Tritrophic metabolism of plant chemical defenses and its effects on herbivore and predator performance

  1. Ruo Sun
  2. Xingcong Jiang
  3. Michael Reichelt
  4. Jonathan Gershenzon
  5. Sagar Subhash Pandit  Is a corresponding author
  6. Daniel Giddings Vassão  Is a corresponding author
  1. Max Planck Institute for Chemical Ecology, Germany
  2. Indian Institute of Science Education and Research, India

Abstract

Insect herbivores are frequently reported to metabolize plant defense compounds, but the physiological and ecological consequences are not fully understood. It has rarely been studied whether such metabolism is genuinely beneficial to the insect, and whether there are any effects on higher trophic levels. Here, we manipulated the detoxification of plant defenses in the herbivorous pest diamondback moth (Plutella xylostella) to evaluate changes in fitness, and additionally examined the effects on a predatory lacewing (Chrysoperla carnea). Silencing glucosinolate sulfatase genes resulted in the systemic accumulation of toxic isothiocyanates in P. xylostella larvae, impairing larval development and adult reproduction. The predatory lacewing C. carnea, however, efficiently degraded ingested isothiocyanates via a general conjugation pathway, with no negative effects on survival, reproduction, or even prey preference. These results illustrate how plant defenses and their detoxification strongly influence herbivore fitness but might only subtly affect a third trophic level.

Data availability

All data generated or analysed during this study are included in the manuscript and supporting files. Source data files have been provided for figures and figure supplements.

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Ruo Sun

    Department of Biochemistry, Max Planck Institute for Chemical Ecology, Jena, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-9861-6097
  2. Xingcong Jiang

    Department of Evolutionary Neuroethology, Max Planck Institute for Chemical Ecology, Jena, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  3. Michael Reichelt

    Department of Biochemistry, Max Planck Institute for Chemical Ecology, Jena, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-6691-6500
  4. Jonathan Gershenzon

    Department of Biochemistry, Max Planck Institute for Chemical Ecology, Jena, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  5. Sagar Subhash Pandit

    Molecular and Chemical Ecology Lab, Indian Institute of Science Education and Research, Pune, India
    For correspondence
    sagar@iiserpune.ac.in
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  6. Daniel Giddings Vassão

    Department of Biochemistry, Max Planck Institute for Chemical Ecology, Jena, Germany
    For correspondence
    vassao@ice.mpg.de
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-8455-9298

Funding

China Scholarship Council

  • Ruo Sun

Max-Planck-Gesellschaft

  • Ruo Sun
  • Xingcong Jiang
  • Michael Reichelt
  • Jonathan Gershenzon
  • Sagar Subhash Pandit
  • Daniel Giddings Vassão

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

Copyright

© 2019, Sun et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 3,514
    views
  • 480
    downloads
  • 39
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Ruo Sun
  2. Xingcong Jiang
  3. Michael Reichelt
  4. Jonathan Gershenzon
  5. Sagar Subhash Pandit
  6. Daniel Giddings Vassão
(2019)
Tritrophic metabolism of plant chemical defenses and its effects on herbivore and predator performance
eLife 8:e51029.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.51029

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.51029

Further reading

    1. Ecology
    Ming-Qiang Wang, Shi-Kun Guo ... Chao-Dong Zhu
    Research Article

    Environmental factors can influence ecological networks, but these effects are poorly understood in the realm of the phylogeny of host-parasitoid interactions. Especially, we lack a comprehensive understanding of the ways that biotic factors, including plant species richness, overall community phylogenetic and functional composition of consumers, and abiotic factors such as microclimate, determine host-parasitoid network structure and host-parasitoid community dynamics. To address this, we leveraged a 5-year dataset of trap-nesting bees and wasps and their parasitoids collected in a highly controlled, large-scale subtropical tree biodiversity experiment. We tested for effects of tree species richness, tree phylogenetic, and functional diversity, and species and phylogenetic composition on species and phylogenetic diversity of both host and parasitoid communities and the composition of their interaction networks. We show that multiple components of tree diversity and canopy cover impacted both, species and phylogenetic composition of hosts and parasitoids. Generally, phylogenetic associations between hosts and parasitoids reflected nonrandomly structured interactions between phylogenetic trees of hosts and parasitoids. Further, host-parasitoid network structure was influenced by tree species richness, tree phylogenetic diversity, and canopy cover. Our study indicates that the composition of higher trophic levels and corresponding interaction networks are determined by plant diversity and canopy cover, especially via trophic links in species-rich ecosystems.

    1. Ecology
    Itai Bloch, David Troupin ... Nir Sapir
    Research Article

    Optimal foraging theory posits that foragers adjust their movements based on prey abundance to optimize food intake. While extensively studied in terrestrial and marine environments, aerial foraging has remained relatively unexplored due to technological limitations. This study, uniquely combining BirdScan-MR1 radar and the Advanced Tracking and Localization of Animals in Real-Life Systems biotelemetry system, investigates the foraging dynamics of Little Swifts (Apus affinis) in response to insect movements over Israel’s Hula Valley. Insect movement traffic rate (MoTR) substantially varied across days, strongly influencing swift movement. On days with high MoTR, swifts exhibited reduced flight distance, increased colony visit rate, and earlier arrivals at the breeding colony, reflecting a dynamic response to prey availability. However, no significant effects were observed in total foraging duration, flight speed, or daily route length. Notably, as insect abundance increased, inter-individual distances decreased. These findings suggest that Little Swifts optimize their foraging behavior in relation to aerial insect abundance, likely influencing reproductive success and population dynamics. The integration of radar technology and biotelemetry systems provides a unique perspective on the interactions between aerial insectivores and their prey, contributing to a comprehensive understanding of optimal foraging strategies in diverse environments.