The CDK Pef1 and Protein Phosphatase 4 oppose each other for regulating cohesin binding to fission yeast chromosomes

Abstract

Cohesin has essential roles in chromosome structure, segregation and repair. Cohesin binding to chromosomes is catalyzed by the cohesin loader, Mis4 in fission yeast. How cells fine tune cohesin deposition is largely unknown. Here we provide evidence that Mis4 activity is regulated by phosphorylation of its cohesin substrate. A genetic screen for negative regulators of Mis4 yielded a CDK called Pef1, whose closest human homologue is CDK5. Inhibition of Pef1 kinase activity rescued cohesin loader deficiencies. In an otherwise wild-type background, Pef1 ablation stimulated cohesin binding to its regular sites along chromosomes while ablating Protein Phosphatase 4 had the opposite effect. Pef1 and PP4 control the phosphorylation state of the cohesin kleisin Rad21. The CDK phosphorylates Rad21 on Threonine 262. Pef1 ablation, non phosphorylatable Rad21-T262 or mutations within a Rad21 binding domain of Mis4 alleviated the effect of PP4 deficiency. Such a CDK/PP4 based regulation of cohesin loader activity could provide an efficient mechanism for translating cellular cues into a fast and accurate cohesin response.

Data availability

All data generated or analysed during this study are included in the manuscript and supporting files. Source data files have been provided for Figure 1, 2, 4, 6 and 7

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Adrien Birot

    Institut de Biochimie et Génétique Cellulaires, CNRS-Université de Bordeaux, Bordeaux, France
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  2. Marta Tormos-Pérez

    Institut de Biochimie et Génétique Cellulaires, CNRS-Université de Bordeaux, Bordeaux, France
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  3. Sabine Vaur

    Institut de Biochimie et Génétique Cellulaires, CNRS-Université de Bordeaux, Bordeaux, France
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  4. Amélie Feytout

    Institut de Biochimie et Génétique Cellulaires, CNRS-Université de Bordeaux, Bordeaux, France
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  5. Julien Jaegy

    Institut de Biochimie et Génétique Cellulaires, CNRS-Université de Bordeaux, Bordeaux, France
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  6. Dácil Alonso Gil

    Institut de Biochimie et Génétique Cellulaires, CNRS-Université de Bordeaux, Bordeaux, France
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  7. Stéphanie Vazquez

    Institut de Biochimie et Génétique Cellulaires, CNRS-Université de Bordeaux, Bordeaux, France
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  8. Karl Ekwall

    Department of Biosciences and Nutrition, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  9. Jean-Paul Javerzat

    Institut de Biochimie et Génétique Cellulaires, CNRS-Université de Bordeaux, Bordeaux, France
    For correspondence
    jpaul.javerzat@ibgc.cnrs.fr
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-9671-6753

Funding

Fondation ARC pour la Recherche sur le Cancer (PJA 2013 1200 205)

  • Jean-Paul Javerzat

Fondation ARC pour la Recherche sur le Cancer (PJA 20171206211)

  • Jean-Paul Javerzat

Agence Nationale de la Recherche (ANR-14-CE10-0020-01)

  • Jean-Paul Javerzat

Agence Nationale de la Recherche (ANR-10-IDEX-03-02)

  • Adrien Birot

Fondation ARC pour la Recherche sur le Cancer (DOC20160603884)

  • Adrien Birot

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Reviewing Editor

  1. Bruce Stillman, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, United States

Version history

  1. Received: July 25, 2019
  2. Accepted: January 2, 2020
  3. Accepted Manuscript published: January 2, 2020 (version 1)
  4. Version of Record published: January 10, 2020 (version 2)

Copyright

© 2020, Birot et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 1,210
    views
  • 245
    downloads
  • 4
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Adrien Birot
  2. Marta Tormos-Pérez
  3. Sabine Vaur
  4. Amélie Feytout
  5. Julien Jaegy
  6. Dácil Alonso Gil
  7. Stéphanie Vazquez
  8. Karl Ekwall
  9. Jean-Paul Javerzat
(2020)
The CDK Pef1 and Protein Phosphatase 4 oppose each other for regulating cohesin binding to fission yeast chromosomes
eLife 9:e50556.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.50556

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.50556

Further reading

    1. Chromosomes and Gene Expression
    Allison Coté, Aoife O'Farrell ... Arjun Raj
    Research Article

    Splicing is the stepwise molecular process by which introns are removed from pre-mRNA and exons are joined together to form mature mRNA sequences. The ordering and spatial distribution of these steps remain controversial, with opposing models suggesting splicing occurs either during or after transcription. We used single-molecule RNA FISH, expansion microscopy, and live-cell imaging to reveal the spatiotemporal distribution of nascent transcripts in mammalian cells. At super-resolution levels, we found that pre-mRNA formed clouds around the transcription site. These clouds indicate the existence of a transcription-site-proximal zone through which RNA move more slowly than in the nucleoplasm. Full-length pre-mRNA undergo continuous splicing as they move through this zone following transcription, suggesting a model in which splicing can occur post-transcriptionally but still within the proximity of the transcription site, thus seeming co-transcriptional by most assays. These results may unify conflicting reports of co-transcriptional versus post-transcriptional splicing.

    1. Chromosomes and Gene Expression
    2. Genetics and Genomics
    Maria L Adelus, Jiacheng Ding ... Casey E Romanoski
    Research Article

    Heterogeneity in endothelial cell (EC) sub-phenotypes is becoming increasingly appreciated in atherosclerosis progression. Still, studies quantifying EC heterogeneity across whole transcriptomes and epigenomes in both in vitro and in vivo models are lacking. Multiomic profiling concurrently measuring transcriptomes and accessible chromatin in the same single cells was performed on six distinct primary cultures of human aortic ECs (HAECs) exposed to activating environments characteristic of the atherosclerotic microenvironment in vitro. Meta-analysis of single-cell transcriptomes across 17 human ex vivo arterial specimens was performed and two computational approaches quantitatively evaluated the similarity in molecular profiles between heterogeneous in vitro and ex vivo cell profiles. HAEC cultures were reproducibly populated by four major clusters with distinct pathway enrichment profiles and modest heterogeneous responses: EC1-angiogenic, EC2-proliferative, EC3-activated/mesenchymal-like, and EC4-mesenchymal. Quantitative comparisons between in vitro and ex vivo transcriptomes confirmed EC1 and EC2 as most canonically EC-like, and EC4 as most mesenchymal with minimal effects elicited by siERG and IL1B. Lastly, accessible chromatin regions unique to EC2 and EC4 were most enriched for coronary artery disease (CAD)-associated single-nucleotide polymorphisms from Genome Wide Association Studies (GWAS), suggesting that these cell phenotypes harbor CAD-modulating mechanisms. Primary EC cultures contain markedly heterogeneous cell subtypes defined by their molecular profiles. Surprisingly, the perturbations used here only modestly shifted cells between subpopulations, suggesting relatively stable molecular phenotypes in culture. Identifying consistently heterogeneous EC subpopulations between in vitro and ex vivo models should pave the way for improving in vitro systems while enabling the mechanisms governing heterogeneous cell state decisions.