571)

  • Prashant Rajbhandari

National Institutes of Health (DK063491)

  • Peter Tontonoz

National Institutes of Health (DK120851)

  • Peter Tontonoz

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Ethics

Animal experimentation: This study was performed in strict accordance with the recommendations in the Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals of the National Institutes of Health. All of the animals were handled according to approved institutional animal care and use committee (IACUC) protocol (99-131) of the University of California, Los Angeles.

Copyright

© 2019, Rajbhandari et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 14,686
    views
  • 1,977
    downloads
  • 122
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Prashant Rajbhandari
  2. Douglas Arneson
  3. Sydney K Hart
  4. In Sook Ahn
  5. Graciel Diamante
  6. Luis C Santos
  7. Nima Zaghari
  8. An-Chieh Feng
  9. Brandon J Thomas
  10. Laurent Vergnes
  11. Stephen D Lee
  12. Abha K Rajbhandari
  13. Karen Reue
  14. Stephen T Smale
  15. Xia Yang
  16. Peter Tontonoz
(2019)
Single cell analysis reveals immune cell-adipocyte crosstalk regulating the transcription of thermogenic adipocytes
eLife 8:e49501.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.49501

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.49501

Further reading

    1. Cancer Biology
    2. Cell Biology
    Kourosh Hayatigolkhatmi, Chiara Soriani ... Simona Rodighiero
    Tools and Resources

    Understanding the cell cycle at the single-cell level is crucial for cellular biology and cancer research. While current methods using fluorescent markers have improved the study of adherent cells, non-adherent cells remain challenging. In this study, we addressed this gap by combining a specialized surface to enhance cell attachment, the FUCCI(CA)2 sensor, an automated image analysis pipeline, and a custom machine learning algorithm. This approach enabled precise measurement of cell cycle phase durations in non-adherent cells. This method was validated in acute myeloid leukemia cell lines NB4 and Kasumi-1, which have unique cell cycle characteristics, and we tested the impact of cell cycle-modulating drugs on NB4 cells. Our cell cycle analysis system, which is also compatible with adherent cells, is fully automated and freely available, providing detailed insights from hundreds of cells under various conditions. This report presents a valuable tool for advancing cancer research and drug development by enabling comprehensive, automated cell cycle analysis in both adherent and non-adherent cells.

    1. Cell Biology
    Yue Miao, Yongtao Du ... Mei Ding
    Research Article

    The spatiotemporal transition of small GTPase Rab5 to Rab7 is crucial for early-to-late endosome maturation, yet the precise mechanism governing Rab5-to-Rab7 switching remains elusive. USP8, a ubiquitin-specific protease, plays a prominent role in the endosomal sorting of a wide range of transmembrane receptors and is a promising target in cancer therapy. Here, we identified that USP8 is recruited to Rab5-positive carriers by Rabex5, a guanine nucleotide exchange factor (GEF) for Rab5. The recruitment of USP8 dissociates Rabex5 from early endosomes (EEs) and meanwhile promotes the recruitment of the Rab7 GEF SAND-1/Mon1. In USP8-deficient cells, the level of active Rab5 is increased, while the Rab7 signal is decreased. As a result, enlarged EEs with abundant intraluminal vesicles accumulate and digestive lysosomes are rudimentary. Together, our results reveal an important and unexpected role of a deubiquitinating enzyme in endosome maturation.